Exhibit G, Evaluation Tool.pdf
PDF 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Professional Multi Audit Services
- Solicitation number
- _HHS0016852
- Issued by
- Travis County, Austin City, Texas
About this file
This is an evaluation tool document (Exhibit G) for RFQ No. HHS0016852 issued by a Texas state health and human services agency for audit and reporting services. The solicitation seeks qualified respondents to provide comprehensive audit services and reporting as detailed in the Scope of Work. The evaluation process utilizes a best value approach with two primary evaluation categories: Qualifications and Experience, weighted at 60 percent, and Project Work Plan, weighted at 40 percent, for a combined total of 100 percent.
The evaluation tool establishes scoring criteria on a scale of 1 to 10, with specific rating levels ranging from "Unacceptable" (scores 1-3) to "Exceptional" (score 10). Under Qualifications and Experience, evaluators assess respondent qualifications demonstrating ability to provide audit and reporting services (weighted 30 percent) and demonstrated experience in providing audit services including staffing profiles and resumes for all proposed key staff (weighted 30 percent). The Project Work Plan criterion (weighted 40 percent) evaluates the respondent's proposed processes and methodologies for providing all components outlined in the solicitation. The scoring guide provides detailed descriptions for each score level, enabling evaluators to determine whether responses address requirements, meet fundamental requirements with minor or significant modifications needed, satisfy requirements with minor weaknesses, or exceed requirements.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluator Respondent
# Criteria Weight Score Comments
1.1 Evaluate the Respondent's qualifications that demonstrate the ability to provide Audit and reporting Services as outlined in the SOW. 30%
1.2 Evaluate the Respondent's demonstrated experience in providing Audit Services, including staffing profiles and resumes for all proposed key staff responsible for performing the Services outlined in the SOW.
30%
60%
2.1 Evaluate the Respondent's proposed processes and methodologies for providing all components of the SOW as outlined in the Solicitation. 40%
40%
100%TOTAL (%)
Subtotal
Subtotal
RFQ No. HHS0016852 Criteria, Subcriteria Sheet
Exhibit G, Evaluation Tool
Qualifications and Experience
Project Work Plan
Version 1.6 September 2023 1 of 3
Score Level
Unacceptable 1
Unacceptable 2
Unacceptable 3
Marginal. Fails to meet evaluation standards but failures are correctable. 4
Marginal. Fails to meet evaluation standards but failures are correctable. 5
Marginal. Fails to meet evaluation standards but failures are correctable. 6
Acceptable 7
Acceptable 8
Acceptable 9
Exceptional 10
For the purposes of this exhibit, “the agency” means the contracting state agency as specified in the solicitation.
Response satisfies requirements and has some benefits above requirement.
Response far exceeds all aspects of requirement.
Response addresses requirement, but response described does not allow the agency to fulfill mission.
Response meets fundamental requirements, however could not be implemented as described (would require both the agency and Respondent to make significant changes not currently anticipated).
Response meets fundamental requirements, however could not be implemented as described (implementation would require both the agency and Respondent to make minor changes not currently anticipated).
Response meets fundamental requirements, however could not be implemented as described (implementation would require changes to be made by Respondent only).
Response clearly satisfies requirement but has some minor weaknesses.
Response clearly satisfies requirement.
Response mentions requirement, but is not responsive to the elements of the requirement.
Exhibit G, Evaluation Tool RFQ No. HHS0016852
Evaluation Scoring Guide
Description
Response does not address requirement. Response is completely unacceptable.
Version 1.6 September 2023 2 of 3
No. Best Value Criteria Weight 1 Qualifications and Experience 60% 2 Project Work Plan 40%
GRAND TOTAL 100%
Exhibit G, Evaluation Tool RFQ No. HHS0016852
Version 1.6 September 2023 3 of 3
| Master Score Sheet Template |
| Scoring Guide |
| Evaluation Criteria |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .