ATCH 3b-MD080022.doc

DOC document 41 KB Posted

Attached to
Award Notice for Andrews AFB & Bolling AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER)
Solicitation number
FA4416-08-R0010
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 3b - General Decision Wage Rates - Highway MD080022 - 8 Feb 2008

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 04 FA4416-08-R-0010 —
Amendment 03 FA4416-08-R-0010 —
Contractor Questions and Government Answers —
1245.2.pdf PDF
Existing Utilities As Builts.pdf PDF
ETL Engineering Technical Letter 12-02.pdf PDF
1245.3.pdf PDF
1245.6.pdf PDF
1245.1.pdf PDF
1245.5.pdf PDF
1245.4.pdf PDF
Contractor Questions and Government Answers.doc DOC document
Amendment 02 FA4416-08-R-0010.doc DOC document
Amendment 01 FA4416-08-R-0010.doc DOC document
ATCH 5-Past Performance Questionnaire.doc DOC document
ATCH 9-AF66 Schedule of Material Submittals.xls XLS spreadsheet
ATCH 8-Drawings BLDG 1245 Passenger Terminal.doc DOC document
ATCH 4b-MD080016.doc DOC document
ATCH 4c-MD080048.doc DOC document
ATCH 1-BAFB-AAFB SABER Specs —
ATCH 2b-DC080001.doc DOC document
ATCH 3a-MD080021.doc DOC document
ATCH 7-SOW Bldg 1245.doc DOC document
ATCH 2a-DC080003.doc DOC document
ATCH 3c-MD080035.doc DOC document
ATCH 6-Past Performance Reference List.doc DOC document
ATCH 4a-MD080057.doc DOC document
BAFB-AAFB SABER Solicitation —
Industry Day QA's.doc DOC document
Industry Day Attendees by Company Name.xls XLS spreadsheet
Industry Day Slides —
BAFB-AAFB SABER Specs —
DRAFT BAFB-AAFB SABER Solicitation —
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3b

FA4416-08-R-0010

General Decision Number: MD080022 02/08/2008 MD22

Superseded General Decision Number: MD20070022

State: Maryland

Construction Type: Highway

County: Anne Arundel County in Maryland.

HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (Excluding tunnels, building structures in rest area projects and railroad construction;

bascule, suspension and spandrel arch bridges; bridges designed for commercial navigation; bridges involving marine construction; and other major bridges)

Modification Number Publication Date

0 02/08/2008

SUMD2001-001 08/28/2001

Rates Fringes

Cement Mason/Finisher

(Excluding Formsetting)........$ 13.21

Laborers:

Asphalt Rakers..............$ 11.80 2.52

Flaggers....................$ 11.19

Formsetters.................$ 11.58

Lutemen.....................$ 11.31

Mason Tenders, Cement

(Excluding Formsetting).....$ 11.95

Pipelayers..................$ 10.58 1.86

Unskilled...................$ 10.44

Power equipment operators:

Asphalt Screed Operators....$ 12.08 2.67

Loader Operators............$ 10.25 .22

Milling Machine

Operators...................$ 12.50 3.15

Pavers......................$ 12.94 2.98

Rollers.....................$ 12.52 3.79

Truck drivers:

Dump Truck..................$ 10.69 .75

Liquid Asphalt/Tack

Truck.......................$ 11.92 2.97

Water Truck.................$ 11.74 .58

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses

(29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

In the listing above, the "SU" designation means that rates listed under the identifier do not reflect collectively bargained wage and fringe benefit rates. Other designations indicate unions whose rates have been determined to be prevailing.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour

Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the

Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations

Wage and Hour Division

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator

(See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative

Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .