Attachment 5 - Self Evaluation Sheet -Amendment 0004 - 10.05.2026.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 69 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 711th HPW Mission Support Services MAC IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- FA239626RB008
About this file
This is a Self-Evaluation Sheet template for the 711th HPW Mission Support Services MAC IDIQ solicitation (FA239626RB008). The document provides a standardized evaluation framework that offerors must use to assess their own proposals against the government's stated evaluation criteria prior to submission. The self-evaluation sheet functions as a guide to help prospective contractors understand how the government will evaluate proposals on technical merit, past performance, and pricing considerations for this multiple award indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract vehicle. By completing this self-assessment tool, offerors can ensure their proposals address all required evaluation factors and demonstrate compliance with solicitation requirements before formal submission.
The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) issued this template as part of Amendment 0004 (posted October 5, 2026) to provide advanced notice to industry of evaluation expectations. The solicitation represents an 8(a) set-aside for mission support services under NAICS code 541990 with a $19.5 million size standard. The estimated maximum contract value is $505 million over a five-year ordering period with six years of performance. The proposal due date was extended to October 15, 2026, at 10:00 AM EDT, and the government indicated it would evaluate proposals and award without negotiations unless determined otherwise. The self-evaluation sheet, along with government responses to industry questions, was released in advance of the formal Amendment 0004 SF 30 posted October 6, 2026.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| 711th Human Performance Wing Mission Support Professional Services | Offeror Name: | |||||||||||
| Solicitation Number: FA2396-26-R-B008 | ||||||||||||
| Attachment#5, 2 Oct 26 | ||||||||||||
| SELF SCORING TECHNICAL CAPABILITY WORKSHEET | ||||||||||||
| (See instructions in Section L Paragraph 6.1.2) | ||||||||||||
| OFFEROR NAME: | Name | |||||||||||
| ID | Technical Experience | Check box to each question as applicable | Point Value | Score | Input "P" or "S" in each box | Supporting Documentation | Government Validation | |||||
| 1 | Government Facility Clearance | 0 | Score | |||||||||
| Prime Offeror (or member entities of an unpopulated Joint Venture) currently possess an active Government Secret (or higher) Facility Security Clearance. | Pass | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | |||||||
| 2 | Multiple Locations | Score for 2 | 0 | 0 | PRIME | SUB | ||||||
| (a) | Recruited, placed, and managed qualified personnel at 1 -2 geographical location during same period of performance | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (b) | Recruited, placed, and managed qualified personnel at 3 or more geographical location during same period of performance | 50 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| 3 | Recruiting and placing Qualified Personnel for the Federal Government | Score for 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| (a) | Flight Medicine Physician Performing Human Research | 30 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (b) | Flight Medicine Physician Performing Education | 30 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (c) | Flight Medicine Physician Performing Patient Care | 30 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (d) | Physician Board Certified in Ophthamology, Neurology, Cardiology, Pulmonology, or Psychiatry Performing Human Research | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (e) | Physician Board Certified in Ophthamology, Neurology, Cardiology, Pulmonology, or Psychiatry Performing Education | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (f) | Physician Board Certified in Ophthamology, Neurology, Cardiology, Pulmonology, or Psychiatry Performing Patient Care | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (g) | Scientist | 50 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (h) | Psychologist Performing Human Research | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (i) | Psychologist Performing Patient Care | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (j) | Information Technology Support Personnel | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (k) | Data Scientist | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (l) | Certified Toxicologist | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (m) | Acquisition Program Manager Research Program | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (n) | Curriculum Developer | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (o) | Research Coordinator | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (p) | Public Health Specialist | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (q) | Engineer | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (r) | SCA Labor Categories | 25 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (s) | Recruited and placed onsite at a federal agency in Ohio a board certified licensed ophthalmologist, neurologist, cardiologist, psychiatrist, or OB/GYN physician with experience in military medicine within the past 5 years. | 100 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (t) | Recruited and placed onsite at a federal agency in Ohio a program manager with all of the following qualifications: (a) minimum APDP Level II certification in Program Management, equivalent PMP or PjMP certification, or at least five years’ program management experience in a military research environment; (b) experience reviewing contractor cost, schedule, and activity reports on research projects; and (c) experience performing cost, schedule and performance analysis. | 100 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| 4 | Timeline | Score for 4 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| (a) | Filled a vacancy with qualified employees within 15 consecutive business days for the Federal Government | 400 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (b) | Filled a position with qualified personnel within 14 calendar days of contract award (or authorized POP start date) for the Federal Government. | |||||||||||
| (1) | Filled a position with qualified personnel within two weeks of contract award for the Federal Government - 1 instance | 100 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (2) | Filled a position with qualified personnel within two weeks of contract award for the Federal Government - 2 different instances | 250 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (3) | Filled a position with qualified personnel within two weeks of contract award for the Federal Government - 3 different instances | 400 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| 5 | Management | Score for 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| (a) | Managed employees requiring classified clearances | 100 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (b) | Managed travel arrangements for contract employees in accordance with the JTR | 100 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (c) | Provided Government-approved corrective action plans to remedy concerns regarding employee performance and professionalism. | 200 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (d) | Provided to all employees an established Government/Contractor Relations Training. | 100 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (e) | Developed and performed business management strategy for research laboratory service performance-based requirements (determining number and mix of FTEs). | 100 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| (f) | Developed and performed business management strategy for IT, Educational, Transcription, or Audiovisual service performance-based requirements (determining number and mix of FTEs). | 100 | FALSE | 0 | FALSE | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
| Total Score: | 0 | Total Validated Score: | 0 | |||||||||
| Minimum Acceptability Score: | 1740 | |||||||||||
| Proposal Rated Acceptable: | No | |||||||||||
| PRIME | 0% | |||||||||||
| SUB | 0% |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .