H4247213 Bay Pines PET-CT Mold Sampling Final - signed.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Z2DA--FY26: NRM (PROJ: 516-CSI-134) BB Prepare Site for installation of a new PET/CT
Solicitation number
36C24826Q0459
Issued by

About this file

This is a technical assessment report documenting limited indoor air quality and surface mold sampling conducted at the C.W. (Bill) Young Bay Pines VA Medical Center in Bay Pines, Florida on December 18, 2024. The assessment was performed by Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Report No. H4247213) in accordance with a proposal dated July 1, 2024, and a subsequent change order dated December 4, 2024. The work was conducted for Above Group, Inc., acting as the project manager, with services directed toward establishing baseline/background mold conditions in Building 100 designated areas scheduled for renovation to support installation of a new PET/CT imaging system.

The assessment included visual inspections, indoor air quality (IAQ) parameter measurements (CO2, CO, temperature, and relative humidity), three surface swab samples analyzed via direct microscopic examination, and four non-cultured air samples (two outdoor baseline samples and two indoor samples) analyzed for total non-viable bioaerosols. Key findings indicate mold growth confirmed in two surface samples (CS-1 at Room 2C-120 door threshold with 1,200 spores/cm² and CS-2 at Room 2C-121 windowsill with 1,300 spores/cm²), with Penicillium/Aspergillus types as the dominant genera. Interior air samples showed total mold spore counts of 100 spores/m³, not elevated compared to outdoor averages of 995 spores/m³. All IAQ measurements (CO2: 359–412 ppm, CO: 0.0 ppm, temperature: 72.3–74.4°F, relative humidity: 52.7–54.3%) were within acceptable ASHRAE standards. Recommendations include thorough cleaning of affected windowsills and floors using mild detergent solutions, with particular attention to doorway transitions and wall-to-floor joints to prevent water migration and microbial growth.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24826Q0459 0003.docx DOCX document
Bay Pines PET-CT Room 2025.07.24 - Shielding Report.pdf PDF
S02_36C24826Q0459 0002.docx DOCX document
S05_Site visit Sign in sheet 05262026 .jpg JPG image
Change Summary.docx DOCX document
516-CSI-144_Submittal_Log.pdf PDF
516-CSI-144_Install New PETCT_100 percent IFC Specs.pdf PDF
516-CSI-134_Bay Pines PET CT_IFC Change Summary.pdf PDF
S05_RFIs Prepare Site PET.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
516-CSI-144_Submittal_Log.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
H4247213 - Bay Pines VA Hospital CT Update - ACM LBP Report Revised Final Signed.pdf PDF
516-CSI-134_Bay Pines PET-CT_100 percent IFC Drawings.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire 4 pages.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment H4247213-BayPinesVA_CT_Update-ACM_LBP_Report_Revised 41 pages.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment NARA 3 pages Bay Pines 2026.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment 07b-516-CSI-144_New_PET-CT_100percent_IFB_Specs_REV_30MAR2026 945 pages.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment SOW-516-CSI-134_2026-04-02 4 pages.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment H4247213 Bay Pines PET-CT Mold Sampling Final 23 pages.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment Specialized Experience Form 3 pages.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment Divisional Price Breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
S02_RFP Attachment WD FL20250222 01022026_Pinellas 10 pages.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment 07a-516-CSI-134_BayPines_PET-CT_100percent_IFB_Drawings_REV31MAR2026 104 pages.pdf PDF
S02_Solicitation 36C24826R0112 FINAL.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment EMR 1 page.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment LOS 2 pages.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment Price Schedule 1 page.pdf PDF
S02_RFP Attachment VA_Submittal_Register 17 pages.pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

5463 West Waters Avenue, Suite 830

Tampa, Florida 33634

P (813) 221-0050

F (813) 221-0051

Terracon.com

Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 1

January 27, 2025

Above Group, Inc.

400 E. Pratt Street, 8th Floor

Baltimore, MD 21202

Attn: Ms. Jennifer Knight

P: (405) 206-0437

E: jknight@abovegroupinc.com

RE: Limited Indoor Air & Surface Mold Sampling

C.W. (Bill) Young, Bay Pines VA Medical Center

Project No. 516-CSI-134 – Site Prep for the Installation of New PET/CT

Designated Areas Building 100

10000 Bay Pines Boulevard

Bay Pines, Florida 33612

Terracon Report No. H4247213

Dear Ms. Knight:

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to present the results of the limited indoor air

& surface mold sampling, performed on December 18, 2024 in the designated areas of the

Bay Pines VA Medical Center located in Bay Pines, FL. This assessment was conducted in general accordance with Terracon Proposal Order PH4247213 Dated July 1, 2024 and subsequent change order, dated December 4, 2024. Our services were requested to perform background/baseline mold sampling in areas to be renovated as part of the new PET/CT installation project.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Project Background

It is our understanding that the designated areas of Building 100 are scheduled for renovations as part of upgrades to support the new PET/CT system. It was requested that

Terracon perform baseline/background surface and airborne mold sampling. Air and surface samples were obtained in random areas and in areas where conditions could support microbial growth, based on visual observations.

Scope of Services

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) representative Mr. Karl Kologiski conducted the air and surface mold sampling on December 18, 2024. Copies of applicable licenses and certifications are included in Attachment C.

Indoor air quality (IAQ) parameters that were also measured in designated indoor as well as outdoor locations included carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), temperature, and relative humidity (RH).

mailto:jknight@abovegroupinc.com mailto:jknight@abovegroupinc.com

Limited Indoor Air & Surface Mold Sampling Bay Pines VA, Project No. 516-CSI-134, New PET/CT 10000 Bay Pines Boulevard, Bay Pines, Florida 33612 January 27, 2025, Terracon Report No. H4247213

Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 2

FIELD ACTIVITIES

Visual Assessment

A visual assessment was performed in designated areas. The indoor environment was observed for visual evidence of water damage, suspect mold growth, or other hygiene concerns that could affect indoor air quality. Destructive sampling/testing and observations of the HVAC system were not within the scope of work for this project.

General IAQ Measurements

The CO2, temperature and RH measurements were obtained from the designated areas using a

QTrak™ (Model 9565) Indoor Air Quality instrument manufactured by TSI. The instrument is calibrated by a third party annually. Measurements were obtained from the designated indoor location and the outdoor environment, for comparison purposes.

Surface Sampling

Three swab samples were collected using laboratory-supplied swabs rolled over any suspect mold-impacted area. The surface swab samples were submitted under chain of custody (COC) to Eurofins for identification and quantification of bioaerosols (i.e., mold spores, mold hyphal structures, etc.) via light microscopy. Eurofins is accredited by the AIHA® Laboratory

Accreditation Programs, LLC under the Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Accreditation

Program.

Samples taken from noted surfaces were analyzed by direct microscopic examination. The primary purpose of a direct microscopic examination of a sample taken from a surface is to determine whether or not mold is growing on the surface sampled, and if so, what kinds of mold are present. This type of analysis may identify marker genera that may be indicative of indoor growth as opposed to simply settled spores. The presence of biological materials on a particular surface is not a direct indication of what may be in the air.

Spore Trap Air Sampling

Terracon collected four non-cultured air samples (including two outdoors) for analysis for total non-viable bioaerosols. Samples were collected using a tripod to elevate the sample approximately four feet from ground level. The outdoor samples were collected to establish a baseline for air quality.

The samples were collected utilizing a Buck BioAire™ pump calibrated at 15 liters of air per minute prior to sample collection. Calibration was performed using a sample cassette in conjunction with a manufacturer-supplied calibration device. Each sample was collected over a span of 10 minutes for a total volume of 150 liters of air/sample.

The samples were submitted under chain of custody (COC) to Eurofins for identification and quantification of bioaerosols (i.e., mold spores, mold structures).

Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 3

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Visual Assessment

Since many building materials can provide a source of food for mold spores, water is the limiting factor in minimizing the potential for mold growth. Therefore, visible fungal/mold spore stains, excessive dirt, and water-damaged building materials should not be observed. When these conditions are observed, it indicates a need to conduct cleaning or remediation activities to minimize the potential for mold-related issues.

General IAQ Measurements

Carbon Dioxide

The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE)

Standard 62.1-2022, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, gives specific design criteria for determining the ventilation rates for different types of facilities. The standard calls for outdoor air supply requirements based on the usage of the space, the occupant density, and the square footage of the space. Generally stated, ASHRAE notes that CO2 concentration for offices no greater than 700 ppm above the outdoor air concentration equates to a breathing zone outdoor airflow rate of 15 cfm per person.

OSHA regulates occupational exposure to CO2 under 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

1910.1000, Table Z-1 – Limits for Air Contaminants. The permissible exposure limit (PEL) for

CO2 is 5,000 parts per million (ppm) as an 8-hour TWA.

The ACGIH® has established threshold limit values (TLV®) for CO2 of 5,000 ppm as an 8-hr

TWA and 30,000 ppm as a short-term exposure limit (STEL). TLVs® are guidelines and are not enforced by OSHA.

Carbon Monoxide

The EPA has established a CO standard for outdoor air. Currently, the National Ambient Air

Quality Standard (NAAQS) is 9 ppm, as an 8-hour average. Many indoor air quality professionals consider the NAAQS standard to be applicable as a conservative, but realistic guideline when applied to the indoor environment.

Temperature and Relative Humidity

Indoor air temperature and relative humidity are physical conditions important to the perception of comfort. ASHRAE Standard 55-2023, Thermal Environmental Conditions for

Human Occupancy recommends indoor temperatures during the cooling season (i.e., summer) between 73- and 79-degrees Fahrenheit (oF).During the heating season (i.e., winter), recommended temperatures can range between 68 and 75 oF. For all seasons, the recommended RH range is between 30 and 60%.

Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 4

ASHRAE Standard 55-2023, recommends that relative humidity in occupied spaces be controlled to less than 60% to reduce the likelihood of conditions that can lead to condensation and microbial growth.

Surface Sampling

At present, no mandatory regulations or standards have been established for the maximum allowable concentration of mold spores.

Spore Trap Sampling

At present, no mandatory regulations or standards have been established for the maximum allowable concentration of bio-aerosols such as mold spores. Over the past years, industrial hygienists, and researchers from a number of governmental and non-governmental agencies have collectively gathered a significant body of data from air, dust and surface samples during both investigative studies and remediation projects. The recommended criteria for evaluating airborne mold concentrations that have emerged from peer-reviewed publications include the following:

◼ The mold spore concentrations in indoor air should be quantitatively lower than, but qualitatively similar to, that of outdoor air.

◼ The presence of one or more mold genera at significant levels indoors but not outdoors is evidence of indoor amplification (i.e., biological growth occurring in the indoor environment).

RESULTS

Visual Assessment

A summary of the visual observations is provided in Table 1.0. Refer to Attachment B for referenced photographs.

TABLE 1.0: OBSERVATIONS

Location General Observations

Outside

Conditions

▪ Sea fog during morning hours / sunny, clear during afternoon hours.

Rm 2C-120

▪ Debris – staining observed on doorway threshold in Rm 2C-120 and 2C50 Hallway

(Photo 1).

Rm 2C-121

▪ Visible debris on windowsill of Rm 2C-121(Photo 2).

▪ Debris – staining observed on doorway threshold in Rm 2C-121 and 2C50 Hallway

(Photo 6).

Flooring

▪ Debris and staining were observed on the carpet and vinyl tiled floor in Rooms

2C107, 2C-122D, 2C-121 and other various wall to floor locations and doorway thresholds within the designated areas (Photos 3-5).

Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 5

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

The average outdoor CO2 concentration measured was 335 ppm. Therefore, based on ASHRAE

Standard 62.1-2013, indoor locations with CO2 concentrations greater than 1,035 ppm (335 ppm + 700 ppm) would be areas suspected of insufficient outdoor air delivery.

• The CO2 concentration measured inside the designated areas ranged from 359 ppm to 412 ppm.

The CO2 results were below the above noted interior CO2 concentration of 1,035 ppm based on

ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2013. A summary of the CO2 measurements is presented in Table 2.0.

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

Refer to Table 2.0 for measured CO levels and locations collected during the assessment.

Measured concentrations were below referenced threshold levels.

Temperature and Relative Humidity

The average outdoor temperature was 72.9 ° Fahrenheit (F). Designated area temperature readings were 72.3 and 74.4°F. The average outdoor RH was 74.8%. Designated areas RH levels were 52.7% and 54.3%.

Based on the data collected, the relative humidity readings and temperature levels recorded from the noted areas were within ASHRAE recommended levels. A summary of IAQ measurements is presented in Table 2.0.

TABLE 2.0: GENERAL IAQ MEASUREMENTS

LOCATION Time Temperature

(heating)

CO2 CO

Relative Humidity

Target Levels 68-75º F <1,035 ppm <9 ppm 20%-60%

Outside – Side Entrance 8:20 am 69.2 297 0.0 81.5

Outside – Side Entrance 4:00 pm 76.5 373 0.0 68.1

Outside – Average N/A 72.9 335 0.0 74.8

Hallway C2-50 11:25am 74.2 359 0.0 53.1

Reception 2C-129 11:55 am 72.3 390 0.0 52.9

Imaging 2C-108 1:05 pm 74.4 367 0.0 54.3

Waiting Rm 2C-48 2:45 pm 73.8 412 0.0 52.7

Mold Spore Air Sample Results

The following is a summary of the analytical results for the swab samples that were collected from the various surfaces within the designated areas. The bioaerosol laboratory report is presented in Attachment A.

Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 6

TABLE 3.0: SURFACE SAMPLE RESULTS

Location:

CS-1: 2C-120

Door Threshold

CS-2: 2C-121

Windowsill

CS-3: 2C-107A

Floor

Comments (see below) None None None

Background debris (1-4+) 2+ 2+ 1+

Reporting unit 1 cm2 1 cm2 1 cm2

Count/sample Count/sample Count/sample

Ascospores 80 160

Basidiospores 40

Cladosporium 480 440

Curvularia 40

Penicillium/Aspergillus types 1,200 1,300 120

TOTAL FUNGAL SPORES 1,900 1,700 280

Hyphal fragments 80 360 200

The three surface swab samples were collected from areas of visible suspect staining / debris on surfaces in the designated areas. The purpose of a direct microscopic examination of a sample taken from a material is to document the level of total mold present on the material sampled, and if so, what kinds of molds are present. This type of analysis may identify marker genera that may be indicative of indoor mold growth. The presence of biological materials on a particular surface is not a direct indication of what may be in the air.

Based on the visual observations, size of the suspect microbial growth area and the reported quantity of Penicillium/Aspergillus type spores per square centimeter, mold growth was confirmed in samples CS-1 and CS-2. The other remaining settled spores were reported at De minimis levels.

De minimis levels per industry consensus are not considered to be a concern as related to

Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) as the levels present are not considered significant and are not considered evidence of indoor amplification. The mold spores categorized as de minimis settle out on surfaces from the indoor air, and are introduced into the building via outdoor air infiltration, occupant traffic, from interior plant matter, etc.

Background debris reported in the samples results often constitute pollen, dirt, cellulose – synthetic fibers, etc.

At present, no mandatory regulations or standards have been established for the maximum allowable concentration of mold spores on surfaces. Swab samples provide semi-quantitative results for total mold contamination. Samples are analyzed by direct examination which identifies mold spores and structures but does not differentiate between viable and nonviable mold spores.

Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 7

Mold Spore Air Sample Results

Laboratory analytical results of total mold spore air samples collected at representative indoor and outdoor locations are presented in Table 4.0.

TABLE 4.0: Mold Spore Air Sample Results

Location:

V1:

Outside Bldg 100

V2: Outside Bldg 100

Outside Average

C1: 2C-129 Reception

C2:

2C-120-

Office

C3:

2C-118 Imaging

Background debris (1-4+) 1+ 2+ 1+ 1+ 1+

Count/m3 Count/m3 Count/m3 Count/m3 Count/m3 Count/m3

Ascospores 110 100 105 7 13

Basidiospores 310 180 245 33 20

Cercospora 7 4

Cladosporium 67 1,200 634 27 13 20

Curvularia 27 14

Other brown 0 13 13 7

Other colorless 0 7

Penicillium/Aspergillus types 13 7 20 33 33

Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes 0 7

TOTAL MOLD SPORES 490 1,500 995 100 100 73

Hyphal fragments 7 33 20

Pollen 0 7 7

* Bold Entries Indicate Above Outside Averages or Types

• Total indoor airborne mold spore counts were not elevated when compared to the average of the outdoor airborne mold spore concentrations.

• The bolded indoor bioaerosol mold spore concentrations noted in Green could be interpreted as de minimis.

The total bioaerosol values documented in this report are empirical values. To date, no data support a medically based threshold limit or dose-response relationship for exposure to mold aerosols or mold aeroallergens. No state or federal exposure limits have been established for mold aerosols. The bioaerosol laboratory report is presented in Appendix B.

Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 8

CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Conclusions Recommendations

Mold growth was confirmed along with visible debris, and dust on the windowsill of Room 2C- 121 (Storage).

It is recommended that a thorough cleaning be performed of the windowsills, utilizing a mild detergent solution.

It is also recommended that the windowsills in all rooms be cleaned as part of routine housekeeping activities.

Mold growth was confirmed along with visible debris & staining on carpeted / tile floor transitions (door threshold) in Room 2C-120.

Dirt and debris was observed on the tiled floors in various locations of the designated areas.

It is recommended that when cleaning / moping the tiled floor areas, water accumulation be removed and the floor be dried as soon as possible to reduce the risk of water migrating in the adjacent carpeted areas and lower sections of drywall walls.

It is recommended that a thorough cleaning be performed of the floor utilizing a mild detergent solution. Areas of staining and debris building up at doorways and wall to floor joint should be given special consideration.

Services associated with the IAQ/mold assessment report by the client and all authorized parties will be subject to the terms, conditions and limitations stated in the Task Order, the report, and in the Services Agreement between Above Group, Inc., and Terracon.

Terracon appreciates the opportunity to provide this service to the client. If you have any questions, please contact us at (813) 221-0050.

Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc.

Karl Kologiski, CIEC Mark J. Fricke, CIH, CSP, LAC

Staff Industrial Hygienist Senior Industrial Hygienist

Florida Licensed Mold Assessor #MRSA-2761

Attachments: A – Laboratory Analytical Results

B – Photographs

C – Licenses / Certifications

Karl Kologiski

Attachment A

Laboratory Results

Approved by:

Laboratory Manager Agner Martinez

Report for:

Wilson Bull, Mr. Karl Kologiski Terracon - Tampa 5463 W Waters Ave, Suite 830 Tampa, FL 33634

Regarding:

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC Project: VA Bay Pines; H4247213

EML ID: 3887006

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank correction of results is not applied. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested. Information supplied by the client which can affect the validity of results: sample air volume.

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results.

In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Spore trap analysis: 12-18-2024

Service SOPs: Spore trap analysis (EB-MY-S-1038) AIHA LAP, LLC accredited service, Lab ID #173067

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC's LabServe® reporting system includes automated fail-safes to ensure that all AIHA LAP, LLC quality requirements are met and notifications are added to reports when any quality steps remain pending.

EMLab ID: 3887006, Page 1 of 3Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC 6340 NW 5th Way, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Terracon - Tampa C/O: Wilson Bull, Mr. Karl Kologiski Re: VA Bay Pines; H4247213

Date of Sampling: 12-16-2024 Date of Receipt: 12-18-2024 Date of Report: 12-19-2024

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

Location: V1:

Outside Bldg 100 V2:

Outside Bldg 100 Comments (see below) None None

Lab ID-Version‡: 19255846-1 19255847-1

Analysis Date: 12/18/2024 12/18/2024 raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3 Ascospores 16 100 110 15 100 100 Basidiospores 46 100 310 27 100 180 Cercospora 1 100 7 Chaetomium Cladosporium 10 100 67 180 100 1,200 Curvularia 4 100 27 Epicoccum Fusarium Myrothecium Nigrospora Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 2 100 13 Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+) 1+ 2+ Hyphal fragments/m3 7 33 Pollen/m3 < 7 < 7 Skin cells (1-4+) < 1+ < 1+ Sample volume (liters) 150 150 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 490 1,500 Comments:

EMLab ID: 3887006, Page 2 of 3Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.

† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.

††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

§ Total Spores/m3 has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision.

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Terracon - Tampa C/O: Wilson Bull, Mr. Karl Kologiski Re: VA Bay Pines; H4247213

Date of Sampling: 12-16-2024 Date of Receipt: 12-18-2024 Date of Report: 12-19-2024

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

PROJECT ANALYST AND SIGNATORY REPORT

Project Analyst

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by AIHA LAP, LLC, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Analyst: Gabriela Arocha

EMLab ID: 3887006, Page 3 of 3Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

Agner Martinez

Report for:

Mr. Karl Kologiski Terracon - Tampa 5463 W Waters Ave, Suite 830 Tampa, FL 33634

Regarding:

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC Project: Bay Pines CT; H4247213

EML ID: 3887012

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank correction of results is not applied. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested.

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results.

In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Quantitative spore count direct exam: 12-19-2024

Service SOPs: Quantitative spore count direct exam (EM-MY-S-1041) AIHA LAP, LLC accredited service, Lab ID #173067

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC's LabServe® reporting system includes automated fail-safes to ensure that all AIHA LAP, LLC quality requirements are met and notifications are added to reports when any quality steps remain pending.

EMLab ID: 3887012, Page 1 of 3Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Terracon - Tampa C/O: Mr. Karl Kologiski Re: Bay Pines CT; H4247213

Date of Sampling: 12-16-2024 Date of Receipt: 12-18-2024 Date of Report: 12-19-2024

QUANTITATIVE SPORE COUNT REPORT

Location: C5-1:

2C- 120 Door Threshold C5-2:

2C- 121 Window Sill C5-3:

2C- 107A Floor Comments (see below) None None None Sample type Swab sample Swab sample Swab sample Lab ID-Version‡: 19255924-1 19255925-1 19255926-1 Analysis Date: 12/19/2024 12/19/2024 12/19/2024 Dilution 1:40 1:40 1:40 raw ct. spores/unit raw ct. spores/unit raw ct. spores/unit Alternaria Arthrinium Ascospores 2 80 4 160 Aureobasidium Basidiospores 1 40 Bipolaris/Drechslera group Botrytis Chaetomium Cladosporium 12 480 11 440 Curvularia 1 40 Epicoccum Fusarium Myrothecium Nigrospora Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 31 1,200 32 1,300 3 120 Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+)†† 2+ 2+ 1+ Sample size 1 1 1 Unit 1 cm2 1 cm2 1 cm2

§ TOTAL SPORES/UNIT 1,900 1,700 280

Comments:

EMLab ID: 3887012, Page 2 of 3Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.

†† Background debris is an indication of the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the slide (dust in the air) and is graded from 1+ to 4+ with 4+ indicating the largest amounts. This background material is also an indication of visibility for the analyst and resultant difficulty reading the slide. For example, high background debris may obscure the small spores such as the Penicillium/Aspergillus group. Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may actually be higher than reported.

Where tape lifts are performed for bulk sample analysis, the unit reported is specific to the area of tape analyzed.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

§ Total Spores/unit has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision.

The limit of detection is 1 spore per area analyzed; Analytical Sensitivity is 1 spore per unit times the dilution factor.

Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Terracon - Tampa C/O: Mr. Karl Kologiski Re: Bay Pines CT; H4247213

Date of Sampling: 12-16-2024 Date of Receipt: 12-18-2024 Date of Report: 12-19-2024

QUANTITATIVE SPORE COUNT REPORT

PROJECT ANALYST AND SIGNATORY REPORT

Project Analyst

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by AIHA LAP, LLC, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Analyst: Luis Esteva

EMLab ID: 3887012, Page 3 of 3Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

Agner Martinez

Report for:

Mr. Karl Kologiski Terracon - Tampa 5463 W Waters Ave, Suite 830 Tampa, FL 33634

Regarding:

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC Project: Bay Pines CT; H4247213

EML ID: 3887012

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank correction of results is not applied. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested. Information supplied by the client which can affect the validity of results: sample air volume.

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results.

In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Spore trap analysis: 12-19-2024

Service SOPs: Spore trap analysis (EB-MY-S-1038) AIHA LAP, LLC accredited service, Lab ID #173067

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC's LabServe® reporting system includes automated fail-safes to ensure that all AIHA LAP, LLC quality requirements are met and notifications are added to reports when any quality steps remain pending.

EMLab ID: 3887012, Page 1 of 4Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Terracon - Tampa C/O: Mr. Karl Kologiski Re: Bay Pines CT; H4247213

Date of Sampling: 12-16-2024 Date of Receipt: 12-18-2024 Date of Report: 12-19-2024

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

Location: C1:

2C129- Reception C2:

2C 120- Office Comments (see below) None None

Lab ID-Version‡: 19255927-1 19255928-1

Analysis Date: 12/19/2024 12/19/2024 raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3 Ascospores 1 100 7 Basidiospores 5 100 33 3 100 20 Chaetomium Cladosporium 4 100 27 2 100 13 Curvularia Epicoccum 1 100 7 Fusarium Myrothecium Nigrospora Other brown 2 100 13 2 100 13 Other colorless 1 100 7 Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 3 100 20 5 100 33 Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes 1 100 7 Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+) 1+ 1+ Hyphal fragments/m3 < 7 < 7 Pollen/m3 7 7 Skin cells (1-4+) 1+ 1+ Sample volume (liters) 150 150 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 100 100 Comments:

EMLab ID: 3887012, Page 2 of 4Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.

† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.

††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Terracon - Tampa C/O: Mr. Karl Kologiski Re: Bay Pines CT; H4247213

Date of Sampling: 12-16-2024 Date of Receipt: 12-18-2024 Date of Report: 12-19-2024

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

Location: C3:

2C 118- Imaging Comments (see below) None

Lab ID-Version‡: 19255929-1

Analysis Date: 12/19/2024 raw ct. % read spores/m3 Ascospores 2 100 13 Basidiospores Chaetomium Cladosporium 3 100 20 Curvularia Epicoccum Fusarium Myrothecium Nigrospora Other brown 1 100 7 Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 5 100 33 Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+) 1+ Hyphal fragments/m3 < 7 Pollen/m3 < 7 Skin cells (1-4+) 1+ Sample volume (liters) 150 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 73 Comments:

EMLab ID: 3887012, Page 3 of 4Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.

† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.

††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Terracon - Tampa C/O: Mr. Karl Kologiski Re: Bay Pines CT; H4247213

Date of Sampling: 12-16-2024 Date of Receipt: 12-18-2024 Date of Report: 12-19-2024

SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

PROJECT ANALYST AND SIGNATORY REPORT

Project Analyst

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by AIHA LAP, LLC, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Analyst: Luis Esteva

EMLab ID: 3887012, Page 4 of 4Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

Attachment B

Photographs

Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 1

Photo #1 Visible staining on vinyl flooring to carpet transition, door threshold at entrance to Rm 2C-120 (Surface Sample C5-1)

Photo #2 Visible debris on window sill of Rm

2C-121 (Surface Sample C5-2)

Photo #3 Visible debris on floor in Rm 2C-107 (Surface Sample C5-3)

Photo #4 Stains on carpet observed in Rm 2C-121

Photo #5 Staining on floor observed under the sink in Restroom 2C-122D

Photo #6 Visible staining on vinyl flooring to carpet transition, door threshold at entrance to Rm 2C-121

Attachment C

Licenses / Certifications

Kologiski, Karl V Stamp

Kologiski, Karl V Stamp

Kologiski, Karl V Stamp

2025-01-27T21:21:04+0000
Certified by Adobe Acrobat Sign

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .