EXHIBIT 1_Past Performance Reference Check.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- General Services Administration (GSA) seeks to lease office and lab space in Seattle, WA
- Solicitation number
- 0WA2313
About this file
This document is a past performance reference check template for a federal construction contract opportunity issued by the General Services Administration (GSA). The template collects details on a referenced project including the name, location, size, services provided, duration, and ratings for quality, cost control, timeliness, and business relations on a scale of 0 to 10. It asks if the offeror met any subcontracting goals and confirms there were no claims or liens on the project. It inquires if the reference would hire the offeror again and provides space for an overall rating and comments. The related federal contract opportunity is for GSA to lease office and lab space in Seattle, Washington, with responses due by an unspecified date.
View the file
Other files
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT 1
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK
General Services Administration Project 0WA2313 NOAA, Seattle WA
I. YOU ARE BEING CONTACTED FOR A REFERENCE REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF
| II. | Project Name: |
| Project Address: | |
| City and State: | |
| Type of Project: | |
| Square Footage: |
III. Name of Company/ Government Agency Employing Reference:
Name and Title of Individual Providing Reference Responses:
Phone Number: 000.000.0000 email address: Current Address:
| Was this design/build? |
| Does the information in II above accurately describe your project, and if not, please explain. |
1. What was your role in the project?
2. What was the duration of the project?
3. Please describe the types of services the firm/person provided:
As applicable to the role he or she had on the team, please provide responses to the following questions using a scale of 0 to 10 with zero being the lowest rating and 10 being the highest rating.
9-10 Significantly Exceeded Expectations 7-8 Met and to Some Extent Exceeded Expectations 5-6 Met Expectations 3-4 Did Not Fully Meet Expectations 0-2 Failed to Meet Expectations
III. QUALITY OF BUILDING AND SERVICES
BUILDING
1. a. For the building, how satisfied were you with workmanship, quality of materials used and overall appearance? Circle one.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
2. a. For the interior spaces, how satisfied were you with the efficiency of the space and flexibility for future space changes?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
SERVICES
3. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her time commitment to the project?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
4. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with the quality of his or her project management methods (or design if the person named above was an architectural designer) and his or her response to unanticipated problems?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
IV. COST CONTROL
5. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her commitment to your budget?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
6. How satisfied were you with the handling and pricing of change orders?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
V. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
7. a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to stay on schedule?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
8. a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to respond to any of your questions and comments in a timely manner?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
VI. BUSINESS RELATIONS
9. a. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her working relationship between the project team members?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10. a. How satisfied were you with his or her problem resolution skills?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11. (Complete this if you are providing a reference for the Offeror only and if the referenced project was a Government contract requiring a subcontracting plan.) Did the firm meet subcontractor and Small Disadvantaged Business goals and file the required 294’s and 295’s?
YES NO
12. Were any claims or mechanics liens filed in connection with this project?
YES NO
If yes, please explain:
| 13. | a. Would you contract with them again? | |
| YES | NO |
b. What is your overall score for the person named above?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
c. What could have improved your score?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .