Updated Attachment 27.docx

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE VOLUME

Total Maintenance Contract – Okinawa, Japan

N/CAGE Code:

Unique Entity ID:

Email Address:

Point of Contact Number:

Company Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact:

HE125426RE003

Attachment 27

Volume II – Past Performance

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

Past Performance Volume Instructions

In the event the Offeror does not have any past performance record, the Offeror shall still submit the Attachment 3 Past Performance proposal with a statement that past performance is unavailable.

The Offeror shall submit Volume II Past Performance (Attachment 3), listing no more than three (3) recent contract(s) performed by the prime, subcontractors, or teaming partners acting as prime. The Government may choose not to evaluate more than three (3) recent contract references. If more than three (3) recent contract references are submitted, the government will select, at its discretion, which three references to evaluate.

· Prime Offeror Information. The Prime Offeror for this solicitation must submit at least one (1) past performance reference where they served as the Prime Contractor or Subcontractor/Teaming Partner for the reference submitted.

· Subcontractor/Teaming Information. If an Offeror proposes a subcontracting/teaming arrangement for services, the Prime Offeror shall provide past performance information for their subcontractor or teaming partner as follows:

· If the Prime Offeror teams with a subcontractor, past performance information for that subcontractor must be provided for at least one (1) effort. The proposal must also include written consent from the proposed subcontractor(s) authorizing the Government to discuss their past performance with the Prime Offeror.

· At a minimum, the Prime Offeror must describe the specific roles and responsibilities assigned to each proposed subcontractor/teaming partner as outlined in their teaming arrangement. The Offeror must provide:

1) the percentage of work each teaming partner will perform;

2) the specific resources each teaming partner will contribute to fulfill the solicitation requirements, and

3) any other relevant details.

A “Neutral” rating will be assigned if 1) the Prime Offeror does not submit at least one past performance reference in which they provided services as a Prime Contractor or Subcontractor/Teaming Partner; and 2) the Prime Offeror fails to describe the specific roles and responsibilities of each proposed subcontractor or teaming partner as outlined in their teaming arrangement.

To be considered recent, efforts must be ongoing or completed within three (3) years of the solicitation closing date.

To be relevant, the Offeror must demonstrate experience with total maintenance services of similar scope, magnitude of effort and complexities that this solicitation requires.

Past Performance Quality. The Offeror’s Past Performance information will also be reviewed to determine the quality of the Offeror’s performance and general trends in performance, which will also be a factor in the performance confidence assessment.

The Offeror shall demonstrate recent and relevant past performance by completing and submitting Attachment 3 – Volume II – Past Performance.

Scope: Refers to the type of work performed in the Offeror’s past performance reference when compared

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

to the type of work required in this solicitation. The type of work required is for Facility Operations and Maintenance services.

Magnitude of effort: Refers to the size of an Offeror’s past performance reference. The Offeror’s past performance reference will be compared to the Government’s estimated amount to perform the work required in the PWS.

Complexity: Refers to the level of complexity of an Offeror’s past performance reference. The level of complexity will be compared to the Government’s estimated complexity level. The following factors may be considered for each past performance reference to determine whether each reference is similar in complexity.

1. Managing integrated facility operations and maintenance services across multiple functional areas (e.g. preventative and corrective maintenance, HVAC systems, grounds, sports fields, playgrounds, and non-routine work.).

1. Operating in multi-site and/or campus-style environments, including occupied and mission-critical facilities, while maintaining continuous service and minimal disruption to operations.

1. Administering performance-based requirements, including service level objectives, response times, completion standards, and compliance with performance work statement (PWS) requirements.

1. Coordinating subcontractors and specialized trades as part of a unified maintenance delivery model, including oversight, scheduling, and quality control.

1. Utilizing a CMMS or equivalent system for work order management, asset tracking, preventative maintenance scheduling, and reporting.

1. Complying with applicable regulatory, safety, and environmental requirements, such as NFPA, OSHA, ASHREA, EPA, and host nation or local authority standards.

1. Managing both recurring and non-routine maintenance activities, including emergency response, service requests, and task-order-driven work under an T&M/IDIQ or similar contract structure.

The Contractor shall follow the format shown in the next page when submitting Volume II – Past Performance.

Volume II – Past Performance InformationCONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

The Offeror, shall at a minimum, submit the following for each past performance reference (Do not change the format. Complete, and address all areas below):

Reference Information:

Brief Description of Effort Please provide a brief description of the past performance reference to include the services provided.

Past Performance Relevancy Factors In this section, please indicate how the past performance reference is relevant in scope, magnitude of effort and complexity based on the definitions provided to you in this document and under Factor 2: Past Performance in the solicitation. Please feel free to use additional pages (but not exceeding the page limit) if more than one past performance reference is used.

Scope: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in scope.

Magnitude of Effort: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in magnitude of effort.

Complexity: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in complexity.