Amendment 01 FA4416-08-R-0010.doc
DOC document 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Award Notice for Andrews AFB & Bolling AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER)
- Solicitation number
- FA4416-08-R0010
About this file
Amendment 01--FA4416-08-R-0010
View the file
Other files
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
1. The purpose of this ammendment is to update the Past Performance Questionnaire and change the proposal due date.
2. Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire w/ Cover Letter is hereby replaced with the attached, updated version. The previous version posted on 14 May 2008 is no longer valid and will not be accepted for the evaluation of past performance.
3. Offeror must acknowledge receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted, as stated in Block 11 method (b) of this amendment.
4. The required response/proposal due date for past performance questionnaires is hereby changed from 16 June 2008 04:00 PM DST to 3 July 2008 04:00 PM DST.
5. The required response/proposal due date for volumes I, II, III, and IV is hereby changed from 23 June 2008 04:00 PM DST to 3 July 2008 04:00 PM DST.
6. All others terms remain unchanged.
FA4416-08-R-0010
ATTACHMENT 5
TO: Insert addressee and address
FROM: Insert company name and address
SUBJECT: Request for Past/Present Performance Information
1. You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of insert company’s name. Insert company’s name is currently being considered for a combined Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) IDIQ contract at Andrews AFB and Bolling AFB, DC.
2. Your prompt attention to this survey will be greatly appreciated. Please be sure to e-mail the completed worksheet directly Lt Nathaniel Franz at nathaniel.franz@us.af.mil. Worksheets shall not be sent back to insert company’s name. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this request, please contact Lt Nathaniel Franz at 301-981-1958 or by email at the addresses listed above. In the event that email cannot be utilized, the questionnaires can be faxed to 301-981-1907.
FA4416-08-R-0010
ATTACHMENT 5
Past Performance Questionnaire SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor requesting information prior to mailing)
A. Contractor’s name and address: ___________________________________________
B. Point of Contact: _______________________________________________________
C. Phone/Fax/Email Address: _______________________________________________
D. Contract Number: ______________________________________________________ E. Project Title/Description of Work: ________________________________________
F. Contract Type: Firm-Fixed Price Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity Cost-Reimbursement
G. Project Award Date: _______________ Scheduled Completion Date ______________
Current/Final Completion Date ____________
H. Project Award Amount: ____________ Current/Final Project Amount _____________
I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Supplier
J. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in SECTION B of this Questionnaire
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
EVALUATED BY:
(Signature) (Date)
_____________________________________ Address: _____________________________
(Typed or Printed Name) _____________________________________
(Title)
(Phone/Fax/Email)
NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information shall not be disclosed
FA4416-08-R-0010
ATTACHMENT 5
| A |
| B |
| C |
| D |
NA
| EXCELLENT |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
NOT APPLICABLE
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is some doubt that the offeror will successfully perform. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is extreme doubt that the offeror will successfully perform. |
No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no rating can be reasonably assigned.
EVALUATION AREAS
I. Quality A B C D NA
| 1. |
| Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 2. |
| Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedules. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 3. |
| Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 4. |
| Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punchlist items. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 5. |
| Contractor thoroughly reviewed design package proposals for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with contract requirements. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 6. |
| Contractor designs were all concise, accurate and captured all details of the site visit. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
II. Timely Performance A B C D NA
| 1. |
| Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 2. |
| Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a cure notice or show cause letter. (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if liquidated damages were assessed.) |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 3. |
| Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 4. |
| Contractor submitted the progress schedule and interim progress reports as required in a timely manner and the schedule was approved prior to actual construction. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 5. |
| Contractor provided submittals on time as required. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 6. |
| Contractor provided payhrolls for both their firm and their subcontractor’s employees as required and scheduled |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 7. |
| Contractor provided timely resolution of all punchlist items. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
III. Management Effectiveness A B C D NA
| 1. |
| Contractor provided experienced qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 2. |
| Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 3. |
| Contractor hired, maintained, and replaces as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 4. |
| Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 5. |
| Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 6. |
| Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 7. |
| Contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
IV. Compliance with Labor Standards A B C D NA
| 1. |
| Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 2. |
| Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a cure notice or show cause letter. (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if liquidated damages were assessed.) |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 3. |
| Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 4. |
| Contractor submitted the progress schedule and interim progress reports as required in a timely manner and the schedule was approved prior to actual construction. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 5. |
| Contractor provided submittals on time as required. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 6. |
| Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractor’s employees as required and scheduled |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 7. |
| Contractor provided timely resolution of all punchlist items. |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
V. Compliance with Safety Standards A B C D NA
| 1. |
| Adequacy of Safety Plan |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| 2. |
| Implementation of Safety Plan |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
VI. Overall Performance A B C D NA
| 1. |
| Please rate the contractor’s overall performance |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
| □ |
FA4416-08-R-0010
ATTACHMENT 5
Additional Information:
(1) Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
(2) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?
(3) Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
(4) Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, write on back, or attach pages.)
Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire. If you have any additional comments or questions, you can contact Lt Nathaniel Franz at 301-981-1958 / nathanial.franz@us.af.mil.
SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
The required response date/time has changed from 23-Jun-2008 04:00 PM to 03-Jul-2008 04:00 PM.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .