FA2521-13-R-0005_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to make administrative/clarif ication changes in Section B, Section L, Section M, Performance Work Statement (PWS), CDRL B034, and extend proposal due date. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 21

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 25-Mar-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA2521-13-R-0005

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Feb-2014

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25-Mar-2014

CODE

45 CONS/LGCZR

1201 EDWARD H WHITE II ST, MS 7200

PATRICK AFB FL 32925-3237

FA2521 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA2521-13-R-0005

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 11-Apr-2014 03:00 PM to 25-Apr-2014 03:00 PM.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 7001

The pricing detail quantity 6.00 has been added.

The unit of issue Months has been added.

CLIN 7002

CLIN 7003

CLIN 7004

CLIN 7005

The contract type has changed from FFP to COST.

The CLIN extended description has changed from The Government may require continued performance for CAP within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract IAW 52.217-8, OPTION TO EXTEND SERVICES. **FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES ONLY** to The Government may require continued performance for CAP within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract IAW 52.217-8, OPTION TO EXTEND SERVICES. **FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES ONLY** The estimated cost for CAP is $2,750,000.00.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

7005 Months

OPTION CONTRACTOR ACQUIRED PROPERTY (CAP)

COST

The Government may require continued performance for CAP within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract IAW 52.217-8, OPTION TO EXTEND SERVICES. **FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES ONLY** The estimated cost for CAP is $2,750,000.00

FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

SUBCLIN 700601

The cost constraint NSP has been added.

SUBCLIN 700602

SUBCLIN 700603

SUBCLIN 700604

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

DOCUMENT

TYPE

DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement 138 18 Mar 14 Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List-CLIN X001 16 12 Jul 13 Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List-CLIN X002 40 18 Mar 14 Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List-CLIN X003 8 16 Sep 13 Exhibit D Contract Data Requirements List-CLIN X004 11 16 Sep 13 Exhibit E Contract Data Requirements List-CLIN 0700 5 16 Sep 13 Exhibit F Contract Data Requirements List-CLIN 9000 1 16 Sep 13 Attachment 2 Contract Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254

12 Jul 13

Attachment 3 Service Contract Act Wage Determination – ER 10 19 Jun 13 Attachment 4 DOL Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)

Wage Determination

12 Jul 13 Attachment 5 Service Contract Act Wage Determination - WR 10 19 Jun 13 Attachment 6 Government Furnished Facilities 17 12 Jul 13 Attachment 7 Government Property (Part 1 & 2) 848 24 Feb 14 Attachment 7a GP Incidentals 259 12 Jul 13 Attachment 8 Rights in Data 11 12 Jul 13 Attachment 9 Base Support 2 12 Jul 13 Attachment 10 Questions and Answers Template 1 12 Jul 13 Attachment 11 Section L Attachments (L1-L4) 7 12 Jul 13

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS

L-1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

a. The Offeror’s proposal shall include all data and information requested in Section L and shall be submitted in accordance with these instructions. In developing the proposal, the Offeror shall comply with all the requirements contained in the RFP. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in the Request for Proposal (RFP) may result in a proposal being ineligible for award. The Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

b. The Offeror’s proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet these requirements. The Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of the Offeror’s experience and will make its evaluation based solely on the information presented in the Offeror’s proposal.

c. The proposal acceptance period is specified in Section A of the RFP. The Offeror shall make a clear statement in Section A of Volume IV of the Offeror’s proposal that the offer is valid until 1 January 2015.

d. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 4.8, Government Contract Files, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the Offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

e. The Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) will promptly notify the Offeror of any decision to exclude its proposal from the competitive range, whereupon the Offeror may request a debriefing in accordance with FAR

15.505. The PCO will notify unsuccessful Offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.506. Upon such notification, unsuccessful Offerors may request and receive a debriefing.

An Offeror desiring a debriefing must make its request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

L-1.2 Points of Contact

The CO, Ms. Charlene Thomas, is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns to charlene.thomas@us.af.mil with a courtesy copy to the Contract Specialist Kristine Lundblad at kristine.lundblad@us.af.mil. The PCO for this acquisition will be Ms. Miranda Firth.

L-1.3 Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Questions

If an Offeror believes the requirements in these instructions lack clarity or contain an error, omission, discrepancy, or are unsound, the Offeror shall immediately contact the CO in writing with supporting rationale. Government responses will be placed on fbo.gov for access by all Offerors.

Address all questions or concerns to all the POCs listed above using the format provided in Section J, Attachment

10. Offerors are encouraged to submit all questions and requests for clarifications no less than ten (10) days prior to the RFP closing date. The decision whether to respond to questions and requests for clarifications made less than ten (10) days prior to the RFP closing shall be at the sole discretion of the PCO.

L-1.4 Considerations of Alternate Proposals

Alternate proposals will not be considered.

L-1.5 Amendment of Solicitation Prior to Proposal Closing

The Government reserves the right to revise and amend the solicitation prior to the proposal closing time. Such revisions or amendments will be communicated by amendment(s) to this RFP. If such amendments require material changes in quantities or prices, the proposal closing date may be postponed by enough days to enable Offerors to revise their proposals. In such cases, the amendment will include announcement of the new proposal closing date and time. Amendments will be posted on the internet with the solicitation documents without notice. Offerors are responsible for accessing all amendments prior to proposal submission at www.fbo.gov.

L-1.6 Technical Reference Library

The Technical Reference Library documents for this acquisition will be available on https://www.liscbidderslibrary.com, under the ROS Documents tab. The information contained in the library is provided for informational purposes to aid in proposal preparation. Forms and Publications referenced in the Performance Work Statement may be accessed at the http://www.e-publishing.af.mil. For 45 SW and 30 SW instructions in the website, select 45 SW or 30 SW under the bases & units dropdown. Any questions pertaining to the bidder’s library may be submitted to Charlene Thomas, charlene.thomas@us.af.mil.

L-1.7 Pre-Award Survey

a. If the information on hand or readily available to the Contracting Officer is not sufficient to make a determination of responsibility in accordance with FAR 9.1, the Offeror may be required to participate in a pre-award survey for the purpose of determining their financial and technical ability to perform. The pre-award survey is conducted with the assistance of the Offeror’s responsible Government Contract Administration Office to determine its eligibility and ability to perform. Refusal to participate in a pre-award survey and provide all requested information may be cause for rejection of the offer. If the Offeror is aware of some circumstances in its performance record or current ability to perform which may result in a negative report, Offeror should provide any information on mitigating circumstances or corrective action planned or taken.

b. The pre-award survey may include performance of a formal financial capability risk assessment or audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) or other personnel assigned by the Contracting Officer to perform the task.

This effort would be performed in accordance with DFARS 232.072-1 and the information required for audit would include but not be limited to that identified in DFARS 232.072-2. The contractor agrees to provide the financial information for such financial capability effort in a timely manner. Failure to provide the requested data could cause the Offeror to be determined financially irresponsible as discussed in FAR 9.103(b).

L-1.8 Proposal Preparation

a. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub-factors. The proposal should include all of the information requested in the subparagraphs. Failure to do so may adversely affect the evaluation. A proposal that is sufficiently documented to support performance and price/cost in a complete, orderly, and specific detailed manner will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation. To facilitate review and evaluation for this source selection, the Government proposes to transmit data via commercial systems (i.e. encrypted e-mail, UPS, FedEx, etc.). Distributed material will be identified as source selection sensitive and distribution strictly limited to appropriate personnel. Offers’ responses shall consist of four (4) separate Volumes; Volume I – Price/Cost, Volume II – Technical Capability, Volume III - Past Performance, and Volume IV Contract Documentation.

b. Table L-1.8 – Proposal Organization

The following instructions cover the preparation and submittal of the Offeror's proposal for this solicitation.

Proposals shall be submitted to the Government in separate volumes as set forth below:

Volume Volume Title Number of Copies

(Including original) Page Limit Electronic

Copies Due Date

I Price/Cost 3 No limit 2** April 25, 2014 3:00pm EST

II

Technical Capability

100*

April 25, 2014

III Past Performance 2 30 2 April 25, 2014

IV

Contract Documentation 2 No limit 2 April 25, 2014

*Page limit does not include position descriptions, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms and organization charts.

** Price/Cost Volume data to be submitted in MS Excel with all formulas so calculation can be verified. One protected version and one that can be manipulated by Government shall be provided.

c. Any proposal which fails to conform to the requirements or specification in the solicitation may be considered ineligible for award. Proposals should be complete and clear and not require additional explanation of information.

The Government may make a final determination as to whether a proposal is acceptable or unacceptable based solely on the proposal as presented and submitted.

d. The Contracting Officer has determined there is potential for adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the Contracting Officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists, no certified cost and pricing data will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition does not exist; Offerors may be required to submit certified cost and pricing data for the Contracting Officer to determine price reasonableness.

L-2 VOLUME I – PRICE/COST (FACTOR 1)

L-2.1 The price proposal shall be based on your own Technical Capability approach to meeting the Government’s Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements. Provide sufficient detail in the Price/Cost Volume to demonstrate understanding of the requirements. Explain any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between promised performance and price/cost. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to demonstrate price affordability and price reasonableness on all applicable Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs).

L-2.2 The Contracting Officer has a reasonable expectation of competition; therefore, certified cost or pricing data is currently not required. Other than certified cost or pricing data is required in order to determine a fair and reasonable price, see FAR 15.403-3. The information for other than cost and pricing data should be made up of the same information and data that is required by FAR 15.408. The Government retains the right to require submission of certified cost and pricing data in the event the Contracting Officer deems it necessary to support price reasonableness.

L-2.3 Preliminary Budget Information to include all CLINs.

(FY15) (FY16) (FY17) (FY18) (FY19) (FY20) Total Budget $22.69M * $40.98M $41.59M $42.22M $42.85M $44.08** $234.41M

*Includes Phase In **Includes Phase Out

L-2.4 Volume Organization

The Price/Cost Volume shall consist of the following sections:

Section 1 – Introduction

Section 2 – Estimating Techniques/Methods and Assumptions

Section 3 – Price/Cost

Section 4 – Other Information

Detailed Instructions for the Price /Cost Volume:

Section 1 – Introduction. Provide a table of contents and overview of all data accompanying or identified in the Price/Cost Volume.

The Price/Cost Volume shall include a cover sheet that contains the information listed in FAR 15.408, table 15-2, General Instructions, Section A only. Additionally, the cover sheet shall contain the name, address and telephone number of the Defense Contract Administration Office and Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) office that is responsible for your audit review including whether your DCAA office has approved your estimating system. If you have reached an agreement with Government representatives on use of forward pricing rates/factors, identify the agreement, include a copy, and describe its nature.

Section 2 – Estimating Techniques/Methods and Assumptions

a. Provide all documentation and rationale used in estimating techniques and methods.

b. Explain any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between promised performance and price/cost. For example, explain the nature of innovative techniques and their impact on price/cost.

Section 3 – Price/Cost

a. Direct Man -Year Hours: The Offeror shall identify productive labor hours associated with one (1) man-year effort (Full-Time Equivalent or FTE).

b. Labor Categories. Identify labor categories that are subject to the Service Contract Act (SCA) and provide a cost breakdown showing the wage and overtime rates, SCA fringe benefit rates, and any other fringe or overhead rate proposed on SCA labor. Include a manpower matrix that identifies the labor category and corresponding SCA labor category/classification. Use current rates in pricing all years and do not propose escalation for the labor categories covered by the SCA Wage Determinations (WDs) for work under Fixed Price CLINs; in accordance with FAR 52.222-43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act - Price Adjustment (Multiple Year and Option

Contracts), you will be allowed to submit a proposal for increases covered by that clause. The Government will provide current Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) in the bidder’s library.

c. The costs associated with the Offerors labor approach, as proposed in the Technical Capability (Volume II), shall be cross referenced to the Price/Cost Volume including chapter, page, paragraph, etc. and identify the labor categories and their associated hours/rate. All cost and price information shall be traceable at CLIN level for basic and option years.

Section 4 – Other information:

a. Proposals for all major first tier subcontracting/teaming shall be submitted within the prime contractor’s proposal for CLIN X001, X002, X003 and X004. Major subcontractors are those whose cost equals 10% or more of total cost. Nonprime cost proposals should be submitted through the prime to the Contracting Officer. If the subcontractor/teaming partner considers its information proprietary, then it may be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer by the same date and time the prime contractor’s proposal is due. The prime proposal shall uniquely identify major subcontractor/teaming partner labor hours and total burdened costs. The prime contractor is responsible for the consistency of the cost data between the prime contractor’s submission and the subcontractor/teaming partner submission.

b. If there will be subcontracting/teaming, provide your analysis to determine the price reasonableness of the subcontractor/teaming partner’s proposal. Include the subcontractors/teaming partner’s methodology to estimate costs and results of your reviews and evaluations of those proposals. Explain how the subcontractor/teaming effort relates to the overall effort. Any price adjustment to the subcontractor/teaming partner proposed prices that are included in the prime proposal submission, including discounting or expected decreases to be achieved in negotiations, shall be fully identified and explained. Offerors are required to provide the results of their price or cost analysis of subcontractor proposal as required in FAR 15.404-3(b).

c. Contractor Acquired Property (CAP). The Government has established contract baseline amounts for CAP, which is included in the overall budget. Propose those Government established amounts for CLIN X005 as indicated in section B of this solicitation. All G&A or any other proposed rates shall be included within the established government provided values and identified within the Offeror’s proposal.

L-3 VOLUME II – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY (FACTOR 2)

L-3.1 Technical Capability shall consist of the following sections:

Technical Capability Volume Organization

Subfactor 1: Base Operations Support Subfactor 2: Mission Support Communications Subfactor 3: Program Management

L-3.2 General Instructions

Using the instructions outlined below, provide the actual methodology that would be used to address the criteria listed in the technical capability subfactors. The technical proposal shall address each of the following subfactors in sufficient detail to describe the Offeror’s proposed approach to performing the requirements set forth in the PWS, and Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs), and provide the references. For each subfactor, the Offeror shall identify risks, if any, associated with the proposed approach and actions the Offeror will take to mitigate the identified risks. If no risks/mitigations are identified in the Offeror’s proposal, it indicates the Offeror does not consider there to be any risk associated with their proposed approach.

L-3.2.1 Subfactor 1: Base Operating Support

L-3.2.1.1 Describe the strategy for managing downrange base services at Antigua Air Station (AAS) and Ascension Auxiliary Air Field (AAAF) in accordance with the PWS. Describe a strategy to accommodate multiple U.S.

Government tenants, manage a foreign national workforce, and interface with Host Nation representatives.

L-3.2.1.2 Describe the approach for managing civil engineering services at AAS and AAAF in accordance with the PWS. Describe the approach to managing real property; energy program; providing facility engineering project identification, prioritization and programming over a 5-year planning horizon; supporting project design reviews, and construction; updating and maintaining geospatial data; utilize and maintain Maximo software application and Geographic Information System (GIS) for facilities and infrastructure work including recurring work programs (preventative maintenance); in-house repairs and maintenance, and planned work.

L-3.2.1.3 Describe the approach for providing and supporting base airfield services, including air traffic control and air crew services at AAAF and airfield ground support services at AAS and AAAF in accordance with the PWS.

L-3.2.1.4 Describe the approach for managing a public health program, occupational health program, and base medical services in accordance with the PWS.

L-3.2.1.5 Describe the approach for emergency response, emergency medical response, and fire protection services for facilities, aircraft, and people on station at AAS and AAAF in accordance with the PWS.

L-3.2.1.6 Describe the approach for security services in accordance with the PWS and DD254.

L-3.2.1.7 Describe the approach for lodging and housekeeping, dining, laundry, recreation, and other related support services in accordance with the PWS.

L-3.2.1.8 Describe the approach for managing base logistics to include stock levels, food and supply items.

L-3.2.2 Subfactor 2: Mission Support Communications

L-3.2.2.1 Describe the approach for providing network services in accordance with the PWS, including the approach to:

a. Tracking and updating IT equipment inventory for all accountable hardware.

b. Updating the baseline network and software configuration.

c. Integrating with Air Force Network Operations Command (AFNETOPS) to prioritize and respond to help desk inquiries for all types of network outages at the Western Range (WR), AAS, and AAAF. Describe how the approach will prioritize inquiries.

L-3.2.2.2 Describe the approach to operate and maintain the Geographic Information Management System (GIMS)/ Geospatial Information System (GIS) at Eastern and Western Range in accordance with the PWS.

L-3.2.2.3 Describe the approach for providing operating and maintaining telephone voice and public address (PA)/ aural warning (Giant Voice) systems at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Jonathan Dickinson Missile Tracking Annex (JDMTA), Malabar, Patrick AFB (PA only), AAS , and AAAF, in accordance with the PWS.

L-3.2.2.4 Describe the approach for providing communication security (COMSEC) support services in accordance with the PWS for levels up to and including Secret for CCAFS, AAS, and AAAF IAW AFI 33-201, Vol.9.

L-3.2.2.5 Describe the strategy for managing Information Assurance (IA) activities on the mission support network in accordance with the PWS. Describe the approach for prioritizing limited resources against highest system risks, performing continuous monitoring of systems, and defending information systems and networks. Describe the approach for maintaining awareness of and mitigating emerging threats to the network.

L-3.2.2.6 Describe the approach for maintaining Air Traffic Control and Landing Systems (ATCALS) at AAAF in accordance with the PWS.

L-3.2.3 Subfactor 3 – Program Management

L-3.2.3.1 Organization and Staffing:

a. Provide a program-specific organizational chart that starts at the level of the Offeror’s Chief Executive Officer and clearly identifies the entire chain of command down to the Division Chief level, specifying each position relevant credentials party’s name, title, position description, division name, and location. Describe the relationships, communications channels, roles, and responsibilities of the participants.

b. Describe the management approach (including the authority, accountability, and responsibility of the Offeror’s Program Director to execute that program), and identify the decision- making flow within the team.

c. Describe the processes and/or tools that will be used to provide the Government with oversight of prime contractor activities and insight into subcontractor activities.

d. Provide a recruitment and retention program.

L-3.2.3.2 Management Approach:

a. Describe the overall management approach for ROS contract execution.

b. Provide the proposed Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) to graphically display contract cost by work element that shows a clear linkage between the CLIN, CBS, and PWS in accordance with PWS 2.1.3.

c. Offerors shall submit a matrix addressing CLIN 2005, first full year only. The matrix elements shall include category of expense, applicable PWS chapter, and estimated cost per category of expense. Explain and describe the planned level of support within each category of expense and the basis of that estimate. Offerors shall identify one-time costs and recurring costs. In constructing the matrix, Offerors shall include the following categories of expense:

Category of Expense Description/Examples Material and Supplies Material and supplies, other than food, purchased by the contractor and used in the execution of this PWS (example: generator parts, vehicle parts, O&M materials and repair parts for all instrumentation and communications equipment, bench stocks and shop material, and so forth)

Equipment Equipment, purchased by the contractor and used in the execution of this PWS (example: desktop computers, servers, and so forth)

Vehicles Vehicles purchased/leased by the contractor and used in the execution of this PWS (example: GSA leased vehicles, general and special purpose vehicles for downrange stations)

Repairs Outside vendor repairs of equipment/material used in the execution of this PWS (examples: components for vehicle repairs, computers, and instrumentation and communications components not under depot support, etc.)

Maintenance Agreements Standing agreements with outside vendors for service or technical support of commercial equipment or software used in the execution of this PWS (example: computer maintenance contracts and software license agreements).

d. Describe the communications and collaboration strategy that illustrates how information will be shared openly with downrange tenants its subcontractors and vendors, other divisions of the prime contractor, associate contractors, and the Government.

e. Describe how the proposal will meet the Government’s minimum data rights needs as described in Attachment 8 and will result in an executable ROS contract.

f. Describe how the approaches and processes outlined in the proposal ensure compliance with FAR 22.1008-2, Section 4(c), union work rules, and other Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) constraints. Indicate intent to accept existing CBAs, negotiate new CBAs, or not utilize a represented workforce.

L-3.2.3.3 Describe the integrated Data Management System.

L-3.2.3.4. Describe the approach to the contractor developed Quality Management System.

L-3.2.3.5 Describe the approach to training, certification, and licensing for personnel in compliance-based positions.

Describe how the approach will track and maintain currency of certifications and licensing for all areas of responsibility.

L-3.2.3.6 Describe the approach to complying with environmental regulatory requirements, handling and shipping of hazardous materials and waste, and preventing and responding to environmental mishaps.

L-3.2.3.7 Provide a draft Phase-in and Phase-out plan in accordance with CDRLs E001 and F001.

L-4 Volume III – PAST PERFORMANCE (FACTOR 3)

L-4.1 General Instructions

Offeror shall submit a Past Performance Volume, including the information shown in Section J, Attachment 11 (L3- L4). Past Performance volume is requested to be submitted on April 11, 2014 but is due no later than the proposal closing date as specified in block 9 of the SF 33. This information is required on the Offeror and all major subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners. The Government will use data provided by each Offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past performance.

L-4.2 Consent/Client Letter

The Offeror shall submit a consent letter executed by each major subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the Offeror so the Offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the Offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the Offeror's performance.

L-4.3 Recent/Relevant Contracts

For the purpose of this source selection, recent present/past performance is defined as contracts performed within (3) three years from the issuance of this solicitation. This portion of the evaluation will consider the Offeror’s performance including Prime contract experience, subcontractor experience, and that of any of the Offeror’s proposed subcontractors and/or partner/team participants in the format requested in L-4.4.

L-4.4 Past Performance Volume Organization

a. Company and contract information

b. Period of Performance

c. Contact information

d. Description of work

e. Resource summary

f. Relevancy to Technical Capability and Price/Cost Factor

g. Contract Performance

L-4.5 Specific Volume Requirements

The contractor shall submit a sufficient number of citations to address each relevancy area: Base Operating Support (BOS) and Logistics, Mission Support Communications and Other, Program Management (minimum of 1 citation per area). For each relevant citation submitted, the Offeror shall address the following with respect to its relevant past performance:

a. Company name, contract name, and contract number for the relevant past performance.

b. Period of Performance. Provide the contract commencement and completion date of the citation.

c. Names, addresses, telephone numbers, fax numbers and email addresses for Contracting Officer Representatives (CORs), Administrative Contracting Officers (ACOs), and Contract Administrators.

d. Provide a brief narrative for each contract or subcontract listed. Explain the nature of the work involved and the extent the work involved was/is similar to the ROS effort.

e. A description of the differences between the resources the Offeror used to perform the past effort and the resources the Offeror proposes to use for ROS.

f. A description of the relevancy of the Offeror’s past performance with respect to the areas in each evaluation factor.

g. Contract Performance. Describe contract performance in terms of the items listed in the Past Performance Questionnaire Section J, Attachment 11 (L-1). If the contract in question includes Incentive or Award Fee provisions, provide incentive or award fee data for the entire period of performance. For any work that did not meet original cost, schedule, or technical performance and requirements, explain the reason(s) for the disparity and any corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Provide rationale as to why the price or delivery at the end varied from the beginning. Describe efforts performed by the Offeror to resolve problems encountered during its relevant past performance, as well as efforts conducted to identify and manage program risk. The Offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified.

L-5 VOLUME IV – CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION

L-5.1 Proposal Organization

a. This volume must contain the following documents:

- Table of Contents

- Standard Form 33

- Section B [Priced]

- Section K, Representations & Certifications

- Acknowledgment of all amendments issued

- Offeror's acceptance to ALL terms and conditions to the solicitation

- Statement of the period for which the proposal is valid (1 January 2015) relationship and copies of any teaming or joint venture agreements

- Other Required Documents

The purpose of this volume is to provide information to the government for preparing the contract document and supporting file. The Offeror's proposal shall include a signed copy of the RFP, and Sections A through K. This includes:

(1) Completion of blocks 13, 14, 15, 16 and signature and date for blocks 17 and 18 of the SF33 in Section A of the RFP. In signing, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K and constitutes an offer that the government may accept. The "original" copy should be clearly marked under separate cover and should be provided without any punched holes.

(2) Completed pricing information in Section B, including all option periods. For evaluation purposes, Option 7 OPTION TO EXTEND SERVICES CLINS managed IAW 52.217-8 should be priced using FY20 rates.

(3) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certification in ALL Sections in its entirety.

b. Other Required Documents

(1) Authorized Offeror Personnel - provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding source selection decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the government.

(2) Company/Division Street Address - provide company/division's street address, county and facility code, and size of business (large or small). This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other location(s). List all locations where work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.

(3) Organizational Conflict of Interest. Submit a mitigation plan for any organizational conflict of interest or a statement of assurance that no plan is required. If a plan is provided, the plan should address the provisions of the section L OCI clause of this solicitation.

(4) Insurance. Contractor shall provide evidence of insurability concerning medical liability insurance.

L-5.2 Proposal Submission

Proposals shall be submitted to the attention of the PCO. Submit your proposal to arrive no later than time and date stated on the first page of this solicitation. All proposals delivered in response to this solicitation shall reflect the following information on the address label:

i. Solicitation Number

ii. “TO BE DELIVERED UNOPENED TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER: and

iii. Solicitation volume and number of copies contained in each box.

Offerors are cautioned that Patrick AFB has stringent visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visor pass and be cleared by the Government point of contact to be visited prior to entrance. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE POINT OF CONTACT MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE TO CLEAR

OFFERORS FOR ENTRANCE WHICH MAY PROHIBIT SUBMISSION OF HANDCARRIED OFFERS;

CONSEQUENTLY, OFFERORS ELECTING TO HANDCARRY THEIR PROPOSALS FOR SUBMITTAL JUST

PRIOR TO PROPOSAL CLOSING TIME DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK. FURTHERMORE, PROPOSALS

SENT VIA COMMERCIAL CARRIER TO ARRIVE JUST PRIOR TO PROPOSAL CLOSING TIME ALSO

RISK DELAY IN ACCESSING THE FACILITY WHICH COULD RESULT IN LATE DELIVERY. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with the provision 52.215-1 entitled “Instructions to Offerors— Competitive Acquisitions.

L-5.3 Proposal Requirements

Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

a. Requirements of the RFP (CLINs & PWS) and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

b. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this Section L will not be read or evaluated and will be removed from the proposal.

c. Binding and Labeling. Each paper volume of the proposal should be separately bound in a D-ring loose-leaf binder, which shall permit the volume to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used. All binders will allow for easy removal and replacement of pages. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, copy number, solicitation identification and the offeror's name. The same identifying data should be placed on the spine of each binder. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and shall not be submitted. Identify appropriate markings as required by FAR 52.215-1(e), “Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data”, in Section L, and FAR 3.104-4, “Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information” on both the paper copy and the CD.

d. E-mail/facsimile proposal submission will not be accepted.

e. Page size shall be 8 1/2” x 11” except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”. All foldouts will be considered one page and must only contain content of a graphical nature, no excessive text is allowed.

f. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. Double-sided printing is acceptable but will count as two pages.

g. Using MS Word - Typing font size shall not be less than 10, using Times New Roman type face, with a minimum of 1 inch margins not inclusive of headers/footers. Offerors shall insert page numbers in footer.

h. Electronic media is a CD ROM/DVD with the following requirements:

i. To enable the Government to successfully view the proposals electronically, the Offeror shall submit their proposal in Adobe Portable Document File (PDF) or Microsoft Word format for Volumes I -IV; and Microsoft Excel format for Volume I (see L-1.8 **Footnote). The Government will use the electronic copies and/or paper copies in the evaluation process. However, there is no requirement for the Government to compare or verify the consistency of the electronic proposal to the paper proposal. In the case of an identified dispute or variation in content, the paper/hardcopy submitted proposal shall be deemed and treated as the official version for all purposes. Each CD-ROM case and the CD-ROM itself must be labeled as to the offeror and numbered sequentially in the required number of copies.

ii. File Preparation. The offeror shall generate “bookmarks” within each PDF file for at least each section and subsection of the document. Bookmarks shall be generated based on indexed entities appearing in the document volume organization. The offeror has the option of generating “thumbnails” within the PDF files as well. The minimum requirement for hypertext links is an overall proposal table of contents linked to each volume and a table of contents within each PDF file linked to each section of the file. Additional hypertext links within the proposal are at the offeror’s discretion. The use of thumbnails or additional hypertext links will not influence the evaluation. The PDF file has a built in security function. The offeror shall set all security options in each PDF file to “allowed.” All text, including table and figure identifiers, shall be indexed and 100% searchable text. All text shall be displayed as a font and not displayed as a bitmap in any proposal volume or appendix to facilitate the ability to copy and paste to another document.

iii. Font and Page Setup. Text font and layout shall be as stated for paper copies. Hypertext links shall be the same minimum font size. The preferred method of implementing hyperlinks is to indicate the hyperlink by blue font color and establishing the hyperlink in Acrobat with “invisible rectangle” with “no outline.”

However, the offeror may indicate hyperlinks by any color font or with a visible rectangle.

iv. Other Requirements. The offeror shall not embed sound or video files into the proposal files. Minimize the use of scanned images and keep embedded graphics as simple as possible.

v. Proposal Format and Structure. Each volume of the electronic proposal shall be on its own CDROM with each section sequentially labeled in its own subdirectory.

vi. Proposal Table of Contents file (TBLCONT.PDF). This file serves as a table of contents for the proposal information. The offeror shall provide the capability to “jump” from this file using hypertext links to all other PDF files on the CD-ROM. Also include the list of key terms used in the proposal with their definitions, and a list of acronyms and abbreviations used in the proposal.

vii. Cost Data File (COST.XLS or COST.PDF). This should be prepared in Microsoft Excel and must cross reference to Section B, Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs.). All of the cells should show the calculations and be unlocked.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION

M-1 Basis for Contract Award

This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) acquisition and will be conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) and the Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS). A contract will be awarded to the Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, as supplemented, and whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and subfactors, to represent the best value to the Government. The Government will select the offer with the lowest total evaluated price that is technically acceptable, i.e. the proposal clearly meets the requirements of the solicitation, based upon an assessment of Technical Capability, Past Performance, Price/Cost, and all contractual documentation. While the Government Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature is subjective;

therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Should the Government conduct discussions, in accordance with FAR 15.306(d)(3), the Government will provide the Offerors with their rating status after the Competitive Range determination and again prior to final proposal revisions.

Contract Award will be made on the basis of the lowest total evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for Technical Capability and Past Performance factors, based upon an assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below. Any proposal with one or more “unacceptable” technical ratings (for any subfactor within the Technical Capability Factor) will be ineligible for award. Any proposal with an “unacceptable” Past Performance rating will be ineligible for award. Out of those proposals that are acceptable in the Technical Capability and Past Performance factors, the Government will select the offer with the lowest total evaluated price.

M-1.1 Mandatory Requirement

Failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the Offeror being ineligible for award.

M-1.2 Number of Contracts to Be Awarded The Government intends to award a single contract as a result of this solicitation. However, the Government reserves the right to not award a contract.

M-1.3 Rejection of Unrealistic Offers The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or cost when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.

M-1.4 Government Furnished Property (GFP) All GFP presently available for ROS is listed in Attachment 7. In accordance with FAR 45.201(c) and FAR 45.202(a), the Government will eliminate any competitive advantage resulting from an Offeror's proposed use of any GFP that is in addition to the GFP listed in Attachment 7.

M-2 PRICE/COST (FACTOR 1)

M-2.1. Price Evaluation. Total evaluated price will be calculated as the sum of all proposed prices, for all CLINs.

The price evaluation will document the affordability and reasonableness of the Offeror’s total evaluated price. The performance period of the contract includes a phase-in period with one six month option and five one year options.

In addition, the government may further extend the performance period for up to six months under FAR 52.217-8 (CLINs 700X). The Extension will be IAW prevailing rates within the contract at the time of the extension, utilization of FY20 rates is strictly for evaluation purposes and CLIN 700X will not be included in the affordability assessment. Proposals determined not to be reasonable or affordable will result in the Offeror being deemed not acceptable for award.

M-2.2 Price/Cost Proposal evaluation will be as follows:

a. Firm-Fixed-Price/Cost-Plus-Fixed Fee CLINs X001, X002, X003, X004, 0700 and 9000 will be evaluated for price reasonableness.

b. CAP CLIN X005 shall use government provided amounts.

c. CLIN X006 is not separately priced.

M-2.3 Price Reasonableness. The techniques and procedures described under FAR 15.404-1(b) will be the primary means of assessing proposal reasonableness. Further, the evaluation techniques described under FAR 15.404-1(c), as determined appropriate, may also be performed in further determining the reasonableness of the proposal.

M-2.4 Affordability. The affordability assessment will consider the proposed prices as compared to the annual and total projected budget for this program. If the Offeror’s proposed prices exceed the available budget in any given year or in total, the Government will determine the proposal to be unaffordable and will be ineligible for contract award.

M-2.5 Unbalanced Pricing. Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing.

Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment of unreasonably high prices.

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether they are unbalanced with the respect to separately priced line items. Offeror that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

M-3 TECHNICAL CAPABILITY (FACTOR 2)

M-3.1 Technical Rating

Each Offeror’s technical proposal shall be evaluated, based on the subfactors listed below, on a pass/fail basis assigning ratings of Acceptable or Unacceptable. Technical risk will be a part of the criteria considered in the technical acceptability decision. For the purposes of this evaluation, technical risk is defined as the degree to which an Offeror’s proposed approach for the requirements of this solicitation may cause disruption of schedule, increased costs, or degraded performance, the need for increased government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.