Atch_8_Relevancy_Assessment.pdf

RFP FA8533-16-R-0001

ATTACHMENT 8

Relevancy Assessment

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RELEVANCY TABLE

(Complete with each effort submitted for evaluation)

This table will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the BAT requirement.

The offeror shall enter information on each contract identified in its Past Performance Volume into the “Relevancy Table” as indicated below. Additional copies of this attachment may be produced for completion on contracts as necessary. Offeror shall only complete column two. Offeror’s answers are applicable only to the effort identified in paragraph B. above, not the offeror’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. * Use additional pages as needed to describe

RELEVANCY TABLE

This table is not all inclusive and offerors are encouraged to provide as much information as possible to enable the Government to correlate the submitted effort to one of the relevancy definitions.

Category

Contract/Effort_____________________

Circle all that apply

1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved

Design

Development

Production

Sustainment

Other: ______________

2. Product effort

Armament Test System (automatic or manual)

Armament /Avionics Core Tester Armament Test System (automatic or manual)

Armament/Avionics Test Program Sets (TPS)

3. Application

USAF - Fighter or Bomber

DoD - Fighter

Other Aircraft (e.g. Helicopter, UAV, etc.)

Other Platform Armament (e.g. Tank, Naval Vessels, etc.)

4. Primary Operational Environment

Organizational Level (O-Level)

Intermediate Level (I-Level)

Depot Level (D-Level)

5. Is the product on the master nuclear certification list?

Yes

No

N/A

6. Were technical manuals or engineering drawings or other supporting technical documentation required in the work/contract effort?

Technical Manuals

Engineering Drawings

7. Were software documentation or test requirements documents required in the

Software Documentation

Test Requirements Documents

8. Was testing involved in the

Reliability

Environmental

Cybersecurity

9. Contract Type(s)

CPIF

FFP

FPIF

10. Contract Length (months, years, etc.)

11. Quantities produced (per month or year)

12. Did the effort include familiarization/training on product

Yes

No

13. Is the effort similar to the BAT program encompassed in this effort?

Similar*

Not Similar

* Describe in detail what makes it similar

14. Program Complexity

Complex*

Non-Complex

*Describe in detail how the program effort is of a similar complexity.

14. Present status of program effort

Complete

Not Complete

* Explain present status

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY