Answers Posted on 22 Oct 11.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 206 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA3002-10-R-0059
About this file
Log attached with responses to submitted Comments and Questions as of 22 Oct 2011. Additional responses will be provided at a later date.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 124 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q & A
| Count | Tracking Number | RFP/PWS Reference | Comments/Questions | Answers/Actions | Posted CONS |
| 1 | M-0001 | Who is the pest control subcontractor and what is the value/size of the pest control portion? | The Government is not privy to subcontractor relationships with the prime contractor. | 21-Oct-11 | |
| 2 | T-11-0001 | Appendix 11C.1 | Appendix 11C.1 (Maps and work area layout) states “See technical library located in CEPT, programs Flight - Technical support G section of 325th Civil Engineering, Building 421.” It would be helpful if the Government could provide these maps and work area layouts as Technical Exhibits in the RFP. | ||
| 3 | T-11-0002 | PWS 11 B | There are two separate locations of meters for electric and water. What is the difference between the meters? | The latest Workload Estimate on FEDBIZOPPS.GOV only shows 6 water meters. The previous Workload Estimate did show separate locations of meters for electric and water. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 4 | T-11-0003 | PWS 11.1.2.2.3.1.2 | How many doors and what type need to be maintained (i.e., electrical/manual, fire door, overhead, hangar, etc)? Data is required so that a proper man-hour estimate can be generated. | ||
| 5 | T-11-0004 | PWS 11.2.2.3.3 | Please provide a sweeping schedule so that a proper estimate for man-hours can be performed. | ||
| 6 | T-11-0005 | PWS 11.1.2.2.2.5 | How many UH units will require maintenance and cleaning each year? | ||
| 7 | C-RFP-0001 | Section L-RFP | Reference (2) above, the Proposal Organization Chart indicates the Technical Proposal is restricted to 50 pages, including Setion1 Technical Approach, Section 2 Mobilization and Section 3 Program Management and Staffing. Reference (2) above, Special Instructions defines numerous items the offeror is required to address in the Technical Proposal, supposedly within 50 pages. It is unrealistic of the Government to require the amount of information required in the Special Instructions to be limited to 50 pages. As examples: The Government is asking offerors to provide “detailed description” of training, recruiting, certifying and qualifying personnel”; demonstrate “an adequate approach” for meeting 7 major areas of the statement of work; provide a Manpower Matrix prescribed by the Government that in itself will consume 5-10 pages of the proposal. I could provide several other examples requiring detailed input to adequately address the Government’s requirements. Please reconsider and raise the page count to 150 pages (at the minimum) or significantly reduce the amount and kind of information required to be addressed within the 50 pages. | The government will not reconsider raising the page count. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 9 | T-11-0007 | PWS 11-1 | The above paragraph references “RPIE”- Real Property Installed Equipment. Please include in the final RFP a listing of RPIE. Also provide a listing of Real Property (building) square footage by location. The information is needed to develop a realistic estimate. Please provide information in Xcel format. | ||
| 13 | T-11-0008 | PWS 11B | Each area (example EMCS) is followed by some type of number. What does the number designation mean? | The number you are referring to in the “Shop codes” it is also use to indentify the shop in the IWIMS system to track labor and material cost. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 14 | T-11-0009 | 11B | On this page/data there are no hours shown work center for 492 (EMCS) nor 442 (Pavement). Does this mean RWP work is not required for EMCS or for pavement? | ||
| 15 | T-11-0010 | 11B | Is the Focus Work covered under the Davis Bacon Act? If so, a Davis Bacon Wage Determination is required. | The Davis Bacon Act does not apply to this solicitation. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 16 | C-RFP-0002 | RFP Section L | What is the page limit of the Specific Content portion of the Past Performance Volume? | The page limit for the Specific Content portion of the Past Performance Volume is included in the page count for the past performance information sheets (no more than 5 pages for each contract). | 21-Oct-11 |
| 17 | M-0005 | What is the range of magnitude for this solicitation? | Please see the PWS and Section B. The range of magnitude will not be provided. | 21-Oct-11 | |
| 18 | C-RFP-0003 | RFP | The referenced section of the PPIF states: “For Government contracts provide current information on all three individuals”. The form only identifies areas for two individuals: Program/Site Manager and Administrative Contracting Officer. Who is the 3rd person? | The 3rd person will be provided only if your Program Manager is different from the Site Manager. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 19 | T-11-0011 | 11.1.2.2 | What real property and RPIE is designated as critical systems by the Government? | ||
| 20 | T-11-0012 | 11.1.2.2.3.2 | Please provide standards for each type of ground maintenance: • Improved (mowing cycle, height standards, etc?) |
• Semi-Improved (mowing cycle, height standards, etc?)
• Unimproved: See Air Force Level of Services
• Landscaping (trimming, etc)
• Edging Standards?
• Replacement of dead grass
• Irrigation of improved areas (how often)
• Fence line, maintenance or criteria?
| Improved: Between 2 inches and 4 inches. • Semi-Improved: Between 4 to 18 inches. • Unimproved: Determined by Air Force Level • Landscaping: Between 2 inches and 4 inches. • Edging Standards: Turf shall not be cut back more than 1 inch away from edges. • Replacement of dead grass: Ensure repairs conform to surrounding areas. • Irrigation of improved areas. IAW the base watering schedule as determined by the Base Energy Manager. • Fence line, maintenance or criteria: Ensure vegetation does not exceed the height of the adjacent mowed areas. | 21-Oct-11 | ||||
| 21 | T-11-0013 | 11.1.2.2.3.1.2 | Doors: Please provide the number of doors by type that require maintenance. | ||
| 22 | T-11-0014 | 11.1.2.2.1.3.1 | Please provide a definition of “measured work orders” | ||
| 23 | T-11-0015 | 11.1.2.2.1.4 | How many Land Mobil Radio (LMR) devices do we control and issue? | ||
| 24 | T-11-0016 | 11.1.2.2.3.1 | |||
| 25 | T-11-0017 | 11.1.2.2.3 | |||
| 26 | T-11-0018 | PWS 11.1.2.2.2.5 | UH Maintenance: Please provide the average number of rooms/suites turn over per year. How many square feet of dorm rooms require painting on a 3-year cycle? | ||
| 27 | T-11-0019 | PWS 11.1.2.2.2.4 | Please provide the base watering schedule | ||
| 28 | T-11-0020 | PWS 11.1.2.2.2.3 | Industrial water treatment program: How many close loop systems require water treatment? | ||
| 30 | T-11-0022 | PWS 11.1.2.2.2.1 | Is the corrosion control and cathodic control programs a part of the current preventive maintenance program? | ||
| 31 | T-11-0023 | PWS 11.1.2.2.1.10 | How many CE Vehicles are included in the CE Vehicle Fleet 7? Who maintains these vehicles? | The Government Provided Vehicle (GFV) are listed in PWS Section 11, Appendix 11-FF, any additional commercial design, general-purpose, special-purpose, base maintenance, and material handling vehicles necessary for contract performance shall be Contractor Provided Vehicles (CPV). Please reference PWS Section 2, 2-3, paragraph 2.3.1.4. | 20-Oct-11 |
| 32 | T-11-0024 | PWS 11.1.2.2.1.6 | How many parts are included in the self help store? What is the turn over rate? | ||
| 34 | T-11-0026 | PWS 11-B | Is there any work described in the RFP that is not reflected in the RWP hours (page 11-B-6) work load estimate reflection in Page 11-B-7 and 11-B-8 plus focus work shown on page 11-B-9. If there is, what are the areas and what is their historical performance? | ||
| 35 | C-RFP-0004 | RFP | Leadership is relooking at this portion of Section M, I am waiting for their decision/response to see if we can or will amend this portion. | 21-Oct-11 | |
| 42 | T-0032 | Does the current CMMS system have mobile handheld units? If the CMMS system has mobile handheld units will those units be available for the successful service provider? | At present the Integrated Work Information Management System (IWIMS) and the Automated Civil Engineer System (ACES) are the CMMSs currently being used at Tyndall AFB. Per paragraph 11.1.2.2.1.4. LAND MOBILE RADIOS (LMR): Control and issue LMRs and other Government approved communication devices for the accomplishment of CE assigned duties. Purchase new and/or replacement radios after coordination with the 325th Communication Squadron. All radios provided by the Government or purchased by the service provider in support of this contract remain the property of the Government. | 20-Oct-11 | |
| 43 | T-0033 | What was the AF’s cost for unleaded and diesel fuel per gallon historically for the last year? | 20-Oct-11 | ||
| 44 | T-0034 | Please provide a complete list of the Real Property Installed Equipment that the AF expects this contract to maintain. | |||
| 48 | T-0038 | Is there another Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) other than IWIMS and ACES being utilized at Tyndall AFB? If there is what is the system? | 19-Oct-11 | ||
| 49 | T-11-0039 | 11.1.2.2.4.2 | |||
| 50 | T-0040 | For Fire Suppression and Fire Alarm Reporting, what are the existing warranties? | |||
| 51 | T-0041 | How many fire hydrants does Tyndall AFB have? Who accomplishes the annual fire hydrant flow tests. | |||
| 52 | T-0042 | What is the make and model of the current Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)? | |||
| 55 | T-0045 | Please provide an RPIE inventory. | |||
| 58 | T-11-0048 | 11.1.2.2.3.1 | Reference paragraph 11.1.2.2.3.1 Active Roof Management Inspection Program. Who currently provides the Active Roof Management Inspection Program? When were the last inspections accomplished? What is the status of the roofs based on the last inspection reports? | ||
| 59 | T-11-0049 | 11.1.2.2.1.5.2 | Reference paragraph 11.1.2.2.1.5.2 Hazardous Material Management. Does Tyndall AFB have a HAZMAT Pharmacy? If yes, will the SP have access to the pharmacy? | ||
| 60 | M-0006 | Contracting | Can the governement provide a list of the curretns services that are subcontrated out to specialty compancies (Pest control, fire alarms, etc)? Also can the government provide a list of names of those subcontractors? | The government is not privy to subcontractor relationships with the prime contractor. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 61 | C-0006 | Can the government Provide the sign-in- Sheet of the attendees and the powerpoint presentation privided at the 9/29/11 pre-proposal/site tour ? | This information was provided with the minutes. This was posted inFedBizOps on 13 Oct 2011. | 19-Oct-11 | |
| 62 | C-RFP-0005 | RFP | Request that the deadline for submitting questions be extended due to the final PWS not yet available. Additionally questions could arise after the RFP is released. | The final RFP was released on 30 Sep 2011. The deadline for submitting questions (Site Visit) was changed from 5 Oct 2011 to 11 Oct 2011. Comments and questions cutoff date is 13 Oct 2011 per Amendment 01. | 19-Oct-11 |
| 63 | C-RFP-0007 | RFP | The page count indicated for paragraphs 1 & 1.2 of this volume are 5 (shown to the right of para. 1 Table of Contents and 1.1 Summary Page. Does this mean that the TOC (that is excluded by page count in the Note to this chart) and the Summary page combined must not exceed 5 pages? Or, does it mean the Summary Page is not to exceed 5 pages? | The TOC is excluded from the page count. The Summary Page is not to exceed 5 pages. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 72 | T-H-0058 | H-13 | RFP Para H-13 Page 47 of 84 states DeCA and the Medical Facility have requested to be a part of this contract, however you have only listed the Medical Clinic in the CLIN update posted 23 September 2011 to FBO. Please advise if DeCA should be included and provide workload? | H-13 THE MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIY (MTF) |
The Medical Treatment Facilities (MTF), one of AETC reimbursable customers, have requested approval to manage and provide services to maintain real property and real property installed equipment (RPIE) under their control via a service contract funded through their respective activity. Should a final decision be rendered to approve this initiative, the Government reserves the right to remove any or all of these requirements from the Base Operating Support (BOS) contract. Any workload changes caused by these initiatives will be incorporated via bilateral modification; workload specifics to each affected functional area will be adjusted accordingly upon implementation.
| 20-Oct-11 | |||||
| 73 | T-H-0059 | H-20 | RFP Para H-20 Fuel Products, Page 48 of 84 states the use of Govt. fuel is authorized at DESC price (Can we obtain the daily pricing during the proposal development period for analysis?) | 20-Oct-11 | |
| 74 | T-11-0060 | 11.1.2.2.2 | |||
| 90 | T-0073 | Do you have a current listing of the spare parts inventory? | |||
| 91 | T-0074 | What on-base facilities are considered "critical" or "high profile"? | |||
| 94 | T-0077 | What are the manufacturer/type(s) of building automation system(s) in use at Tyndall? Will the supplier be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the systems? | |||
| 95 | C-RFP-0008 | RFP | In Section D, Part 3, Volume III – Past Performance Information, the RFP states:“4) Specific Content. Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the Offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk,”HOWEVER, the Proposal Organization Chart, found in Section E, does not allow any extra pages for this “Specific Content” section in the allotted page numbers. Please add to the current page limit for Volume III to allow for inclusion of this information. | The page limit for the Specific Content portion of the Past Performance Volume is included in the page count for the past performance information sheets (no more than 5 pages for each contract). No additional pages will be added to the page limit. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 97 | T-0079 | ||||
| 98 | T-0080 | ||||
| 105 | T-02-0087 | 2.1.2.3.7 | Can a Top secret cleared personnel be unescorted in the AFCOM building, or do they still have to be escorted by the base? | ||
| 108 | T-11-0090 | 11-B-6 | Page 11-B-6 in the draft PWS shows Historical Workload Data, Please provide Work Center description and breakdown of different groups within that work center. | 20-Oct-11 | |
| 110 | T-11-0092 | PWS Section 11-2 | Section 11-2 page no. 11-2-5 in draft PWS labeled Operation-Service Summary item no. 38, Please provide additional information if this is pertaining to Final Denial Barriers at all gates / Base Entry location or Aircraft Barrier maintenance. | ||
| 113 | T-0095 | Highway 98 roads sides, it was stated on the site visit road side responsibility ends at the building 1800 area. Please provide single line drawings for the Highway 98 area. | |||
| 114 | T-0096 | Flight line areas- we realize your grounds are flat with little drainage. Are there areas in the grass that are soft/swampy that equipment will sink during maintenance of these areas? If so, how large are these areas or area? | |||
| 115 | T-0097 | Could the government please provide single line drawings of grounds maintenance areas with fence line, irrigation, etc. Example: Maintain Irrigation System 100 each (What different systems, 100 zones, 100 heads, etc.) |
Landscape areas and Athletic areas (They are combined in fertilization and aeration, 35 acres) the orginal acreages are listed as 21 acres and 25 acres.
Maintain Fence Lines - the maps in the back of the room during the site visit did not clearly identify these.
| 116 | T-0098 | Could the government please provide the Storm Water Prevention Plan with the drawings included? | |||
| 117 | M-0010 | When will the government provide a copy of the site visit sign in sheet? | A copy of all individuals who attended the site-visit was provided as an attachment with the minutes posted on FedBizOps. | 21-Oct-11 | |
| 118 | T-H-0099 | H-17 | |||
| 119 | T-11-0100 | 11.1.2.2.2.3 | |||
| 120 | T-11-0101 | 11.1.2.2.2.3 | The listing of equipment in Appendix 11B is not detailed or sufficient to accurately define and estimate the cost of maintained for listed equipment. For example there is no capacity or size information for cooling towers, Heating Plants Boilers lists a quantity of 40 with no capacity/size information. There is no way to differentiate between large chillers. Data as presented would suggest there are nineteen 107 ton chillers, (19*107 = 2036 total tons) however we assume it is unreasonable that there 19 identical chillers over 100 tons on site. Equipment size affects manpower estimates based on frequency of recurring work (preventive/planned maintenance) Based on Paragraph 11.1.2.2.2.7 requirements, it appears that there is a comprehensive RPIE list available on the current contract. Please provide the comprehensive and complete RPIE list to include type of equipment and structures, manufacturer, model numbers (where available), capacity (such as tonnage, HP, MBTUs etc.) and location. | ||
| 121 | T-11-0102 | 11.1.2.2.2.3 | This paragraph requires us to “provide an industrial water treatment program designed to improve heat transfer systems by reducing scale buildup.” The listing of equipment in Appendix 11B is not detailed or sufficient to accurately define and estimate the cost of a water treatment program. b. Please provide a detailed, comprehensive list of closed loop chill water systems, closed loop hot water and open loop systems that require water treatment. Please include equipment such as boilers, chillers and water towers included in the water treatment program. Current information listed in Appendix 11 is inadequate to design and estimate an accurate water treatment program. |
If there is a water treatment program in place please answer the following: -Is there automated water treatment equipment in place now?
-If so, please identify what type(s) of system and whether the equipment will remain in place for the follow-on contract?
- If there are automated water treatment systems in place now, please identify the ones that are monitored through the DDC systems?
-Who currently performs the water treatment?
| 122 | T-11-0103 | 11.1.2.2.2.1.5.3 | Given that this paragraph is “reserved” does this mean we are not responsible for Chill water systems to include maintenance and treatment? |
| 124 | T-11-0105 | 11.1.2.2.2.4 | The listing of Plumbing systems is vague in Appendix 11, identifying only linear feet of water lines and sanitary sewerage lines. Does this mean the contractor is only responsible for maintain the water lines? |
-Are the water lines listed interior LF or exterior LF?
-If the water lines listed are exterior LF, please clarify responsibility for maintaining these lines since 11.1.2.2.2.1.3. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS is reserved and it would seem exterior piping would fall under this paragraph.
-Usual interior plumbing requirements delineate a line of demarcation for responsibility normally at the from head wall entering the building to the terminal equipment (faucets etc.). Please clarify where the line of demarcation for interior plumbing maintenance begins.
-Please provide all equipment such as pumps, valves, traps, water coolers, fixtures etc. that is part of interior plumbing maintenance. Based on Paragraph 11.1.2.2.2.7 requirements, it appears that there is a comprehensive RPIE list available on the current contract. Please provide the comprehensive and complete RPIE list to include type of equipment and structures, manufacturer, model numbers (where available), capacity (such as tonnage, HP, MBTUs etc.) and location.
| 125 | T-11-0106 | 11.1.2.2.2.4 | Who certifies backflow preventers? Please provide a list by size of all backflow preventers. When was the last backflow prevention survey conducted? | ||
| 126 | T-11-0107 | 11.1.2.2.2.4 | Appendix 11 identifies sprinklers systems in two places with different quantities. Water Distribution Systems identifies Irrigation Systems Underground with a quantity of 207. Grounds Maintenance Services says Maintain Irrigation System with a quantity of 100. Please clarify how these “irrigation systems” differ. Please provide the number of heads, pumps and timers/zones associated with irrigation systems on site. | ||
| 127 | T-11-0108 | 11.1.2.2.4.1 | Please provide all EMCS systems currently in use by manufacturer, model and software build currently used (for example Tridium Niagara AX 3.5, Metasys, Apogee etc.) We assume software upgrades are considered materials costs and are part of the reimbursable CLINs. Appendix 11 lists total points but does not identify electric or pneumatic controls. Please provide a comprehensive list of electric and pneumatic controls. | ||
| 130 | T-11-0110 | 11.1.2.2.3.1.2 | (repeat of a previous question, re-worded) How many, what type (Hanger, Overhead, Rollup, Fire Door, etc.) and which are electrical operated or manual? Information is required to form an estimate of the man-hours required to maintain these items. | ||
| 131 | C-RFP-0010 | Section B Clin 13 | CLIN 0013, Minor Services - Cost Reimbursable, H-17. Should the referenced "H" paragraph be H-16, Minor Services? Please clarify. | Concur. The reference will be corrected (Amended) to read H-16 for CLINs X013 in Section B, as well as to Attachment 5, Tyndall Cost Price Model 19 Oct 11. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 132 | T-11-0111 | 11.1.2.2.2.1.3 | |||
| 134 | T-11-0113 | 11.1.2.2.2.3 | |||
| 135 | C-RFP-0011 | Section B | |||
| 136 | T-11-0114 | T-11-0114 | Regarding offeror input on the DRAFT solicitation, please advise if the Government’s responses to those questions are still valid and applicable to the FINAL solicitation.” | ||
| 138 | T-0116 | DD254 | The attached DD254 is blank. Please provide a DD254 completed with the security requirements related to this contract. | A completed DD Form 254 will be provided on the next upcoming amendment. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 140 | M-0011 | description | The 30 Sep 11 MEMORANDUM FOR PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS (“Tyndall Executive Summary”) refers to RFP FA3002-10-R-0059 as “Tyndall Civil Engineering Support Services, Tyndall AFB, FL.” The PWS title page (“00 00a TYN Cover Page 26 Sep 11”) says, “TYNDALL AFB FL BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT.” The FBO synopsis calls this project “Tyndall AFB Civil Engineering Operations Services.”Please specify the Government’s preferred title for this solicitation/contract. | ||
| 141 | C-RFP-0012 | RFP | Section 1.7 and 3.4 of the Price Proposal both ask for “Signatory Authority to Contractually Bind Offeror (signed at VP level or above).” Please advise if this information is required in one (specify) or both sections. | This is a duplicate. The solicitation will be amended and 1.7 will be removed. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 142 | C-RFP-0013 | RFP | The information required in Section 1 of the Price Proposal is typically provided at the beginning of the Technical Proposal or in a separate volume. Does the Government wish for this information to remain in the Price Proposal?Regarding Section 1.1, please specify any required or expected content for the Executive Summary. | Please follow the Proposal Organizationa Chart for Volume I as stated.The Government does not specify content for the Executive Summary of the Contractor’s proposal. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 143 | T-11-0118 | 11.1.2.2.3.2 | Please provide the required level of services standards for the requirements listed in Appendix B under the Grounds Maintenance Services. | 21-Oct-11 | |
| 145 | T-11-0120 | 11.1.2.2.4.5 | Please clarify if the service provider is responsible for maintaining the airfield ramp lighting? If the service provider is responsible, please provide the number of ramp lights. | ||
| 146 | T-0121 | 11.1.2.2 | |||
| 147 | T-11-0122 | 11.1.2.2.2.2. | |||
| 148 | T-11-0123 | 11.1.2.2.3.4 | |||
| 149 | T-11-0124 | 11.1.2.2.4.3.1 | |||
| 150 | T-11-0125 | 11.1.2.2.1.3.1. | |||
| 159 | T-0134 | ||||
| 160 | T-0135 | ||||
| 161 | T-11-0136 | 11.1.2.2.1 | |||
| 162 | T-11-0137 | 11B | |||
| 163 | T-0138 | ||||
| 164 | T-0139 | ||||
| 165 | T-11-0140 | 11.1.2.2.2.1.3 | |||
| 166 | T-0141 | What are the dollar limits, if any, for NTE on reimbursable items? For single items? | |||
| 171 | T-0146 | ||||
| 172 | T-11-0147 | 11.1.2.2.2.5 | |||
| 174 | T-0149 | ||||
| 175 | T-0150 | ||||
| 176 | T-11-0151 | 11B | Will bollards be listed in the PWS? The workload estimates shows the number and type of various bollards but there is no requirement in the PWS for this service. Is this requirement going to be added to the PWS or is this requirement included in the pavement sustainment section as vehicle barriers? | ||
| 177 | T-01-0152 | 1.1.9 | |||
| 178 | T-11-0153 | 11.1.2.1 | |||
| 179 | T-11-0154 | 11.1.2.2.3.2 | |||
| 180 | T-11-0155 | 11.1.2.2.3.3 | |||
| 181 | T-11-0156 | 11.1.2.2.2.1.2 | |||
| 182 | T-11-0157 | 11.1.2.2.2.1.2 | |||
| 183 | T-11-0158 | 11.1.2.2.4.2 | |||
| 184 | T-11-0159 | 11.1.2.2.2.1 | |||
| 185 | T-11-0160 | 11.1.2.2.2.1 | |||
| 186 | T-11-0161 | 11.1.2.2.2.1 | |||
| 187 | T-11-0162 | 11.1.2.2.4 | |||
| 188 | T-11-0163 | 11B | |||
| 189 | T-02-0164 | 2.1.2.13.4 | |||
| 190 | T-11-0165 | 11.1.2.2.4.7 | |||
| 191 | T-11-0166 | 11B | |||
| 192 | T-11-0167 | 11B | |||
| 193 | T-11-0168 | 11B | |||
| 194 | T-11-0169 | 11B | |||
| 195 | T-11-0170 | 11B | |||
| 196 | T-11-0171 | Page 11-1-6 | |||
| 197 | T-11-0172 | 11B | |||
| 198 | T-11-0173 | Page 11-1-6 | |||
| 200 | T-11-0175 | 11B | Will the Government identify the trades/type of work performed at each work center shown in the “Total Actual RWP Hours” table on this page? | 21-Oct-11 | |
| 201 | T-11-0176 | 11B | |||
| 202 | T-11-0177 | 11B | |||
| 203 | T-11-0178 | 11B | |||
| 204 | T-11-0179 | 11.1.2.2.2.1.4 | |||
| 205 | T-11-0180 | 11B | |||
| 206 | T-11-0181 | 11B | |||
| 207 | T-11-0182 | 11B | |||
| 208 | T-11-0183 | 11B | |||
| 209 | T-11-0184 | 11B | |||
| 210 | T-11-0185 | 11B | |||
| 211 | C-RFP-0014 | CBA | Which takes precedence, the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) or the service contract act (SCA)? | The provisions of the Service Contract Act apply to all service contracts over $2,500 regardless of whether employees are covered by a Collective Bargaining Agreement or a Service Contract Act Wage Determination. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 212 | C-RFP-0015 | Section L-RFP | Should this FAR clause also reference cost reimbursable? | It is not necessary to mention the inclusion of cost reimbursable CLINS for this Firm-Fixed Price Contract. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 213 | C-RFP-0016 | Section I | Recommend these two FAR clauses be deleted given that this is a FFP contract. | These clauses will not be deleted. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 214 | C-RFP-0017 | RFP | Clause H-16 is referenced for each of the referenced CLINs. Clause H-16 is entitled, “Minor Services”. Should the reference be H-15, “Reimbursable CLINs”? | The reference will be corrected (Amended) to read H-15 for CLINs X012 and X014 in Section B, as well as to Attachment 5, Tyndall Cost Price Model 19 Oct 11. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 215 | C-RFP-0018 | RFP | The CLINs reference Section H-17, which is entitled, “Replacement of Government Furnished Property (GFP)”. Should the reference be H-16, “ Minor Services”? | Concur. The reference will be corrected (amended) read H-16 for CLINs X013 in Section B, as well as to Attachment 5, Tyndall Cost Price Model 19 Oct 11. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 216 | C-RFP-0019 | RFP | The CLIN references clause H-7, entitled, “Federal Holidays”. Should the reference be clause H-6, “Mobilization and Service Provider Changeover”? | Concur. The reference will be corrected (Amended) to read H-6 for CLIN 0015 in Section B, as well as to Attachment 5, Tyndall Cost Price Model 19 Oct 11. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 217 | C-RFP-0020 | RFP | The paragraph references Attachment 9, “Manpower Index”. Should this be Attachment 6, “Manpower Index”? | It should be Atachment 6, I will amend to read this on our next amendment. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 218 | C-RFP-0021 | RFP | In accordance with instructions for Attachment 5, “Tyndall Cost Price Model 30 Sep 11”, on tab “Mobilization & Base Sched B” Column B, Row 2, we are instructed to enter our name as the offeror. However, this cell is locked and we are not able to enter data. Does the Government intend to provide a revised attachment containing unlocked cells that require the offeror to enter data? | Concur. Will be amended - The cell has been unlocked to allow input for Attachment 5, Tyndall Cost Price Model 19 Oct 11. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 219 | T-11-0186 | 11B | |||
| 220 | T-11-0187 | 11B | |||
| 221 | T-11-0188 | 11B | |||
| 222 | T-11-0189 | 11B | |||
| 223 | T-11-0190 | 11B | |||
| 224 | T-11-0191 | Appendix B | |||
| 225 | T-11-0192 | AppendixB | |||
| 227 | T-1-0194 | 1.1.9 | |||
| 228 | C-RFP-0022 | RFP | The Attachment 5 worksheets do not allow providing information regarding hours/costs of labor by position and do not allow offerors to provide information on G&A and Fee Rates. Is it the Government’s intention to evaluate pricing from offerors without this information in hand to ensure that calculations are correct and that staffing in the Technical Volume of offerors matches staffing used in the Pricing Volume? | Please provide only the information being requested. Refer to Section L, Paragraph 1, "Data beyond that required by this instruction shall not be considered or evaluated." | 21-Oct-11 |
| 229 | C-RFP-0023 | RFP | The outline for the Price Volume includes Item 1.6, Validity Statement. This is not addressed anywhere else in the solicitation. Will the Government explain what it requires offerors to submit for this item? | 1.6 Validity Statement will be removed via an amendment. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 230 | C-RFP-0024 | RFP | The outline for the Price Volume includes Item 1.7, “Contact Information and Signatory Authority to Contractually Bind Offeror (signed at VP level or above)” and Item 3.4, “Signatory Authority to Contractually bind Offeror (letter to be signed at VP level or above)”. Is it the Government’s intent that a signed letter of signatory authority be inserted in two separate places in the same volume, or may offerors simply refer to Item 3.4 in their discussion of Item 1.7? | This is a duplicate. The solicitation will be amended and 1.7 will be removed. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 231 | C-RFP-0025 | RFP | The outline for the Price Volume includes Item 1.7, “Contact Information and Signatory Authority to Contractually Bind Offeror (signed at VP level or above)” and Item 3.4, “Signatory Authority to Contractually bind Offeror (letter to be signed at VP level or above)”. Is it the Government’s intent that a signed letter of signatory authority be inserted in two separate places in the same volume, or may offerors simply refer to Item 3.4 in their discussion of Item 1.7? | This is a duplicate. The solicitation will be amended and 1.7 will be removed. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 232 | T-11-0195 | 11FF | |||
| 233 | T-11-0196 | 11.3.2. | |||
| 234 | T-0197 | ||||
| 237 | T-11-0200 | 11.1.2.2.2.1.2 | |||
| 238 | T-11-0201 | 11FF.1 | |||
| 239 | T-0202 | 11B | CLINS 0011- 4011 Is for Medical Group Maintenance Support. Work load for Medical Group Estimated Man-hours are: HVC Craftsman 650MH |
Electrician 320 MH Plumber 650 MH There is no PWS description of the support required to be provided to the Medical Group. Please provide a detailed description of the required functions to support the medical group.
| PWS section 11-1 paragraph 11.1.2.2 supports the requirement for the MTF. | 21-Oct-11 | |||
| 240 | T-0203 | 11B | Paragraph H-13 states that the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) has a services contract funded through their specific activity. Page 11-B-9 estimates workload against the Medical Group. Is the workload provided in 11-B-9 in addition to the support provided by the Medical Treatment Facility separate contract and collected against CLIN 0011? | H-13 THE MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIY (MTF) |
The Medical Treatment Facilities (MTF), one of AETC reimbursable customers, have requested approval to manage and provide services to maintain real property and real property installed equipment (RPIE) under their control via a service contract funded through their respective activity. Should a final decision be rendered to approve this initiative, the Government reserves the right to remove any or all of these requirements from the Base Operating Support (BOS) contract. Any workload changes caused by these initiatives will be incorporated via bilateral modification; workload specifics to each affected functional area will be adjusted accordingly upon implementation.
| 20-Oct-11 | |||||
| 242 | T-11-0205 | 11.1.2.2.2.2. | |||
| 243 | T-11-0206 | 11.1.2.2.1.3 | |||
| 244 | C-RFP-0026 | RFP | Instructions for Attachment 5 states: "The Offeror shall complete the Cost/Price Model, IAW instructions contained therein, provided at Attachment 5 of this RFP and submit (two) 2 hard copies and one e-version with the proposal, Under no Circumstances shall this data and documentation be included elsewhere in the proposal." Is Attachment 5 two hard copies in addition to the Original Unbound document? | Yes, refer to the Proposal Organization Chart at the end of Section L (page 77). | 21-Oct-11 |
| 245 | C-RFP-0027 | RFP | The Past Performance Information (PPI) sheet instructs the contractor to provide current contact information for the three (3) individuals for the contractor’s Government contract. There are just two (2) contact roles provided in the PPI. Who is the third contact the Government wants the contractor to include? | The 3rd person will be provided only if your Program Manager is different from the Site Manager. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 246 | C-RFP-0028 | RFP | Are the Cost CLINs for CE Travel/Training, Minor Services, and Work Order Supplies & Materials non-competitive CLINs since a not-to-exceed amount is provided? May a Handling Charge be loaded the Cost CLINs? | CLINs X0012 and X013 are Cost Reimbursable NTE CLINs; a handling charge cannot be loaded to these CLINs | 21-Oct-11 |
| 247 | C-RFP-0029 | RFP | |||
| 248 | C-RFP-0030 | RFP | Clause H-5 will be been revised/Amended. | 21-Oct-11 | |
| 249 | M-H-0012 | H-20 | The prescription for the above, 22.1006( C)(1) , states if the contract is expected to be a fixed-price, time-and-materials, or labor-hour service contract and it is to these that the 52.222-43 clause states may be adjusted. The hours reimbursable in H-5 refers more correctly to time and materials or fixed labor hours rates, neither of which are applicable as this is a fixed price contract.The clause at H-5 would more correctly be applicable to a cost plus time and materials line item or fixed price labor hours rates than a contract adjustment under a fixed price contract. Furthermore, it creates an undue burden on small businesses for the administrative and accounting requirements imposed by a monthly itemized billing for the hours, wage differences and fringe differences as well as regulatory burdens such as FICA, FUTA, and SUTA applicable to those differences. We respectfully request you consider changing this clause to be in line with the normal adjustment of a contract adjustment to the fixed price effort. | Government fuel products for service provider owned or leased vehicles and equipment are not reimbursable under Cost CLINs X0014. Please note the reference paragraph will be changed to read as follows: H-20 Fuel Availability. Government fuel products may be available for use by the service provider in service provider owned or leased vehicles and equipment and shall be used by the service provider in government owned or leased vehicles and equipment to perform the PWS requirements. Government fuel products that are issued to service provider owned or leased vehicles and equipment will be charged (based on the current DESC Price Bulletin + surcharge) to the service provider through the use of a "T" DoDAAC. Government fuel products that are issued to government owned or leased vehicles and equipment used by the service provider will be charged to the government. To obtain use of government fuel products, the service provider shall obtain a “T” DoDAAC by contacting DESC-RRR at Defense Logistics Agency Energy, Retail Management Division, DESC-RRR, 2261 Hughes Avenue, Suite 128, Lackland AFB, TX 78236-9828 COM (210) 925-4887 or DSN 945-4887. |
| 21-Oct-11 | |||||
| 250 | T-02-0207 | ParaG.3.8 | |||
| 251 | T-02-0208 | 2.3.2.6 | |||
| 252 | T-11-0209 | 11.1.2.2.3.3. | |||
| 253 | T-11-0210 | 11.C.1 | |||
| 255 | T-H-0212 | H-13 | Has the Government decided whether the Medical clinic will fall under this or another contract. If not, will the Contractor be required to provide support to the Medical Group for their Defense Medical Logistics Standard Support (DMLSS) software program? More specifically, will the contractor be required to provide O&M information to the MTF manager (or MTF DMLSS operator) such as labor hours and material costs associated with completed service orders and completed preventive maintenance work? What is the Government’s expectation regarding the information and work interface between CE Operations and the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF)? | The government expects the contractor to perform the work stated in PWS section 11-1, paragraph 11.1.2.2 and associated workload listed in appendix 11-B. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 256 | T-11-0213 | Section 11 | |||
| 257 | T-11-0214 | 11B | |||
| 258 | T-11-0215 | 11.1.2.2.2.5 | |||
| 261 | T-02-0218 | 2.1.2.13.2 | Is any specialized training required for members of the listed Emergency Management teams? If so, will the cost of the training be at the expense of the Government or the SP? | ||
| 264 | T-02-0221 | Appendix 2D | The FAR reference identified in the directive for the Quality Control/Operations Compliance Plan report is incorrect. Please clarify the correct reference for this directive. | ||
| 265 | T-02-0222 | Appendix 2E | Does the Government intend for the SP to perform each of the duties listed in Appendix 2E for the entire CE squadron? If so, can the Government please provide workload history for each of the duties listed? | ||
| 266 | T-11-0223 | Appendix 11FA | |||
| 267 | T-11-0224 | 11.1.2.2.1.4 | Does the Government intend for the SP to control and issue Land Mobile Radios (LMR’s) for all of CE or just for the SP? Please clarify. | ||
| 268 | T-11-0225 | 11.1.2.2.1.6 | Would the Government please provide more specific requirements for self-help? Will the SP be required to assist customers with self-help work if skilled craftsmen are necessary? If yes, will the Government please provide a work load history? To what extent is the SP to provide training and technical support? | Self-help projects can be undertaken only if there is no requirement for skilled craftsman to support the project. The SP will not provide labor on Self-help projects. The SP will brief pertinent Self Help info to facility managers at the Facility Managers Briefing held at CE building 421. Also ensure self help info is located in the Building and Facility Coordinator Handbook TAFBP 32-1001. Training can consist of proper and safe use of equipment and installation of parts materials for example. Please reference paragraph 11.1.2.2.1.6. SELF-HELP in the PWS. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 269 | T-11-0226 | 11.1.2.2.1.9 | |||
| 270 | T-11-0227 | 11.1.2.2.2.2 | Does the Government intend for the SP to provide control services, monitoring, response, removal, educational services, and disposal of large wild animals such as bear, alligator, deer, and coyotes? If so, please provide a work load history. | No, not for large wild animals. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 271 | T-11-0228 | 11.1.2.2.2.3 | Does the Government intend for annual boiler inspection to be included in the HVAC requirements listed in 11.1.2.2.2.3, as part of the RWP? | Yes; the Government’s intent is to have the SP maintain all boilers IAW all applicable AFIs, codes, and regulations (local, state and federal). | 21-Oct-11 |
| 272 | T-11-0229 | 11.1.2.2.2.5 | |||
| 273 | T-11-0230 | 11.1.2.2.3 | |||
| 274 | T-11-0231 | 11.1.2.2.3.1.2 | |||
| 275 | T-11-0232 | 11.1.2.2.3.4 | |||
| 276 | T-11-0233 | 11.1.2.2.3.4 | |||
| 278 | T-11-0235 | 11.1.2.2.4.2 | |||
| 279 | T-11-0236 | 11.1.2.2.4.6 | |||
| 280 | T-11-0237 | 11.1.2.2 | |||
| 281 | T-11-0238 | 11.1.2.2.1.5 | |||
| 282 | T-11-0239 | 11.1.2.2 | |||
| 283 | T-11-0240 | 11B | |||
| 284 | T-11-0241 | 11-B-3 | |||
| 285 | T-11-0242 | 11.1.2.2.2.1.3 | |||
| 286 | T-11-0243 | 11B | |||
| 287 | T-11-0244 | 11B | |||
| 288 | T-11-0245 | Appendix 11B | |||
| 289 | T-11-0246 | 11B | |||
| 290 | T-11-0247 | 11B | |||
| 291 | T-11-0248 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 292 | T-11-0249 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 293 | T-11-0250 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 294 | T-11-0251 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 295 | T-11-0252 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 296 | T-11-0253 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 297 | T-11-0254 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 298 | T-11-0255 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 299 | T-11-0256 | Appendix 11 D | |||
| 300 | T-11-0257 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 301 | T-11-0258 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 302 | T-11-0259 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 303 | T-11-0260 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 304 | T-11-0261 | Appendix 11D | |||
| 305 | T-11-0262 | 11FB-2 & -3 | |||
| 306 | T-11-0263 | Appendix 11I | |||
| 307 | T-11-0264 | Appendix 11I | |||
| 308 | T-11-0265 | Appendix 11I | |||
| 309 | T-11-0266 | Appendix 11I | |||
| 310 | T-02-0267 | 2.1.2.9 | |||
| 313 | T-11-0270 | 11.1.2.2.2.1.4 | |||
| 314 | T-11-0271 | 11.1.2.2.2.4 | |||
| 315 | T-11-0272 | 11.1.2.2.6 | |||
| 316 | T-11-0273 | 11.1.2.2 | |||
| 317 | T-11-0274 | 11-B-9 | |||
| 318 | T-0275 | RPIE | |||
| 319 | T-11-0276 | 11.1.2.2.3.2 | |||
| 320 | T-11-0277 | 11.1.2.2.3.2 | |||
| 321 | T-0278 | Section L- | |||
| 322 | C-RFP-0031 | RFP | The DD Form 254 provided in Attachment 11 of the RFP is blank. Will the Government provide the actual completed form for proposal preparation? | A completed DD Form 254 will be provided on the next upcoming amendment. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 323 | C-RFP-0032 | RFP | Part (b) states, “The offeror shall provide with its offer a written plan describing how it will continue to perform the essential contractor services listed in attachment PWS Section 2.1.2.13, page 2-1-10, Mission Essential Contractor Services, dated 14 Sep 11, during periods of crisis.” Is it the Government’s intent to have offerors submit this Mission Essential Contractor Services plan with the proposal, as “with its offer” implies or was this inadvertently included in the solicitation? If it is the intent for offerors to submit this plan, can the Government please provide: 1) information on where this plan should go in the proposal, per the Proposal Organization Chart provided in Section L, Paragraph E; 2) information on how this plan will be included or excluded from the page limitation for Volume II; and 3) information on how this plan will be evaluated, per Section M? | ||
| 324 | C-RFP-0033 | RFP | In the proposal requirement identified in this section, “Attachment 9 Manpower Matrix” is referenced. Should this be a reference to “Attachment 6 Manpower Matrix”? | It should be Atachment 6, I will amend to read this on our next amendment. | |
| 325 | C-RFP-0034 | RFP | The “Quality and Satisfaction Rating” requirement provides the opportunity for offerors to submit information currently available that demonstrates customer satisfaction, and the requirement lists examples of these information, including letters, metrics, and surveys. Because there is not a reference to this requirement in the Proposal Organization Chart in paragraph E, how does the Government intend offerors to provide these documents? And will these documents be excluded from the page counts for this volume? | The page limit for the “Quality and Satisfaction Rating” of the Past Performance Volume is included in the page count for the past performance information sheets (no more than 5 pages for each contract). No additional pages will be added to the page limit. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 326 | C-RFP-0035 | RFP | This requirement for Specific Content appears to allow offerors a separate narrative to discuss efforts to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts, as well as past efforts to identify and manage risk. However, this Specific Content narrative does not appear in the Proposal Organization Chart in Paragraph E.How would the Government like offerors to address and include this Specific Content narrative? Will it have a page limit? | The page limit for the Specific Content portion of the Past Performance Volume is included in the page count for the past performance information sheets (no more than 5 pages for each contract). No additional pages will be added to the page limit. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 327 | C-RFP-0036 | RFP | The directions for paragraph E in Attachment 8 Past Performance Information Sheet direct offerors to provide current information on three primary customer points of contact; however, the form only allows for offerors to list two POCs and does not identify who the third POC should be.In the questions and answers for the draft solicitation, the Government indicated that the third POC should be the “Contract Administrator.” However, the PPI form already provides a space for the Administrative Contracting Officer.Does the Government desire two or three Government POCs listed on this form? If three, can the Government please clarify what position the third POC should be? Will the Government revise the PPI to include a space for the third POC? | The 3rd person will be provided only if your Program Manager is different from the Site Manager. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 328 | C-RFP-0037 | RFP | Volume 1 – PRICE PROPOSAL - Item 1.4 List of Tables and Figures. Should the requirement to provide a List of Tables and Figures be found in each of the three volumes? If so, should those lists be volume specific? If the Government only requires on list in Volume I should it be a Master List of Tables and Figures including all volumes? | Please follow the Proposal Organizationa Chart for Volume I as stated. This is not required in all three volumes. | |
| 329 | C-RFP-0038 | RFP | |||
| 330 | C-RFP-0039 | RFP | Due to fluctuating fuel prices it is extremely difficult to forecast future fuel costs. This places a significant risk on the contractor under a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract and mitigating this risk increases contract pricing. Will the Government consider adding FAR 52.216-4, Economic Price Adjustment—Labor and Material, or an agency approved clause, to ensure the contractor does not assume extra risk in contract performance under the FFP contract? This approach will mitigate risk and allow contractors to offer the Government the lowest pricing in this area. | The Government will not be adding FAR 52.216-4 to the contract. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 331 | C-RFP-0040 | RFP | The Proposal Organizational Chart in RFP Section L, Paragraph E includes a reference to 1.1 Executive Summary to be included in Volume I—Price Proposal. However, this requirement does not appear in the descriptions of the requirements provided in Paragraph D, nor does it appear in Section M. Is it the Government’s intent to have offerors submit an Executive Summary in the Price Proposal? If so, can the Government please provide guidance regarding what is required in the Executive Summary and how it will be evaluated? | The Government does not specify content for the Executive Summary of the Contractor’s proposal. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 332 | C-RFP-0041 | RFP | The Proposal Organizational Chart in RFP Section L, Paragraph E includes a reference to 1.6 Validity Statement to be included in Volume I—Price Proposal. However, this requirement does not appear in the descriptions of the requirements provided in Paragraph D and there is no other information indicating what should be included in this statement. Is this an accurate requirement? If so, can the Government provide guidance was to what information should be validated and included in the validity statement? | 1.6 Validity Statement will be removed via an amendment. | 21-Oct-11 |
| 333 | T-11-0279 | 11.1.2.2.1.10 | |||
| 334 | T-11-0280 | 11.1.2.2.1.3.1 | |||
| 335 | T-11-0281 | 11.1.2.2 | |||
| 336 | T-11-0282 | 11.1.2.2.2.5 | |||
| 337 | T-11-0283 | 11.1.2.2 | |||
| 338 | T-11-0284 | 11B | |||
| 339 | T-11-0285 | 11.1.2.2 | |||
| 340 | T-0286 | ||||
| 341 | T-11-0287 | 11.1.2.2.3.1 | |||
| 342 | T-11-0288 | 11FF | |||
| 343 | T-11-0289 | 11FB & 11FC | |||
| 8 | T-11-0006 | PWS 11B | The referenced page states “Workload Data May or May Not be Indicative of Future Workload”.” As a fixed-price contract the Government has an obligation to define the workload anticipated. The Government should remove this open-ended statement. Please correct. | We have defined the workload and we do not anticipate changing this statement in the PWS. | 19-Oct-11 |
| 10 | M-02-0002 | PWS 2G.3.3.1 | The referenced paragraph makes reference to a Technical Exhibit 8 that shows examples of service calls. We cannot find a Technical Exhibit 8 in the Draft RFP. Please include in the final RFP. | The referenced paragraph will be removed. The correct reference should be Appendix 2A.1, AFI 32-1001, para. 8. | 20-Oct-11 |
| 11 | M-02-0003 | PWS 2G.3.8 | The referenced paragraph makes reference to a Technical Exhibit 10 that shows examples of DSW and also to a Section 5.4.5.3 that supposedly defines DSW. We cannot find a Technical Exhibit 8 or a Section 5.4.5.3 in the Draft RFP. Please include in the final RFP | The referenced paragraph will be removed. The correct reference should be Appendix 2A.1, AFI 32-1001, para. 8. | 20-Oct-11 |
| 12 | M-02-0004 | PWS 2G.3.3.1 | The paragraph defines a Service Call. However, it does not define parameters established for service calls, nor can we find any other section/paragraph in the draft RFP that defines service call parameters such as the limit of cost and/or labor hours that may be expended on a service call before it is classified as some other type work. Obviously offerors need to know these parameters to determine their responsibilities and exposure under the fixed price of the contract. Please provide these parameters in the final RFP. | The referenced paragraph will be removed. The correct reference should be Appendix 2A.1, AFI 32-1001, para. 8. | 20-Oct-11 |
| 29 | T-11-0021 | PWS 11.1.2.2.2 | How are the large energy consumption items funded? | The Tyndall Base Operation Support contract will be a Firm-Fixed Price labor contract and all part and materials will be funded thru a cost reimbursable CLIN. | 19-Oct-11 |
| 33 | T-11-0025 | PWS 11.7.2.2.1.5 | Please quantify the material acquisition, logistical support and warehouse activities for CE operations. We assume CE operations means in support of Government organization/activities | The reference should be 11.1.2.2.1.5 Material Control. Quantified: Provide and manage Parts/material planning, purchasing, storing (warehousing), inventorying, receiving, inspection and parts/material accountability using the Civil Engineering Material Acquisition System (CEMAS) within IWIMS and Government designated replacement system | 19-Oct-11 |
| 36 | T-0027 | Workload | The workload hours do not account for all the hours necessary for actual known costs. Can you provide the additional data that more accurately shows total actual labor hours? | Workload data has been updated. | 19-Oct-11 |
| 37 | T-0028 | Workload | If the workload hours are not provided to the government or available, how many persons are employed in what shop under the incumbent CE BOSS contract? | Workload data has been provided in appendix 11-B. We will not provide the number of persons employed by the incumbent contactor. | 19-Oct-11 |
| 38 | T-0029 | Workload | The historical workload data that was provided calculates to roughly 50-60 FTE’s per year. But the gross cost per year is roughly 15M. That would make the cost per employee at $300,000.00 per FTE including ODC’s. Is there a place to find better actual data? | Please review appendix 11-B. | 19-Oct-11 |
| 39 | T-11-0030 | 11B | 19-Oct-11 | ||
| 40 | T-0030 | PWS Appendix 11B | The hours provided in the PWS Appendix 11B do not contain 2010 data. With it being 10/2011 please release 2010 data for all actual Historical Workload. | Your proposal should be base on the workload data provided. | |
| 41 | T-0031 | Is there an electronic CMMS in place and if so what is it? | At present the Integrated Work Information Management System (IWIMS) and the Automated Civil Engineer System (ACES) are the CMMSs currently being used at Tyndall AFB. | 19-Oct-11 | |
| 45 | T-11-0035 | 11B | On Appendix 11B Workload Estimates, page 11-B-1, are the Gas Generators Liquid Natural Gas, Propane or Unleaded Gas? | Please reference the PWS Appendix 11B, page 11-B-1, there are 72 Diesel Generators and 10 Gasoline (unleaded) generators. | 19-Oct-11 |
| 46 | T-11-0036 | 11B | On Appendix 11B Workload Estimates, page 11-B-1, what type(s) of fuel is the Deluge Engines? |
| The Deluge Engines referenced in Appendix 11B requires diesel fuels. The word Diesel will be added to the description in Appendix 11B. | 20-Oct-11 |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .