Industry Day Briefing - 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS FINAL.pptx

PPTX presentation 659 KB Posted

Attached to
AFCENT Global Prepositioned Materiel Services (GPMS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA489022R0051
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to AFCENT Global Prepositioned Materiel Services (GPMS), newest first.
File Type Posted
GOV RSP - FA489022R0051 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS RFP SITE VISIT QUESTION (13Apr23).pdf PDF
FA489022R0051 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS DRAFT RFP SITE VISIT QUESTION TEMPLATE.docx DOCX document
Appendix A - Definitions Abbreviations and Acronyms (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
Sect L - Instructions to Offerors (DRAFT).pdf PDF
Sect L Atch 4 GPMS AFCENT Pricing Template (Draft RFP).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA489022R0051 DRAFT RFP.pdf PDF
Appendix M - Qualifications Experience Certifications (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
Sect M - Evaluation Criteria (DRAFT).pdf PDF
App B Atch 3.1-1 Deliverables Matrix (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
App F Atch 1 Sample AFRB Master Scoresheet (Draft RFP).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix F - Award Fee Plan (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
Appendix G - Level of Effort (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
Appendix O - WRM Authorizations (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
Appendix K - Government Furnished Property (GFP) (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
FA489022R0051 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS Draft RFP Feedback Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
App C Atch 1 Pubs and Forms (Draft RFP).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
9AF(AFCENT) GPMS Performance Work Statement (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
Appendix B - Deliverables (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
Appendix D - Quality Management Systems (QMS) (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
Appendix J - Government-Furnished Facilities (GFF) (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
Appendix C - Pubs and Forms (Draft RFP).pdf PDF
FA4890-22-R-0051 Notification of 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS Industry Site Visits - 5-18 Feb 2023.pdf PDF
FA489022R0051 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS Industry Day Questions FINAL - 15Nov22.pdf PDF
Atch 2 - FA489022R0051 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS Industry Day Question Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA489022R0051 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS Industry Day.pdf PDF
Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

9AF(AFCENT) Global Prepositioned Materiel Services (GPMS) Contract Industry Day 19-20 Oct 2022

This Briefing is:

UNCLASSIFIED

Headquarters Air Combat Command

Welcome Mr. Steve Peters GPMS Portfolio Manager

ACC AMIC/PMCS

Agenda Topics of Discussions Rules of Engagement Project Overview Ms. Maleah Wegscheider Program Manager

Agenda 0900 – 1030 Briefing 1030 – 1045 Break Attendees submit written (email) questions for discussion panel 1045 – 1130 Discussion Panel 1130 – 1300 Lunch Break 1300 – 1545, 0800 – 1600 on 19/20 Oct 2022 Industry Attendee(s) and Government One-on-Ones 30-minute time slots

Topics of Discussion Rules of Engagement Administration Communications with the Government Project Overview Program Overview Acquisition Strategy/Solicitation Overview Open Forum Discussion Panel One-on-One Sessions

Administration Virtual Attendance All participants must be identified to the Government via email Main Session: No more than 2 logins per company One-on-Ones: No more than 4 logins per company There is no limit to the participation per login for either session Industry/Attendee Folders (emailed) Agenda Briefing Official Industry Day Question Sheets (Open Forum & One-On-One Session) Government Questions for Industry Day Industry Day Surveys (Open Forum & One-On-One Session) Reference Documents Latest Draft PWS

Project Team Program Manager (PM) Contracting Officer (CO) Contracting Manager (CM) Quality Assurance Manager (QAM) Ms. Maleah Wegscheider, AMIC/PMCS Ms. Anissa Ross, AMIC/PKFC Ms. Veronica Boston, AMIC/PKFC Mr. Art Silver, AMIC/DRQM

AMIC Functional Team

9AF(AFCENT) Customer Representative Mr. Raymond Hasenhager, AMIC/PLGT MSgt Christopher Leon, AMIC/PLGS Mr. Mike Miller, AMIC/PCEC MSgt Joseph Inman, AMIC/PCYM TSgt Arthur Cortez, AMIC/PCYM Mr. Jerry Molina, AFCENT/A4RX Ms. Colleen Dudley, AMIC/PKS

Mr. Pierre “Chip” Dallaire, 9AF(AFCENT)/A4XR

Legal AdvisorMr. David Dusseau, AMIC/DRJ
AFICC/KC MonitorMr. Ryan Palmer, AFICC/KC
AMIC Small Business ProfessionalMs. Lorie Henderson, AMIC/PKS
AFPEO/CM Action OfficerMaj Kevin Whitt, SAF/AQ (AFPEO/CM)

Communications with the Government Industry Day Questions:

Submit panel discussion questions by email Subject line must begin “Panel Questions, [Company]:”

Submit one-on-one questions by email Subject line must begin “One-on-One Question, [Company]:”

Contractor questions as a result of panel discussions or one-on-ones, not submitted by email, are preliminary/interim and must be submitted to the Contracting Officer (CO) by email for staffing and “official” Government response. All Government responses during Industry Day are not considered official until posted on SAM.gov Proprietary Information:

Clearly identify to the Government any information you deem proprietary

The Government will consolidate all email questions received and post the “official” answers to SAM.gov Proprietary question responses will be provided directly to the company

All communications from potential offerors shall be sent to Veronica.Boston.2@us.af.mil & Anissa.Ross.2@us.af.mil After the final solicitation is released/posted, communications are limited to the Contracting Officer Communications with the Government (cont)

AMIC Overview Background AMIC provides strategic facilitation, integrated program and contract management for complex service acquisitions (>$100M), and specialized contracting support

Support Department of Homeland Security, OSD Counterdrug agencies, Host Nations, Unified Commands, MAJCOMs, and ACC Directorates, Tenants and Wings

Manage 14 complex service acquisition programs

Contract portfolio exceeds $20B

AMIC Overview Integrated Culture SPO Type / Acquisition Center of Excellence organization Dedicated Program Managers, Contracting Officers and Quality Assurance Functional support within organization (i.e., Comm/Electronics, Logistics, Civil Engineering, Finance, etc.)

Report to single Director Maintain philosophy of partnering with contractors to create business-like environment conducive to meeting the mission

AMIC Director

(SES)

AMIC Organizational Chart

PK (NH-04/GS-15)

Deputy Director, Contracting Det 1 North Warning Sys Ottawa, Canada

PM (NH-04/GS-15)

Deputy Director Program Management

DD (O-6)

Deputy Director

PCY

Cyber Support Division

PMS

Multi-Domain Ops Division

PMT

CN&GT

Division

PMA

Aircraft MX Division

PCE

Civil Engineer Division

PMC

AFCENT Support Division

PLG

Logistics Division

DRQ

Quality Assurance Division SEM (SMSgt) Sr Enlisted Manager

DRE

Executive Assistant

PKC

Contracting Division

PKF

Contracting Division

PKA

Contracting Division

PKB

Contracting Division

PKD

Contracting Division

PKS

Contracting Division

DRR

Resource Mgt Division

DRJ

Legal Division

DSS

Director’s Support Staff

DRA

Acquisition Support Division

JWAC

Contracting Division Det 2, JBSA Contracting Spt Det 2 OL A Patrick Det 2 OL C Tinker

AUTHASSIGN
OFFICER:1716
ENLISTED:114114
CIVILIAN:341297
CONTRACTOR:2018

TOTAL: 492 445

Joint Tasks Review PWS Develop Acquisition Strategy Develop Request for Proposal (RFP) Evaluate Proposals

Acquisition Team Roles & Responsibilities Contractor Contracting Officer Post Requirements to SAM.gov Primary Interface to Industry Program Manager Interface to Customer Develops Program Requirements Functional Support

PSC, PLG, PCE, DRQ

Contract Manager

Project Environment Acquisition falls under the Air Force Program Executive Officer for Combat and Mission Support (AFPEO/CM) portfolio and remains within the authority of AFPEO/CM ACC/CD: Lt Gen Russel Mack Services Advocate (SA) Requirement Approval Authority (RAA) AFPEO/CM: Ms. Nancy Andrews, SES Services Designated Official (SDO) Source Selection Authority (SSA) Acquisition Approval Authority AFICC/KC: Col Aaron Boyd Clearance Authority

Project Milestones

MilestonesDate
Post Draft Performance Work Statement & Appendices21 Sep 22
Small Business Capabilities Request21 Sep 22
Industry Day / One-on-Ones19-20 Oct 22
Release Draft Solicitation9 Dec 22
Industry Site Visits (Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, UAE)5 - 18 Feb 23
Final Solicitation Issued9 May 23
Pre-Proposal Conference24 May 23
Proposals Due (~60 days allotted for preparation)14 Jul 23
Source Selection (9 months allotted)17 Jul 23 – 17 Apr 24
Contract Award26 Apr 24
Transition (~120 days allotted)1 Jun – 30 Sep 24
Performance Start1 Oct 24

Program Overview

Ms. Maleah Wegscheider Program Manager

Program Overview Mission Sites/Locations Contract Scope of Work Performance Work Statement (PWS) Award Fee Approach Risks

Mission Provide support for both War Reserve Materiel (WRM) and non-WRM (e.g. MRAP) assets in the AFCENT Area of Responsibility (AOR): GPMS/WRM asset storage, accountability, maintenance, outload, reconstitution, exercise support and contingency logistics support. Munitions storage, management and outload at specified locations.

Infrastructure Support: Maintenance and Repair (M&R) and minor construction of Government-Furnished Facilities (GFF) at specified locations. Maintain and repair Government-Furnished Property (GFP).

Warm Base/Lodging Support: Maintenance and Repair (M&R) of warm base facilities at specified locations and lodging facilities for Government personnel Temporary Duty (TDY) to select location. Support for USNAVCENT munitions at specified locations and deployed personnel & In-Flight Emergency (IFE) diverted personnel at Masirah.

Sites/Locations 9AF(AFCENT) Headquarters, Shaw AFB, SC 9AF(AFCENT) GPMS/WRM Storage Locations:

Al Udeid AB*, Qatar BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE, Munitions, FSE Al Dhafra AB**, UAE BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE, Munitions, FSE Abu Dhabi Warehouses***, UAE BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE, FSE, Medical Al Jaber AB**, Kuwait BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE RAFO Thumrait AB*, Oman BEAR, Vehicles, AGE, TRAP, MMHE, Munitions, FSE, Medical RAFO Masirah AB*, Oman BEAR, Vehicles, AGE Salalah Port***, Oman BEAR staging

* Denotes GFF/Facilities mnx req’d ** Denotes GFF/Facilities mnx not req’d *** Denotes Contractor-Leased Facilities

9AF(AFCENT)

Shaw AFB

AJAB

Masirah

ADAB/ADWH

Thumrait Salalah Port

AUAB

Contract Scope of Work Program Management: Exercise management and control for performance requirements contained in PWS Comply with work, services, operations, safety, security, environmental, and technical order requirements Provide management, personnel, materials, supervision, and other items necessary to perform services Operations & Maintenance (O&M): Perform O&M for GPMS/WRM assets, GFE/GFP and vehicles.

Mission Support: Support includes, but not limited to, materiel management, transportation management, information management and security.

Contingency Logistics Support: Outload/reconstitution Exercise Support: Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and coalition exercises Infrastructure Support: Perform facilities management and maintenance of all Government-Furnished Facilities (GFF)/Real Property Installed Equipment (RPIE)/Real Property Similar Equipment (RPSE).

PWS Overview

Program Management Contractor PM: Responsible for performance of all work and the single interface between Govt and Contractor personnel Management/Operational Control: Contractor retains full responsibility for performance of requirements set forth in the PWS Human Resources: Provide fully trained/qualified workforce to sustain GPMS/WRM, GFE/GFP and GFF from Day 1 Integrate Contracted Operations: Ensure Shaw AFB operations and processes are standardized/integrated with 9AF(AFCENT)/A4 staff functions Contract Administration: Provide all data and information including Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) deliverables, operating instructions, and records as required Quality Management System (QMS): Provide a QMS that is ISO 9001 compliant Financial Management and Reporting: Develop and submit financial management report according to CDRL Technical Orders and Publications: Adhere to all publications and instructions as coded mandatory without deviation

Operations and Maintenance:

GPMS assets: Manage, maintain, troubleshoot and repair stored GPMS assets in serviceable condition at serviceability rates prescribed in the PWS and appendices.

Periodic Maintenance Inspections (PMIs) Periodic Inspections (PIs) Unscheduled/corrective maintenance Acceptance/receipt inspections; Limited Technical Inspections (LTIs) Government-furnished assets: Manage, operate, maintain, troubleshoot, and repair all Government-provided assets to support the overall GPMS/WRM mission.

Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE) Government-Furnished Property (GFP) Contractor-Furnished Vehicles (CFV) Contractor will provide mission support CFV (FFP CLIN) Contractor will provide transportation to/from living quarters/work sites for their own Contractor (ktr) personnel

(continued)

(continued) Mission Support:

Materiel Management Maintain accountability/inventory of all GPMS assets and Government-furnished assets Transportation Management Outloads/deployments including airlift, linehaul, surface movements Freight/traffic management Air Transportation Services Provide Aerial Port services at specified location(s) Ground Fuel Container Management Contractor Personnel lodging and feeding Lodging of ktr personnel in either GFF or contract acquired lodging Feeding of ktr personnel (contractor-determined) Information Technology (IT) Management Operate/maintain Government-furnished IT equipment Client Support Administrator (CSA); Systems/Network Administration

(continued) Contingency Logistics Support: Prepare, outload, transfer, receive, reconstitute GPMS/WRM assets in support of contingency operations when tasked.

Maintain capability to transition from baseline support to contingency support Respond to Logistics Readiness Center (LRC) Taskers Ensure ability to meet potential outload volume/timelines Ensure capability for surface (linehaul & sealift) and air outload Timely reconstitution of assets Deployable Teams (when directed) Exercise Support: Prepare, outload, set up/tear down, and reconstitute GPMS/WRM in support of bilateral, multi-lateral and coalition exercises.

Deployable Teams (when directed)

(continued) Infrastructure Support:

Comprehensive facility maintenance (preventive) and repair (corrective) of Government-furnished facilities Real Property (RP) Real Property Installed Equipment (RPIE) Real Property Similar Equipment (RPSE) Configuration Control/Management BUILDER® Sustainment Management System (SMS) RPIE Life Cycle Maintenance/Management/Replacement Custodial/Refuse Collection and Disposal Pest Control/Grounds Maintenance Interim Warm Base Management CE Projects/Design/Construction Services Maintenance & Repair (M&R), Minor Construction (MC) Engineering Services Life-cycle information technology systems management

Services Summary Services Summary (SS): Identifies critical factors for the successful performance of requirements Purpose: Lists performance objectives for required service Components: States performance objective, standard, and threshold for each critical success factor (accept/reject point)

Program Management Operations & Maintenance Mission Support Contingency Logistics Support & Exercises Facilities Maintenance

(SS continued)

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVEPERFORMANCE STANDARDPERFORMANCE THRESHOLD
1.PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
A. Personnel:
1.A.1PWS Section A, Para 2.2.1.1., Para 2.2.10.2.,and Appendix NMaintain and staff a qualified and motivated workforceNo vacancies in key positions greater than 90 days unless waived by the Government
1.A.2PWS Section A, Para 2.2.1.1., Para 2.2.10.2., Appendix M and Appendix NEnsure personnel are qualified as specified in the contract (i.e. such as but not limited to, experience, education, and language requirements)No major non-conformances allowed.
B. Data Management
1.B.PWS Section A, Para 4.6.1.Provide accurate and current (within

24 hours of occurrence) data within the Computer Aided-DMS

No major nonconformances allowed. Performance is acceptable when the data specified in the PWS is available on the DMS, is technically accurate (excluding minor errors such as spelling, grammatical, and punctuation) and is updated within 24-hours unless otherwise noted in the CDRL or PWS.
C. Quality Management System (QMS):
1.C.Implement, maintain, and comply with a comprehensive QMS

PWS Section A, Para 2.1., 8.1-2. and Appendix D (Quality Management System) IAW ANSI/ISO/ASQ Most Current Version of 9001 QMS requirements and PWS No major nonconformance is allowed. If a Major nonconformance is discovered the QMS will be considered non-compliant. A major nonconformance adversely effects mission, safety of personnel and equipment, schedule, cost, and increases risk to the government such as non-provision of resources, poor quality resources, and recurring defects.

(SS continued)

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVEPERFORMANCE STANDARDPERFORMANCE THRESHOLD
2.OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
Maintain all GPMS/WRM to meet or exceed established standards.
2.A.Appendix G (Level of Effort)A. Establish and maintain a PMI schedule IAW the PWSAll PMIs conducted within the month due unless there is a documented deferral/waiver.
2.B.Appendix G (Level of Effort)B. Achieve established semi-annual reconstitution goals.All semi-annual reconstitution goals (Appendix G) met within required timeframes unless deferral is approved by the Government.
2.C.Appendix G (Level of Effort)C. Achieve established storage serviceability standards.All storage serviceability goals (Appendix G) met within required timeframes unless deferral is approved by the Government.
3.MISSION SUPPORT
A. Materiel Management
3.A.1.PWS Section A, Para 4.1.7.1. GFE/P InventoryNo major non-conformances allowed.
3.A.2.PWS Section A, Para 4.1.7.3., 4.1.7.4.1., 4.1.7.8., 4.1.7.16.1., 4.1.9.1., 4.1.9.5., 4.1.9.10.2. Health of Supply AccountNo major non-conformances allowed.
3.B.PWS Section A, Para 4.2. and Para 5.4.B. Packaging, Storage, Handling and Shipping: Properly handle, store, package, preserve, and deliver freight and materials to include certification and packaging of HAZMAT.No major non-conformances allowed; no delays on any shipment due to contractor documentation error(s).

(SS continued)

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVEPERFORMANCE STANDARDPERFORMANCE THRESHOLD
4.CONTINGENCY LOGISTICS SUPPORT & EXERCISES
A. Logistics Readiness Center (LRC) Taskers
4.A.PWS Section A, Para 5.4.Execute contingency/exercise outload taskers as directed by the Govt.No major non-conformances allowed.
5.FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
A. Infrastructure:
5.A..PWS Para 6.0. and Appendix JMaintain facilities IAW PWS.No major non-conformances allowed.

Award Fee Approach Proposed Award Fee Plan:

Award Fee Plan (Subjective) - $1M (fixed) pool per 6-month period Technical Performance (40-60 pts., depending on SIIs) Storage, Maintenance & Production (50%) Materiel Management & Traffic Management (50%) Management Performance (40 pts.)

Cost Management (50%) Communications (25%) Organizational Management (25%) Special Interest Items (SII) (up to 20 pts.)

Multiple SIIs allowed, not to exceed 20 pts. total Unused portion of SIIs reverts to Technical Performance Positive Significant Incident (PSI)/Negative Significant Incident (NSI) may increase/decrease earned award fee Award fee not awarded does not carry forward to next period

Program Risks Management Plan/qualified workforce Omanization impacts (35% quota for LNs in Oman) Quality Management System Proactive vs. Reactive QMS Abu Dhabi Warehouse (ADWH) Lease Contractor-Leased Facility Lease began 2014; GFP installed throughout facilities 9AF(AFCENT) working U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Attempting to bring under a Government lease and provided to awardee as GFF Outload Capability Lead-time for ADWH outload to ADAB a challenge

NOTE: Not all inclusive – all listed are considered High risk items

Management Plan.

If the contractor does not submit and implement an efficient and effective management plan that fully recognizes the critical need of providing qualified, key, and essential personnel, identifies management's control and efficient use of resources in the delivery of all services, and ensures that all requirements of the contract are accomplished on schedule and are consistent with contractual standards of performance then the contractor's ability to execute the GPMS program/overall mission may be impeded/cause severe mission degradation.

Particular focus on mitigating issues associated with Omanization quotas Control.

Contractor required to provide an acceptable comprehensive management plan detailing management approach; human resources plan to attract, train, and retain qualified management and technical personnel. The plan includes work force manning levels by functional level and skill mix. The approach will be evaluated during source selection.

Quality Management System.
If the contractor does not develop and implement an effective QMS, then ineffective contract management, poor performance, and degraded mission success rates will result, thereby increasing government surveillance, manpower requirements and costs.Control.

Contract requires ISO compliance with qualified QC Manager on staff. Government COR will perform audits on QMS implementation. In the field, government CORs will perform intense surveillance at the start of contract to ensure effective QMS. The approach will be evaluated during source selection.

Risk Event Risk Strategy

Abu Dhabi Warehouse Lease.
If the warehouse is not picked up as a government lease by the USACE and provided to the contractor as Government-furnished facilities then the contractor may not be able to secure these same facilities or may incur additional costs to secure the leases.Control.

Working with USACE for Government lease. Contractors will be required to propose for the capability of the existing facility and mitigation of movement of GPMS/WRM assets to another location.

Outload.
If the Contractor does not have the capability to correctly outload all assets, in serviceable condition, on multiple modes, to multiple destinations, while providing the Government complete visibility over DoD and non-DoD transportation modes, and in the timelines given then assets will not arrive in a manner to support the warfighter, resulting in mission failure.Control.

Ensure contractor has a sound understanding of contingency outload procedures by all modes of transportation including (but not limited to) commercial linehaul/sealift and military airlift/sealift. Ensure a robust capability to transition from baseline GPMS/WRM maintenance and support activity to contingency outload operations supporting major outload requirements.

Risk Event Risk Strategy

Acquisition Strategy / Solicitation Overview Ms. Anissa Ross Contracting Officer

ACC AMIC/ PKFC

Key Contractual Aspects Contract Type/Period of Performance Source Selection Methodology Evaluation Factors and Subfactors Source Selection Process Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) Posting Site Visit/Pre-Proposal Conference Points of Contact One-On-One Information

Contracting Overview

Key Contractual Aspects Solicitation Number: FA4890-22-R-0051

NAICS Code: 561210 – Facilities Support Services (Small Business Administration (SBA) Size Standard is $41.5 million)

Government Furnished Facilities (GFF): Appendix J

Government Furnished Property (GFP) & Government Furnished Equipment (GFE): Appendix K

Anticipate non-commercial acquisition (FAR Part 15) Small Business Set Aside Determination not yet established Market Research Questionnaire posted to www.SAM.gov If Full & Open competition, Small Business Subcontracting goal will be considered Subcontracting plans required for Large Businesses IAW FAR Part 19 – Small Business Programs

Key Contractual Aspects (continued)

Contract Type

The Acquisition Strategy has not been approved. The Government is anticipating a Single Award hybrid contract with Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Cost Reimbursable (CR) and a fixed Award Fee Pool

Period of Performance Contract: 8-mos Base Period plus 6 Option Years

Transition:1 Jun 24 – 30 Sep 24 (4 mos)
Base Period:1 Oct 24 – 31 May 25 (8 mos)
Option Year 1:1 Jun 25 – 31 May 26
Option Year 2:1 Jun 26 – 31 May 27
Option Year 3:1 Jun 27 – 31 May 28
Option Year 4:1 Jun 28 – 31 May 29
Option Year 5:1 Jun 29 – 31 May 30
Option Year 6:1 Jun 30 – 31 May 31

6-mos Optional Extension: 1 Jun 31 – 30 Nov 31

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

Read and evaluate Offerors’ proposals Document eval findings Reach Consensus Finalize ENs Evaluate EN responses Document eval. findings Prepare follow-up ENs, if required

Establish initial ratings Competitive Range or Award w/o Discussions Adjust ratings/ Competitive Range based on EN responses

** IEB **

Award w/o Discussions or Release ENs upon SSA approval;

Discussions Started Receive Contract Clearance ** Pre-FPRB** Issue Request for FPRs upon SSA approval Discussions Closed Receive & evaluate FPRs from offerors Document FPR Findings Formulate award recommendation Establish final ratings Finalize PAR/SSDD Award recommendation Receive Clearance

** SSDB**

SSA makes Award decision PAR/SSDD signed Award

INITIAL

EVALUATION

INTERIM

EVALUATION

FINAL

EVALUATION

Source Selection Evaluation Phases

Source Selection Methodology Best Value Tradeoff IAW DoD Source Selection Procedures dated 20 August 2022 and AFFARS 5315.3 Anticipate Technical Approach is most important, and when combined with Past Performance, is significantly more important than Price Factor 1 – Technical Subfactor Ratings: Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable Factor 2 – Past Performance Minimum 2 maximum 5 (within 3 years of solicitation date)/relevant contracts Ratings: Relevancy & Confidence Ratings Factor 3 – Price Complete, Balanced, Fair and Reasonable

Technical Evaluation (Volume 1) Factor 1: Technical Subfactors – TBD Separate Technical/Risk Ratings Strengths, Significant Strengths, Weaknesses, Significant Weaknesses, Deficiencies Technical Assessment Finding Definitions Meets: Explanation of how the proposal meets the requirement Strength: An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance Significant Strength: An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal with appreciable merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance Significant Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level

Evaluation Methodology (cont.)

Technical Ratings

Color RatingAdjectival RatingDescription
BlueOutstandingProposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements, contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength.
PurpleGoodProposal demonstrates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength.
GreenAcceptableProposal demonstrates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.
YellowMarginalProposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.
RedUnacceptableProposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is un-awardable.

Technical Risk Ratings

Adjectival RatingDescription
LowProposal may contain weakness/weaknesses which have low potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. Normal contractor emphasis and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.
ModerateProposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may have a moderate potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.
HighProposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to have high potential to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will unlikely be able to overcome any difficulties.
UnacceptableProposal contains a deficiency or a combination of significant weaknesses that causes an unacceptable level of risk of unsuccessful performance.

Past Performance Offerors authorized to submit references on themselves, joint venture/teaming partners, and subcontractors (Total possible: a maximum of five (5) references) References (aka Past Performance Information (PPI)) are used to evaluate past performance PPI may be obtained through one or more of the following:

Review recent Contract Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs) related to the effort Review Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) information Conduct telephone interviews Offeror given opportunity to respond to any adverse ratings Three components of evaluation Recency Relevancy Quality

Past Performance (Volume 2) Factor 2: Past Performance Recency A minimum of 12-months Performance within the past 3 years Relevancy See table at slide 48 Performance Confidence Assessment Rating Method See table at slide 49 A “Satisfactory Confidence” rating is significantly more valuable than a “Neutral Confidence” or “Limited Confidence” rating A “Substantial Confidence” rating is only slightly more valuable than a “Satisfactory Confidence” rating All Offerors rated as “Satisfactory Confidence” will be considered equal for the Past Performance Factor for trade off purposes

Adjectival RatingDescription
Very RelevantPresent/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
RelevantPresent/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat
RelevantPresent/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not RelevantPresent/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Past Performance - Relevancy

RatingDescription
Substantial
ConfidenceBased on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory
ConfidenceBased on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral
ConfidenceNo recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited
ConfidenceBased on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No
ConfidenceBased on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Past Performance – Confidence Ratings

Cost/Price (Volume 3) Factor 3: Cost/Price There is an expectation of competition – Offeror’s price proposal shall represent the Offeror’s best effort to respond to the solicitation The price of each offeror will be evaluated on the total, overall evaluated price, which consists of the total proposed price (FP and CR CLINS) of the transition period, base contract period, optional CLINs, and all optional contract periods (to include a six-month extension of services IAW FAR 52.217-8; using 50% of the last option year’s pricing) Price will be evaluated using FAR 15.404-1 to ensure Government receives a fair, reasonable, realistic, and balanced price Price reasonableness will be determined based on a comparison of offerors’ total overall evaluated price In addition to the analyses as described in FAR 15.404-1(b), proposals will be analyzed to identify any potential unbalanced pricing (See FAR 15.404-1(g)

Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) Draft RFP tentatively scheduled to be posted to SAM.gov on 9 Dec 2022 Industry review and input is highly encouraged Government will post responses to questions to SAM without publicizing the originating source(s) Formal communications should be with the Contracting Officer only – please do not contact the requirement owner The next Q&A period will be after draft RFP release

Site Visit / Pre-Proposal Conference Formal site visit before release of final RFP Tentatively scheduled for Feb 23; will be posted to www.SAM.gov Location(s): Six (6) Storage and Maintenance sites located at Al Udeid, Qatar; Abu Dhabi, UAE; Sultanate of Oman and Al Jaber, Kuwait Information needed prior to site visit Name of attendees (no more than 2 per offeror/joint venture/partnership) Company Name Job Title Photo Identification Cell number, business and/or personal (24/7) Email, business and/or personal (24/7) Pre-Proposal Conference Scheduled for 24 May 2023 Format TBD (Virtual vs. In-person)

Points of Contact / References

ACC AMIC/PKF

Ms. Anissa Ross, Contracting Officer – (757) 225-6188 Ms. Veronica Boston, Contract Manager – (757) 764-6635

Submit questions/comments:

Anissa.Ross.2@us.af.mil Veronica.Boston.2@us.af.mil

Internet Links:

www.SAM.gov (Reference No. FA4890-22-R-0051)

One-on-One Information Location 19 Oct 22, 1300-1545; Virtual 20 Oct 22, 0800-1600; Virtual

Questions/recommendations from industry are encouraged Verbal dialog between Government and industry, both during today’s open forum & one-on-one appointments, is unofficial Official responses to questions requires industry’s submission of questions to the Government on question template provided on SAM.gov

The government will post official responses to all Industry Day questions on SAM.gov; however, the originating source(s) will not be published Proprietary information will not be published

Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) Draft RFP tentatively scheduled to be posted to www.SAM.gov in Dec 2022 timeframe Industry review and input is encouraged Government will post responses to questions to www.SAM.gov without publicizing the originating source(s)

Break

TURN IN ALL WRITTEN QUESTIONS

Discussion Panel

Closing Remarks

TURN IN ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS AND SURVEYS

image2.png image3.png image4.jpeg image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .