BIP_Report_3450-009P_Blagden_Bridge.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Rock Creek Parkway 10(5) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-16-R-00001
About this file
BIP Report_3450-009P_Blagden Bridge
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
BLAGDEN BRIDGE
BEACH DRIVE OVER ROCK CREEK
ROCK CREEK PARK
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 3450-009P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/14/13
Federal Highway Administration
Report prepared by: EU
MILE POINT:
KILOMETER POINT:
2.15 3.46
Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3450-009P
BLAGDEN BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/14/13
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 9 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 106.8 FT (32.6 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 105.0 FT (32.0 M) WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 45.3 FT (13.8 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ UNKNOWN CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.3 FT (10.5 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / 55.1-2 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 47 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1983-BRIDGE RAIL REPAIR/REPLACEMENT. 2006-PATCHING OF SOUTH APPROACH.
2008-MEDIAN COVERED WITH ASPHALT.
LOCATION
ROCK CREEK PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 2.15 (KM PT 3.46)
STATE: ................................. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LOCATION: BROAD BRANCH ROAD INTERSECTION
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BEACH DRIVE
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. ROCK CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problems include widespread deterioration of the concrete elements, as well as deterioration of the asphalt wearing surface and rusting of the bearing devices. The wearing surface should be replaced with a new overlay. In addition, the areas of spalling and delamination in the deck underside, curbs, and superstructure should be repaired and the cracks in the abutment breastwalls, bearing seats, and backwalls should be sealed to prevent water intrusion. Finally, the anchor bolts for the bearing assembly for Beam #2 at the north abutment are corroded and should be replaced, and all of the bearing devices should be cleaned and painted to arrest section loss.
It should also be noted that a 13" long x up to 5" wide area of loss of bearing is present at Beam #1 bearing at the south abutment due to a spall in the bearing seat.
The previously noted wingwall rotation has not increased since the previous inspection and will continue to be monitored during future inspections.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. If corrective action is not taken, the deterioration will continue to progress and may eventually lead to loss of load capacity.
INSPECTION TEAM: R. VENKATAREDDY, B. CARPER (GANNETT FLEMING)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
RAMESH VENKATAREDDY, PE, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW :
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/31/13
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3450-009P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS:
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3450-009P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(VEGETATION)
P F N N N F N N G
F G
(VEGETATION)
P F P F G N
F
P
G
F
58.1 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER SEEPAGE
ON DECK UNDERSIDE; WATER SEEPAGE MODERATE AT NORTH
ABUTMENT. MINOR DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF DECK
UNDERSIDE WITH EXPOSED REBAR.
58.2 NORTH EXPANSION JOINT IN WEST SIDEWALK DAMAGED; ASPHALT
PATCH IN SIDEWALK AND CURB OVER AND IN PLACE OF TOP JOINT
PLATE. NORTH EXPANSION JOINT PAVED OVER IN MEDIAN. NORTH
EXPANSION JOINT PACKED WITH DEBRIS. MODERATE RUSTING OF
NORTH EXPANSION JOINT PLATES AT CURBLINES; MINOR SNOW
PLOW DAMAGE IN SOUTHBOUND LANE. MINOR PITTING OF NORTH
EXPANSION JOINT PLATES.
SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT PAVED OVER.
58.3 MODERATE WIDESPREAD CRACKING AND RAVELING OF WEARING
SURFACE; ASPHALT PATCHING THROUGHOUT. LANE MARKINGS
FADED THROUGHOUT.
MODERATE POTHOLE IN WEARING SURFACE, NORTHBOUND LANE
NEAR SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT PATCHED WITH ASPHALT. MINOR
POTHOLE IN WEARING SURFACE, NORTHBOUND LANE AT
APPROXIMATELY MIDSPAN; PARTIALLY PATCHED WITH ASPHALT.
INCREASED NUMBER OF POTHOLES IN NORTHBOUND LANES
SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
58.4 ROUGH RIDE DUE TO CONDITION OF WEARING SURFACE AND
EXPANSION JOINTS.
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. F
PILE BENTS2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. F
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. F
FOUNDATIONS5. N
WINGWALLS6. F
WEEP HOLES7. P
EXPANSION JOINTS8. P
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. F
SLOPE PROTECTION11. N
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS15. N
FOUNDATIONS16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. N
OTHER 19. N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G G G N
MED
SUFF
12 FT.
ROCK, SAND, SILT
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N N F G F G G N
223. RETAINING WALL 8
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL G
G N G G N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
58.5,6 ENTIRE MEDIAN OVER STRUCTURE COVERED WITH ASPHALT.
MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF MEDIAN AT
APPROACHES.
MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND
SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON CONCRETE CURBS. MINOR
SPALLING OF SIDEWALKS. MODERATE TO SEVERE SPALLING OF
EXTERIOR FACE OF EAST SIDEWALK EXPOSING REBAR AND
ANCHOR BOLTS AT THREE RAIL POSTS. ASPHALT PATCHING AT
WEST SIDEWALK AND CURB ADJACENT TO NORTH EXPANSION
JOINT. FAILED TRANSITION PATCH WITH 6" DROP-OFF AT NORTH
APPROACH END OF EAST SIDEWALK.
MODERATE TO SEVERE COLLISION DAMAGE AT SOUTH END OF
EAST RAILING AND AT WEST RAILING IN SOUTH APPROACH.
EXPANSION SLEEVE LOOSE WITH RAIL MISALIGNED AT FIRST JOINT
FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT, WEST RAILING.
58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES.
58.10, 59.11 TREES AND VEGETATION OVERHANG STRUCTURE AT EAST SIDE
NEAR SOUTH END OF BRIDGE.
59.1 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF PAINT WITH
MODERATE TO SEVERE RUSTING OF BEARING DEVICES;
MODERATE SECTION LOSS ON SEVERAL MASONRY PLATES.
MODERATE SECTION LOSS ON ANCHOR BOLTS AND NUTS; 100%
SECTION LOSS ON ONE ANCHOR BOLT AT BEAM #2 WITH
REMAINING ANCHOR BOLT SEVERELY CORRODED AT NORTH
ABUTMENT. ROCKERS AT NORTH ABUTMENT ARE TILTED 15
DEGREES (EXPANSION) AT 85 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. HEAVY
VEGETATION ON BEAM #1 BEARING AT SOUTH ABUTMENT. PIECE
OF WOOD STUCK BETWEEN SEVERELY CORRODED SOLE AND
MASONRY PLATES AT BEAM #2 SOUTH ABUTMENT.
59.2 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH MODERATE TO HEAVY
EFFLORESCENCE, SPALLING (SOME WITH EXPOSED REBAR), AND
DELAMINATION OF BEAM ENDS. MODERATE WATER LEAKAGE
ONTO BEAM ENDS FROM DECK. MINOR EDGE SPALLING OF BEAM
#9 BOTTOM FLANGE, LIKELY DUE TO FLOOD DEBRIS IMPACT.
PREVIOUSLY NOTED DEBRIS LODGED IN SUPERSTRUCTURE AT
SEVERAL LOCATIONS WAS ONLY OBSERVED AT A SINGLE
LOCATION DURING 2013 INSPECTION.
59.6 MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND
RUST STAINS, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED
REBAR ON DIAPHRAGMS AT ABUTMENTS.
BLAGDEN BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/14/13
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
60.1,3 MINOR TO MODERATE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, RUST AND MOISTURE
STAINING, AND WATER LEAKAGE ON BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.
MINOR TO MODERATE SPALL (11"L X 20"H X 5"D) ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AND BEARING SEAT
BELOW BEAM #1 WITH LOSS OF BEARING 13"L X UP TO 5"W AT SOUTHWEST CORNER.
MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEATS. MODERATE CRACKING OF BEARING SEATS UNDER BEAM #6 AND BETWEEN BEAMS #7 AND #8 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT. MINOR RANDOM CRACKING OF BEARING SEAT
CONCRETE UNDER BEAM #1 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT AND UNDER BEAM #3 AT NORTH ABUTMENT.
60.4 MODERATE VERTICAL CRACKING OF BOTH ABUTMENT BACKWALLS. 1/2"W CRACK IN NORTH ABUTMENT
BACKWALL BETWEEN BEAMS #3 AND #4.
60.6 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AT WATERLINE AT SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST WINGWALLS. STONES MISSING AT WATER LINE AT NORTH END OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MODERATE VINE
GROWTH ON NORTHWEST, NORTHEAST, AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALLS.
60.7 3 OF 4 WEEP HOLES AT NORTH ABUTMENT AND 1 OF 4 WEEP HOLES AT SOUTH ABUTMENT ARE BELOW
GROUND LINE.
60.8 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT FILLER BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND ABUTMENTS.
MODERATE VINE GROWTH IN SOUTHWEST WINGWALL VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT.
60.10 SOUTHWEST WINGWALL HAS ROTATED FORWARD 1/2" AND SEPARATED 1-1/2" AT TOP. SOUTHEAST WINGWALL HAS ROTATED FORWARD 3" AND SEPARATED 1/2" AT TOP. NORTHEAST WINGWALL HAS SEPARATED 2" AT TOP.
NO CHANGE TO WINGWALL ROTATION SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
61.2 MINOR EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS.
222.4 MODERATE CRACKING OF PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES. ASPHALT BREAKING UP AND SPALLING ADJACENT TO NORTH EXPANSION JOINT IN SOUTHBOUND LANES; AREAS OF ASPHALT PATCHING. LANE
MARKINGS FADED THROUGHOUT.
222.5 MINOR EROSION OF APPROACH SHOULDER AT NORTH END OF EAST SIDEWALK.
222.6 UP TO 1" SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES ADJACENT TO ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.
223.1 MODERATE IVY GROWTH ON RETAINING WALL ADJACENT TO NORTHWEST WINGWALL.
36.A RAILING HEIGHT OF 3'-0" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT OF 3'-6" FOR PEDESTRIAN
BARRIERS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3450-009P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 30 27 50 45
TYPE 3 29 26 49 44
TYPE 3S2 34 31 57 52
TYPE 3-3 38 34 63 57
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
A
A
R
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-009P
BLAGDEN BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/14/13
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: ROCK CREEK PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 113 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BLAGDEN BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 001 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3450-009P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... ROCK CREEK
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 009P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BEACH DRIVE
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 3450009P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ BROAD BRANCH ROAD INTE
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 2.15 (KM PT 3.46)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 55.1-2 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
105.0 FT (32.0 M)
106.8 FT (32.6 M)
0 - UNKNOWN
0 - UNKNOWN
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 30.0 TONS (27.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 50.0 TONS (45.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 1 - DECK SURVEY (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-009P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°56'38.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°02'58.40"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 3 MI (5 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.3 FT (10.5 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 45.3 FT (13.8 M)
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 2 - CLOSED MEDIAN (no barrier
(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 47 °
(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.3 FT (10.5 M)
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT : ...................................... 4.3 FT (1.3 M)
RIGHT : ................................... 4.3 FT (1.3 M)
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
MATERIAL: .............................. 4 - STEEL
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.00 FT (0.91 M)
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL:
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
U - Unknown foundation. Not yet
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
C - MODERATE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1983-BRIDGE RAIL REPAIR/REPLACEMENT. 2006-PATCHING OF SOUTH APPROACH. 2008-MEDIAN COVERED WITH ASPHALT.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:77�02'58.40 http:38�56'38.30
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3450-009P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3450-009P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD BLAGDEN AVENUE
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE TYPICAL SPALLING
OF CURBS AND SIDEWALKS AND TYPICAL
FADED LANE MARKINGS
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF WEARING
SURFACE, NORTHBOUND LANE SHOWN; ALSO
NOTE ASPHALT PATCHING
PHOTO #5 - SNOW PLOW DAMAGE TO NORTH
EXPANSION JOINT IN SOUTHBOUND LANE
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL RUSTING AND PITTING
OF NORTH EXPANSION JOINT PLATES;
NORTHBOUND LANE SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL SPALLING WITH
EXPOSED REINFORCING ON CONCRETE
CURBS; NORTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - SPALLING OF EAST SIDEWALK
NEAR NORTH END
PHOTO #9 - SPALL IN EXTERIOR FACE OF
EAST SIDEWALK AT MIDSPAN; NOTE RAIL
POST ANCHOR BOLTS EXPOSED
PHOTO #10 - FAILED TRANSITION PATCH WITH
DROP - OFF AT NORTH APPROACH END OF
EAST SIDEWALK
PHOTO #11 - CRACKING AND SPALLING OF NORTH APPROACH MEDIAN
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT; NORTH
APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO WEST
RAILING AT SOUTH APPROACH
PHOTO #14 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO EAST
RAILING AT SOUTH END
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF BEARINGS; BEAM #9 AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF BEARINGS; BEAM #3
BEARING AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #18 - LOSS OF SECTION ON BEAM #2 ANCHOR BOLT AT NORTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT BEAM
ENDS; EAST SIDE OF BEAM #8 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF BEAM ENDS
WITH EXPOSED REBAR; BEAM #9 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL CRACKING, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING OF
END DIAPHRAGMS WITH EXPOSED REBAR; BETWEEN BEAMS #1 AND
#2 AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF END DIAPHRAGMS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE, RUST AND MOISTURE STAINS; BETWEEN BEAMS #2
AND #3 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE; SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #25 - SPALL IN SOUTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL AND BEARING SEAT BELOW
BEAM #1; NOTE LOSS OF BEARING
PHOTO #26 - CLOSE UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS
PHOTO
PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING
OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS; SOUTH
ABUTMENT AT BEAM #9 SHOWN
PHOTO #28 - DETERIORATION OF MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS AT WATERLINE AT
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; ALSO NOTE
TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL JOINT
FILLER BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND
ABUTMENTS
PHOTO #29 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
VERTICAL JOINT MATERIAL; SOUTHWEST
WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #30 - TYPICAL IVY GROWTH ON
RETAINING WALL ADJACENT TO NORTHWEST
WINGWALL; PREVIOUSLY NOTED
OVERGROWTH HAS BEEN REMOVED
PHOTO #31 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #32 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .