Atch_7_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 67 KB Posted

Attached to
Bomber Armament Tester (BAT) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8533-16-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

About this file

Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Bomber Armament Tester (BAT), newest first.
File Type Posted
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_4_May_16.pdf PDF
DD_Form_2345 _Militarily_Critical_Technical_Data_Agreement.pdf PDF
AFGSC_Industry-Day_Brief-18Feb15.pdf PDF
Bomber_Armament_Tester_Bidder's_Library-Notice_to_Industry.pdf PDF
BAT_Pre-Proposal_Teleconference_Slides.pdf PDF
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_21_Apr_16.pdf PDF
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_19_Apr_16_(2).pdf PDF
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_18_Apr_16.pdf PDF
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_15_Apr_16.pdf PDF
Atch_19_CDRL_General_Notes.pdf PDF
DRAFT_BAT_Section_L.pdf PDF
Atch_6_Transmittal_Letter.pdf PDF
Atch_4_Client_Authorization_Letter.pdf PDF
Atch_26_AFMC_260.pdf PDF
Atch_16_Contract_Data_Requirements_List_B00U-B018.pdf PDF
Atch_18_Contract_Data_Requirements_List_C001-C008.pdf PDF
Atch_1_Cross_Reference_Martix.pdf PDF
Atch_22_SGFP_BAT_GFP_Form.pdf PDF
Atch_3_Past_Performance_Information_for_Offerors.pdf PDF
DRAFT_BAT_Section_M.pdf PDF
Atch_21_RGFP_BAT_GFP_Form.pdf PDF
Atch_15_Contract_Data_Requirements_List_A001-A00G.pdf PDF
Atch_11_Total_Resources_Volume_WBS_Breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_2_Electronic_Format_for_All_Proposal_Volumes.pdf PDF
Responses_to_Draft_RFP_Questions.pdf PDF
Atch_17_Contract_Data_Requirements_List_B001-B00T.pdf PDF
Atch_24_AFMC_807.pdf PDF
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_14_Apr_16.pdf PDF
Atch_14_Performance_Specification_Rev9.pdf PDF
Atch_5_Consent_Form.pdf PDF
Atch_20_TMCR_for_Bomber_Armament_Test_Set.pdf PDF
Atch_27_Form_158.pdf PDF
RFP_Incentive_Language.pdf PDF
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_22Mar16.pdf PDF
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_21Mar16.pdf PDF
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_17Mar16.pdf PDF
Contractor_Briefing_of_BAT_Incentives.pdf PDF
Contract_Data_Requirements_List_C_Portfolio.pdf PDF
Contract_Data_Requirements_List_A_Portfolio.pdf PDF
DRAFT_BAT_Performance_Specification _dated_8_Mar__16 _Rev_9.pdf PDF
DRAFT_BAT_Section_L_-_As_of_5_Feb_16.pdf PDF
DRAFT_BAT_Performance_Specification _dated_26_Jan_16 _Rev_8.pdf PDF
DRAFT_FA8533-16-R-0001.pdf PDF
DRAFT_BAT_Statement_of_Work dated_21_Jan_16 _Rev_5.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Responses_ao_Jan_4_16.pptx PPTX presentation
DRFP_BAT_CDRLs_26_Jan_16.pdf PDF
Bomber_Armament_Tester_Bidder's_Library-Notice_to_Industry.pdf PDF
DRAFT_BAT_APPENDIX_C_as_of_30_Oct_15.pdf PDF
Updated_BAT_NEWS_dated_5_Feb_16.pdf PDF
DRAFT_BAT_Section_M_-_As_of_5_Feb_16.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Bomber Armament Tester (BAT) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RFP FA8533-16-R-0001

ATTACHMENT 7

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Role in the Program/Work Performed As:

_____ Prime _____ Subcontractor _____ Vendor/Supplier

F. Was this a competitive contract?

_____Yes _____ No

G. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ___________________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): ____________________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable): ___________________

H. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

I. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

K. Description of service/product provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency name: __________________________________________________________ B. Address: _________________________________________________________________________ C. Customer or Agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

D. Using commands (AFMC, ACC, AFGSC, etc) for the service / product provided:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name/Role of Evaluator Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager, etc.)

B. Evaluator's title: ____________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number/email: ___________________________________________________

D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

E EXCEPTIONAL/BLUE - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

G VERY GOOD/PURPLE - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

S SATISFACTORY/GREEN - During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

M MARGINAL/YELLOW – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level;

performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY/RED – During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive customer oversight and involvement was required.

N NEUTRAL/WHITE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

NOTE: In Section 4, should your response be other than “satisfactory (S),” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” in Section 5 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.

Technical Performance E G S M U N

1. How well did the contractor’s final product meet the technical requirements of the specification and/or SOW?

2. How well were contractor’s systems engineering processes integrated to ensure timely completion of technical milestones such as SRR, PDR, CDR, DT&E, OT&E and production of the end product?

3. What was the overall quality of initial through final technical data deliveries such as Engineering Drawings, Tech Manuals as well as other key technical documents supporting the development, design, testing and production reviews and processes?

Schedule E G S M U N

1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

2. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems?

3. How did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts?

4. How effectively did the contractor overcome issues associated with Government Furnished Property, Government Furnished Equipment, and/or Government Furnished Information?

Schedule E G S M U N

5. How effective was the contractor at maintaining schedule requirements (including program milestones, and production requirements)?

Cost E G S M U N

1. How effectively was the contractor in managing cost?

2. How effective was the contractor in matching the intial cost estimate with the final price?

3. How effectively did the contractor manage any cost overruns or underuns?

4. Did the contractor deliver timely and accurate cost reporting?

5. Did the contractor deliver timely and accurate invoicing?

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

___ Yes ___ Default ___ Convenience ___ Pending Terminations ___ No If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?.

What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .