BIP_Report_3450-027P_Joyce_Road_box_culvert.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT ROSS DRIVE

JOYCE ROAD OVER LUZON BRANCH

ROCK CREEK PARK

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 3450-027P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/13

Report prepared by: NU

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3450-027P

JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT ROSS DRIVE INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/13

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 31.0 FT (9.4 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 10.5 FT (3.2 M) WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 75.5 FT (23.0 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ OTHER CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 59.0 FT (18.0 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ OTHER YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2008-UPSTREAM CURB AND SIDEWALK RECAST.

LOCATION

ROCK CREEK PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

STATE: ................................. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LOCATION: 0.1 MILES FROM ROSS DRIVE

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ JOYCE ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LUZON BRANCH

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in fair structural condition. The main problems are widespread deterioration of the structural concrete, especially the floor and the ends of the pier walls and abutment breastwalls. The floor exhibits several large areas of spalls with exposed and heavily corroded reinforcing. The deteriorated concrete throughout the structure, especially at the midspan of each cell, should be repaired.

Additional problems include minor to moderate deterioration of the approach pavement and asphalt wearing surface, minor rotation of the northeast and southwest wingwalls, areas of settled and missing stones in the northeast and northwest wingwalls, and moderate scour on both sides of the structure. The rotation of the wingwalls appears to have stabilized, but will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

It should be noted accumulation of debris exists along the north side of structure at the west opening. Debris should be removed to allow proper water flow.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. If corrective action is not taken, the deterioration will likely continue to progress and may eventually lead to loss of load capacity.

INSPECTION TEAM: E. DUES, C. MARBURGER (GANNETT FLEMING)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

ERIC DUES, PE, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/31/13

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3450-027P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS:

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3450-027P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 5

1. DECK SLAB F

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE G

4. RIDEABILITY G

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN G

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS G

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE G

8. UTILITIES P

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. OTHER N

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 5

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. ALIGNMENT

11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS (FLOOR)

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS (FLOOR)

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

N N F N N N N N G G N

F N N N P P G N F G N N

F N N P F G N

58.1, 59.3

58.3, 222.4

58.5

58.6

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

THROUGHOUT DECK UNDERSIDE. RUST STAINING, SCALING, AND

WATER LEAKAGE ALONG CENTERLINE CONSTRUCTION JOINT.

EXPOSED AND RUSTED REBAR CHAIRS ON SLAB UNDERSIDE.

HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE AND ACTIVE LEAKAGE ON SLAB

UNDERSIDE ALONG WATER LINE AT NORTH END, ALL SPANS.

6'L X 2-1/2'W AREA OF DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH

EXPOSED REBAR ON SLAB UNDERSIDE APPROXIMATELY 30' FROM

NORTH SIDE IN EAST SPAN. 8'L X 1-1/2'W AREA OF DELAMINATION

ON SLAB UNDERSIDE IN EAST SPAN AT SOUTH END. 10'L X 4'W X

2"D AREA OF DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED

REBAR AND WATER LEAKAGE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE AT

CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN EAST AND CENTER SPANS;

DELAMINATION ONLY IN WEST SPAN. SEVERAL ADDITIONAL SMALL

AREAS OF DELAMINATION ON SLAB UNDERSIDE IN WEST SPAN.

MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SLAB UNDERSIDE,

CENTER SPAN NEAR NORTH END. 4'L X 2'W AREA OF

DELAMINATION ON SLAB UNDERSIDE, CENTER SPAN,

APPROXIMATELY 30' FROM NORTH END.

SEVERE CRACKING, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING (UP TO 4"D) OF

SLAB EDGES WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND EFFLORESCENCE.

MINOR RANDOM CRACKING OF ASPHALT OVER STRUCTURE AND

APPROACHES. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF PAVEMENT

OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACK IN

WEARING SURFACE AT MIDSPAN OF STRUCTURE. MODERATE MAP

CRACKING AND BREAKING UP OF WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT.

MINOR POTHOLES IN EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT; SOME ASPHALT

PATCHES.

ONE MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACK IN NORTH SIDEWALK. ONE

MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACK IN SOUTH SIDEWALK WITH MINOR

SETTLEMENT. MODERATE MAP CRACKING AND DELAMINATION OF

EXTERIOR FACE OF SOUTH SIDEWALK AT WEST END. MINOR

VEGETATION GROWTH IN LONGITUDINAL CURB JOINT AT SOUTH

SIDEWALK.

MINOR DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS

AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS; MINOR MOSS GROWTH IN JOINTS.

DISPLACED MASONRY CAPSTONE AT EAST END OF NORTH

PARAPET.

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 6

G F G P N

MED

SUFF

7 FT.

ROCK, SAND, SILT

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N F G G N F N

223. RETAINING WALL 6

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL F

N N G G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

58.7 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG SOUTH PARAPET.

58.8 NORTH UTILITY LINE IS BROKEN AND IN WATER. UTILITY LINE IN

EAST CELL IS SAGGING IN WATER.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, SOME

WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL NEAR

NORTH END. MODERATE VERTICAL CRACK IN EAST ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL NEAR NORTH END UNDER WATER LINE; MINOR

SPALL IN CRACK. HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL UNDER WATER LINE AT NORTH END. MODERATE

EDGE SPALLING OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT NORTH END.

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT NORTH END UNDER WATER LINE;

MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT NORTH END. MINOR

LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH WATER LEAKAGE ALONG BASE OF

WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, SOUTHERN HALF.

60.5,16 SEVERE SCALING OF FLOOR SLAB (UP TO 1-1/2"D) WITH UP TO 50%

SECTION LOSS TO EXPOSED REBAR.

60.6,10 MINOR DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

TREE GROWING AGAINST SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; MINOR TO

MODERATE VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH ALONG OTHER

WINGWALLS. DISPLACED MASONRY STONE AT TOP OF

SOUTHEAST WINGWALL DUE TO VEGETATION GROWTH.

NORTHEAST WINGWALL HAS ROTATED ±4" AT EAST ABUTMENT; 6'L

X 4'H AREA WITH MISSING STONES; 2'D VOIDS IN WINGWALL BY

DRAINAGE PIPE. SOUTHWEST WINGWALL HAS ROTATED ±1" AT

TOP. 5'H X 2'W (UNCHANGED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION) AREA

AT BASE OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL WITH SETTLED AND MISSING

STONES. NO CHANGE TO WINGWALL ROTATION SINCE LAST

INSPECTION.

60.9, 61.2 MODERATE SCOUR WITH FLOOR SLAB EXPOSED 2.5'H ON

DOWNSTREAM SIDE AND 6"H ON UPSTREAM SIDE.

60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT

PIER WALLS. MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING, SPALLING (UP TO

4"D), AND EFFLORESCENCE ON ENDS OF PIER WALLS. MODERATE

DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE UNDER

WATER LINE AT NORTH END, ALL PIERS. 3' X 3' AREA OF

DELAMINATION AND WATER LEAKAGE ON EAST SIDE OF EAST PIER

WALL AT CENTER CONSTRUCTION JOINT.

61.4 DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND FALLEN TREE AT UPSTREAM END;

DEBRIS ACCUMULATION INSIDE WEST SPAN.

JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT ROSS DRIVE INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/13

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

222.5 SOUTH SIDEWALK AT WEST APPROACH UNDERMINED; AS-BUILT CONDITION.

222.6 MINOR SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES (UP TO 1").

222.8 STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 4-WAY INTERSECTION.

223.1 RETAINING WALLS AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE ALONG CHANNEL BANKS; MINOR DETERIORATION OF

MORTAR JOINTS WITH SEVERAL LOOSE AND MISSING STONES.

36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 2'-9" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT OF 3'-6" FOR PEDESTRIAN

BARRIERS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3450-027P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 27 24 45 41

TYPE 3 28 25 46 42

TYPE 3S2 44 40 73 66

TYPE 3-3 54 49 89 81

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE AND

CONDITION.

A

A

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-027P

JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT ROSS DRIVE INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/13

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: ROCK CREEK PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT ROSS DRIVE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3450-027P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 15

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 027P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

113 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

001 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

164000150

LUZON BRANCH

JOYCE ROAD

3450027P0000000

0.1 MILES FROM ROSS DRIVE

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

07 - FRAME

10.5 FT (3.2 M)

31.0 FT (9.4 M)

5 - OTHER

5 - OTHER

5 - OTHER

5 - OTHER

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (41.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

o

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-027P

JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT ROSS DRIVE INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/13

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°57'38.00"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°02'30.60"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 1 MI (2 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 59.0 FT (18.0 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 75.5 FT (23.0 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 59.0 FT (18.0 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 59.0 FT (18.0 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 59.0 FT (18.0 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 6.6 FT (2.0 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 6.3 FT (1.9 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY

MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.75 FT (0.84 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2008-UPSTREAM CURB AND SIDEWALK RECAST.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:77�02'30.60 http:38�57'38.00

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3450-027P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3450-027P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD ROSS DRIVE

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL RANDOM CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE;

EAST END AT SOUTH SIDE SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL POTHOLES IN EAST

APPROACH PAVEMENT

PHOTO #5 - LONGITUDINAL CRACK IN

WEARING SURFACE AT MIDSPAN OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #6 - VEGETATION GROWTH IN

LONGITUDINAL CURB JOINT AT SOUTH

SIDEWALK

PHOTO #7 - TRANSVERSE CRACK IN SOUTH

SIDEWALK AT WEST END; NOTE SETTLEMENT

PHOTO #8 - MAP CRACKING AND

DELAMINATION OF EXTERIOR FACE OF

SOUTH SIDEWALK AT WEST END

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS; NORTH PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - DISPLACED MASONRY CAPSTONE IN NORTH PARAPET AT

EAST END

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF WEST APPROACH

PAVEMENT; EASTBOUND LANE SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH, CENTER

SPAN

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SLAB EDGES; SOUTH SIDE

SHOWN; ALSO NOTE DETERIORATION OF WEST PIER WALL

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH

EFFLORESCENCE; NORTH END OF CENTER SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON SLAB UNDERSIDE, NEAR NORTH SIDE IN EAST SPAN; NOTE

INCREASED SPALLING SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION

PHOTO #16 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON SLAB UNDERSIDE IN CENTER SPAN NEAR ROADWAY CENTERLINE;

NOTE INCREASED SPALLING SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL SCALING WITH RUST

STAINING AND WATER LEAKAGE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE AT CONSTRUCTION JOINT; WEST

SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

ABUTMENT; NOTE SAGGING UTILITY LINE

PHOTO #19 - VERTICAL CRACKING IN EAST

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL NEAR NORTH END

UNDER WATER PIPE

PHOTO #20 - EDGE SPALLING OF EAST

ABUTMENT AT NORTH END; NOTE

EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #21 - LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH WATER LEAKAGE ALONG

BASE OF WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

PHOTO #22 - MISSING STONE IN SOUTHEAST WINGWALL DUE TO

VEGETATION; NOTE TREE GROWING AT TOP OF WINGWALL

PHOTO #23 - MISSING STONES AND VOIDS IN NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #24 - SETTLED AND MISSING STONES AT BASE OF

NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST PIER,

EAST SIDE

PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING

OF PIER WALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE; EAST

FACE OF WEST PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL WATER LEAKAGE

AROUND WATER PIPE AT NORTH END; WEST

PIER, EAST SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #28 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

ENDS OF PIER WALLS; SOUTH END OF WEST

PIER WALL SHOWN

PHOTO #29 - PREVIOUSLY NOTED SCALING

OF FLOOR SLAB WITH SECTION LOSS FROM

EXPOSED REBAR NOT VISIBLE DUE TO HIGH

WATER; UPSTREAM END SHOWN

PHOTO #30 - PREVIOUSLY NOTED SCOUR

WITH FLOOR SLAB EXPOSED AT

DOWNSTREAM SIDE NOT VISIBLE DUE TO

HIGH WATER

PHOTO #31 - DEBRIS IN EAST SPAN AT NORTH UPSTREAM SIDE

PHOTO #32 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE, CENTER

SPAN; NOTE UTILITY LINE PREVIOUSLY ACROSS OPENING IS BROKEN

PHOTO #33 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE,

CENTER SPAN