EXHIBIT 2_Past Performance Check.docm.docx
DOCX document 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- General Services Administration (GSA) seeks to lease office and lab space in Seattle, WA
- Solicitation number
- 0WA2313
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Reference Check form related to a General Services Administration (GSA) project in Seattle, Washington. The form requests information about the respondent's role, duration, and satisfaction with the services provided by the referenced firm on the project, including quality of the building and services, cost control, timeliness of performance, and business relations. The form uses a 0-10 rating scale to assess various aspects of the firm's performance. Additional details requested include whether subcontractor and small disadvantaged business goals were met, if any claims or liens were filed, and if the respondent would contract with the firm again.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the GSA seeking to lease office and lab space in Seattle, Washington. The space requirements include a minimum of 115,074 ABOA square feet and a maximum of 139,000 RSF, with 21 structured parking spaces. The lease term is 20 years, with no option term. Offers are due on December 4, 2023, and the estimated occupancy date is May 21, 2027.
View the file
Other files
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT 2
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK
General Services Administration Project # 0WA2313 Seattle, Washington
I. YOU ARE BEING CONTACTED FOR A REFERENCE REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF
| II. | Project Name: |
| Project Address: | |
| City and State: | |
| Type of Project: | |
| Square Footage: |
III. Name of Company/ Government Agency Employing Reference:
Name and Title of Individual Providing Reference Responses:
Phone Number: 000.000.0000 email address: Current Address:
| Was this design/build? |
| Does the information in II above accurately describe your project, and if not, please explain. |
1. What was your role in the project?
2. What was the duration of the project?
3. Please describe the types of services the firm/person provided:
As applicable to the role he or she had on the team, please provide responses to the following questions using a scale of 0 to 10 with zero being the lowest rating and 10 being the highest rating.
9-10 Significantly Exceeded Expectations 7-8 Met and to Some Extent Exceeded Expectations 5-6 Met Expectations 3-4 Did Not Fully Meet Expectations 0-2 Failed to Meet Expectations
III. QUALITY OF BUILDING AND SERVICES
BUILDING
1. a. For the building, how satisfied were you with workmanship, quality of materials used and overall appearance? Circle one.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
2. a. For the interior spaces, how satisfied were you with the efficiency of the space and flexibility for future space changes?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
SERVICES
3. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her time commitment to the project?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
4. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with the quality of his or her project management methods (or design if the person named above was an architectural designer) and his or her response to unanticipated problems?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
IV. COST CONTROL
5. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her commitment to your budget?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
6. How satisfied were you with the handling and pricing of change orders?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
V. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
7. a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to stay on schedule?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
8. a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to respond to any of your questions and comments in a timely manner?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
VI. BUSINESS RELATIONS
9. a. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her working relationship between the project team members?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10. a. How satisfied were you with his or her problem resolution skills?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11. (Complete this if you are providing a reference for the Offeror only and if the referenced project was a Government contract requiring a subcontracting plan.) Did the firm meet subcontractor and Small Disadvantaged Business goals and file the required 294’s and 295’s?
YES NO
12. Were any claims or mechanics liens filed in connection with this project?
YES NO
If yes, please explain:
| 13. | a. Would you contract with them again? | |
| YES | NO |
b. What is your overall score for the person named above?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
c. What could have improved your score?
Page of
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .