Attachment_17_-_PPQ.pdf

SECTION L ATTACHMENT

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED-IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the offeror prior to mailing to the reference):

A. Contractor’s name and address: _____________________________________________________________ B. Point of Contact: _______________________________________________________ C. Phone/Fax/Email Address: _______________________________________________ D. Contract Number: ______________________________________________________ E. Project Title/Description of Work: ___________________________________________________________ F. Contract Type: Firm-Fixed Price Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity Cost-Reimbursement G. Project Award Date: _________________________ Scheduled Completion Date ______________ Current/Final Completion Date ____________ H. Project Award Amount: _____________________ Current/Final Project Amount ____________________ I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Supplier J. Authorization is hereby granted to provided the information requested in SECTION B of this Questionnaire

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

(Signature)

SECTION B: To be completed by the Reference/Evaluator: Please complete the information below and the Past Performance Questionnaire on Pages 2 & 3, and return by email or mail to: TSgt Kendra Strnad or SrA Matthew Marshall, 27 SOCONS/BFLT, NO LATER THAN 15 July 2013.

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

_____________________________________ Address: _______________________________________ (Typed or Printed Name) (Title)

(Phone) (Fax) (/Email)

NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information SHALL NOT be disclosed.

URGENT! PLEASE RESPOND PROMPTLY

FA4855-13-R-0011

Attachment 17

07 June 2013 1 of 6 Pages

Past Performance Questionnaire

E VG S M U N

EXCEPTIONAL VERY GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSATISFACTORY NEUTRAL

Contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level.

Perfomance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems.

Contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

Contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level.

Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

Contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

EVALUATION AREAS

I. Quality / Technical Performance E VG S M U N

1.

Quality of Workmanship: Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punchlist items.

2.

Adequacy & Implementation of the CQC Plan: Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project.

3.

Quality of QC Documentation: Contractor thoroughly reviewed correspondence for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with contract requirements.

4. Adequacy of Materials: Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.

5.

Adequacy of Submittals: Contractor thoroughly reviewed correspondence for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with contract requirements.

6.

Adequacy of As-Builts: Contractor provided a well documented As- Builts that are accurate, complete, timely, and comply with contract requirements.

7. Identification/Correcton of Deficient Work

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

07 June 2013 2 of 6 Pages

II. Management Effectiveness / Business Relations E VG S M U N

1.

Cooperation and Responsiveness: Provided timely/effective contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance. Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion.

2.

Management of Resources / Personnel: Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer.

Coordination and Control of Subcontractors: Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.

4. Adequacy of Site Cleanup: Contractor cleaned the site as required.

5.

Effectiveness of Job Site Supervision: Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.

6.

Compliance with Laws and Regulations: Contractor understood/complied with customer objectives, technical requirements, laws, and regulations.

7.

Professional Conduct: Contractor presented and addressed government concerns in a professional matter. Contractor provided experienced qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

8. Review/Resolution of Subcontractor’s Issues: Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.

9. Implementation of Subcontracting Plan: Contractor adhered to submitted and approved subcontracting plan.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

III. Timely Performance E VG S M U N

1. Adequacy of Initial Progress Schedule: Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedules.

2. Adherance to Approved Schedule: Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time.

3. Resolution of Delays: Contractor resolved delay issues and took necessary actions keep the project on schedule where appropriate.

4.

Submission of Required Documentations: Contractor provided submittals on time as required. Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractor’s employees as required and scheduled.

5. Completion of Punchlist Items: Contractor provided timely resolution of all punchlist items.

6.

Submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules: Contractor submitted the progress schedule and interim progress reports as required in a timely manner and the schedule was approved prior to actual construction.

07 June 2013 3 of 6 Pages

7. Warranty Response: Contractor resolved warranty issues in a timely manner.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory)

IV. Compliance with Labor Standards E VG S M U N

1. Correction of Noted Deficiencies: Contractor corrected deficiencies associated with labor standards requirements.

2.

Payrolls Properly Completed and Submitted: Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractor’s employees as required.

Compliance with Labor Laws and Regulations: Contractor facilitated labor inspections for determination of compliance with wage determinations and labor standards. Labor posters and wage determinations were displayed as required. Subcontractor acceptance of labor standard clauses submitted as required. Statement of Compliance for payroll reports was submitted as required.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory)

V. Compliance with Safety Standards E VG S M U N

1. Adequacy of Safety Plan: Contractor provided adequate and effective environmental and safety plan and procedures.

2. Implementation of Safety Plan

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

VI. Cost Performance E VG S M U N

1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

3.

Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur:

Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer.

07 June 2013 4 of 6 Pages

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory)

VII. Overall Performance E VG S M U N

1. Please rate the contractor’s overall performance

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

NARRATIVE SUMMARY:

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

FA4855-13-R-0011

07 June 2013 5 of 6 Pages

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Please return this completed questionnaire no later than 15 July 2013 to:

TSgt Kendra Strnad SrA Matthew Marshall 27th SOCONS/BFLT 27th SOCONS/BFLT 110 E. Alison Ave, Bldg 600 110 E. Alison Ave, Bldg 600 Cannon AFB, NM 88103-5214 Cannon AFB, NM 88103-5214

AND:

Email: kendra.strnad@cannon.af.mil EMail: matthew.marshall@cannon.af.mil

07 June 2013 6 of 6 Pages