Attachment_L-4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_13JUN23.pdf

Controlled Unclassified Information When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 1 of 9

ATTACHMENT L-4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The Past Performance Team will contact the points of contact identified on the Past Performance Information Sheet(s). A telephone interview will be conducted utilizing this Present/Past Performance Questionnaire.

The Air Force F-16 Foreign Military Sales (FMS) International Branch, AFLCMC/WAMI, Hill Air Force Base is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a F-16 FMS Product Support Integrator program. Scope includes F-16 Repair and Return (R&R) of assets, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS), and Engineering and Technical Services (E&TS).

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 2 of 9

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel ☐ Other (explain) Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 3 of 9

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Performance E V S M U N/A

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 4 of 9

T1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the contract?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T2. How was the quality of testing and certification efforts?

T3. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

T4. How adequate/effective was the System Engineering Process?

T5. Effectiveness of access to data Library and/or use/control of TCTOs or other Government data.

T6. How well did the contractor develop, and execute test and evaluation efforts?

T7. How well did the contractor develop, manage, and control system and subsystem interface requirements and communicate and manage system and subsystem requirements to the subcontractor?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 5 of 9

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including resolution of action items, providing timely updates, the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

P3. Did the program include a corrective action process and a system or process for tracking, resolving, and improving upon any identified non-conformances? If so, how effective was it?

P4. How well was this contractor able to effectively resolve performance issues without extensive customer involvement/guidance in a timely manner?

P5. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P6. How successfully did the contractor respond to surge and/or accelerated performance situations?

P7. How successful was the contractor with timely award and effective management and quality of subcontracts?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 6 of 9

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P8. How effective was the contractor’s management of Government Furnished Property and Material to support the workload?

P9. How effective was the contractor’s supply chain?

P10. How beneficial were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability, or other factors?

P11. How well did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

P12. How effective was the contractor’s security controls for material/part storage facilities?

P13. How would you rate the accuracy, timeliness, and compliance of the Contractor’s Contractor Data Requirement List (CDRL) deliveries?

Transition / Phase-in E V S M U N/A

TP1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel? If you had a plan, how well did they execute it?

TP2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 7 of 9

Transition / Phase-in E V S M U N/A

TP3. Effectiveness of ramp-up for full assumption of responsibilities as new awardee.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation E V S M U N/A

S1. If the contract included FAR 52.219-9, to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan? If possible, detail the percent goals versus the achieved goals during contract performance.

(Please state if FAR 52.219-9 was not included in the contract)

S2. If the contract included FAR 52.219-8, how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

(Please state if FAR 52.219-8 was not included in the contract)

Cost Performance E V S M U N/A

C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the customer of unforeseen/increased costs?

C4. How accurate, sufficient, and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 8 of 9

Quality E V S M U N/A

Q1. Were any deliveries considered insufficient or failed inspection and were returned for rework? If so, how would you rate the rework process? Was the rework addressed to your satisfaction?

Q2. How would you rate the program’s continuous improvement efforts?

Schedule E V S M U N/A

SCH1. Efficiency in achieving schedule reductions through actions such as streamlined logistics, work sequencing, and work planning.

SCH2. How well did the contractor perform against the delivery schedules of the contract? In the remarks, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual delivery dates.

Risk Management E V S M U N/A

R1. How well did the Contractor perform risk management, to include risk mitigation strategies, for any identified risks?

Country Specific E V S M U N/A

C1. How well did the contractor comply with required customs documentation?

C2. How well did the contractor handle any issues with shipping, receiving, and/or transporting material to and from the Contractor’s location of operations?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 9 of 9

Country Specific E V S M U N/A

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what they promised in their proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to them today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Respondents will be contacted by the Past Performance Team [click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!