[BPM007090] Solicitation Attachment 3 - Conformance Statements and Exceptions Requests.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 161 KB Posted

Attached to
Lottery Business Intelligence (BI) Support
Solicitation number
BPM007090
Issued by
Maricopa County, Phoenix City, Arizona

About this file

This is a conformance statements and exceptions request form for Solicitation No. BPM007090, issued by the Arizona Lottery Commission through the State Procurement Office. The form serves as the official document through which offerors must declare their compliance with or exceptions to the Instructions to Offerors, Scope of Work and Specifications, and Contract Terms and Conditions outlined in the solicitation for Lottery Business Intelligence (BI) Support services. Offerors are required to place an "X" in designated boxes to indicate either full conformance or partial conformance with exceptions to three distinct categories: Instructions to Offerors (RFP), Scope of Work and Specifications, and Contract Terms and Conditions (including Special Terms and Conditions, Addendum A, Addendum B, and Uniform Terms and Conditions). Any offeror taking exceptions must complete the relevant subsequent sections by providing the RFP article or paragraph reference, copying the relevant RFP language, proposing alternate language, and explaining the rationale for the proposed change. The form must be returned in Excel (.xls or .xlsx) format, and the state will not consider any exceptions unless properly designated on this form.

The instructions emphasize that if neither a "YES" nor "NO" box is marked for any section, the offeror's response will be interpreted as full conformance with no exceptions. Offerors are explicitly warned that offers with exceptions may be found not susceptible for award under A.A.C. R2-7-C311, and they must read all instructions to offerors before taking any exceptions. The form provides structured columns for State Response, allowing the procurement authority to document its evaluation of and decision regarding any exceptions proposed by offerors during the evaluation process.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1 Request for Proposal

Solicitation No. BPM007090 Lottery Business Intelligence (BI) Support Arizona Lottery 4740 E. University Drive Phoenix, AZ 85034 State Procurement Office

Attachment 3 - BPM007090 Conformance Statements and Exceptions Requests

Offeror Name:

If taking exceptions, the relevant subsequent sections must be completed. Add additional rows as needed.

This document must be returned in an Excel (.xls or .xlsx) format.

STATE WILL NOT CONSIDER ANY EXCEPTIONS UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THIS FORM.

READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS BEFORE TAKING ANY EXCEPTIONS. OFFERS WITH EXCEPTIONS MAY BE FOUND NOT SUSCEPTIBLE FOR AWARD UNDER A.A.C. R2-7-C311.

IF NEITHER BOX IS MARKED WITH AN "X" UNDER ANY SECTION BELOW, THE OFFEROR’S RESPONSE TO THAT SECTION WILL BE CONSIDERED “YES” AND STATE WILL INTERPRET THE OFFER AS IF THERE WERE NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN.

CONFORMANCE TO THE INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
Place an "X" in one of the following boxes to indicate the Offeror's conformance:
YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Instructions to Offerors (RFP) of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects.
NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Instructions to Offerors (RFP) in the Solicitation Documents, and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed below.
Exceptions to Instructions to Offerors (RFP)
Article / Paragraph or Exhibit ReferenceRFP language (Copy and paste from Solicitation)Proposed Changes / Alternate LanguageRationale for Proposed ChangeState Response
Special Instructions to Offerors

Standard Instructions to Offerors (RFP)

CONFORMANCE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS
Place an "X" in one of the following boxes to indicate the Offeror's conformance:
YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Scope of Work and Specifications, along with any respective Exhibits, Addendums, and Appendices of the Solicitation Requirements and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects.
NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Scope of Work and Specifications, along with any respective Exhibits, Addendums, and Appendices of the Solicitation Requirements and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed below.
Exceptions to Scope of Work and Specifications
Article / Paragraph or Exhibit ReferenceRFP language (Copy and paste from Solicitation)Proposed Changes / Alternate LanguageRationale for Proposed ChangeState Response
Scope of Work and Specifications
CONFORMANCE TO THE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Place an "X" in one of the following boxes to indicate the Offeror's conformance:
YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with any respective Exhibits, Addendums, and Appendices of the Solicitation Requirements and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects.
NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with any respective Exhibits, Addendums, and Appendices of the Solicitation Requirements and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed below.

Exceptions to Contract Terms & Conditions

Article / Paragraph or Exhibit ReferenceRFP language (Copy and paste from Solicitation)Proposed Changes / Alternate LanguageRationale for Proposed ChangeState Response
Special Terms & Conditions

Addendum A to Special Terms & Conditions

Addendum B to Special Terms & Conditions

Uniform Terms & Conditions

Solicitation Attachment – Conformance Statements and Exceptions Requests | Revision No. 2 | Revised 03-24 image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .