HHS0016943v2_Exhibit G_Evaluation Tool.pdf
PDF 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Water Improvements at El Paso Psychiatric Center
- Solicitation number
- HHS0016943v2
- Issued by
- El Paso County, Texas
About this file
This is an evaluation tool document for a general contractor (GC) request for proposal (RFP) HHS0016943v2 issued by a Texas state health and human services agency. The document establishes the scoring framework and weighted criteria for evaluating contractor responses to a construction project. The evaluation process assesses respondents across four primary categories: Relevant Construction Service Ability and Experience (30% weight), Quality and Safety Programs (5% weight), Proposed Methodology (25% weight), and Pricing (40% weight). Under the experience category, evaluators assess the relevance of past and present construction project experience similar to the project, the experience of key personnel including the Project Superintendent and Project Manager, and the designated team members' qualifications relative to previous similar projects. The methodology section requires respondents to address their approach to project implementation, subcontractor coordination, critical path items and milestones, schedule maintenance, and budget management.
The evaluation tool provides a 10-point scoring scale with defined performance levels ranging from "Unacceptable" (scores 1-3) to "Exceptional" (score 10), with detailed descriptions for each level to guide evaluator consistency. The scoring guide differentiates between responses that fail to address requirements, responses with significant implementation challenges requiring agency and respondent changes, responses requiring only respondent-side modifications, and responses that clearly satisfy requirements with varying degrees of strength. Pricing represents the largest weighted component at 40 percent of the total evaluation score, while the Quality and Safety Programs category, which includes evaluation of the respondent's quality assurance program, safety requirements, measurement methodology, and workers' compensation experience modification rate (EMR), comprises only 5 percent of the overall assessment. The master score sheet template consolidates all four criteria categories for a grand total evaluation score of 100 percent.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluator Respondent
# Criteria Weight Score Comments
1.1 Evaluate the relevance of the Respondent's past and present experience for completed construction Projects that are similar to this Project. 15%
1.2 Evaluate the previous experience of the Respondent's Project Superintendent, Project Manager, and other employee's assigned to this Project.
10%
1.3 Evaluate the Respondent's designated team member responsibilities in relation to previous experience and/or working together on similar Projects.
5%
30%
2.1 Evaluate Respondent's approach to quality and safety including its quality assurance program, requirements, means of measurement, and workers' compensation experience rate (EMR).
5%
5%
3.1 Evaluate the Respondent's proposed plan and methodology for the implementation and realization of the Project. 5%
3.2
Evaluate the Respondent's proposed approach to managing and coordinating work with subcontractors; or, if no subcontracting, evaluate the Respondent's proposed approach to managing and coordinating work with designated staff assigned to the Project.
5%
3.3 Evaluate the Respondent's identified major critical path items and milestones that are necessary for the completion of the Project in the proposed timeline.
5%
3.4 Evaluate the Respondent's plan and methodology for maintaining the schedules required to implement the Project. 5%
3.5 Evaluate the Respondent's plan and methodology for maintaining budgets related to the Project. 5%
25%
4.1 Evaluate Respondent's proposed pricing. 40%
40% 100%
Pricing
Subtotal
TOTAL (%)
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
RFP No. HHS0016943v2 Criteria, Subcriteria Sheet
Exhibit G, Evaluation Tool
Proposed Methodology
Relevant Construction Service Ability and Experience
Quality and Safety Programs
GC RFP, V1.7 Dec 10, 2024 1 of 3
Score Level
Unacceptable 1
Unacceptable 2
Unacceptable 3
Marginal. Fails to meet evaluation standards but failures are correctable. 4
Marginal. Fails to meet evaluation standards but failures are correctable. 5
Marginal. Fails to meet evaluation standards but failures are correctable. 6
Acceptable 7
Acceptable 8
Acceptable 9
Exceptional 10
For the purposes of this exhibit, “the agency” means the contracting state agency as specified in the solicitation.
Response satisfies requirements and has some benefits above requirement.
Response far exceeds all aspects of requirement.
Response addresses requirement, but response described does not allow the agency to fulfill mission.
Response meets fundamental requirements, however could not be implemented as described (would require both the agency and Respondent to make significant changes not currently anticipated).
Response meets fundamental requirements, however could not be implemented as described (implementation would require both the agency and Respondent to make minor changes not currently anticipated).
Response meets fundamental requirements, however could not be implemented as described (implementation would require changes to be made by Respondent only).
Response clearly satisfies requirement but has some minor weaknesses.
Response clearly satisfies requirement.
Response mentions requirement, but is not responsive to the elements of the requirement.
Exhibit G, Evaluation Tool RFP No. HHS0016943v2 Evaluation Scoring Guide
Description
Response does not address requirement. Response is completely unacceptable.
GC RFP, V1.7 Dec 10, 2024 2 of 3
No. Best Value Criteria Weight 1 Relevant Construction Service Ability and Experience 30% 2 Quality and Safety Programs 5% 3 Proposed Methodology 25% 4 Pricing 40%
GRAND TOTAL 100%
Exhibit G, Evaluation Tool RFP No. HHS0016943v2
GC RFP, V1.7 Dec 10, 2024 3 of 3
| Master Score Sheet Template |
| Scoring Guide |
| Evaluation Criteria |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .