Exhibit_11.5_Customer_Reference_Form.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Tablets (IT)
Solicitation number
0000000669
Issued by
Los Angeles County, California

About this file

This is a Customer Reference Form (Exhibit 11.5) associated with Solicitation 56905, Event ID 0000000669. The document requires bidders to submit three completed customer reference forms as part of their submittal, as specified in Section 5.4.1. The reference must be from contracts executed within the last 5 years. The form collects basic information about the bidder and their customer reference, including contract numbers, duration, dollar amounts, and services provided.

The form includes a detailed rating system for evaluating contractor performance across multiple categories including timeliness, contract management, quality, ordering, and customer satisfaction. The rating scale ranges from 1 (Unsatisfactory) to 5 (Exceptional), with specific descriptions for each rating level. Raters must provide mandatory explanations for any scores of 1 or 5. The evaluation categories focus on geographic coverage, product availability, response time, account management experience, service quality, value-added services, product performance, ordering systems, and overall satisfaction.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Addendum_1_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_4_-_Proposed_System.pdf PDF
Addendum_1_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_5_-_Admin_REQs.pdf PDF
Addendum_1_Exhibit_11.25_Administrative_Requirements.doc DOC document
Addendum_1_Exhibit_11.28_B_Dell_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_1_Exhibit_11.28_C_HP_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_1_Exhibit_11.28_D_Lenovo_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_1_Exhibit_11.28_E_Microsoft_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_3_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_1_-_Introduction_Reqs.pdf PDF
Addendum_3_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_7_-_Cost.pdf PDF
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.28_A_Apple_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.28_C_HP_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.28_E_Microsoft_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_3_Response_to_Request_for_Changes_Set_2.pdf PDF
Addendum_4_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_1_-_Introduction_Reqs.pdf PDF
Addendum_4_Revision_Response_to_Request_for_Changes_Set_2.pdf PDF
Event_ID_0000000669_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Exhibit_11.24_Standard_Agreement_(STD_213).doc DOC document
Exhibit_11.25_Administrative_Requirements_Response.doc DOC document
Exhibit_11.26_Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
Exhibit_11.28_C_HP_Evaluation_and_Cost_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_1_Event_ID_0000000669_-_Table_of_Contents.pdf PDF
Addendum_1_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_7_-_Cost.pdf PDF
Addendum_1_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_8_-_Proposal_Format.pdf PDF
Addendum_1_Event_ID_0000000669_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Addendum_2_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_4_-_Proposed_System.pdf PDF
Addendum_2_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_5_-_Admin_Req.pdf PDF
Addendum_2_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_7_-_Cost.pdf PDF
Addendum_2_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_8_-_Proposal_Format.pdf PDF
Addendum_2_Response_to_Request_for_Changes.pdf PDF
Addendum_3_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_5_-_Admin_Reqs.pdf PDF
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.28_B_Dell_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.28_G_Rugged_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.4_APP_Regulations.pdf PDF
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.7A_CUF_Worksheet.doc DOC document
Addendum_5_Exhibit_11.28_G_Rugged_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_11.28_F_Samsung_Evaluation_and_Cost_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_11.28_G_Rugged_Evaluation_and_Cost_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_11.28_H_Open_Evaluation_and_Cost_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_1_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_6_-_Technical_REQs.pdf PDF
Addendum_1_Exhibit_11.22_Tablets_Minimum_Requirements.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_1_Exhibit_11.28_F_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_2_Event_ID_0000000669_-_Table_of_Contents.pdf PDF
Addendum_2_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_1_-_Intro_Overview.pdf PDF
Addendum_2_Event_ID_0000000669_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Addendum_3_Event_ID_0000000669_-_Table_of_Contents.pdf PDF
Addendum_3_Event_ID_0000000669_Section_11_-_Exhibits.pdf PDF
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.24_Standard_Agreement_(STD_213).doc DOC document
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.28_D_Lenovo_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_3_Exhibit_11.28_F_Samsung_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum_4_Event_ID_0000000669_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation 56905

Event ID: 0000000669 Exhibit 11.5

CUSTOMER REFERENCE FORM

Bidders must submit three (3) completed Customer Reference Forms with their submittal as described in Section 5.4.1, Customer Reference. Refer to requirement for detailed instructions.

Contractor’s (Bidder) Name:

Customer/Agency Name (Bidder’s Customer):

Contract Number/PO:

Contract Duration (must be within the last 5 years):

Dollar Amount of Contract (read requirements of the IFB for minimum required dollar value):

Products/Services Provided:

Customer (Bidder’s Customer) Contact Name and Title:

Customer Phone Number:

Customer Fax Number:

Customer E Mail Address:

Ratings: Please summarize contractor performance and circle in the column on the right the number which best corresponds to the performance rating for each question. If the score is either 1 or 5, provide an explanation.

Follow the rating guidelines below for description of rating scale:

Rating Guidelines and Description of Rating Scale:

Exceptional(5)
Best-in-class performance. Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded several to the customer’s benefit. No issues were encountered.
Very Good(4)
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the customer’s benefit. There were a few minor issues, which were negligible.
Satisfactory(3)
Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor issues, and corrective actions taken by the contractor were acceptable.
Marginal(2)
Performance did not meet the contractual requirements. There were issues, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only somewhat effective.
Unsatisfactory(1)
Performance did not meet contractual requirements. There were serious issues and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Factors Rated

Questions
Comments

(continue on additional sheets if desired) Mandatory if score is either 1 or 5 All questions must be answered. N/A is NOT acceptable.

Rating

Timeliness
1. How would you rate the contractor’s geographic coverage and ability to deliver on time throughout all your locations?

2. How would you rate the contractor’s product availability and fill rate?

3. How would you rate the contractor’s turnaround time when contacted to provide assistance?

Contract Management
4. How would you rate the experience of the contractor in managing large accounts?

5. How would you rate the service provided by the contractor’s assigned Contract Administrator and/or Project Manager?

Quality
6. How would you rate the quality of the contractor’s value-added services (i.e. Installation, Assembly, Delivery etc.)?

7. How would you rate the performance of contractor’s products compared to that of its competitors?

Ordering
8. How would you rate the contractor’s ordering system?
Customer Satisfaction
9. How would you rate your level of overall satisfaction with the contractor?

Rater’s Signature: Date:

Page 2 of 2 03/23/2016

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .