J.19 Past Performance Questionnaire 08MAR22 Markup.docx

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) HM0476-21-R-0023

(U) Section J Attachment 19

(U) National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)

CLOVER

(EMERALD FOLLOW-ON)

Solicitation HM0476-21-R-0023

(U) Blank CLOVER Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

(U) Version: Amendment 00042

(U) February March 83, 2022

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS

CLOVER

(U) The Offeror shall provide past performance information for no more than nine (9) recent and relevant contracts (or task orders).

(U) Only contracts having a performance period ending not earlier than three (3) years from original Request for Proposal release date, 09DEC2021, are deemed to be recent.

(U) Relevancy, as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service or support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract and teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood past performance is an indicator of future performance.

(U) The Offeror shall complete PART 1 of this questionnaire and submit the entire questionnaire to the respective Government/Commercial Points of Contact (POCs) pertaining to referenced contracts for completion of PART 2.

U) Upon receipt of the questionnaire, it is incumbent upon the Offeror to contact and request the identified POCs to promptly complete their assessment of the Offeror’s contractual past performance, forward the assessment to the below cited e-mail or mailing address by the below specified date and time, and agree to participate in a subsequent telephonic interview with the CO or CO’s designee.

(U) In accordance with paragraphs L.20.3 of the Request for Proposal, it is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that:

· (U) The information regarding their Government POCs is current, complete and accurate.

· (U) The past performance is recent and relevant.

· (U) The respective POCs receive this questionnaire promptly so as to provide the POCs with sufficient time to complete their respective assessments and return the entire PPQ by 1200 (Noon) ET on 2243MARFEB2022 via e-mail to Vanessa.L.Knight@nga.mil and Gary.J.Davis@nga.mil.

(U) All narrative sections are unclassified until filled in with classified information.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO: <Cognizant Government Contracting Officer or Prime vendor Point of Contact>

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) is in the process of selecting a contractor for an Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity contract. The contract consists of providing NGA support to three Work Service Categories (WSCs): Lifecycle Acquisition Management Support Services, Financial Management Support Services, and Strategic Business Management Support Services.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the contractor’s ability to perform on the proposed effort.

The areas of interest are summarized in the enclosed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). Please complete and return the entire PPQ by 1200 (Noon) ET on 23MAR24FEB2022 via e-mail to Vanessa.L.Knight@nga.mil and Gary.J.Davis@nga.mil.

If you have any questions, contact Vanessa Knight, Contracting Officer (Secondary), at (571) 557-8954 or by e-mail prior to the above submission deadline. (Please ensure confirmation of receipt of your call or e-mail.) Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official record. Your help is greatly appreciated and your proposed response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this requirement.

//Original Signed//

Gary J. Davis Contracting Officer (Primary)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(U) PART 1—To be completed by OFFEROR and provided to Assessment Organization—

2. ADDRESS

4. CONTRACT VALUE

21. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE REFERENCED CONTRACT AND ITS RELEVANCE TO A SPECIFIC L.20.2.2 EXAMPLE

(U) PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(U) PART 2—DIRECT INPUT PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

—to be completed by the Assessment Organization and provided to the Soliciting Agency—

(U)Enter Offeror Name has submitted your organization as a Government Point of Contact (POC) for the purpose of rendering information and your assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract cited below.

(U) This is a two-step questionnaire process. The first step is the following Direct Input Assessment of the contractor’s performance. Once completed, please return this completed form, PART 1 and PART 2, to the Government COs by e-mail at Vanessa.L.Knight@nga.mil and Gary.J.Davis@nga.mil by 1200 (Noon) ET on 23MAR24FEB2022.

(U) Concurrently, please notify Enter Offeror Name of your submission directly to the government.

(U) Upon receipt of your submission to the Government CO, you may be requested to participate in a brief follow-up telephonic interview as the second step in this questionnaire process. The purpose of this step is to obtain a more detailed understanding of the contractor’s performance and the assessments made.

(U) Based on your knowledge of the contract identified above, please provide your assessment of how well the contractor performed on each of the following topics. Your responses to the below questions will assist the Government in assessing the Past Performance for the subject offeror in response to this solicitation.

11. OBSERVED PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (DD MMM YYYY):

FROM:

☐ SUBCONTRACTOR

TO:

☐ OTHER (SPECIFY) _____________________

(U) NOTE: The assessment information obtained through this questionnaire process constitutes SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) Please use the below rating system in your assessment of the contractor’s performance for each of the questions. Please provide an assessment rationale to describe the ratings for each topical area. For each of the performance ratings indicated, use the following guidelines to rate each question and mark the appropriate box:

· To justify an Exceptional rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

· To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the Government. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

· To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract/order. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

· To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter).

· To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency reports, or letters).

ASSESSMENT RATIONALE:

ASSESSMENT RATIONALE:

ASSESSMENT RATIONALE:

ASSESSMENT RATIONALE:

ASSESSMENT RATIONALE:

ASSESSMENT RATIONALE:

ASSESSMENT RATIONALE:

ASSESSMENT RATIONALE:

(U) This concludes your direct input past performance assessment. Thank you for taking the time to provide this information.

image1.png