J-7_PPQ_Updated_05202013.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 0002 to FA5215-13-R-7004 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5215-13-R-7004
About this file
J-7 PPQ for soliciation FA5215-13-R-7004
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
[Type text] [Type text] [Type text]
FA5215-13-R-7004 SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104 J-7 Attachment
FA5215-13-R-7004
J-7 ATTACHMENT
SECTION L ATTACHMENT
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________
B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________
C. Contract number: ______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________ B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________
B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________
Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE | PERFORMANCE RATING | |
| B | BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur. | |
| P | PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur. | |
| G | GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur. | |
| Y | YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. | |
| R | RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. | |
| N/A | NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know. |
| Technical Performance |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
T1 How did the contractor meet the employee minimum qualification requirements of the specification?
T2 How did the contractor implement current standard practices for accomplishing sorties required annually?
T3 How adequate/effective was the contractor’s training for pilots?
T4 How did the contractor provide employees with security clearances at TOP SECRET clearance level?
| Program Management |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?
P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?
P3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?
P4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?
P5. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?
P6. How did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts?
P7. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)?
P8. How effective was the contractor’s acquisition management?
P9. Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors?
P10. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?
| Transition/phase-in |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
T1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?
T2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?
| Employee Retention/Attraction |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?
E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?
E3. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?
| Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
S1. To what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?
S2. How effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
| Yes___ | Default___ | Convenience___ | Pending Terminations___ |
| No ___ |
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
| OVERALL RATING |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
Based on the above, what is your overall assessment of the contractor’s past performance? And why (please provide below)?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s overall performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
647th Contracting Squadron Attn: Tami Branham, Contract Specialist
647CONS/LGCZ
90 G Street
JBPH-H, HI 96853-5230
or Email: Tami Branham, tami.branham@us.af.mil
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .