Attach_5_L-2_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 25 AF DCGS IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA7037-15-R-0001
About this file
Attach 5 L-2 PPQ
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA7037-15-R-0001
Attachment L-2
Instructions for Sending Past Performance Questionnaire Forms
Offeror shall prepare and send a reference questionnaire package for each customer listed on the Previous Contracts List. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to follow-up and to encourage their references to send in their questionnaire. It is suggested that Offerors send their identified customer points of contact a Client Authorization letter requesting that past performance information be provided directly to the Contracting Officer. Each questionnaire package should contain the following.
· Client Authorization Letter Concerning Offeror Performance
· Past Performance Questionnaire Form
· Complete Part 1 (to be completed by firm requesting reference) of each Questionnaire before sending it to the individual who will be providing the reference
OFFEROR SHOULD DELETE THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE SENDING OUT QUESTIONNAIRES
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
SECTION 1: OFFEROR INFORMATION (completed by the Offeror requesting evaluation prior to mailing)
Offeror’s name and address:
Point of Contact:
Phone Number
Contract Number:
Project Title/Description of Work performed under this project:
| Contract Type |
| |_| Firm Fixed Price |
|_| Cost Reimbursement
Project Award Date:
Schedule Completion Date:
Current/Final Completion Date:
Project Award Amount:
Current/Final Project Amount:
| Contractor being evaluated performed as the |
| |_| Prime Contractor |
|_| Sub-contractor
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorized Official)
(Date)
SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (completed by Respondent)
The questionnaire may be filled out electronically or by hand and emailed to Ms. Yvonne Camarce at yvonne.camarce@us.af.mil. For questions, you may call Ms. Camarce at 210-977-2038 (DSN 969-2038).
EVALUATED BY:
(Signature)
(Date)
(Typed or Printed Name)
(Title)
(Phone Number Commercial/DSN)
SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 (or N/A) that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance or situation. For the “Customer Satisfaction” section only, please provide a narrative explanation for any ratings of 1, 2, and 5.
| (5) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified |
| (4) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified |
| (3) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (2) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (1) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N/A) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative |
1. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
(For this section, please provide a narrative explanation for any ratings of 1, 2, and 5)
| Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Customer would have no reservations in awarding another contract to the Contractor. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
2. QUALITY
| Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts (CDRLs) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
3. TIMELINESS
| Contractor adhered to/met established schedules to complete projects/tasks on time |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Contractor provided adhered to/timely cost/design proposals. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Contractor provided on-time CDRLs as required |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
4. RESPONSIVENESS
| Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed and maintained communication with the government to keep projects/tasks on schedule. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
5. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
(For this section, please provide a narrative explanation for any ratings of 1, 2, and 5)
| Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors and/or labor force |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Ability to meet minimum hire requirements for TS/SCI cleared personnel at start of contract |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Ability to retain experienced personnel with the required TS/SCI clearances in order to maintain continuity of critical positions to ensure contract performance |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Ability to retain experienced personnel with the required Counter Intelligence (CI) Polygraph in order to maintain continuity of critical positions to ensure contract performance |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Ability to minimize employee turnover/absences with personnel that meet requirements and clearance levels upon start of work. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
6. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| Contractor was timely and accurate in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
7. GENERAL
| Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain any specific issues in the Remarks section) |
| Yes |
| No |
8. SECURITY COMPLIANCE
| Ability to follow Government mandated security governances and guidance (explain any specific issues in the Remarks section) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| Ability to mitigate security incidents |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
SECTION 4: NARRATIVE SUMMARY:
1. What were the Contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract? (response is not limited to area provided)
2. What were the Contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract? (response is not limited to area provided)
3. Please provide any additional comment concerning the Contractor’s performance (response is not limited to area provided)
4. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Has or was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or is there any pending termination?
|_| Yes |_| No |_| Default |_| Convenience |_| Pending Termination
If yes, please explain.
5. Were there any performance issues regarding the Contractor’s work? If yes, please explain.
REMARKS:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .