Attachment_L-2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
L-2
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Section L Attachment L-2 Solicitation #FBISME
ATTACHMENT L-2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS
SOLICITATION NUMBER: FBISME
1. Please complete this questionnaire.
Explanation of codes:
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
| (E) EXCEPTIONAL |
| The contractor’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded expectations. Contractor consistently and proactively addressed problems that arose during contract performance before the problems could compromise achievement of contract objectives. |
| (S) SATISFACTORY |
| No problems existed or only minor problems for which solutions were available and corrected with minimal disruption to contract requirements. |
| (U) UNSATISFACTORY |
| Problems existed which the contractor was unable to solve. The problems led to disruption in achievement of contract requirements. Actions taken by the contractor to resolve the problems were ineffective. |
| (N) NOT APPLICABLE |
| Evaluation area not applicable to this contracted effort |
2. Circle the appropriate letter for each item on the questionnaire and provide narrative justification.
3. Please scan and e-mail Questionnaire to sasha.mcnealy@ic.fbi.gov by Tuesday, May 26th, 2015 (close of business). Email subject heading should read “FBISME PP for X” where X is the contractor.
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
SOLICITATION NUMBER: FBISME
Please complete the following:
A. Contractor:
B. Contract number:
C. Estimated contract dollar amount:
D. Period of Performance:
E. Contract type:
F. |_| Federal |_| Non Federal
G. Describe product/service acquired:
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA:
1. Contractor’s record of recruitment and retention of qualified, skilled, cleared (TS/SCI) personnel and ability to maintain staffing levels to ensure contract performance. Did the contractor have a high turnover of personnel during performance of the contract? Were there any issues with the contractor providing personnel that did not meet the skill levels required for the work being performed? Please explain.
Performance Level - Select One: E S U N
Narrative Justification (please provide comments):
2. Contractor’s record of meeting deliverable and performance schedules. Were the contract deliverables completed on time and were they of acceptable quality? If not, were there mitigating circumstances? Please also note if deliverables were completed ahead of schedule or were of exceptional quality. Were there performance schedule delays? Were the delays attributable to the contractor? How did the contractor mitigate?
Performance Level - Select One: E S U N
3. Contractor’s program management. Note any issues with teaming/subcontracting arrangements, responding to rapidly emerging issues and conditions, contract management (administrative and technical).
Performance Level - Select One: E S U N
4. Did the Contractor isolate performance problems and take action to resolve the problems? Please provide a summary of the issues identified. If performance issues were not encountered, please provide feedback concerning contractor’s responsiveness to constructive feedback or the changing needs of the program. Was Contractor’s response timely, adequate and/or appropriate? Please discuss:
Performance Level - Select One: E S U N
5. Please rate the contractor’s overall performance under this contract:
Performance Level - Select One: E S U N
Name/Title _____________________________________________________
Role regarding contract (e.g. Contracting Officer, COR, PM, etc.):__________________________________________________________ Phone_______________________________________
FAX________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .