C250192_PP-APPROVED.pdf
PDF 311 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Enterprise Asset Management Phase 2
- Solicitation number
- 250192
- Issued by
- Orange County, California
About this file
This is an interoffice procurement plan memorandum from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) concerning RFP 250192 for an Enterprise Asset Management System Phase 2. The procurement seeks qualified consultants to provide enterprise asset management system services over a two-year contract term effective September 1, 2026 through August 31, 2028. The RFP format was selected because evaluation criteria beyond price are necessary to select the most qualified consultant. The Scope of Work specifies individual tasks and deliverables that vendors must address in their proposals.
The contract is structured as a firm-fixed-price engagement with a budget of $1,500,000 for the initial two-year term and no option terms. Evaluation will be weighted across four criteria: Qualifications of the Firm (25%), Staffing and Project Organization (20%), Work Plan (30%), and Cost (25%). The evaluation team comprises five internal members including representatives from Contract Administration and Management, Information Technology Project Management Office, Enterprise Computer Solution & Support, OC Streetcar Operations, and Contract Services Maintenance Oversight. Funding is provided through Local Measure M and Federal CMAQ sources. The procurement plan indicates that an independent cost estimate and Scope of Work verification form have been received, with requisition number R000680. Prevailing wages, liquidated damages, and DBE goals are applicable to this procurement.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise_Asset_Management_Phase_2_(Addendum_#3_Revision).pdf | ||
| C250192_PS.pdf | ||
| C250192_Exhibit_A,_Attachment_A_Business_Requirements.pdf | ||
| C250192_Exhibit_A,_SOW.pdf | ||
| C250192_Exhibit_C_Proposed_Agreement.pdf | ||
| C250192_RFP_Exhibit_B_Price_Summary_Sheet.pdf | ||
| C250192_Exhibit_D_Level_1_Safety_Specifications_Rev_8.pdf | ||
| C250192_PP.pdf | ||
| C250192_Exhibit_C_Proposed_Agreement_gmedits.docx | DOCX document | |
| C250192_PP_GMEDITS.docx | DOCX document | |
| C250192_Form_700_Legal_Counsel_Response_03-18-26.pdf | ||
| C250192_Public_Record_Draft.pdf | ||
| C250192_ICE_R000680.pdf | ||
| C250192_SOW_Verification.pdf | ||
| C250192_PP.docx | DOCX document | |
| C250192_PS.docx | DOCX document | |
| C250192_Public_Notice.doc | DOC document | |
| C250192_R000680.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INTEROFFICE MEMO
Date: May 7, 2026
To: Cheryl Larson, Senior Project Manager - Consultant, Finance and
Administration
From: Gina Torres, Senior Contract Administrator, CAMM
Subject: PROCUREMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULE RFP 250192 “Enterprise Asset Management System”
Please review the procurement plan for the subject RFP and advise your concurrence with the evaluation criteria and contract elements. Include suggested evaluation team members and/or comments.
Procurement Type: RFP IFB
Justification: A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued as the nature of the requirement demands that evaluation criteria, in addition to price, be used to select a consultant.
Evaluation Criteria:
PROPOSAL WEIGHT
Qualifications of the Firm 25%
Staffing/Project Organization 20%
Work Plan 30%
Cost 25%
Justification: Qualifications of the firm is weighted at 25 percent as the firm must demonstrate it has prior experience providing similar services. Staffing and project organization is weighted at 20 percent to ensure the firm’s staff have the requisite expertise for completing the project of similar size. Work plan is weighted the highest at 30 percent to ensure the firm’s approach and EAM system phase 2 meet OCTA’s asset management requirements. Cost and price are weighted at 25 percent to ensure OCTA receives value for the services provided.
Contract Type: Time & Expense CTO-Based Firm Fixed Price
Justification: The contract type is firm-fixed because the firms are requested to propose fixed prices for the efforts specified in the Scope of Work. The RFP has a specific Scope of Work detailing individual tasks and deliverables;
therefore, a firm-fixed price contract shall be used.
Procurement Plan and Schedule, RFP 250192
Retention: Yes % No N/A
Prevailing Wages: Yes $ No N/A
Liquidated Damages: Yes $ No N/A
P.M. to provide support documentation identifying how the LD amount was established.
Suggested Evaluation Team Members:
5 members are required over $250k
Internal Evaluators:
Gina Torres, Senior Contract Administrator, CAMM Cheryl Larson, Senior Project Manager - Consultant, Information Technology Project Management Office Mike Henry, Senior Section Manager, Enterprise Computer Solution & Support Tamika Wright, Section Manager III, OC Streetcar Operations Fermin Mora, Section Manager III, Contract Services Maintenance Oversight
Contract Term: Two (2)-year Term effective September 1, 2026 through August 31, 2028
Funding Source: Local Measure M Federal (CMAQ)
Dollar Amount: Initial Term $1,500,000 Option Term N/A
Independent Cost Estimate Received: Yes No
Scope of Work Verification Form Received: Yes No
Requisition Received: Yes R000680 No
DBE Goal: Yes No
Project Manager Concurrence:
Charyl Larson, Senior Project Manager - Consultant, Information Technology Date Project Management Office
CAMM Section/Department Manager Concurrence:
Georgia Martinez, Department Manager, CAMM Date
5/8/26
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .