BIP_Report_3450-016P_Milkhouse_Ford_Bridge.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

MILKHOUSE FORD BRIDGE

BEACH DRIVE OVER ROCK CREEK

ROCK CREEK PARK

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 3450-016P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/12/13

Federal Highway Administration

Report prepared by: EU

MILE POINT:

KILOMETER POINT:

4.20 6.76

Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3450-016P

MILKHOUSE FORD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/12/13

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 6 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 96.5 FT (29.4 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 94.0 FT (28.7 M) WEARING SURFACE: .......... MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 37.8 FT (11.5 M) ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. 1985

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 10-1(1) / 202(1) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 36 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1985-MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION/SUPERSTRUCTURE. 2000-BEAM REPAIR. 2006-RIPRAP

INSTALLED AT NORTH ABUTMENT, WEST APPROACH SIDEW ALKS REPAIRED.

LOCATION

ROCK CREEK PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 4.20 (KM PT 6.76)

STATE: ................................. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LOCATION: 0.2 MILES FROM BINGHAM DRIVE

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BEACH DRIVE

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. ROCK CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge is in fair to good condition overall. The main problem is deterioration of the deck expansion joints. The joint assemblies exhibit snow plow impact damage and deteriorated sealant.

Furthermore, a section of joint armor is missing and there are several loose bolts at the south expansion joint, which creates a significant hazard for traffic. W ater leakage through the deck expansion joints onto the bearing areas has caused moderate to severe deterioration of the steel bearing devices, prestressed concrete beam ends, and reinforced concrete end diaphragms. These areas of concrete deterioration should be repaired, and the bearing devices should be cleaned, repainted, and reset. Both expansion joint assemblies should be replaced.

Additional problems include minor to moderate deterioration of the abutments, rotation of the wingwalls, and moderate scour along the north abutment. The wingwall rotation will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

It should be noted that the south channel bank along the pedestrian path at the south abutment appears to have been overtopped during recent high flows. There is minor scour along the abutment breastwall and significant sediment in the pedestrian path. In order to properly maintain the pedestrian path, the channel bank should be built up to prevent future overtopping. The sediment should also be removed from the path routinely until the bank is built up.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. If corrective action is not taken, the deterioration will continue to progress and may eventually lead to loss of load capacity.

INSPECTION TEAM: E. DUES, C. MARBURGER (GANNETT FLEMING)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

ERIC DUES, PE, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/31/13

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3450-016P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS:

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3450-016P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

F F N N N F N N G

N G

N G G F G G

N

P

G

G

58.1 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE AT SOUTHEAST

CORNER. PREVIOUSLY NOTED FADED YELLOW STRIPING AT

ROADWAY CENTERLINE HAS BEEN RESTRIPED.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE AND UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS.

58.2 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND MINOR IMPACT DAMAGE TO

EXPANSION JOINTS; PLASTIC SEALANT FOR JOINT ARMOR

BREAKING UP. WATER LEAKAGE THROUGH JOINTS ONTO BEARING

AREAS. SEVERAL BOLTS LOOSE AND MISSING, AND SECTIONS OF

JOINT ARMOR MISSING IN SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT. NORTH JOINT

BOLTS ARE LOOSE. TRAFFIC HAZARD FOR BOTH LANES OF

TRAFFIC, JOINTS IMPACT UNDER LIVE LOAD.

MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF POURABLE JOINT

SEAL IN SIDEWALKS; WORSE AT SOUTH END WHERE JOINT

MATERIAL HANGS FROM UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS.

58.5 MINOR SPALLING OF CURBS AND SIDEWALKS ALONG EXPANSION

JOINTS. CRACK IN EAST SIDEWALK AT NORTH END. MODERATE

VEHICLE SCRAPES THROUGHOUT GRANITE CURBS.

58.6 MINOR FLAKING OF PAINT ON RAILINGS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

TOP RAIL LOOSE AT NORTH END OF WEST RAILING. TOP RAIL

EXPANSION SLEEVE MISSING AT MIDSPAN OF WEST RAILING;

OTHER RAILING EXPANSION SLEEVES HAVE EXCESSIVE

EXPANSION.

MINOR VEHICLE SCRAPES WITH RUSTING THROUGHOUT WEST

TRAFFIC RAILING; MINOR IMPACT DAMAGE TO NORTH END.

MODERATE RUSTING WITH SECTION LOSS ON WEST TRAFFIC

RAILING AT JOINT AT NORTH END.

58.8 WRAPPING AROUND UTILITY LINE LOOSE. TWO UTILITY CONDUITS

EXPOSED AT SOUTH END OF EAST SIDEWALK.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. F

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. F

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. G

FOUNDATIONS5. N

WINGWALLS6. G

WEEP HOLES7. F

EXPANSION JOINTS8. F

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. F

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. F

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N14. PILE BENTS

N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N16. FOUNDATIONS

N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F F G G

F((SEDIMENT))

MED

SUFF

13 FT.

ROCK, SILT

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N F G F N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.1 MINOR TO MODERATE RUSTING WITH RUST SCALE ON BEARING

DEVICES; UP TO 100% SECTION LOSS TO SOME ANCHOR BOLT

NUTS AND SOME NOT FULLY SEATED. MODERATE PACK RUST

BETWEEN ROCKERS AND MASONRY PLATES AT SOUTH ABUTMENT;

ROCKER BEARINGS TILTED (EXPANDED) ABOUT 5 DEGREES AT

APPROXIMATELY 70 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. ROCKER HOLD-DOWN

ANCHORS ARE BENT DUE TO ROCKER ROTATION BEYOND LIMIT OF

SLOTTED HOLES.

59.2 MINOR CRACKING OF BEAMS WITH EFFLORESCENCE

THROUGHOUT. MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING OF BEAM ENDS;

ESPECIALLY BEAMS #4 AND #5. MINOR CRACKING WITH

DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF BEAM #2 AT NORTH ABUTMENT;

PATCHED AREA NEARBY. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON BEAMS #3, #5, AND #6 AT NORTH END. MINOR LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING AND DELAMINATION OF BEAM #4 BOTTOM FLANGE AT

MIDSPAN.

59.6 MODERATE TO SEVERE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR,

EFFLORESCENCE, AND SCALING OF END DIAPHRAGMS. MINOR TO

MODERATE CRACKING AND DELAMINATION OF INTERMEDIATE

DIAPHRAGMS.

60.1 MINOR SPALLING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS THROUGHOUT.

MODERATE MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. MINOR TO MODERATE HORIZONTAL,

VERTICAL, AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL; MINOR SCALING ALONG WATERLINE.

60.3 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING OF BEARING SEATS; UP TO 3"D

ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS. SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

WITH NO LOSS OF BEARING AT NORTH ABUTMENT, EAST END OF

BEARING SEAT.

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON

ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.

MINOR TO MODERATE SPALLING OF TOP OF BACKWALLS,

POSSIBLY DUE TO SNOW PLOW DAMAGE.

60.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MORTAR JOINTS. MINOR

VEGETATION GROWTH NEAR WINGWALLS.

60.7 WEEP HOLES AT SOUTH ABUTMENT AND EAST END OF NORTH

ABUTMENT BELOW GROUND LINE.

60.8 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL EXPANSION

JOINT FILLER.

MILKHOUSE FORD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/12/13

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

60.9, 61.1,2 STREAM FLOWS AGAINST NORTH ABUTMENT RESULTING IN MODERATE SCOUR. MINOR SCOUR ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT; CHANNEL APPEARS TO HAVE OVERTOPPED BANK IN RECENT PAST DURING HIGH FLOW.

MODERATE CHANNEL BANK EROSION ON BOTH SIDES OF STRUCTURE WITH EXPOSED TREE ROOTS AND SOME

LEANING TREES.

60.10 MODERATE OUTWARD ROTATION OF SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST, AND NORTHEAST WINGWALLS; UP TO 3"

MEASURED AT TOP (2" MEASURED DURING PREVIOUS INSPECTION).

61.3 RIPRAP ALONG NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

222.4 ASPHALT PATCHES AT NORTH APPROACH. MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE AND CURBLINES. MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF

SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT.

222.6 MINOR SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES. UP TO 8" DROP-OFF FROM EAST SIDEWALK TO GROUND LINE AT NORTH

END; 6" AT SOUTH END (12" MEASURED DURING PREVIOUS INSPECTION).

36.A RAILING HEIGHT OF 3'-0" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT OF 3'-6" FOR PEDESTRIAN

BARRIERS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3450-016P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 28 25 47 43

TYPE 3 27 24 45 41

TYPE 3S2 33 30 55 50

TYPE 3-3 37 34 61 55

DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

A

A

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-016P

MILKHOUSE FORD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/12/13

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: ROCK CREEK PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 113 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... MILKHOUSE FORD BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 001 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3450-016P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... ROCK CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 016P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BEACH DRIVE

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 3450016P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.2 MILES FROM BINGHAM D

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 10-1(1) (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 4.20 (KM PT 6.76)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 202(1) (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

94.0 FT (28.7 M)

96.5 FT (29.4 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 28.0 TONS (25.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 47.0 TONS (43.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-016P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°57'55.10"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°02'51.00"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 3 MI (5 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 37.8 FT (11.5 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 36 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 6.8 FT (2.1 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 4.4 FT (1.3 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.00 FT (0.91 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

4 - Stable; action required to pro

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1985-MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION/SUPERSTRUCTURE. 2000-BEAM REPAIR. 2006-RIPRAP INSTALLED AT NORTH ABUTMENT, WEST

APPROACH SIDEWALKS REPAIRED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:77�02'51.00 http:38�57'55.10

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3450-016P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3450-016P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JOYCE ROAD

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

EXPANSION JOINTS; SOUTH EXPANSION

JOINT SHOWN; NOTE LOOSE AND MISSING

BOLTS

PHOTO #5 - SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL:

NOTE MISSING STEEL JOINT ARMORING

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

POURABLE JOINT SEAL IN SIDEWALKS; WEST

SIDEWALK AT SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT

SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL VEHICLE SCRAPES THROUGHOUT GRANITE

CURBS; EAST CURB SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TOP RAIL LOOSE AT NORTH END OF WEST RAILING; ALSO

NOTE TYPICAL FLAKING OF PAINT

PHOTO #9 - VEHICLE SCRAPES AND IMPACT

DAMAGE TO NORTH END OF WEST TRAFFIC

RAILING

PHOTO #10 - RUSTING WITH SECTION LOSS

ON WEST TRAFFIC RAILING AT NORTH END

PHOTO #11 - CRACK IN EAST SIDEWALK AT NORTH END

PHOTO #12 - DROP-OFF AT SOUTH END OF EAST SIDEWALK; NOTE

PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED UTILITY CONDUITS ARE NO LONGER EXPOSED

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF TOP OF

BACKWALLS; SOUTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL

SHOWN; ALSO NOTE DETERIORATION OF

SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT

PHOTO #14 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS; EAST

OVERHANG SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF BEARING DEVICES AT

SOUTH ABUTMENT; BEAM #5 SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - BEAM #5 BEARING AT SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE ROCKER

ROTATED BEYOND LIMIT OF SLOTTED HOLES

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF BEARING DEVICES AT

NORTH ABUTMENT; BEAM #6 SHOWN; NOTE LOOSE ANCHOR BOLT

NUT

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF BEAM ENDS; BEAM #5 AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT

END OF BEAM #6 AT NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

END DIAPHRAGMS; SOUTH ABUTMENT

BETWEEN BEAMS #1 AND #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE SEDIMENT

ALONG PEDESTRIAN PATH

PHOTO #24 - SEDIMENT ALONG PEDESTRIAN PATH AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; BETWEEN BEAMS

#5 AND #6 SHOWN; PREVIOUSLY NOTED

GRAFFITI HAS BEEN REMOVED

PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

ABUTMENT BACKWALLS; SOUTH ABUTMENT

BETWEEN BEAMS #5 AND #6 SHOWN

PHOTO #27 - OUTWARD ROTATION OF

NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #28 - TYPICAL WRAPPING AROUND

UTILITY LINE LOOSE; NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO #29 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #30 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #31 - TYPICAL CHANNEL BANK EROSION; NORTH

DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK SHOWN; PREVIOUSLY NOTED

EXPOSED TREE ROOTS WERE NOT VISIBLE DUE TO HIGH WATER