Industry Day Slides
3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Award Notice for Andrews AFB & Bolling AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER)
- Solicitation number
- FA4416-08-R0010
About this file
Industry Day Briefing Slides
Text of this file
11th Wing and 316th Wing
Industry Day Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER)
Bolling AFB, DC and Andrews AFB, MD
AGENDA
| 0830 | Introduction |
| 0900 | Proposed Specifications |
| 1000 | Summary of Questions |
| 1030 | Break |
| 1100 | Proposed Solicitation |
| 1200 | Coefficient Structure |
| 1230 | Summary of Questions |
| 1300 | Summary / Comments |
Briefed by Lt Franz
Introduction 0830-0900
| No food or drinks (even water) are permitted in the conference room |
| Please silence all cell phones and electronic devices |
| Restrooms |
| Break Area |
| Questions |
Introduction briefed by Lt Franz
| Stress that no food or drinks will be permitted, period. |
| Restrooms are located at the bottom of the stairs next to where you signed in this morning (Sign in table will be located by TV at bottom of stairs) |
| Break area is around the corner from the conference room. You can follow the signs posted. |
| Refreshments consists of water and ice |
| Any new questions will not be fielded during industry day. If you have questions during the presentations please annotate them on the note cards provided and return each note card to the designated Government representative. |
| Selected questions obtained prior to industry day will be answered at the end of the presentation. All questions and answers will be compiled and posted on FedBizOps following today’s Industry Day. |
Industry Day Purpose
| Develop acquisition to be as complete and accurate as possible |
| Receive questions, comments, and suggestions from Industry on proposed methods of solicitation |
| Ensure the Government and Industry are on the same track for what is expected in proposals |
Briefed by Major Obergfell Good morning and welcome to Andrews Air Force Base. We are very pleased to have such a great turn out of prospective partners for the joint-SABER contract at both Bolling Air Force Base and Andrews Air Force Base. I am Major Eric Obergfell, the Contracting Officer of this procurement and the Squadron Commander for the 316th Contracting Squadron here at Andrews AFB. I would like to take a brief moment to introduce some key members of our team. Lt Col Linda Bethke, Commander of the 11th Contracting Squadron at Bolling AFB…ADD ANY ADDITIONAL KEY MEMBERS AS YOU SEE FIT.
We are holding this industry day as a way to develop our acquisition to be as complete and accurate as possible. We ask that if you have any questions, comments, ideas, or concerns with the way you see things currently, please use the index cards provided and return them to our Government representatives. We are in a unique situation to catch a glimpse of the future of Air Force Contracting with this joint-base acquisition. PLEASE EDIT AS APPROPRIATE, ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
Thank you again for attending and working with us to make this the best SABER contract possible.
Questions & Answers Limitations
NO QUESTIONS WILL BE ANSWERED DURING INDUSTRY DAY
| All questions must be submitted in writing on the note cards provided (please write legibly) |
| Questions will be read during the “Summary of Questions” portion of presentation |
| Questions and answers will be posted on Federal Business Opportunities following the Industry Day |
Disclaimer
All information provided prior to the solicitation shall be considered as draft or proposed only. The Industry Day brief and materials posted contain only draft information. The Government reserves the right to modify all information provided.
Proposed Contract Specifications 0900-1000
Two Bases
Two independent Offices Two independent Project Managers
Briefed by Franz -Project managers do not report to each other but directly back to corporate (streamline decision process)
Proposed Contract Specifications: Andrews AFB
| Ramp Freeze |
| Pathfinder Security (escorts required) |
| Secure Office of Special Investigations (OSI) and Communications Squadron worksites (escorts required) |
| Privatized utilities contract |
| ADT security contract |
| Siemens control systems for new HVAC |
| Energy management initiatives |
| Satellite sites at Brandywine and Davidsonville |
| AFDW Headquarters |
Briefed by Lt Meredith
Proposed Contract Specifications: Bolling AFB
| The Chief’s Own located along Potomac River |
| DIA internal maintenance (Wackenhut) |
| Privatized utilities contract |
| Advantor security alarm contract |
| Siemens contract |
| Privatized housing |
| Energy savings contract (Noresco) |
Briefed by Capt Bulson
Summary of Questions 1000-1030
Briefed by Mr. Tellechea/Lt Meredith
Break 1030-1100
| Restrooms |
| Agenda of remaining presentations |
1100 Solicitation 1200 Coefficient Structure 1230 Summary of Questions 1300 Summary / Comments
Briefed by Lt Franz
| Restrooms are downstairs by where you signed in this morning |
| Posted is the agenda for the remaining presentations |
| WE WILL GET STARTED AT 1100 |
Proposed Solicitation Evaluation Factors: Overview 1100-1200
| Evaluating Past Performance, Technical, and Price |
| Past Performance is slightly more important than Technical |
| Past Performance and Technical when combined are significantly more important than Price |
| Past Performance will be due prior to the solicitation due date |
Proposed Solicitation Evaluation Factors:
Past Performance
| Past performance will be considered significantly more important than price. In accordance with AFFARS 5315.305(a)(2), offerors will be required to submit recent and relevant past performance information as part of their offer by way of Past Performance Questionnaires to be submitted directly from the referred agency to Contracting prior to the Request for Proposal closing date. |
| The offeror shall identify the most recent, current and relevant efforts that are either just completed or are still in progress and have performance history within the past three years from issuance of the solicitation. |
| In evaluating past performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in the solicitation, e.g. performance of an Army or Navy Job Order Contracts (JOC) and/or Air Force SABER contracts. |
Proposed Solicitation Evaluation Factors Past Performance Continued
AFFARs Table 5315-2. Proposed Past Performance Ratings
| RATING | DEFINITION |
| High Confidence | Based on the offeror's performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Significant Confidence | Based on the offeror's performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Confidence | Based on the offeror's performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Unknown Confidence | No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iii) and (iv)). |
| Little Confidence | Based on the offeror's performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror's existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| No Confidence | Based on the offeror's performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
Proposed Solicitation Evaluation Factors Past Performance Continued
| PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY ASSESSMENT | |
| RATING | DESCRIPTION |
| RELEVANT | Past/present performance effort involved direct involvement with SABER and/or JOC contracts within the last three years with a value greater than $25M. |
| SOMEWHAT RELEVANT | Past/present performance effort involved direct involvement with SABER and/or JOC contracts within the last three years with a value of $25M or less and/or direct involvement with other government construction contracts which are similar in nature to SABER or JOC contracts*. |
| NOT RELEVANT | Past/present performance effort did not involve direct involvement with SABER or JOC contracts or other government contracts which are similar in nature to SABER or JOC contracts*. |
*contracts which are similar in nature to SABER or JOC contracts: defined as fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts which include detailed task specifications that encompass most types of real property maintenance, repair, and construction work.
Proposed Solicitation Evaluation Factors:
Technical Overview
| Two Parts to the Technical Evaluation: Management Approach and Demonstration Project Approach |
| Unacceptable offers will be excluded from further competition because that offer will not be eligible for award |
| Rating Definition |
Acceptable: Meets minimum mandatory requirements.
Reasonably Susceptible to Being Made Acceptable: Does not meet minimum mandatory requirements as is, but is susceptible of being made acceptable with clarifications.
Unacceptable: Does not meet minimum mandatory requirements.
Proposed Solicitation Evaluation Factors Technical: Management Approach
| Evaluated on three subfactors: Key Project Management/Technical Support, Quality Control, and Subcontract Management |
| Key Project Management/Technical Support |
Offeror addresses their management organization, including a description of functions, authorities and credentials of key management personnel fulfilling at a minimum the personnel requirements specified within the contract specification paragraph 2.1.
Quality Control
Offeror addresses their approach to quality control. Offerors submit a Quality Control Plan that as a minimum meets the requirements of the contract specification paragraphs 2.2.1 through 2.2.1.1.7.
Subcontract Management
Offeror addresses their plan for acquiring qualified subcontract support and defines company policy, procedures and responsibilities for post award management of subcontractors. Offeror describes the method and criteria to be used in selection of subcontractors. Methods and criteria described should include consideration of subcontractor’s previous experience, present capabilities, and quality of previous jobs. Policies and procedures should ensure effective management of subcontractors to ensure quality workmanship and timely completion.
Proposed Solicitation Evaluation Factors Technical: Demonstration Project
| Will propose a total solution to a “typical” SABER-type project in accordance with the guidelines specified in the Solicitation, Specifications, and project Statement of Work |
| Specific project information will be provided with the solicitation |
| A Site Visit will be scheduled approximately 10 calendar days after the solicitation is posted. |
Site visit of the project site will be walked in the morning Base tour of Andrews AFB and Bolling AFB will be in the afternoon
Coefficient Structure Evaluation Factor: Pricing 1200-1230
| CLIN | ITEM DESCRIPTION | WEIGHT |
| 0001 | The following coefficients shall apply to all contract periods - Base Year plus all Four Option Years. | |
| 0001AA | Project bare costs between $2000 - $99,999.99: during standard working hours | 45% |
| 0001AB | Project bare costs between $100,000 - $299,999.99: during standard working hours | 25% |
| 0001AC | Project bare costs between $300,000 - $499,999.99: during standard working hours | 12% |
| 0001AD | Project bare costs greater than $500,000: during standard working hours | 14% |
| 0001AE | All projects bare cost ranges: during non-standard working hours | 2% |
| 0001AF | All projects bare cost ranges: secure areas | 2% |
The top chart is the breakdown of our coefficient structure and their associated weights. It is based on the historical data contained on the next slide
Historical Data for Evaluation of Bids – Andrews AFB/Bolling AFB Combined
The above information is historical data only and does not necessarily represent future volume under this contract.
| MEAN AVERAGE OF ALL YEARS – 259 Projects | Weight |
| Project costs between $2000 - $99,999.99 during standard working hours | 48% |
| Project costs between $100,000 - $299,999.99 during standard working hours | 25.5% |
| Project costs between $300,000 - $499,999.99 during standard working hours | 12.5% |
| Project costs greater than $500,000.00 during standard working hours | 14% |
| Work during non-standard working hours | 0% |
| Work performed in secure areas | 0% |
Information based on data between contract award through March 2008
Work was conducted in secure areas / non-standard hours but was not charged under the CLIN
Sample Coefficient Structure Continued Example on how the Coefficient Structure determines the Price Evaluation
Stress that this is an EXAMPLE ONLY
Sheet1
CLIN Item Description Weight based on historical data Proposed Coefficient Weighted Value Result
0001AA Standard Hours, $2000 - $99,999.99 45% 1.02 0.4590
0001AB Standard Hours, $100,000 - $299,999.99 25% 0.98 0.2450
0001AC Standard Hours, $300,000 - $499,999.99 12% 0.94 0.1128
0001AD Standard Hours, Greater than $500,000 14% 0.90 0.1260
0001AE Work during non-standard working hours 2% 1.05 0.0210
0001AF Work performed in secure areas 2% 1.10 0.0220
SUBTOTAL WEIGHTED COEFFICIENT RATE 100% 0.9858
Proposed Solicitation Evaluation Factors:
Total Page Number Table
| VOL | TITLE | PAPERCOPIES | DISK COPIES | PAGE LIMITS |
| I | PAST PERFORMANCE | 4 | 1 | 10 plus Past Performance Questionnaires |
| II | TECHNICAL PART I: MANAGEMENT | 4 | 1 | 30 |
| III | TECHNICAL PART II: DEMONSTRATION PROJECT | 4 | 1 | 40 plus drawings |
| IV | PRICE | 2 | 1 | Sections A, B, K and bond letter from surety |
Proposed Solicitation Timeline of Events
| Milestones | Suspense Date | Proposed Calendar Date |
| Issue Solicitation | Day 1 | 9-May-08 |
| Demonstration Project Site Visit / Base Tour | Day 10 | 19-May-08 |
| Receive All Questions Pertaining to Solicitation | Day 14 | 23-May-08 |
| Post Answers to Solicitation Questions | Day 21 | 30-May-08 |
| Past Performance Information Due | Day 38 | 16-Jun-08 |
| Proposals Due | Day 42 | 23-Jun-08 |
Summary of Questions 1230-1300
Summary
| Proposed Contract Specifications |
| Summary of Questions |
| Proposed Solicitation Evaluation Factors |
| Coefficient Structure |
| Summary of Questions |
Closing Comments
A closing to be briefed by Major Obergfell. Thank you for coming…
UNKNOWN-0.ppt 89TH Airlift Wing
“The President’s Wing”
BRIEFINGS
89AW/CC
OVERVIEW
89th Airlift Wing Presentation Formats
Basic PowerPoint Operations
Use of Graphics
Classification Markings
Summary
WHY STANDARDIZED PRESENTATIONS
Non Standard Formats Create:
Hodge-podge and Unprofessional Looking Slides
Poorly Projected Ideas/Images
Complicated Mixed Software
Other Formats Expensive & Labor Intensive
Plastic slides (Overhead transparencies) are expensive and hard to change.
If there’s no standard when briefing the AMC command section, they get:
- Hodge-podge and unprofessional looking slides
- Many projected poorly
-- Hard to read and no consistency of color or format.
-- More re-work and waste of resources (time, money, material, manpower)
Another reason we have an electronic presentation standard - PowerPoint, is our move towards a paperless headquarters
- Acetate free too.
- PowerPoint slides can be e-mailed for pre-view, coordination and sharing
-- Go to next slide.
AMC SLIDE STANDARDS
Template
Supports PowerPoint 2000 SR-1
Always Used Outside the Directorates
Appropriate For All Audiences
Ideal for Electronic / Acetate Presentations
AMC Standard Template.ppt” http://AMC/ds/index.html
- This is in your tool kit
- This standard works good for both Electronic and if you need to do acetate presentations
- Most Directorates within AMC are using Powerpoint 7.0
- This standard is Always used outside the directorate. Your directorate may have a different standard for briefing within --but why?
- Appropriate for all audiences from downtown to AMC/CC
TITLE IS 32-POINT, ARIAL, ALL CAPS, & BOLD
Briefer’s Rank/Name
& Office Symbol
Title Case, Arial, 24-Point, Bold
SLIDE FORMAT
Text Is Arial, 24-point and Bold
First Sub-bullet Is 22-point and Bold
Second Sub-bullet Is 20-point and Bold, Etc.
Never Drop Bullet Text Below 20 Pt – Unreadable for VTC
Use Title Case Capitalization
Mouse-click “Format” – “Change Case” – “Title Case”
Square - Dot - Diamond
Main Bullet Is 80% of 24 Pitch Square Bullet Size
Sub-bullet’ Is 135% of 22 Pitch Dot Bullet Size
Second Sub-bullet’ Is 85% of 20 Pitch Diamond Bullet Size
Bullet Size Is Represented As a Percentage of the Text It Precedes
To Emphasize Words or Phrases, Italicize or Underline
Slides Must Be Numbered
SLIDE FORMAT (CON’T)
Briefs Written for CC/CV
Limit Slides (5 for A-Staff Meetings)
Limit Use of Cartoons (Animations)
Limit Slide Animations to No More Than 2
Never Use If Being Transmitted During VTC
Overuse Distracts From the Briefing Content and Takes Up Memory
SLIDE BUILDING
Each Slide Should Stand-alone
Bullets Are More Than Memory Joggers
Someone Familiar With the Topic Should Be Able to Explain It
Use Indentation to Add Support to Main Topic
Additional Bullets Amplify, Clarify, and Enumerate
Do Not Use More Than 3 Levels of Indentation
No “Filler” Quotes
Quotes Must Directly Relate to the Subject
ADDING GRAPHICS – PICTURES
Use Pictures to Explain or Amplify
Do Not Use Pictures Just Because They Are Nifty
Pictures Need to Add To, and Agree With, Text
Don’t Talk About C-5 Refueling and Show a C-17
Frame Pictures in 3pt Gold
ADDING GRAPHICS – CHARTS
Use Where Appropriate
3D Chart Objects
Can Be Hard to Read
Use Dark, Primary Colors
Preset Under: Format/
Slide Color Scheme/
Standard Tab
Avoid Yellows and
Pastels
Include Titles and Legend
Charts May Occupy
Entire Slide
PRESENTATION BASICS
Analyze Your Audience
Don’t Re-use Presentation If Inappropriate
Keep The Brief…….Brief
Presentation Should “Stand Alone”
Briefer Adds Depth, Amplification, Examples
Briefer Should Not Read Slides
Different Computers, Projectors, Screens Provide Different Images
Test Run Your Presentation on the Target System
Review Your Presentation For:
Clarity
Relevancy
Eye Appeal
Visibility and Readability
Quality
Memorability
Prepare “Read Aheads”
Label (Name & Office) and Write Protect Your Disk
End Presentation with a Black Slide
Field Questions
ENSURE THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS BEFORE YOU SUMMARIZE.
SUMMARY AND CLOSURE:
Well now you know the AMC standard for presentations and have had a little practice creating a presentation. If you’re giving a presentation “here” you’ll need to use the AMC Standard. It’s very easy to create a basic brief, and not too hard to spruce it up a bit. Just remember that your slides are there to supplement your brief. Don’t get so fancy that your slides become the focus of the presentation. Once you’re used to it, PowerPoint can be a lot of fun and you’ll cruise through any briefings or slides you’ll need to create during your tour here.
CLASSIFICATION MARKINGS
DOD 5200.1-PH
Mark Title Slide with Overall Briefing Classification
Unclassified
If Entire Briefing Is Unclassified--No Classification Markings Required
Classified
If... Presented, or Saved with Other Classified Briefing
If... ANY Slide in Briefing is Classified, Mark All Briefing Slides with Appropriate Classification Level
UNCLASSIFIED
AMC SLIDE STANDARD
Mark Classified in 18 Pt Red Arial Bold All Caps
Mark Any Unclassified Slides in 18 Pt Green Arial Bold All Caps
AMC/89AW Standards
FOUO
CONFIDENTIAL
CLASSIFIED (Secret/Top Secret)
CLASSIFIED
TITLE IS 32-POINT, ARIAL, CAPS, & BOLD
Briefer’s Rank/Name & Office Symbol
Title Case, Arial, 24-Point, Bold
BRIEFING IS CLASSIFIED:
<CLASSIFICATION LEVEL>
TURN OFF PAGERS, BEEPERS, CELL PHONES, PDAs, ETC.
SUMMARY
89th Airlift Wing Presentation Formats
Basic PowerPoint Operations
Use of Graphics
Classification Markings
UNKNOWN-1.ppt
BRIEFINGS
89AW/CC
OVERVIEW
89th Airlift Wing Presentation Formats
Basic PowerPoint Operations
Use of Graphics
Classification Markings
Summary
WHY STANDARDIZED PRESENTATIONS
Non Standard Formats Create:
Hodge-podge and Unprofessional Looking Slides
Poorly Projected Ideas/Images
Complicated Mixed Software
Other Formats Expensive & Labor Intensive
Plastic slides (Overhead transparencies) are expensive and hard to change.
If there’s no standard when briefing the AMC command section, they get:
- Hodge-podge and unprofessional looking slides
- Many projected poorly
-- Hard to read and no consistency of color or format.
-- More re-work and waste of resources (time, money, material, manpower)
Another reason we have an electronic presentation standard - PowerPoint, is our move towards a paperless headquarters
- Acetate free too.
- PowerPoint slides can be e-mailed for pre-view, coordination and sharing
-- Go to next slide.
AMC SLIDE STANDARDS
Template
Supports PowerPoint 2000 SR-1
Always Used Outside the Directorates
Appropriate For All Audiences
Ideal for Electronic / Acetate Presentations
AMC Standard Template.ppt” http://AMC/ds/index.html
- This is in your tool kit
- This standard works good for both Electronic and if you need to do acetate presentations
- Most Directorates within AMC are using Powerpoint 7.0
- This standard is Always used outside the directorate. Your directorate may have a different standard for briefing within --but why?
- Appropriate for all audiences from downtown to AMC/CC
TITLE IS 32-POINT, ARIAL, ALL CAPS, & BOLD
Briefer’s Rank/Name
& Office Symbol
Title Case, Arial, 24-Point, Bold
Text Is Arial, 24-point and Bold
First Sub-bullet Is 22-point and Bold
Second Sub-bullet Is 20-point and Bold, Etc.
Never Drop Bullet Text Below 20 Pt – Unreadable for VTC
Use Title Case Capitalization
Mouse-click “Format” – “Change Case” – “Title Case”
Square - Dot - Diamond
Main Bullet Is 80% of 24 Pitch Square Bullet Size
Sub-bullet’ Is 135% of 22 Pitch Dot Bullet Size
Second Sub-bullet’ Is 85% of 20 Pitch Diamond Bullet Size
Bullet Size Is Represented As a Percentage of the Text It Precedes
To Emphasize Words or Phrases, Italicize or Underline
Slides Must Be Numbered
SLIDE FORMAT (CON’T)
Briefs Written for CC/CV
Limit Slides (5 for A-Staff Meetings)
Limit Use of Cartoons (Animations)
Limit Slide Animations to No More Than 2
Never Use If Being Transmitted During VTC
Overuse Distracts From the Briefing Content and Takes Up Memory
SLIDE BUILDING
Each Slide Should Stand-alone
Bullets Are More Than Memory Joggers
Someone Familiar With the Topic Should Be Able to Explain It
Use Indentation to Add Support to Main Topic
Additional Bullets Amplify, Clarify, and Enumerate
Do Not Use More Than 3 Levels of Indentation
No “Filler” Quotes
Quotes Must Directly Relate to the Subject
ADDING GRAPHICS – PICTURES
Use Pictures to Explain or Amplify
Do Not Use Pictures Just Because They Are Nifty
Pictures Need to Add To, and Agree With, Text
Don’t Talk About C-5 Refueling and Show a C-17
Frame Pictures in 3pt Gold
ADDING GRAPHICS – CHARTS
Use Where Appropriate
3D Chart Objects
Can Be Hard to Read
Use Dark, Primary Colors
Preset Under: Format/
Slide Color Scheme/
Standard Tab
Avoid Yellows and
Pastels
Include Titles and Legend
Charts May Occupy
Entire Slide
Analyze Your Audience
Don’t Re-use Presentation If Inappropriate
Keep The Brief…….Brief
Presentation Should “Stand Alone”
Briefer Adds Depth, Amplification, Examples
Briefer Should Not Read Slides
Different Computers, Projectors, Screens Provide Different Images
Test Run Your Presentation on the Target System
Review Your Presentation For:
Clarity
Relevancy
Eye Appeal
Visibility and Readability
Quality
Memorability
Prepare “Read Aheads”
Label (Name & Office) and Write Protect Your Disk
End Presentation with a Black Slide
Field Questions
ENSURE THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS BEFORE YOU SUMMARIZE.
SUMMARY AND CLOSURE:
Well now you know the AMC standard for presentations and have had a little practice creating a presentation. If you’re giving a presentation “here” you’ll need to use the AMC Standard. It’s very easy to create a basic brief, and not too hard to spruce it up a bit. Just remember that your slides are there to supplement your brief. Don’t get so fancy that your slides become the focus of the presentation. Once you’re used to it, PowerPoint can be a lot of fun and you’ll cruise through any briefings or slides you’ll need to create during your tour here.
DOD 5200.1-PH
Mark Title Slide with Overall Briefing Classification
Unclassified
If Entire Briefing Is Unclassified--No Classification Markings Required
Classified
If... Presented, or Saved with Other Classified Briefing
If... ANY Slide in Briefing is Classified, Mark All Briefing Slides with Appropriate Classification Level
AMC SLIDE STANDARD
Mark Classified in 18 Pt Red Arial Bold All Caps
Mark Any Unclassified Slides in 18 Pt Green Arial Bold All Caps
AMC/89AW Standards
FOUO
CONFIDENTIAL
CLASSIFIED (Secret/Top Secret)
TITLE IS 32-POINT, ARIAL, CAPS, & BOLD
Briefer’s Rank/Name & Office Symbol
Title Case, Arial, 24-Point, Bold
BRIEFING IS CLASSIFIED:
<CLASSIFICATION LEVEL>
TURN OFF PAGERS, BEEPERS, CELL PHONES, PDAs, ETC.
SUMMARY
89th Airlift Wing Presentation Formats
Basic PowerPoint Operations
Use of Graphics
Classification Markings
UNKNOWN-2
UNKNOWN-3
Other files
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .