BIP_Report_3450-029P_broad_branch_road_culvert.pdf

PDF 5 MB Posted

Attached to
Rock Creek Parkway 10(5)
Solicitation number
DTFH71-16-R-00001
Issued by

About this file

BIP Report_3450-029P_broad branch road culvert

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_0006_-_PRA-ROCR_10(5).pdf PDF
Amendment_0005_-_PRA-ROCR_10(5).pdf PDF
Amendment_0004_-_PRA-ROCR_10(5).pdf PDF
Amendment_0003_-_PRA-ROCR_10(5).pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_-_PRA-ROCR_10(5)_(Plans_Seperate).pdf PDF
Plans_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
BIP_Report_3450-016P_Milkhouse_Ford_Bridge.pdf PDF
Appendix_DDOT_TS-1138_sheets.pdf PDF
FP03_Eng_.pdf PDF
BIP_Report_3450-008P_Boulder_Bridge.pdf PDF
Report_Geotech.pdf PDF
Report_Certification_Program_for_Bridge_Temporary_Works.pdf PDF
Appendix_CCTV_Camera_and_Associated_Equipment_Specifications.pdf PDF
RFP_Solicitation_-_PRA-ROCR_10(5).pdf PDF
Permit_NPDES_NOI.pdf PDF
Permit_DC_DOE.pdf PDF
Report_Test_Pit_Information.pdf PDF
Permit_ESC_ _SWM.pdf PDF
Report_NEPA_Sch_B_FONSI.pdf PDF
ADV_Subcontracting_Plan.doc DOC document
Appendix_DC_Water_Preliminary_Plans.pdf PDF
VETS-100A-Form.pdf PDF
Report_NEPA_Sch_AB_CE.pdf PDF
BIP_Report_3450-009P_Blagden_Bridge.pdf PDF
Permit_USACE.pdf PDF
BIP_Report_3450-017P_Zoo_Tunnel.pdf PDF
BIP_Report_3450-011P_Piney_Branch_Bridge.pdf PDF
Permit_DCRA.pdf PDF
_Plans_Adv.pdf PDF
BIP_Report_3450-030P_Pinehurst_Branch_Bridge.pdf PDF
Appendix_Special_Sign_Dimensioning_Guide.pdf PDF
Appendix_Bolt_On_UPS_Cabinet_Assembly_with_Inverter_Charger_and_Battery_Bank.pdf PDF
Report_Traffic_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
FP03_Errata.pdf PDF
BIP_Report_3450-018P_Zoo_Tunnel_Bridge.pdf PDF
Appendix_IP_Communications_Equipment_to_be_Supplied_with_Traffic_Controllers.pdf PDF
BIP_Report_3450-027P_Joyce_Road_box_culvert.pdf PDF
ADV_Offeror's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Synopsis_PRA-ROCR_10(5).doc DOC document
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

BROAD BRANCH BRIDGE

BROAD BRANCH ROAD OVER BROAD BRANCH

ROCK CREEK PARK

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/13

Report prepared by: EU

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

BROAD BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/13

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 35.5 FT (10.8 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 12.3 FT (3.7 M) WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 55.0 FT (16.8 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ OTHER CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 44.0 FT (13.4 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ OTHER YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 25C1 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 19 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1984-JOINT REPAIR.

LOCATION

ROCK CREEK PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.69 (KM PT 2.72)

STATE: ................................. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LOCATION: 0.1 MILES FROM BEACH DRIVE

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BROAD BRANCH ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BROAD BRANCH

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in fair structural condition. Problems include deterioration of the slab and pier concrete and undermining and settlement of the downstream apron. The apron should be reconstructed, and the areas of spalled and deteriorated concrete in the substructure and slab underside should be repaired.

Additional problems include deterioration of the masonry mortar joints in the wingwalls and retaining walls, vegetation growth on the wingwalls, debris in the channel, and widespread deterioration of the wearing surface.

The roadway on the north side of the crosswalk, including the north approach, has been repaved since the previous inspection.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: R. VENKATAREDDY, B. CARPER (GANNETT FLEMING)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

RAMESH VENKATAREDDY, PE, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/31/13

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $35,000

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N N F N N N N N G

N G

G N N N F G G G F G N N

F N N N G G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

(FLOOR)

(FLOOR)

58.1, 59.3 MINOR TO MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF SLAB

UNDERSIDE IN SOME LOCATIONS WITH EXPOSED REBAR.

MODERATE CRACKING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH

EFFLORESCENCE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR CRACKING OF

SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT CONSTRUCTION

JOINTS. MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE

OF WEST OVERHANG, CENTER SPAN. MINOR SPALL ON

UNDERSIDE OF EAST OVERHANG, CENTER SPAN.

58.3 WIDESPREAD MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING OF ASPHALT

WEARING SURFACE, PRIMARILY OVER ABUTMENTS. MINOR

POTHOLES IN WEARING SURFACE AT SPOT LOCATIONS.

ROADWAY ON NORTH SIDE OF CROSSWALK HAS BEEN REPAVED,

AND CROSSWALK RESTRIPED, SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

PAVEMENT STRIPING, EXCEPT CROSSWALK STRIPING, IS FADED.

58.5 MINOR CRACKING, SCALING AND SPALLING OF CURBS, SIDEWALKS,

AND MEDIAN.

58.6 MINOR FLAKING OF PAINT ON RAILINGS. BASE OF RAIL POSTS NOT

FLUSH WITH SIDEWALK IN SOME LOCATIONS; MINOR TO

MODERATE DETERIORATION OF GROUT PADS. SEVERAL ANCHOR

BOLTS AND NUTS ARE LOOSE IN WEST RAILING. MINOR VEHICLE

SCRAPES ON ENDS OF RAILINGS. END CAP MISSING TO TOP RAIL

OF EAST RAILING AT SOUTH END.

58.7 BIKE PATH TRANSITION ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH APPROACH

INHIBITS PROPER DRAINAGE ALONG EAST SIDE OF ROADWAY.

58.8 EXPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONDUIT IN NORTH APPROACH

SHOULDER ON EAST SIDE.

60.1 MINOR TO MODERATE VERTICAL AND RANDOM CRACKING OF

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

60.5 MODERATE SCALING OF CONCRETE FLOOR; SOUTHEAST END

EXPOSED. SEE ALSO 60.9,10.

F G F F F N

N

N

G

F

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F G G F N

LOW

SUFF

10 FT.

SILT, SAND, ROCK

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N F F F N G N

223. RETAINING WALL 7

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL G

G N G G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE; MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINTS. ONE

STONE DISLODGED AT BASE OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.8 MINOR DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER AT SOUTHEAST VERTICAL

JOINT; FILLER MATERIAL IS MISSING AT NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST,

AND SOUTHWEST VERTICAL JOINTS.

60.9,10 MODERATE UNDERMINING OF DOWNSTREAM APRON; APRON HAS

SETTLED WITH SEVERE CRACKING; WATER RUNS INTO CRACKS,

BELOW APRON, AND OUT BELOW CUT-OFF WALL. TWO SMALL

HOLES IN SURFACE OF APRON ON NORTH SIDE.

MODERATE EROSION ALONG AND AT END OF NORTHEAST

WINGWALL.

60.13 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING OF PIER WALLS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE. MODERATE SCALING AT WATERLINE WITH

EXPOSED REBAR. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH

FACE OF NORTH PIER WALL, EAST END AND ON SOUTH FACE OF

NORTH PIER WALL NEAR CENTER.

61.1 CHANNEL CURVES TO RIGHT IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OF

STRUCTURE. FLOW IS DIRECTLY INTO SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.

61.2 MINOR SCOUR UP TO 8"D OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; SLAB FLOOR

EXPOSED AT THIS LOCATION.

61.4 MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG UPSTREAM SIDE OF

STRUCTURE.

222.4 WIDESPREAD MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING OF SOUTH

APPROACH PAVEMENT. NORTH APPROACH HAS BEEN REPAVED

SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

222.5,6 APPROACH CURBS SETTLED UP TO 5" ON EAST SIDE AT BOTH

APPROACHES. UP TO 6" HEIGHT DIFFERENTIAL AT ENDS OF

SIDEWALKS DUE TO SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH SHOULDERS; NO

SETTLEMENT AT SOUTHWEST CORNER.

222.7 NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT.

223.1 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS AND EXPANSION

JOINT MATERIAL IN RETAINING WALLS AT NORTHWEST AND

SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF STRUCTURE. TOP COURSE OF STONE

SEPARATED UP TO 1" (PREVIOUS 3/4") AT NORTHWEST RETAINING

WALL DUE TO TREE GROWTH ABOVE. MINOR VEGETATION

GROWTH ALONG RETAINING WALLS.

36.A RAILING HEIGHT OF 3'-1" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM

HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 3'-6" FOR PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE

BARRIERS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 36 33 60 54

TYPE 3 37 34 61 55

TYPE 3S2 58 53 97 88

TYPE 3-3 71 64 119 108

DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

A

A

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

BROAD BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/13

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: ROCK CREEK PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 113 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BROAD BRANCH BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 001 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3450-029P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 19 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... BROAD BRANCH

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 029P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BROAD BRANCH ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 3450029P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.1 MILES FROM BEACH DRIV

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 25C1 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 1.69 (KM PT 2.72)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

12.3 FT (3.7 M)

35.5 FT (10.8 M)

5 - OTHER

5 - OTHER

5 - OTHER

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (33.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.0 TONS (54.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

o

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

BROAD BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/13

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°56'40.20"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°03'00.20"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 44.0 FT (13.4 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 55.0 FT (16.8 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 44.0 FT (13.4 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 44.0 FT (13.4 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 2 - CLOSED MEDIAN (no barrier

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 19 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 44.0 FT (13.4 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 4.0 FT (1.2 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 4.0 FT (1.2 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.10 FT (0.94 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1984-JOINT REPAIR.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:77�03'00.20 http:38�56'40.20

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3450-029P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD BEACH DRIVE

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

WEARING SURFACE; CENTERLINE OF

STRUCTURE IN NORTH SPAN SHOWN; NOTE

PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED REBAR PATCHED

WITH ASPHALT

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF SIDEWALKS; EAST SIDEWALK AT

NORTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL BASE OF RAIL POSTS NOT FLUSH WITH

SIDEWALK; WEST RAILING AT SOUTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL LOOSE ANCHOR BOLT NUTS IN WEST RAILING;

SOUTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL PEELING OF PAINT ON RAILINGS; EAST RAILING

AT NORTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT; SOUTH

APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - BIKE PATH TRANSITION ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH

APPROACH INHIBITS PROPER DRAINAGE

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL HEIGHT DIFFERENTIAL AT ENDS OF SIDEWALKS

DUE TO SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH SHOULDERS; EAST SIDE OF

NORTH APPROACH SHOWN; ALSO NOTE SETTLED APPROACH CURB

PHOTO #12 - EXPOSED UTILITY CONDUIT IN NORTH APPROACH

SHOULDER ON EAST SIDE

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST, NORTH

SPAN; NOTE TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE

WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE

WITH EFFLORESCENCE; NORTH SPAN AT EAST END SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF SLAB

UNDERSIDE, NORTH SPAN AT EAST END

SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND

SPALLING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND EXPOSED REBAR

ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS; CENTER

SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF WEST

OVERHANG IN CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #18 - SPALL IN UNDERSIDE OF EAST

OVERHANG IN CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS;

SOUTH ABUTMENT AT WEST END SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS; SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN; NOTE MASONRY

STONE DISLODGED

PHOTO #22 - SCOUR ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE SLAB

FLOOR EXPOSED

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL SCALING OF SLAB FLOOR; CENTER SPAN AT

WEST END SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER, NORTH SIDE

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF PIER

WALLS; NORTH FACE OF NORTH PIER AT

EAST END SHOWN

PHOTO #26 - SPALL ON SOUTH FACE OF

NORTH PIER WALL AT EAST END WITH

EXPOSED REBAR

PHOTO #27 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG UPSTREAM SIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #28 - HOLE IN APRON ON NORTH SIDE AT DOWNSTREAM END

PHOTO #29 - CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF APRON AT

DOWNSTREAM END

PHOTO #30 - PREVIOUSLY NOTED UNDERMINING AND SETTLEMENT

OF DOWNSTREAM APRON NOT VISIBLE DURING 2013 INSPECTION DUE

TO HIGH FLOW

PHOTO #31 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE; CENTER

SPAN

PHOTO #32 - VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG NORTHEAST RETAINING

WALL

PHOTO #33 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE,

CENTER SPAN

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .