Industry Day Briefing - 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS FINAL.pptx
PPTX presentation 659 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AFCENT Global Prepositioned Materiel Services (GPMS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA489022R0051
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
9AF(AFCENT) Global Prepositioned Materiel Services (GPMS) Contract Industry Day 19-20 Oct 2022
This Briefing is:
UNCLASSIFIED
Headquarters Air Combat Command
Welcome Mr. Steve Peters GPMS Portfolio Manager
ACC AMIC/PMCS
Agenda Topics of Discussions Rules of Engagement Project Overview Ms. Maleah Wegscheider Program Manager
Agenda 0900 – 1030 Briefing 1030 – 1045 Break Attendees submit written (email) questions for discussion panel 1045 – 1130 Discussion Panel 1130 – 1300 Lunch Break 1300 – 1545, 0800 – 1600 on 19/20 Oct 2022 Industry Attendee(s) and Government One-on-Ones 30-minute time slots
Topics of Discussion Rules of Engagement Administration Communications with the Government Project Overview Program Overview Acquisition Strategy/Solicitation Overview Open Forum Discussion Panel One-on-One Sessions
Administration Virtual Attendance All participants must be identified to the Government via email Main Session: No more than 2 logins per company One-on-Ones: No more than 4 logins per company There is no limit to the participation per login for either session Industry/Attendee Folders (emailed) Agenda Briefing Official Industry Day Question Sheets (Open Forum & One-On-One Session) Government Questions for Industry Day Industry Day Surveys (Open Forum & One-On-One Session) Reference Documents Latest Draft PWS
Project Team Program Manager (PM) Contracting Officer (CO) Contracting Manager (CM) Quality Assurance Manager (QAM) Ms. Maleah Wegscheider, AMIC/PMCS Ms. Anissa Ross, AMIC/PKFC Ms. Veronica Boston, AMIC/PKFC Mr. Art Silver, AMIC/DRQM
AMIC Functional Team
9AF(AFCENT) Customer Representative Mr. Raymond Hasenhager, AMIC/PLGT MSgt Christopher Leon, AMIC/PLGS Mr. Mike Miller, AMIC/PCEC MSgt Joseph Inman, AMIC/PCYM TSgt Arthur Cortez, AMIC/PCYM Mr. Jerry Molina, AFCENT/A4RX Ms. Colleen Dudley, AMIC/PKS
Mr. Pierre “Chip” Dallaire, 9AF(AFCENT)/A4XR
| Legal Advisor | Mr. David Dusseau, AMIC/DRJ |
| AFICC/KC Monitor | Mr. Ryan Palmer, AFICC/KC |
| AMIC Small Business Professional | Ms. Lorie Henderson, AMIC/PKS |
| AFPEO/CM Action Officer | Maj Kevin Whitt, SAF/AQ (AFPEO/CM) |
Communications with the Government Industry Day Questions:
Submit panel discussion questions by email Subject line must begin “Panel Questions, [Company]:”
Submit one-on-one questions by email Subject line must begin “One-on-One Question, [Company]:”
Contractor questions as a result of panel discussions or one-on-ones, not submitted by email, are preliminary/interim and must be submitted to the Contracting Officer (CO) by email for staffing and “official” Government response. All Government responses during Industry Day are not considered official until posted on SAM.gov Proprietary Information:
Clearly identify to the Government any information you deem proprietary
The Government will consolidate all email questions received and post the “official” answers to SAM.gov Proprietary question responses will be provided directly to the company
All communications from potential offerors shall be sent to Veronica.Boston.2@us.af.mil & Anissa.Ross.2@us.af.mil After the final solicitation is released/posted, communications are limited to the Contracting Officer Communications with the Government (cont)
AMIC Overview Background AMIC provides strategic facilitation, integrated program and contract management for complex service acquisitions (>$100M), and specialized contracting support
Support Department of Homeland Security, OSD Counterdrug agencies, Host Nations, Unified Commands, MAJCOMs, and ACC Directorates, Tenants and Wings
Manage 14 complex service acquisition programs
Contract portfolio exceeds $20B
AMIC Overview Integrated Culture SPO Type / Acquisition Center of Excellence organization Dedicated Program Managers, Contracting Officers and Quality Assurance Functional support within organization (i.e., Comm/Electronics, Logistics, Civil Engineering, Finance, etc.)
Report to single Director Maintain philosophy of partnering with contractors to create business-like environment conducive to meeting the mission
AMIC Director
(SES)
AMIC Organizational Chart
PK (NH-04/GS-15)
Deputy Director, Contracting Det 1 North Warning Sys Ottawa, Canada
PM (NH-04/GS-15)
Deputy Director Program Management
DD (O-6)
Deputy Director
PCY
Cyber Support Division
PMS
Multi-Domain Ops Division
PMT
CN>
Division
PMA
Aircraft MX Division
PCE
Civil Engineer Division
PMC
AFCENT Support Division
PLG
Logistics Division
DRQ
Quality Assurance Division SEM (SMSgt) Sr Enlisted Manager
DRE
Executive Assistant
PKC
Contracting Division
PKF
Contracting Division
PKA
Contracting Division
PKB
Contracting Division
PKD
Contracting Division
PKS
Contracting Division
DRR
Resource Mgt Division
DRJ
Legal Division
DSS
Director’s Support Staff
DRA
Acquisition Support Division
JWAC
Contracting Division Det 2, JBSA Contracting Spt Det 2 OL A Patrick Det 2 OL C Tinker
| AUTH | ASSIGN | |
| OFFICER: | 17 | 16 |
| ENLISTED: | 114 | 114 |
| CIVILIAN: | 341 | 297 |
| CONTRACTOR: | 20 | 18 |
TOTAL: 492 445
Joint Tasks Review PWS Develop Acquisition Strategy Develop Request for Proposal (RFP) Evaluate Proposals
Acquisition Team Roles & Responsibilities Contractor Contracting Officer Post Requirements to SAM.gov Primary Interface to Industry Program Manager Interface to Customer Develops Program Requirements Functional Support
PSC, PLG, PCE, DRQ
Contract Manager
Project Environment Acquisition falls under the Air Force Program Executive Officer for Combat and Mission Support (AFPEO/CM) portfolio and remains within the authority of AFPEO/CM ACC/CD: Lt Gen Russel Mack Services Advocate (SA) Requirement Approval Authority (RAA) AFPEO/CM: Ms. Nancy Andrews, SES Services Designated Official (SDO) Source Selection Authority (SSA) Acquisition Approval Authority AFICC/KC: Col Aaron Boyd Clearance Authority
Project Milestones
| Milestones | Date |
| Post Draft Performance Work Statement & Appendices | 21 Sep 22 |
| Small Business Capabilities Request | 21 Sep 22 |
| Industry Day / One-on-Ones | 19-20 Oct 22 |
| Release Draft Solicitation | 9 Dec 22 |
| Industry Site Visits (Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, UAE) | 5 - 18 Feb 23 |
| Final Solicitation Issued | 9 May 23 |
| Pre-Proposal Conference | 24 May 23 |
| Proposals Due (~60 days allotted for preparation) | 14 Jul 23 |
| Source Selection (9 months allotted) | 17 Jul 23 – 17 Apr 24 |
| Contract Award | 26 Apr 24 |
| Transition (~120 days allotted) | 1 Jun – 30 Sep 24 |
| Performance Start | 1 Oct 24 |
Program Overview
Ms. Maleah Wegscheider Program Manager
Program Overview Mission Sites/Locations Contract Scope of Work Performance Work Statement (PWS) Award Fee Approach Risks
Mission Provide support for both War Reserve Materiel (WRM) and non-WRM (e.g. MRAP) assets in the AFCENT Area of Responsibility (AOR): GPMS/WRM asset storage, accountability, maintenance, outload, reconstitution, exercise support and contingency logistics support. Munitions storage, management and outload at specified locations.
Infrastructure Support: Maintenance and Repair (M&R) and minor construction of Government-Furnished Facilities (GFF) at specified locations. Maintain and repair Government-Furnished Property (GFP).
Warm Base/Lodging Support: Maintenance and Repair (M&R) of warm base facilities at specified locations and lodging facilities for Government personnel Temporary Duty (TDY) to select location. Support for USNAVCENT munitions at specified locations and deployed personnel & In-Flight Emergency (IFE) diverted personnel at Masirah.
Sites/Locations 9AF(AFCENT) Headquarters, Shaw AFB, SC 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS/WRM Storage Locations:
Al Udeid AB*, Qatar BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE, Munitions, FSE Al Dhafra AB**, UAE BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE, Munitions, FSE Abu Dhabi Warehouses***, UAE BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE, FSE, Medical Al Jaber AB**, Kuwait BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE RAFO Thumrait AB*, Oman BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE, Munitions, FSE, Medical RAFO Masirah AB*, Oman BEAR, Vehicles, AGE Salalah Port***, Oman BEAR staging
* Denotes GFF/Facilities mnx req’d ** Denotes GFF/Facilities mnx not req’d *** Denotes Contractor-Leased Facilities
9AF(AFCENT)
Shaw AFB
AJAB
Masirah
ADAB/ADWH
Thumrait Salalah Port
AUAB
Contract Scope of Work Program Management: Exercise management and control for performance requirements contained in PWS Comply with work, services, operations, safety, security, environmental, and technical order requirements Provide management, personnel, materials, supervision, and other items necessary to perform services Operations & Maintenance (O&M): Perform O&M for GPMS/WRM assets, GFE/GFP and vehicles.
Mission Support: Support includes, but not limited to, materiel management, transportation management, information management and security.
Contingency Logistics Support: Outload/reconstitution Exercise Support: Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and coalition exercises Infrastructure Support: Perform facilities management and maintenance of all Government-Furnished Facilities (GFF)/Real Property Installed Equipment (RPIE)/Real Property Similar Equipment (RPSE).
PWS Overview
Program Management Contractor PM: Responsible for performance of all work and the single interface between Govt and Contractor personnel Management/Operational Control: Contractor retains full responsibility for performance of requirements set forth in the PWS Human Resources: Provide fully trained/qualified workforce to sustain GPMS/WRM, GFE/GFP and GFF from Day 1 Integrate Contracted Operations: Ensure Shaw AFB operations and processes are standardized/integrated with 9AF(AFCENT)/A4 staff functions Contract Administration: Provide all data and information including Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) deliverables, operating instructions, and records as required Quality Management System (QMS): Provide a QMS that is ISO 9001 compliant Financial Management and Reporting: Develop and submit financial management report according to CDRL Technical Orders and Publications: Adhere to all publications and instructions as coded mandatory without deviation
Operations and Maintenance:
GPMS assets: Manage, maintain, troubleshoot and repair stored GPMS assets in serviceable condition at serviceability rates prescribed in the PWS and appendices.
Periodic Maintenance Inspections (PMIs) Periodic Inspections (PIs) Unscheduled/corrective maintenance Acceptance/receipt inspections; Limited Technical Inspections (LTIs) Government-furnished assets: Manage, operate, maintain, troubleshoot, and repair all Government-provided assets to support the overall GPMS/WRM mission.
Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE) Government-Furnished Property (GFP) Contractor-Furnished Vehicles (CFV) Contractor will provide mission support CFV (FFP CLIN) Contractor will provide transportation to/from living quarters/work sites for their own Contractor (ktr) personnel
(continued)
(continued) Mission Support:
Materiel Management Maintain accountability/inventory of all GPMS assets and Government-furnished assets Transportation Management Outloads/deployments including airlift, linehaul, surface movements Freight/traffic management Air Transportation Services Provide Aerial Port services at specified location(s) Ground Fuel Container Management Contractor Personnel lodging and feeding Lodging of ktr personnel in either GFF or contract acquired lodging Feeding of ktr personnel (contractor-determined) Information Technology (IT) Management Operate/maintain Government-furnished IT equipment Client Support Administrator (CSA); Systems/Network Administration
(continued) Contingency Logistics Support: Prepare, outload, transfer, receive, reconstitute GPMS/WRM assets in support of contingency operations when tasked.
Maintain capability to transition from baseline support to contingency support Respond to Logistics Readiness Center (LRC) Taskers Ensure ability to meet potential outload volume/timelines Ensure capability for surface (linehaul & sealift) and air outload Timely reconstitution of assets Deployable Teams (when directed) Exercise Support: Prepare, outload, set up/tear down, and reconstitute GPMS/WRM in support of bilateral, multi-lateral and coalition exercises.
Deployable Teams (when directed)
(continued) Infrastructure Support:
Comprehensive facility maintenance (preventive) and repair (corrective) of Government-furnished facilities Real Property (RP) Real Property Installed Equipment (RPIE) Real Property Similar Equipment (RPSE) Configuration Control/Management BUILDER® Sustainment Management System (SMS) RPIE Life Cycle Maintenance/Management/Replacement Custodial/Refuse Collection and Disposal Pest Control/Grounds Maintenance Interim Warm Base Management CE Projects/Design/Construction Services Maintenance & Repair (M&R), Minor Construction (MC) Engineering Services Life-cycle information technology systems management
Services Summary Services Summary (SS): Identifies critical factors for the successful performance of requirements Purpose: Lists performance objectives for required service Components: States performance objective, standard, and threshold for each critical success factor (accept/reject point)
Program Management Operations & Maintenance Mission Support Contingency Logistics Support & Exercises Facilities Maintenance
(SS continued)
| PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE | PERFORMANCE STANDARD | PERFORMANCE THRESHOLD | |
| 1. | PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | ||
| A. Personnel: | |||
| 1.A.1 | PWS Section A, Para 2.2.1.1., Para 2.2.10.2.,and Appendix N | Maintain and staff a qualified and motivated workforce | No vacancies in key positions greater than 90 days unless waived by the Government |
| 1.A.2 | PWS Section A, Para 2.2.1.1., Para 2.2.10.2., Appendix M and Appendix N | Ensure personnel are qualified as specified in the contract (i.e. such as but not limited to, experience, education, and language requirements) | No major non-conformances allowed. |
| B. Data Management | |||
| 1.B. | PWS Section A, Para 4.6.1. | Provide accurate and current (within |
24 hours of occurrence) data within the Computer Aided-DMS
| No major nonconformances allowed. Performance is acceptable when the data specified in the PWS is available on the DMS, is technically accurate (excluding minor errors such as spelling, grammatical, and punctuation) and is updated within 24-hours unless otherwise noted in the CDRL or PWS. | ||
| C. Quality Management System (QMS): | ||
| 1.C. | Implement, maintain, and comply with a comprehensive QMS |
PWS Section A, Para 2.1., 8.1-2. and Appendix D (Quality Management System) IAW ANSI/ISO/ASQ Most Current Version of 9001 QMS requirements and PWS No major nonconformance is allowed. If a Major nonconformance is discovered the QMS will be considered non-compliant. A major nonconformance adversely effects mission, safety of personnel and equipment, schedule, cost, and increases risk to the government such as non-provision of resources, poor quality resources, and recurring defects.
(SS continued)
| PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE | PERFORMANCE STANDARD | PERFORMANCE THRESHOLD | |
| 2. | OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE | ||
| Maintain all GPMS/WRM to meet or exceed established standards. | |||
| 2.A. | Appendix G (Level of Effort) | A. Establish and maintain a PMI schedule IAW the PWS | All PMIs conducted within the month due unless there is a documented deferral/waiver. |
| 2.B. | Appendix G (Level of Effort) | B. Achieve established semi-annual reconstitution goals. | All semi-annual reconstitution goals (Appendix G) met within required timeframes unless deferral is approved by the Government. |
| 2.C. | Appendix G (Level of Effort) | C. Achieve established storage serviceability standards. | All storage serviceability goals (Appendix G) met within required timeframes unless deferral is approved by the Government. |
| 3. | MISSION SUPPORT | ||
| A. Materiel Management | |||
| 3.A.1. | PWS Section A, Para 4.1.7. | 1. GFE/P Inventory | No major non-conformances allowed. |
| 3.A.2. | PWS Section A, Para 4.1.7.3., 4.1.7.4.1., 4.1.7.8., 4.1.7.16.1., 4.1.9.1., 4.1.9.5., 4.1.9.10. | 2. Health of Supply Account | No major non-conformances allowed. |
| 3.B. | PWS Section A, Para 4.2. and Para 5.4. | B. Packaging, Storage, Handling and Shipping: Properly handle, store, package, preserve, and deliver freight and materials to include certification and packaging of HAZMAT. | No major non-conformances allowed; no delays on any shipment due to contractor documentation error(s). |
(SS continued)
| PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE | PERFORMANCE STANDARD | PERFORMANCE THRESHOLD | |
| 4. | CONTINGENCY LOGISTICS SUPPORT & EXERCISES | ||
| A. Logistics Readiness Center (LRC) Taskers | |||
| 4.A. | PWS Section A, Para 5.4. | Execute contingency/exercise outload taskers as directed by the Govt. | No major non-conformances allowed. |
| 5. | FACILITIES MAINTENANCE | ||
| A. Infrastructure: | |||
| 5.A.. | PWS Para 6.0. and Appendix J | Maintain facilities IAW PWS. | No major non-conformances allowed. |
Award Fee Approach Proposed Award Fee Plan:
Award Fee Plan (Subjective) - $1M (fixed) pool per 6-month period Technical Performance (40-60 pts., depending on SIIs) Storage, Maintenance & Production (50%) Materiel Management & Traffic Management (50%) Management Performance (40 pts.)
Cost Management (50%) Communications (25%) Organizational Management (25%) Special Interest Items (SII) (up to 20 pts.)
Multiple SIIs allowed, not to exceed 20 pts. total Unused portion of SIIs reverts to Technical Performance Positive Significant Incident (PSI)/Negative Significant Incident (NSI) may increase/decrease earned award fee Award fee not awarded does not carry forward to next period
Program Risks Management Plan/qualified workforce Omanization impacts (35% quota for LNs in Oman) Quality Management System Proactive vs. Reactive QMS Abu Dhabi Warehouse (ADWH) Lease Contractor-Leased Facility Lease began 2014; GFP installed throughout facilities 9AF(AFCENT) working U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Attempting to bring under a Government lease and provided to awardee as GFF Outload Capability Lead-time for ADWH outload to ADAB a challenge
NOTE: Not all inclusive – all listed are considered High risk items
Management Plan.
If the contractor does not submit and implement an efficient and effective management plan that fully recognizes the critical need of providing qualified, key, and essential personnel, identifies management's control and efficient use of resources in the delivery of all services, and ensures that all requirements of the contract are accomplished on schedule and are consistent with contractual standards of performance then the contractor's ability to execute the GPMS program/overall mission may be impeded/cause severe mission degradation.
Particular focus on mitigating issues associated with Omanization quotas Control.
Contractor required to provide an acceptable comprehensive management plan detailing management approach; human resources plan to attract, train, and retain qualified management and technical personnel. The plan includes work force manning levels by functional level and skill mix. The approach will be evaluated during source selection.
| Quality Management System. | |
| If the contractor does not develop and implement an effective QMS, then ineffective contract management, poor performance, and degraded mission success rates will result, thereby increasing government surveillance, manpower requirements and costs. | Control. |
Contract requires ISO compliance with qualified QC Manager on staff. Government COR will perform audits on QMS implementation. In the field, government CORs will perform intense surveillance at the start of contract to ensure effective QMS. The approach will be evaluated during source selection.
Risk Event Risk Strategy
| Abu Dhabi Warehouse Lease. | |
| If the warehouse is not picked up as a government lease by the USACE and provided to the contractor as Government-furnished facilities then the contractor may not be able to secure these same facilities or may incur additional costs to secure the leases. | Control. |
Working with USACE for Government lease. Contractors will be required to propose for the capability of the existing facility and mitigation of movement of GPMS/WRM assets to another location.
| Outload. | |
| If the Contractor does not have the capability to correctly outload all assets, in serviceable condition, on multiple modes, to multiple destinations, while providing the Government complete visibility over DoD and non-DoD transportation modes, and in the timelines given then assets will not arrive in a manner to support the warfighter, resulting in mission failure. | Control. |
Ensure contractor has a sound understanding of contingency outload procedures by all modes of transportation including (but not limited to) commercial linehaul/sealift and military airlift/sealift. Ensure a robust capability to transition from baseline GPMS/WRM maintenance and support activity to contingency outload operations supporting major outload requirements.
Risk Event Risk Strategy
Acquisition Strategy / Solicitation Overview Ms. Anissa Ross Contracting Officer
ACC AMIC/ PKFC
Key Contractual Aspects Contract Type/Period of Performance Source Selection Methodology Evaluation Factors and Subfactors Source Selection Process Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) Posting Site Visit/Pre-Proposal Conference Points of Contact One-On-One Information
Contracting Overview
Key Contractual Aspects Solicitation Number: FA4890-22-R-0051
NAICS Code: 561210 – Facilities Support Services (Small Business Administration (SBA) Size Standard is $41.5 million)
Government Furnished Facilities (GFF): Appendix J
Government Furnished Property (GFP) & Government Furnished Equipment (GFE): Appendix K
Anticipate non-commercial acquisition (FAR Part 15) Small Business Set Aside Determination not yet established Market Research Questionnaire posted to www.SAM.gov If Full & Open competition, Small Business Subcontracting goal will be considered Subcontracting plans required for Large Businesses IAW FAR Part 19 – Small Business Programs
Key Contractual Aspects (continued)
Contract Type
The Acquisition Strategy has not been approved. The Government is anticipating a Single Award hybrid contract with Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Cost Reimbursable (CR) and a fixed Award Fee Pool
Period of Performance Contract: 8-mos Base Period plus 6 Option Years
| Transition: | 1 Jun 24 – 30 Sep 24 (4 mos) |
| Base Period: | 1 Oct 24 – 31 May 25 (8 mos) |
| Option Year 1: | 1 Jun 25 – 31 May 26 |
| Option Year 2: | 1 Jun 26 – 31 May 27 |
| Option Year 3: | 1 Jun 27 – 31 May 28 |
| Option Year 4: | 1 Jun 28 – 31 May 29 |
| Option Year 5: | 1 Jun 29 – 31 May 30 |
| Option Year 6: | 1 Jun 30 – 31 May 31 |
6-mos Optional Extension: 1 Jun 31 – 30 Nov 31
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
Read and evaluate Offerors’ proposals Document eval findings Reach Consensus Finalize ENs Evaluate EN responses Document eval. findings Prepare follow-up ENs, if required
Establish initial ratings Competitive Range or Award w/o Discussions Adjust ratings/ Competitive Range based on EN responses
** IEB **
Award w/o Discussions or Release ENs upon SSA approval;
Discussions Started Receive Contract Clearance ** Pre-FPRB** Issue Request for FPRs upon SSA approval Discussions Closed Receive & evaluate FPRs from offerors Document FPR Findings Formulate award recommendation Establish final ratings Finalize PAR/SSDD Award recommendation Receive Clearance
** SSDB**
SSA makes Award decision PAR/SSDD signed Award
INITIAL
EVALUATION
INTERIM
EVALUATION
FINAL
EVALUATION
Source Selection Evaluation Phases
Source Selection Methodology Best Value Tradeoff IAW DoD Source Selection Procedures dated 20 August 2022 and AFFARS 5315.3 Anticipate Technical Approach is most important, and when combined with Past Performance, is significantly more important than Price Factor 1 – Technical Subfactor Ratings: Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable Factor 2 – Past Performance Minimum 2 maximum 5 (within 3 years of solicitation date)/relevant contracts Ratings: Relevancy & Confidence Ratings Factor 3 – Price Complete, Balanced, Fair and Reasonable
Technical Evaluation (Volume 1) Factor 1: Technical Subfactors – TBD Separate Technical/Risk Ratings Strengths, Significant Strengths, Weaknesses, Significant Weaknesses, Deficiencies Technical Assessment Finding Definitions Meets: Explanation of how the proposal meets the requirement Strength: An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance Significant Strength: An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal with appreciable merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the Government during contract performance.
Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance Significant Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level
Evaluation Methodology (cont.)
Technical Ratings
| Color Rating | Adjectival Rating | Description |
| Blue | Outstanding | Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements, contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength. |
| Purple | Good | Proposal demonstrates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength. |
| Green | Acceptable | Proposal demonstrates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. |
| Yellow | Marginal | Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. |
| Red | Unacceptable | Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is un-awardable. |
Technical Risk Ratings
| Adjectival Rating | Description |
| Low | Proposal may contain weakness/weaknesses which have low potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. Normal contractor emphasis and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties. |
| Moderate | Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may have a moderate potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties. |
| High | Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to have high potential to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will unlikely be able to overcome any difficulties. |
| Unacceptable | Proposal contains a deficiency or a combination of significant weaknesses that causes an unacceptable level of risk of unsuccessful performance. |
Past Performance Offerors authorized to submit references on themselves, joint venture/teaming partners, and subcontractors (Total possible: a maximum of five (5) references) References (aka Past Performance Information (PPI)) are used to evaluate past performance PPI may be obtained through one or more of the following:
Review recent Contract Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs) related to the effort Review Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) information Conduct telephone interviews Offeror given opportunity to respond to any adverse ratings Three components of evaluation Recency Relevancy Quality
Past Performance (Volume 2) Factor 2: Past Performance Recency A minimum of 12-months Performance within the past 3 years Relevancy See table at slide 48 Performance Confidence Assessment Rating Method See table at slide 49 A “Satisfactory Confidence” rating is significantly more valuable than a “Neutral Confidence” or “Limited Confidence” rating A “Substantial Confidence” rating is only slightly more valuable than a “Satisfactory Confidence” rating All Offerors rated as “Satisfactory Confidence” will be considered equal for the Past Performance Factor for trade off purposes
| Adjectival Rating | Description | |
| Very Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. | |
| Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. | |
| Somewhat | ||
| Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. | |
| Not Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
Past Performance - Relevancy
| Rating | Description | |
| Substantial | ||
| Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the |
Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
| Satisfactory | |
| Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the |
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
| Neutral | |
| Confidence | No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
| Limited | |
| Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the |
Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
| No | |
| Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the |
Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Past Performance – Confidence Ratings
Cost/Price (Volume 3) Factor 3: Cost/Price There is an expectation of competition – Offeror’s price proposal shall represent the Offeror’s best effort to respond to the solicitation The price of each offeror will be evaluated on the total, overall evaluated price, which consists of the total proposed price (FP and CR CLINS) of the transition period, base contract period, optional CLINs, and all optional contract periods (to include a six-month extension of services IAW FAR 52.217-8; using 50% of the last option year’s pricing) Price will be evaluated using FAR 15.404-1 to ensure Government receives a fair, reasonable, realistic, and balanced price Price reasonableness will be determined based on a comparison of offerors’ total overall evaluated price In addition to the analyses as described in FAR 15.404-1(b), proposals will be analyzed to identify any potential unbalanced pricing (See FAR 15.404-1(g)
Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) Draft RFP tentatively scheduled to be posted to SAM.gov on 9 Dec 2022 Industry review and input is highly encouraged Government will post responses to questions to SAM without publicizing the originating source(s) Formal communications should be with the Contracting Officer only – please do not contact the requirement owner The next Q&A period will be after draft RFP release
Site Visit / Pre-Proposal Conference Formal site visit before release of final RFP Tentatively scheduled for Feb 23; will be posted to www.SAM.gov Location(s): Six (6) Storage and Maintenance sites located at Al Udeid, Qatar; Abu Dhabi, UAE; Sultanate of Oman and Al Jaber, Kuwait Information needed prior to site visit Name of attendees (no more than 2 per offeror/joint venture/partnership) Company Name Job Title Photo Identification Cell number, business and/or personal (24/7) Email, business and/or personal (24/7) Pre-Proposal Conference Scheduled for 24 May 2023 Format TBD (Virtual vs. In-person)
Points of Contact / References
ACC AMIC/PKF
Ms. Anissa Ross, Contracting Officer – (757) 225-6188 Ms. Veronica Boston, Contract Manager – (757) 764-6635
Submit questions/comments:
Anissa.Ross.2@us.af.mil Veronica.Boston.2@us.af.mil
Internet Links:
www.SAM.gov (Reference No. FA4890-22-R-0051)
One-on-One Information Location 19 Oct 22, 1300-1545; Virtual 20 Oct 22, 0800-1600; Virtual
Questions/recommendations from industry are encouraged Verbal dialog between Government and industry, both during today’s open forum & one-on-one appointments, is unofficial Official responses to questions requires industry’s submission of questions to the Government on question template provided on SAM.gov
The government will post official responses to all Industry Day questions on SAM.gov; however, the originating source(s) will not be published Proprietary information will not be published
Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) Draft RFP tentatively scheduled to be posted to www.SAM.gov in Dec 2022 timeframe Industry review and input is encouraged Government will post responses to questions to www.SAM.gov without publicizing the originating source(s)
Break
TURN IN ALL WRITTEN QUESTIONS
Discussion Panel
Closing Remarks
TURN IN ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS AND SURVEYS
image2.png image3.png image4.jpeg image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .