IDIQ Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 87 KB Posted

Attached to
FBI Enterprise Logistics Support Services (ELSS) IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
15F06723R0000075
Issued by
Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation

About this file

This document contains a solicitation for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) multiple award contract to provide logistics support services to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The FBI seeks to establish IDIQ contracts to obtain mail and material handling, shipping and receiving, light and medium truck transportation, moving services, supply, warehousing, inventory management, and dispatching and courier services across its sites in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, Quantico, Virginia, Pocatello, Idaho, Huntsville, Alabama, Clarksburg, West Virginia and other continental United States locations. The base period of performance is one year with four one-year options and a potential six-month extension. Proposals are due June 6, 2023 with anticipated awards the week of September 18, 2023. The solicitation also includes two seed task orders, one for services in the National Capital Region and another for Redstone Arsenal, with pricing expected in a hybrid fixed-price level-of-effort and cost-reimbursable structure.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to FBI Enterprise Logistics Support Services (ELSS) IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF30 Amendment 6.pdf PDF
QA 06052023.pdf PDF
SF33.pdf PDF
SF30 Amendment 2.pdf PDF
SF30 Amendment 4.pdf PDF
SF30 Amendment 1.pdf PDF
SF30 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
SF30 Amendment 5.pdf PDF
ELSS TO002 RedstonePriceTemplate Atch3 Amend 4 Errors fixed.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 3 Question and Answers.pdf PDF
ELSS TO 002 PD AMENDMENT 3 .pdf PDF
Attachment 7 Wage Determindation Idaho 2015 5509 19 12272022.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 Wage Determination West Virginia 2015 4353 20 12272022.pdf PDF
ELSS TO 001 NCR PriceTemplateAtch2 Amend 3- Copy.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP IDIQ AMENDMENT 3.pdf PDF
ELSS TO 002 Redstone PriceTemplate Atch3 Amend3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
QA Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ELSS TORFP002 RFSS RESU SOW amendment 2.pdf PDF
ELSS TORFP 002 RFSS RESU RFP amendment 2.pdf PDF
ELSS TORFP 001 NCR LU RFP amendment 2.pdf PDF
ELSS QA 05172023.pdf PDF
ELSS RFP IDIQ Amendment 02.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 TORFP-Key Personnel Resume Template.docx DOCX document
ELSS TORFP 002 Redstone SOW Attachment 1.pdf PDF
ELSS TO 001 NCR Price Template Attachment 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ELSS TO 002 Redstone Attachment 2 Position Descriptions.pdf PDF
ELSS TO 002 Redstone Price Template Attachment 3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IDIQ Attachment 2 KPML.pdf PDF
IDIQ Attachment 6 Validation Checklist A1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ELSS TORFP 001 NCR RFP.pdf PDF
IDIQ Attachment 1 Position Descriptions.pdf PDF
IDIQ Attachment 7 Wage Determination Redstone 2015 4603 23 12272022.pdf PDF
IDIQ Attachment 3 Acquisition Risk Questions.pdf PDF
ELSS TORFP 002 Redstone RFP.pdf PDF
IDIQ Attachment 5 PricingTemplate.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IDIQ Attachment 7 Wage Determination NCR 2015 4281 25 12272022.pdf PDF
ELSS TORFP 001 NCR Attachment 1 PWS.pdf PDF
IDIQ RFP.pdf PDF
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4

Past Performance Questionnaire

Instructions:

Section II shall be completed by the Offeror and provided back to the FBI with their proposal submittal. A past performance evaluation board member may contact the point of contact (assessor) for the past performance sample submitted to complete Sections III through VII. The past performance sample shall be relevant to the scope the FBI is requesting and recent (current or completed with the last five year of the release of this RFP).

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

Solicitation Number
FBI-23-
Customer/Agency
FBI

Project/Requirement Description Enterprise Logistic Support Services (ELSS)

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Point of Contact:

Address:

Phone No.:

Email Address:

Contract No.

Type of Contract

Initial
Final

Contract Value

Period of Performance / Delivery Schedule

Project/ Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role
Prime or Subcontractor
Terminated
Yes or No

Attachment 4

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only (When Filled-in)

III. PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number

Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

ü
Role
Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions

The following ratings should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

Evaluation Ratings

Rating
Description
Outstanding
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
Acceptable
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
Unacceptable
Performance does not meet most contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Neutral
No information or did not apply to your contract. Unable to provide assessment.

V: Performance Evaluation

1. Technical Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the technical requirements of the contract?

Outstanding
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Neutral

Technical Performance

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

2. Schedule Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet schedule?

Outstanding
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Neutral

Schedule Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only (When Filled-in)

3. Management

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Outstanding
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Neutral

Management

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

Management
Outstanding
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Neutral

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS— Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork, AND Customer satisfaction.

SUBCONTRACT

MANAGEMENT—Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small, disadvantaged business, etc.

PROGRAM

MANAGEMENT—

Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices.

MANAGEMENT OF

PERSONNEL—Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget.

INTEGRATED

MANAGEMENT APPROACH

—Commitment to working efforts in a collaborative environment with customers.

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

4. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Outstanding
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Neutral

Cost Control

Please provide rationale for assigned rating

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

Management
Outstanding
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Neutral

COST REPORTING—

Accuracy and timeliness of the Contractor’s cost reporting data.

NOTIFICATIONS—

Timeliness of the Contractor’s notifications of costs as required by the Limitation of Cost/Funds Clauses.

RESOLUTION OF COST

PROBLEMS—Commitment to resolve cost issues—may include efforts to work with the Government customer to identify opportunities to reduce costs.

ADHERENCE TO COST

TARGETS—Ability to establish and meet the realistic cost targets.

SUBCONTRACT COST MANAGEMENT— Ability to forecast, negotiate, and control subcontract costs

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

VII. Do you recommend this Contractor? and why?

VIII. General Comments:

Name / Title / Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .