Atch 10 Past Performance Questionnare.pdf

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In)

Command, Control, Communications, Computer, Intelligence (C4I) and Munitions Test Improvement Contract (CIMTIC) III Past Performance Questionnaire

Prime CIMTIC III Offeror: _________________________________

Contractor being rated: ____________________________________

Program Title: ____________________________________________

I. Background: The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain past performance information relative to contract(s) that have previously been completed or are currently being performed by the contractor identified above. This contractor is a potential source for a purportedly similar project to be performed at Eglin AFB, FL and other locations. This questionnaire is designed to enable an evaluation of this potential contractor’s past performance on projects similar to the one to be performed at Eglin AFB.

II. Instructions: Please complete the following survey using the following guidance:

A. Legible handwritten responses are sufficient.

B. Indicate, based upon the definitions below, your assessment of this contractor’s performance on your project identified above, by placing a line around the appropriate rating. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.

Exceptional (E): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good (VG): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory (S): Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal (M): Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory (U): Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable (N/A): Indicates that the contractor was not required to perform similar efforts on the subject contract. An N/A response will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

C. Please provide narrative comments to support your rating. NOTE: Comments are most important and must be provided for exceptional ratings, unsatisfactory ratings and other ratings where problems have not been satisfactorily resolved.

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

D. Please include other inputs and comments of others in your organization with knowledge of the contractor’s performance on your project identified above.

E. If the contractor holds or has held other similar contracts with your organization in the last five (5) years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

F. Please FAX your completed questionnaire within five (5) business days after receipt to:

CIMTIC Performance Risk Assessment Group, Eglin AFB FL Commercial FAX: (850) 882-6066

DSN FAX: 872-6066

Commercial Voice: (850) 882-0185 DSN Voice: 872-0185

III. Program Identification

1: Offeror:

2. Program Title:

3. Contract Number/Type:

4. Dollar Value of Contract:

5. Period of Performance:

6. Brief Program Description:

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

YOUR ASSISTANCE IN EVALUATING THE CONTRACTOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE IS

APPRECIATED. OUR GOAL IS TO SELECT THE BEST VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT. YOUR PAST

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IS A CONSIDERATION IN DETERMINING THE BEST VALUE.

IV. Past Performance Evaluation

A. Mission Capability Performance (Please circle the answer corresponding to your confidence rating.)

1. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate expertise and capability to apply modern Test & Evaluation (T&E) principles and practices, including an understanding of DoD test processes, data correlation between facilities, infrastructure requirements, and identification of critical technical risks?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

Unsatisfactory/No Confidence

Comments:

2. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate understanding and capability to design and develop systems to support T&E of the Eglin Range Complex (desired) or other (required) Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I)?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

3. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate understanding and capability to design and develop systems to support T&E of the Eglin Range Complex (desired) or other (required) munitions?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In)

4. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate understanding and capability to design and develop systems to support T&E of the Eglin Range Complex (desired) or other (required) Electronic Combat (EC) systems?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

5. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate understanding and capability to design and develop various Eglin Range Complex (desired) or other (required) T&E range facilities, support equipment, and instrumentation?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

6. How well did/does the offeror provide a technical staff with sufficient engineering expertise to execute design/engineering analyses, develop required hardware and software, and perform systems integration?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

7. How well did/does the offeror design, develop, and fabricate hardware items? Consider interpretation of task/delivery order/contract objectives, identification of key technical issues, use of sound engineering practices, adequacy of proposed solutions, facilities for fabrication, responsiveness to rapid delivery requirements, and accomplishment of simultaneous multiple (5-

25) tasks.

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

8. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate the ability to design and develop software items?

Consider embedded systems, large scale distributed applications, modeling & simulation, user interfaces, real-time data acquisition systems, and data processing & display systems.

Exceptional/High

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

9. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate expertise and capability for system/subsystem hardware integration, system hardware/software integration, and/or integration of subcontractor/vendor activities?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

10. What kind of on-site technical/transitional support, training, and operation did/does the offeror provide for systems delivered under this effort until systems were/are technically evaluated and transitioned to the Government? Consider the offeror’s approach to defining and providing systems documentation and operator training.

Excellent Support

Satisfactory Support

Limited Support

Poor Support

N/A Unknown

11. What level of Government intervention was required to achieve the desired program success in the technical area?

No Intervention

Little Intervention

Moderate Intervention

Continuous and/or

High-Level Intervention

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

12. How well did/does the offeror provide an appropriate management structure for the program, to include sufficient organizational emphasis, proper placement of the program manager within the organization, and management of functional areas?

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

13. How well did/does the offeror work with team members and/or manage subcontractors in order to successfully execute program objectives including the ability to successfully manage 5-25 tasks simultaneously?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

14. How well did/does the offeror develop and execute program management plans that resulted in the achievement of program cost, schedule, and performance goals?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

15. How well did/does the offeror utilize Earned Value Management or a Cost/Schedule Control

System to provide themselves and the Government insight into cost, technical, and schedule problems in a timely manner for corrective action?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In)

16. How well did/does the offeror adhere to schedules? Explain if delays were government or contractor caused.

Ahead of Schedule

Met Schedule

Slightly Behind

Significantly Behind

17. How well did/does the offeror provide a properly sized management and working staff with the proper expertise level to execute the program objectives?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

18. How well did/does the offeror perform technical risk assessment, and to what extent were original technical objectives met?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

19. How well did/does the offeror manage its information and systems security program?

Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

20. How well did/does the offeror respond to short suspenses or quick-reaction taskings (Delivery

Order process from RFP Receipt-to-proposal in 10 days.)?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In)

21. How well did/does the offeror establish/maintain the resources of people, materiel, and facilities required to meet contract requirements?

Exceptional/High Confidence

Very Good/ Significant Confidence

Satisfactory/ Confidence

Neutral/ Unknown

Confidence

Marginal/Little Confidence

22. What level of Government intervention was required to achieve the desired program success in the management area?

No Intervention

Little Intervention

Moderate Intervention

Continuous and/or

High-Level Intervention

B. Cost Performance (Please circle the answer corresponding to your confidence rating.)

1. How well did/does the offeror adhere to cost estimates?

Under Cost Estimate

Met Cost Estimate

Slightly Exceeded

Significantly Exceeded

2. Were there cost overruns on individual delivery orders and/or contracts? If yes, explain whether cost overruns were Government or contractor caused.

No, Under Budget

No, Met Budget

Yes, Some Overruns

Yes, Large Overruns

3. What level of Government intervention was required to achieve the desired program success in the cost area?

No

Intervention Little

Intervention Moderate

Intervention Continuous and/or High-Level Intervention

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

V. General:

1. What were the contractors’ greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

2. What were the contractors’ greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and immediate need programs?

VI. Respondent Information:

The following information will assist in the analysis of the data, and will be kept confidential.

1. Name of Evaluator:______________________________________________________________

2. Office Symbol/Location:__________________________________________________________

3. Phone (Commercial/DSN):_______________________________________________________

4. Position Title/Grade:_____________________________________________________________

5. Length of Time on Program/Contract:_______________________________________________

6. Date Questionnaire Completed:____________________________________________________