Attachment_6.docx

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FA8533-18-R-0003

ATTACHMENT 6

Trailer, Munitions Handling, MHU-110V2 and MHU-141V2

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(28 Nov 2018)

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:

Name/Signature and Role Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager):________________________________________________________ Agency or Business: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone No. _______________________________ FAX No. ____________________________________ Email _______________________________________

Return your completed questionnaire either electronically or by mail to:

Email to: erica.carter.3@us.af.mil, janeka.jones.1@us.af.mil and lenora.elliott@us.af.mil.

If mailing, mail directly to:

AFLCMC/WNKAA

ATTN: Erica Carter, Janeka Jones, and Lenora Elliott 235 Byron Street, STE 19A, BLDG 300 Robins AFB, GA 31098-1670

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

Part I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Contractor/Business: _____________________________________________ Contractor CAGE Code: __________

Program Title and Brief Description: _____________________________________________________________________________________

Role in the Program/Work Performed As: _____Prime _____Subcontractor _____Vendor/Supplier

Contract Number: ________________________________ Number of Years?: Basic:________ Option: _________

Contract Type(s): List all applicable contract types, i.e. Firm-Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, Cost, etc._________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Period of Performance:

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________

Contract Dollar Value:

3. Primary Causes of Changes for differences between initial contract cost and final contract cost: ______________________________________________________________________________________

NOTE: In Part III., should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” on page 4 of 5 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.

PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.

Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions:

N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory M=Marginal S=Satisfactory V=Very Good E=Exceptional

1. How well did the contractor meet performance requirements? (Identify any waivers/deviations that were required.)

E VG S M U N/A

REMARKS:

2. How well did the contractor perform against the delivery schedules of the contract (or IMP/IMS if prior to delivery)? In the remarks, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual delivery dates (or IMP/IMS if prior to delivery) and, if schedule slips occurred, state the number of slips and cumulative schedule variance.

E VG S M U N/A

REMARKS:

3. Did the contract contain Nuclear Certification requirements? If so, was the contractor successful in obtaining Nuclear Certification for the design and how well did the contractor interact with Program Office and the responsible Nuclear Weapon Center.

E VG S M U N/A

REMARKS:

4. How well did the contractor develop and execute test and evaluation efforts?

E VG S U M N/A

REMARKS:

5. How well did the contractor execute the technical data (i.e. Drawings, Tech Manual/Order, Provisioning) program to meet overall program schedules?

E VG S U M N/A

REMARKS:

6. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default (partially or completely)? If yes, explain. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

7. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

8. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

9. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

10. Additional Remarks.

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance.

FA8533-18-R-0003

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

E EXCEPTIONAL: During the contract period, performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD: During the contract period, performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY: During the contract period, performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL: During the contract period, performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY: During the contract period, performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.

NOTICE TO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENTS: Please do not include this page when returning the completed questionnaire.