FARM III RFP SF1442 Atch 6_L-5 Past Performance Rating Form.pdf
PDF 923 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FA910126RB011 FARM III RFP
- Solicitation number
- FA910126RB011
About this file
This is a Past Performance Rating Form template used for evaluating contractor performance on federal contracts under the FARM III RFP (FA9101-26-R-B011).
The form is completed in two sections: offerors provide project identification information including contractor name, contract number, order number, project title, and period of performance; raters (government personnel or customer references) then complete performance reference information with their name, title, agency, phone, and email. Raters evaluate contractors across six performance criteria using a standardized five-point adjectival rating scale: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory. The six evaluation criteria are Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, Small Business Subcontracting, and Regulatory. Each criterion includes detailed definitions distinguishing performance levels, with Exceptional representing performance that exceeds contractual requirements with few minor problems, Very Good indicating performance that meets requirements with some minor problems, Satisfactory indicating performance that meets requirements with minor problems, Marginal indicating performance that does not meet some requirements with serious unresolved problems, and Unsatisfactory indicating performance that does not meet most requirements with ineffective corrective actions. Raters must provide additional comments for any Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings and indicate "N/A" if a criterion cannot be rated. Upon completion, raters return the form to the offeror for inclusion in their proposal submission. This form is designated as source selection sensitive information per FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FARM III
FA9101-26-R-B011
RFP Attachment 6, L-5
ATTACHMENT L-5
Past Performance Rating Form
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 2.101 & 3.104
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):
Contractor Name:
Contract Number:
Order Number (if applicable):
Project Title:
Total Period of Performance, Including Options: to
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):
Note: The Rater will return the completed form back to the Offeror, so they may submit their Proposal per the Government’s Instructions for Offerors.
Name:
Title:
Agency or Customer:
Phone Number:
Email:
For each of the six criteria listed below, the rater must choose one Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If any criterion is not rated, please state N/A in the additional comments box.
RFP Attachment 6, L-5
1. QUALITY
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
2. SCHEDULE
the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious
3. COST CONTROL
the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious
4. MANAGEMENT
the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious
5. SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING
the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious
6. REGULATORY
the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious
| Start: |
| End: |
| Contractor Name: |
| Contract Number: |
| Order Number: |
| Project Title: |
| Name: |
| Title: |
| Agency or Customer: |
| Contact Phone Number: |
| Email Address: |
| Additional Comments: |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box21: Off |
| Check Box20: Off |
| Check Box19: Off |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .