QA Part 4.pdf

Title Q&A 4 Question

No.

Reference (Specifications /

Question Response

1 Solicitation The solicitation does not appear to clearly identify the specific licenses, registrations, permits, or authorizations required for an offeror to be eligible for award and performance of the contract. Given that contract performance will occur in Japan, could the DoWEA please clarify:

1.What specific business licenses, registraƟons, permits, or cerƟficaƟons are required for an offeror to be considered eligible for award under this solicitation?

2.Whether a Japan business license, local corporate registraƟon, or other host-nation licenses and permits are required prior to contract award or prior to commencement of performance?

3.Whether the DoWEA will sponsor, facilitate, or otherwise assist the awardee in obtaining any required host-nation approvals, permits, registrations, licenses, or SOFA status necessary for contract performance in Japan?

4.Whether subcontractors performing work in Japan are subject to the same licensing and permit requirements as the Awardee?

The solicitation does not identify any U.S. Government–issued licenses, permits, or SOFA authorizations as eligibility requirements for award. However, the PWS requires the contractor to comply with all applicable codes, regulations, and host‑nation requirements during performance. The solicitation states the contractor must provide “all personnel, labor, equipment… necessary to perform all operations… in accordance with the Performance Work Statement” and must ensure “full compliance with applicable codes and standards” .

Therefore, while no licenses are required to submit a proposal, the contractor must obtain and maintain all host‑nation business registrations, trade licenses, technical certifications, environmental permits, and labor authorizations necessary to legally perform the work in Japan. Subcontractors must meet the same requirements.

2 Solicitation Will DoWEA provide SOFA status to Awardee or Awardee subcontractors who are U.S. nationals?

The solicitation does not provide or authorize SOFA status for the contractor or subcontractors. The contract requires performance in Japan using personnel who are legally authorized to work under host‑nation requirements. The DFARS clause included in the solicitation requires the contractor to employ “individuals who are residents [of Japan]” and who possess or can promptly acquire the necessary skills to perform the work .

Accordingly, all personnel must obtain work authorization through Japanese processes, and SOFA status will not be issued or sponsored by DoDEA.

3 Solicitation Confirm that contractors with current SOFA status performing contracts in Japan cannot use that SOFA status, or personnel under SOFA status on another contract to participate in the award of this contract?

SOFA status obtained under another contract cannot be used for this requirement. The solicitation does not authorize SOFA sponsorship and requires the contractor to comply with all host‑nation labor and employment requirements. The DFARS clause mandates the contractor employ residents of Japan for performance of work under this contract .

Therefore, personnel holding SOFA status under a different contract may not use that status to perform work under this solicitation. All personnel must meet Japanese work authorization requirements.

4 Q & A Part 2, Question

It states that if the Government determines that beautification-related power washing is desired, it will be processed as non-routine work. In this case, is the contractor liable for the the first $5000.00 in materials, as well as associated costs?

The $5,000 threshold applies to the total material cost required for the work, and the contractor shall credit the first $5,000 of material costs in its proposal consistent with PWS §2.1.1.

5 Q & A Part 2, Question

It states that if the Government determines that repair or replacement of non-fixed outdoor furniture is required, it will be processed as non-routine work. In this case, is the contractor liable for the the first $5000.00 in materials, as well as associated costs?

The $5,000 threshold applies to the total material cost required for the work, and the contractor shall credit the first $5,000 of material costs in its proposal consistent with PWS §2.1.1.

6 Q & A Part 2, Question

In order for the offeror to be assurred they are adequately assessing the burden, please clarify which of these systems are maintained under separate Government contracts.

Certain system components (e.g., fire protection testing, monitoring services, device‑level ESS/MNS functions, etc.) may be maintained under separate Government contracts. The contractor remains responsible for infrastructure‑level RPIE maintenance unless otherwise directed. Final responsibility for overlapping systems will be determined by the COR during contract performance. The contractor shall not independently reclassify system responsibilities.

7 Q & A Part 2, Question

It states that the Government may request work under the non-routine work process. In this case, is the contractor liable for the the first $5000.00 in materials, as well as associated costs?

Yes. The $5,000 contractor responsibility for material costs applies to all non-routine work requests, including new work, unless otherwise specifically excluded in the PWS.

8 Q & A Part 2, Question

In order for the offeror to be assurred they are adequately assessing the burden, please clarify which of these systems are maintained under separate Government contracts.

The PWS does not provide a complete list of systems maintained under separate Government contracts. Some device‑level ESS/MNS functions or monitoring services may be separately contracted. The COR will determine responsibility for any overlapping systems during contract performance.

9 Q & A Part 2, Question

In order for the offeror to be assurred they are adequately assessing the burden, please clarify which of these systems are maintained under separate Government contracts.

Responsibility for overlapping communications, security, or notification systems will be determined by the COR. Infrastructure‑level RPIE maintenance remains the contractor’s responsibility unless a system or component is explicitly maintained under a separate Government contract.

10 Q & A Part 2, Question

It states that the Government reserves the right to request related work under the non-routine work process. In this case, is the contractor liable for the the first $5000.00 in materials, as well as associated costs?

The $5,000 threshold applies to the total material cost required for the work, and the contractor shall credit the first $5,000 of material costs in its proposal consistent with PWS §2.1.1 and material costs definition in the PWS.

11 Q & A Part 2, Question

In order for the offeror to be assured they are adequately assessing the burden, please describe the Govenrment's expecatations.

Contractor responsibilities are limited to the nuisance wildlife and avian control measures defined in PWS §2.1.2. see section 2.1.2 "provision and management of nuisance wildlife avian control measures" for applicable scope and responsibilities.

12 Q & A Part 2, Question

Please confirm if the maintenance for the forklift at the Torii Regional Engineering and Storage building is the responsibilty of the contractor.

The PWS does not provide a specific inventory of Government‑furnished equipment. If a forklift is Government‑furnished and assigned to the contractor for facilities maintenance purposes, maintenance responsibility follows the PWS and manufacturer requirements. Final determination will be made by the COR.

13 Q & A Part 2, Question

Please confirm whether the contractor is responsible for the procurement and storage of trash bags, as well as if it is acceptable to dispose of any trash in the facility's trash compound/dumpster?

The contractor is responsible for providing all materials necessary to perform contract requirements, including trash bags. Disposal of collected waste must follow installation procedures, including use of authorized dumpsters where permitted.

14 Q & A Part 2, Question

In order for the offeror to be assurred they are adequately assessing the burden, please clarify which of these systems are maintained under separate Government contracts.

Certain ESS and MNS device‑level components may be maintained under separate Government contracts. The contractor remains responsible for infrastructure‑level RPIE maintenance unless otherwise directed. The COR will determine responsibility for any overlapping systems.

15 Q & A Part 2, Question

The response to Q & A, Part 2, Question 23, states that MNS and ESS are currently performed under a separate contract. Please provide additional clarity to the original response.

"The contractor, through the Total Maintenance Contract (TMC), is responsible for managing the infrastructure associated with Radon Mitigation Systems at DoWEA Pacific South District (Okinawa) facilities. Radon Mitigation is explicitly identified in PWS Section 2.1.2 (Exterior Facility Management) as a system within the contractor's maintenance scope, consistent with the contractor's broader infrastructure management responsibilities.

However, similar to the Mass Notification System (MNS) and Electronic Security Systems (ESS), device-level maintenance and operational responsibility for Radon Mitigation Systems is currently performed under a separate contract. The Government reserves the right to utilize this contract's non-routine work provisions (PWS Section 2.4) to perform repairs or corrective actions on radon mitigation infrastructure when the responsible contractor is unable to provide the required services.

The contractor's infrastructure management responsibilities for Radon Mitigation Systems include, but are not limited to, the following:

Routine inspections of radon mitigation system infrastructure, including associated piping, penetrations, seals, and support structures Identification and documentation of infrastructure deficiencies in the Work Order System (Asset Essentials) in accordance with PWS Section 2.1.3.1 Notification to the COR of any conditions that may pose a health or safety risk to students, faculty, or staff.

Corrective action on infrastructure components up to the $5,000.00 contractor threshold, covered under the Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) in accordance with PWS Section 2.1.1

16 Q & A Part 3, Question

It states that the Government may request additional support work under the non-routine work process. In this case, is the contractor liable for the the first $5000.00 in materials, as well as associated costs?

Yes. See attachment 22, sections 2.1.1, 2.1.3, and 2.4 of the PWS and other applicable areas of the PWS.

17 Q & A Part 3, Question

In 2.1.5, it indicates that the contractor must perform routine inspections on kitchen appliance equipment. The EIP section states that repairs for the equipment are non-routine. If a repair is required, is the contractor liable for the the first $5000.00 in materials, as well as associated costs?

Yes. See attachment 22, sections 2.1.1, 2.1.5 and 2.4 of the PWS and other applicable areas of the PWS.

18 Q & A Part 3, Question

It states that if the Government determines that repair or replacement of non-fixed indoor furniture is required, such work may be requested and authorized under the non-routine work process. In this event, is the contractor liable for the the first $5000.00 in materials, as well as associated costs?

Yes. See attachment 22, sections 2.1.1, 2.1.3, and 2.4 of the PWS and other applicable areas of the PWS.

Solicitation # HE125426RE003 Okinawa Total Maintenance Contract (TMC)

No.

Reference (Specifications /

Question Response

Solicitation # HE125426RE003 Okinawa Total Maintenance Contract (TMC)

19 Q & A Part 3, Question

In order for the offeror to be assurred they are adequately assessing the burden, please clarify which of these systems are maintained under separate Government contracts.

The PWS does not provide a complete, facility‑specific inventory of communications, security, or notification systems. In accordance with PWS Sections 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3, the contractor is responsible for inspection, preventive maintenance, and corrective maintenance of all facility‑integrated communications, security, and notification systems identified as Real Property Installed Equipment (RPIE), except where such systems are maintained under separate Government contracts.

20 Q & A Part 3, Question

Based on the response provided, it is understood that no non-routine work orders qualify for full reimbursement. Please confirm that, in all cases, the contractor is responsible for the first $5,000.00 in material costs associated with non-routine work.

The $5,000 threshold applies to the total material cost required for the work, and the contractor shall credit the first $5,000 of material costs in its proposal consistent with PWS §2.1.1 and material costs definition in the PWS.

21 Q & A Part 3, Question

In the event of vandalism or natural disasters, please confirm whether the contractor may, at the request of the COR, submit a fully reimbursable proposal to the Government, inclusive of materials, shipping, overhead and profit (OH&P), and labor.

Damages caused by vandalism or natural disasters are excluded from routine maintenance under PWS §2.1.1. When authorized by the COR, the contractor may submit a fully reimbursable non‑routine proposal that includes materials, labor, shipping, and OH&P. The $5,000 routine material threshold does not apply to vandalism or natural disaster repairs.

22 Q & A Part 3, Question

Please clarify the definition of “New Work” and confirm whether such work is fully reimbursable. If so, confirm that the $5,000.00 material liability threshold does not apply and that the contractor may submit proposals inclusive of materials, shipping, overhead and profit (OH&P), and labor.

“New Work” is defined in PWS §§2.4 and 6.2 as Government‑directed work that is not repair or maintenance of existing systems. New Work is a subcategory of non-routine work and is subject to the $5,000 routine material liability threshold. See section 2.4 for non-routine work.

23 Q & A Part 3, Question

It states that the COR may approve repairs via section 2.4. In this event, is the contractor liable for the the first $5000.00 in materials, as well as associated costs?

Yes

24 Q & A Part 3, Question

Beyond fire protection systems, some listed items are known or assumed to be maintained by other entities. Please identify all systems maintained under separate Government contracts to enable accurate assessment of scope, responsibility, and level of effort.

Certain systems or components may be maintained under separate Government contracts. In the event of overlap, the COR will determine responsibility.

25 Q & A Part 3, Question

In order for the offeror to be assurred they are adequately assessing the burden, please clarify which of these systems are maintained under separate Government contracts.

Boiler systems identified as RPIE are maintained by the contractor unless otherwise maintained under separate Government contracts. Final determination of responsibility rests with the COR.

26 Q & A Part 3, Question

In order for the offeror to be assurred they are adequately assessing the burden, please clarify which of these systems are maintained under separate Government contracts.

Only permanently installed HVAC‑related dehumidifiers identified as RPIE are included in routine maintenance. Portable units are addressed only when authorized as non‑routine work.

27 Q & A Part 3, Question

It states that if the Government determines that repair or replacement of non-mounted dehumidifiers is required, such work may be requested and authorized under the non-routine work process. In this event, is the contractor liable for the the first $5000.00 in materials, as well as associated costs?

When repair or replacement of non‑mounted dehumidifiers (not provided by contract to supplement failures of the HVAC system) is authorized as non‑routine work. See section 2.4 of the PWS and other applicable areas of the PWS.

28 Q & A Part 3, PPI Responses 15, 16, and 34 And Performance Work Statement (PWS)

Regarding the $5,000.00 material threshold, current referenced PPI responses and PWS remain inconsistent and ambiguous. To clear up any further contractor concern about the material threshold, confirm that the $5,000.00 Threshold is inclusive of Material Costs as defined by the Federal Acquisition Regulations 31.205-26 Material Costs, which states the cost of such items include such collateral items as inbound transportation and in-transit insurance?

Yes. The $5,000 threshold applies to the total material cost required for the work and is inclusive of associated acquisition costs.

29 Q & A Part 3, PPI Responses 15, 16, and 34 And Performance Work Statement (PWS)

Using the FAR, the PWS, and the example provided in Amendment 01, question #34, the following would apply:

Material (direct) $4,700.00 Inland and Ocean Transportation: 500.00 Insurance (EX: Rate of 0.0040) 20.80 Total Material Cost: $5,220.80 (Exceed $5,000 threshold) Handling Fee (contract fixed 8%) 417.66 Labor (Burdened) $3,000.00 TOTAL COST:: $8,638.46 Understanding:

Contractor absorbs $5,000.00 and would be reimbursed $3,638.46. Confirm this is the correct understanding?

Yes. The contractor is responsible for the first $5,000 of material costs only.

What counts toward the $5,000 threshold Included in Material Costs (threshold basis): Direct material: $4,700.00, Transportation: $500.00, Insurance: $20.80 Total Material Cost = $5,220.80 → exceeds threshold What the contractor must absorb Our rule: Contractor absorbs first $5,000 of material costs only. So total material cost: $5,220.80, Contractor credit (FFP burden): $5,000.00, Remaining material eligible for reimbursement: $5,220.80 – $5,000.00 = $220.80.

What is reimbursable Reimbursable elements include remaining material cost: $220.80, Material Handling Fee (8% applied to material cost): 8% × $5,220.80 = $417.66, • Labor: $3,000.00. Correct Total Reimbursement $220.80 (remaining material) + $417.66 (MHF) + $3,000.00 (labor) = $3,638.46. Final reimbursable amount = $3,638.46

30 Q & A Part 1, Question

The contractor material threshold is $5,000.00. Based on the current Government exchange rate of 150.4415 JPY/USD, this equates to 752,207.50 JPY. If the contract were to commence at this rate, please confirm whether the contractor threshold would be established at this amount in JPY.

The contractor’s $5,000 material threshold is a fixed U.S. dollar amount and does not convert to yen for threshold purposes. Exchange rates may affect actual costs, but the threshold remains $5,000 USD as defined in the PWS.

31 Solicitation Amendment

HE125426RE0030002

SF 30

Given the solicitation was amended to allow additional RFIs to be submitted NLT than 08May26, and it is expected that responses to RFIs would generate contractor proposal changes, it is requested that the proposal due date be based on 10 days following the date DoWEA provides responses to current RFIs. Confirm?

Proposal due dates will remain as stated unless formally revised by the Government through amendment.

32 Q & A Part 3, Question

Sections 2.4 and 6.2 reference “New Work”; however, the responses provided do not clarify whether this work is fully reimbursable. Please confirm whether the contractor is exempt from the $5,000.00 material liability threshold for New Work and may submit proposals inclusive of all associated costs (materials, shipping, OH&P, and labor).

“New Work” is defined in PWS sections 2.4 and 6.2 as Government‑directed work that is not repair or maintenance of existing systems. New Work is a subcategory of non-routine work and is subject to the $5,000 routine material liability threshold. See section 2.4 for non-routine work.

33 Q & A Part 3, Question

Please confirm whether the contractor is responsible for installation activities such as mounting or hanging whiteboards, Smartboards, bulletin boards, pictures, banners, posters, and similar items. If so, please identify whether these activities are classified as Non-Routine Work or New Work for purposes of scope and reimbursement.

Installation of Government‑directed items such as whiteboards, Smartboards, bulletin boards, and similar fixtures is handled as New Work or Non‑Routine Work, as determined by the COR. These activities are not part of routine maintenance and are subject to PWS Section 2.4.

34 Q & A Part 3, Question

While it is understood that Non-Routine Work is subject to the $5,000.00 material cost threshold, the treatment of New Work remains unclear. Please confirm whether New Work is exempt from this threshold and fully reimbursable, or if the same cost-sharing structure applies.

“New Work” is defined in PWS sections 2.4 and 6.2 as Government‑directed work that is not repair or maintenance of existing systems. New Work is a subcategory of non-routine work and is subject to the $5,000 routine material liability threshold. See section 2.4 for non-routine work.

35 Q & A Part 3, Question

If the contractor is required to absorb the cost for installation and similar user-requested tasks under the FFP structure, please clearly define the boundaries of such work. Specifically, what categories of user-requested tasks, if any, are excluded from FFP and eligible for reimbursement? For example, would tasks such as relocating furniture (e.g., trophy cases), retrieving items from roofs, or similar activities also fall under FFP, or are there defined limits to contractor responsibility?

User‑requested tasks that fall outside routine maintenance are addressed as New Work or Non‑Routine Work under PWS Section 2.4, subject to COR approval.

Tasks such as relocating furniture, retrieving items from roofs, or similar non‑maintenance activities are specifically directed as New Work or Non‑Routine Work.

No.

Reference (Specifications /

Question Response

Solicitation # HE125426RE003 Okinawa Total Maintenance Contract (TMC)

36 PWS 2.4 While Section 2.4 identifies a task such as mounting Smartboards as Non- Routine Work to be performed under the contractor’s FFP, this and similar activities do not appear to involve the defined technical disciplines (e.g., electrical, mechanical, civil, structural, or grounds), nor do they align with the definition of repair or maintenance provided in Section 6.2.

Please clarify how these types of services are categorized as Non-Routine Work under the FFP structure. Additionally, given the high frequency of such user-requested tasks, please explain how the Government intends for the contractor to account for and absorb these recurring costs within the FFP without exceeding a reasonable scope of effort.

User‑requested tasks that fall outside routine maintenance are addressed as New Work or Non‑Routine Work under PWS Section 2.4, subject to COR approval.

Tasks such as non‑maintenance activities are specifically directed as New Work or Non‑Routine Work.

37 Q & A Part 3, Question

Contractor’s question was related to “duct cleaning” requirements, as the solicitation does not provide a detailed statement of duct cleaning requirements, frequency of cleaning, and conditions that would trigger duct cleaning to be performed. Government response did not respond to the question, in that contractor question was related to “duct cleaning” and government response in summary states to follow industry standards related to “inspection intervals”. If “duct cleaning” is a requirement of this solicitation, provide “duct cleaning” requirements that include a detailed scope, frequency, parameters to determine frequency, and whether “duct cleaning” is considered “routine” or “non-routine work”?

HVAC duct cleaning under this contract is considered a routine service requirement and is included in the Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) portion of the contract.

The contractor shall clean HVAC air distribution systems for all DoDEA facilities at least once during the contract period of performance, as part of the Preventive Maintenance Program.

The contractor shall develop and propose a phased cleaning schedule, ensuring that all applicable systems are addressed over the life of the contract.

Facilities less than five (5) years old shall be inspected during the base period, and cleaning shall only be performed if conditions warrant.

Cleaning shall be performed in accordance with applicable industry standards and guidance, including UFC 3‑410‑01.

Duct systems shall be maintained free of excessive particulate accumulation, moisture intrusion, and biological contamination. Where inspection identifies such conditions, corrective cleaning shall be performed.

The means, methods, sequencing, and frequency distribution are the responsibility of the contractor and shall be incorporated into the Preventive Maintenance Plan for Government review and approval.

38 PWS 2.2.2(d) Section 2.2.2(d) defines “Routine HVAC Maintenance” requirements, that state Periodic Cleaning and Sanitation of “ducts”, but does not identify the scope of cleaning requirements, the frequency of cleaning requirements, and the factors that determine cleaning would be required. Per HVAC Industry Standards, specifically ANSI, ACCA, ASHRAE, and NADCA, and commercial facility or K–12 schools and other educational facilities, none of these organizations mandate routine or scheduled HVAC duct cleaning. Per HVAC Industry Standards, specifically ACCA, ASHRAE, and NADCA, duct cleaning is “conditioned based”, thus no frequency or fixed schedule is required. Per ACCA 6, ACCA does not require periodic duct cleaning on a calendar basis for schools. ANSI does not establish any requirements for duct cleaning, as ANSI’s role is to accredit other standards such as ACCA, ASHRAE, or NADCA. Per ASHRAE, duct cleaning is a targeted remediation when contamination is identified. Per NADCA, standards are interpreted as requiring cleaning when there is visible debris accumulation, microbial contamination, unacceptable particulate loading, and/or airflow/performance degradation. Per Industry Standard, HVAC duct cleaning in schools should be evidence-driven and condition-based, meaning cleaning is recommended only when inspection results find conditions that warrant cleaning. While HVAC system components would be cleaned under “routine” HVAC maintenance, Duct Cleaning is anything but Routine and only results when HVAC system preventive maintenance and inspections performed under routine maintenance works identify that conditions exist that would require cleaning and then that cleaning would be handled as “non-routine work” due to the nature, duration, operational impacts, and cost magnitude as warranted. Confirm this to be correct understanding of solicitation requirements?

The Government does not concur with the Offeror’s interpretation as it applies to this solicitation.

1. Applicability of PWS §2.2.2.b (Routine HVAC Maintenance) PWS §2.2.2.b explicitly includes “Periodic Cleaning and Sanitation of HVAC systems, including ductwork” as part of Routine HVAC Maintenance.

Under this solicitation, HVAC duct cleaning is considered a programmatic preventive maintenance requirement and is included in the Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) portion of the contract. It is not classified as non-routine work and is not contingent solely upon deficiency findings during inspections.

2. Government-Directed Preventive Maintenance Approach While industry standards often describe duct cleaning as condition-based, such standards do not restrict facility owners from establishing programmatic or lifecycle-based maintenance requirements.

For this solicitation, the Government has determined that HVAC duct cleaning is required as part of a baseline preventive maintenance program, considering facility conditions, environmental factors, and overall system lifecycle. Inspection results may be used to refine prioritization and scheduling but do not eliminate the requirement.

3. UFC Alignment UFC 3‑410‑01 requires HVAC air distribution systems to be maintained free of excessive particulate accumulation, moisture intrusion, and biological contamination.

Given the hot-humid/tropical environment of Okinawa, enhanced preventive maintenance—including duct cleaning—is a reasonable and compliant method of ensuring continued system performance and indoor air quality.

4. ASHRAE Consistency ASHRAE guidance recognizes that HVAC maintenance strategies may vary based on climate, occupancy, system condition, and owner requirements, and does not preclude owner-directed preventive maintenance programs that include duct cleaning.

5. NADCA Standards NADCA standards (ACR) define the methods and performance standards for HVAC duct cleaning. Where duct cleaning is required under this contract, the contractor shall perform the work in accordance with applicable NADCA standards.

that conditions exist that would require cleaning and then that cleaning would be handled as “non-routine work” due to the nature, duration, operational impacts, and cost magnitude as warranted. Confirm this to be correct understanding of solicitation requirements?

39 PWS 2.2.2(d)

PWS 2.1.1

PWS 2.2.2(d) defines “Routine HVAC Maintenance” requirements, that state Periodic Cleaning and Sanitation of “ducts”. Per section 2.1.1, Routine Maintenance is for works up to a threshold of $5,000. Cleaning of “ducts” has a cost magnitude that greatly exceeds the routine maintenance threshold. Confirm that any “duct cleaning” requirements would be established through an approved “non-routine work” order?

See response to question #38

40 Solicitation Supplies or Services & Prices or Costs – CLINs 0004, 1004, 2004, 3004, and 4004 (Non-Routine Work Requests)

Please confirm whether the Unit Price and Amount for these CLINs are to be proposed by the offeror as part of the bid submission, or if these values will be established by the Government.

Yes. Offerors shall propose the Unit Prices; the Government provides the estimated quantities.

41 Non noted Can the government confirm the disposal requirements for groundskeeping refuse (grass, weeds, tree branches, etc.)?

Is the contractor able to dispose of these items on-site at each facility disposal site?

See section 3.7.9 of the PWS. Response "All non-hazardous, non-regulated debris and rubbish resulting from the work under this contract shall be disposed of at appropriate off installation waste handling facilities."

42 Non noted Regarding technician licensing, qualifications and experience, will an employee’s DD214 be sufficient for proof of technical experience and meet the requirements of the PWS?

Please follow requirements in section 3.3.5.2. DD214s can be ambiguous and may qualify on a case-by-case basis but would be subjected to the additional requirements of the 3.3.5.2 section of the contract for obtaining proffesional certifications.

43 PWS, 3.3.6

Licensing/Insurance

In the PWS, 3.3.6 Licensing/Insurance it states that the contractor will possess required insurance to operate government leased or owned vehicles in the performance of this contract. Can the government please confirm that government vehicles will be operated by the contractor and the required applicable insurance to operate these vehicles?

Yes. Contractor personnel may be required to operate Government-owned or leased vehicles as described in PWS §3.3.6. The contractor is responsible for ensuring that required licenses and insurance are in place to operate such vehicles in performance of the contract. If the contractor is unable to meet applicable requirements, the Government will coordinate alternative means to accomplish the requirement.

44 Non noted Can the Government please clarify/confirm they do not wish to see any information regarding how the contractor will manage, support, and perform the work required for this effort (i.e., proposed management, staffing, subcontracted services, etc.)

Yes, see PWS section 2.5, 2.5.1, and 3.3

45 PWS 2.4 Can the Government provide annual historical information on the Non- Routine Work Requests (PWS 2.4)?

Please see attachment 25 under "Tab 1 - PRICE (FACTOR 3)" for quantities in Non-Routine CLIN. Quantities were based on annual historical data.

46 Non noted Can the government please confirm if Status Of Forces Agreement (SOFA) can be provided to U.S. citizen contractors under this contract?

SOFA status not provided under this solicitation.