REVISED L-5 Past Performance Questionnare.pdf

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In) REVISED Attachment L-5

FA9201-10-R-0001

Command, Control, Communications, Computer, Intelligence (C4I) and Munitions Test Improvement

Contract (CIMTIC) III Past Performance Questionnaire

Prime CIMTIC III Offeror: _________________________________

Contractor being rated: ____________________________________

Program Title: ____________________________________________

I. Background: The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain past performance information relative to contract(s) that have previously been completed or are currently being performed by the contractor identified above. This contractor is a potential source for a purportedly similar project to be performed at Eglin AFB, FL and other locations. This questionnaire is designed to enable an evaluation of this potential contractor’s past performance on projects similar to the one to be performed at Eglin AFB.

II. Instructions: Please complete the following survey using the following guidance:

A. Legible handwritten responses are sufficient.

B. Indicate, based upon the definitions below, your assessment of this contractor’s performance on your project identified above, by placing a line around the appropriate rating. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.

Exceptional (E): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the

Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good (VG): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory (S): Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal (M): Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory (U): Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable (N/A): Indicates that the contractor was not required to perform similar efforts on the subject contract. An N/A response will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

C. Please provide narrative comments to support your rating. NOTE: Comments are most important and must be provided for exceptional ratings, unsatisfactory ratings and other ratings where problems have not been satisfactorily resolved.

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In) REVISED Attachment L-5

D. Please include other inputs and comments of others in your organization with knowledge of the contractor’s performance on your project identified above.

E. If the contractor holds or has held other similar contracts with your organization in the last five (5) years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

F. Please FAX your completed questionnaire within five (5) business days after receipt to:

CIMTIC Performance Risk Assessment Group, Eglin AFB FL

Commercial FAX: (850) 882-6066

DSN FAX: 872-6066

Commercial Voice: (850) 882-0171

DSN Voice: 872-0171

III. Program Identification

1: Offeror:

2. Program Title:

3. Contract Number/Type:

4. Dollar Value of Contract:

5. Period of Performance:

6. Brief Program Description:

YOUR ASSISTANCE IN EVALUATING THE CONTRACTOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE IS APPRECIATED. OUR

GOAL IS TO SELECT THE BEST VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT. YOUR PAST PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION IN A CONSIDERATION IN DETERMINING THE BEST VALUE.

IV. Past Performance Evaluation

A. Technical Capability Performance (Please circle the answer corresponding to your confidence rating.)

1. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate expertise and capability to apply modern Test &

Evaluation (T&E) principles and practices, including an understanding of DoD test processes, data correlation between facilities, infrastructure requirements, and identification of critical technical risks?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Applicable

Comments:

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In) REVISED Attachment L-5

2. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate understanding and capability to design and develop systems to support T&E of the Eglin Test and Training Complex or other Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I)?

3. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate understanding and capability to design and develop systems to support T&E of the Eglin Test and Training Complex or other munitions?

4. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate understanding and capability to design and develop various Eglin Test and Training Complex or other T&E range facilities, support equipment, and instrumentation?

5. How well did/does the offeror provide a technical staff with sufficient engineering expertise to execute design/engineering analyses, develop required hardware and software, and perform systems integration?

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In) REVISED Attachment L-5

6. How well did/does the offeror design, develop, and fabricate hardware items? Consider interpretation of task/delivery order/contract objectives, identification of key technical issues, use of sound engineering practices, adequacy of proposed solutions, facilities for fabrication, responsiveness to rapid delivery requirements, and accomplishment of simultaneous multiple (5-25) tasks.

7. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate the ability to design and develop software items? Consider embedded systems, large scale distributed applications, modeling & simulation, user interfaces, real-time data acquisition systems, and data processing & display systems.

8. How well did/does the offeror demonstrate corporate expertise and capability for system/subsystem hardware integration, system hardware/software integration, and/or integration of subcontractor/vendor activities?

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In) REVISED Attachment L-5

9. What kind of on-site technical/transitional support, training, and operation did/does the offeror provide for systems delivered under this effort until systems were/are technically evaluated and transitioned to the

Government? Consider the offeror’s approach to defining and providing systems documentation and operator training.

10. Rate the level of Government intervention required to achieve the desired program success in the technical area.

11. How well did/does the offeror provide an appropriate management structure for the program, to include sufficient organizational emphasis, proper placement of the program manager within the organization, and management of functional areas?

12. How well did/does the offeror work with team members and/or manage subcontractors in order to successfully execute program objectives including the ability to successfully manage 5-25 tasks simultaneously?

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In) REVISED Attachment L-5

13. How well did/does the offeror develop and execute program management plans that resulted in the achievement of program cost, schedule, and performance goals?

14. How well did/does the offeror utilize Earned Value Management or a Cost/Schedule Control System to provide themselves and the Government insight into cost, technical, and schedule problems in a timely manner for corrective action?

15. How well did/does the offeror adhere to schedules? Explain if delays were government or contractor caused.

16. How well did/does the offeror provide a properly sized management and working staff with the proper expertise level to execute the program objectives?

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In) REVISED Attachment L-5

17. How well did/does the offeror perform technical risk assessment, and to what extent were original technical objectives met?

18. How well did/does the offeror manage its information and systems security program?

19. How well did/does the offeror respond to short suspenses or quick-reaction taskings (Delivery Order process from RFP Receipt-to-proposal in 10 days.)?

20. How well did/does the offeror establish/maintain the resources of people, materiel, and facilities required to meet contract requirements?

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In) REVISED Attachment L-5

21. Rate the level of Government intervention required to achieve the desired program success in the management area.

B. Cost Performance (Please circle the answer corresponding to your confidence rating.)

1. How well did/does the offeror adhere to cost estimates?

2. Were there cost overruns on individual delivery orders and/or contracts? If yes, explain whether cost overruns were Government or contractor caused.

3. Rate the level of Government intervention required to achieve the desired program success in the cost area.

(When Filled In)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

(When Filled In) REVISED Attachment L-5

V. General:

1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

1. Name of Evaluator:______________________________________________________________

2. Office Symbol/Location:__________________________________________________________

3. Phone (Commercial/DSN):_______________________________________________________

4. Position Title/Grade:_____________________________________________________________

5. Length of Time on Program/Contract:_______________________________________________

6. Date Questionnaire Completed:____________________________________________________