Attachment 7 - Section M - Technical Evaluation Criteria (Flooring 2026).pdf

1. Completeness: The Government will review the pricing submissions for completeness and compliance with Section L of the solicitation. Proposed Unit Cost should include overhead, indirect costs, profit, general and administrative costs, shipping, storage or other costs. All costs should utilize the appropriate SCA or DBA wages built into the other costs bid for this effort in the work load estimate by line item schedule attachment (ATTACHMENT 4).

2. Reasonableness: The offeror’s Price proposal will be evaluated, using one or more of the techniques defined in RFO 15.404, in order to determine if it is reasonable. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. Normally, price reasonableness is established through price analysis techniques as described in RFO 15.404. For additional information see RFO 31.201-3.

3. Unbalanced Pricing: The Government will analyze each proposal to determine whether it is unbalanced with respect to prices on the Bid Sheet in accordance with RFO 15.404-1.

4. Total Evaluated Price (TEP): The TEP is the sum of the prices for all Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) for the basic period and all option periods. Prices must be provided for all CLINs, for all years, including options.

5. Evaluation of Options: Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise such options.

Technical Capability Evaluation

Compliance with the requirements as stated in the Statement of Work (SOW); and each proposal will be evaluated by application of the assessment criteria to each factor, sub- factor, and element in the mission/technical capability proposal. Only those mission/technicalcapability proposals determined technically acceptable will be considered for award.

Technical Capability Evaluation Factors and Sub Factors are as follows:

Attachment 7

FA860126R0022

9 July 2026

SECTION M

BASE-WIDE FLOORING IDIQ

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. An offeror's proposal must be determined technically acceptable to be considered for award.

Price Evaluation

Price proposals will be evaluated for (1) completeness, (2) reasonableness, (3) unbalanced pricing, and

(4) Total Evaluated Price. Offerors whose price is determined to be incomplete or unreasonable will not be considered for award. Additionally, an offer may be rejected if the contracting officer determines unbalanced pricing poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(1) SUBFACTOR 1: Quality Control Plan (SOW Section 5.11)

Description: This element will evaluate the offeror’s approach for ensuring performance willbe in accordance with (IAW) the standards in the PWS throughout the life of the contract.

Measure of Merit: This element is met when the offeror provides a detailed

QCP that is likely to ensure that performance will be in accordance with (IAW) the standards in the

SOW throughout the life of the contract to include:

1. Identification of personnel responsible for quality control;

2. A description of the offeror’s inspection system with types and frequencies of inspection to be conducted and personnel responsible for conducting inspections;

3. A system for preventing the occurrence of deficiencies; and

4. A description of how inspections will be documented with sample inspection records for each type of inspection to be conducted.

(2) SUBFACTOR 2: Scheduling/Staffing Methodology (SOW Sections 5.1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.15, 5.16, & 5.17 and Appendix C (Section 01 31 10), Paragraphs 1.5 & 3.1) Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s ability to provide a workable schedule that demonstrates an understanding of all of the requirements identified in the SOW, as well as the scope of the work required, including an appropriate staffing plan in relation to the contractual requirements and the deliverable end items. This element will evaluate the offeror’s approach, reflecting different and geographically separated buildings; the maximum amount of delivery orders, and any required re-performance.

Measure of Merit: This element is met when the offeror provides a work schedule that ensures timely performance within the allotted time frames and required work hours, with a sufficient number of employees to meet all requirements outlined in the SOW.

(3) SUBFACTOR 3: Equipment and Supplies (SOW Sections 5.3, 5.5, 5.6, & 5.8)

Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s ability to provide a detailed list of all equipment and supplies necessary to fulfill contract requirements listed in the SOW.

Measure of Merit: The measure of merit is met when the offeror submits a proposal that includes a complete list of the size, number, and type of equipment and supplies that demonstrate an adequate understanding of the scope and size of the service required in the SOW.

(4) SUBFACTOR 4: Storage and Supply Chain Management (SOW Sections 5.5 and 5.8) Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s ability to receive, warehouse, cut, package, and label flooring in order to facilitate Just-in-Time delivery, as required in the SOW.

Measure of Merit: The measure of merit is met when the offeror submits a proposal that demonstrates the ability and offeror’s methodology for receipt, warehousing, cutting, packaging, and labeling flooring in order to facilitate Just-in-Time delivery, as required in the SOW.

(5) SUBFACTOR 5: Mandatory Carpet Ordering Requirements (SOW Section 2.1.1.9 and USAF Carpet Program Ordering Guide (Attachment 2)) Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s understanding of the Mandatory Carpet Ordering Requirements mandated by the United States Air Force, as required by the SOW and the Carpet Ordering Guide attachment.

Measure of Merit: This measure of merit is met when the offeror submits a proposal that demonstrates an understanding of the Mandatory Carpet Ordering Requirements, explaining how the offeror will ensure adequate carpet ordering for Just-in-Time delivery and how the offeror will ensure it has adequate carpet to perform all of the SOW requirements.

(6) SUBFACTOR 6: Flooring and Carpet Samples (SOW Sections 2.1.1 & 2.1.2 and Appendix E) Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s ability to provide flooring samples for all flooring that may be required by the requirements outlined in the SOW. The samples may be sent in electronic format, such as electronic booklets, brochures, or catalogues that demonstrate the contractor’s flooring product options.

Measure of Merit: This measure of merit is met when the offeror provides an electronic sample of all of the different SOW flooring requirements, such as but not limited to sheet vinyl, vinyl composition tile, luxury vinyl tile, rubber flooring, carpet (necessary for when the AFICC mandatory ordering requirements receive a waiver), porcelain tile, ceramic/porcelain flooring, and bases.

(7) Subfactor 7: Response Times (SOW Sections 5.1 & 5.14) Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s ability and plan that ensures it is able to timely meet the response times required by the SOW.

Measure of Merit: This measure of merit is met when the offeror demonstrates an understanding of the response requirements in the SOW and when the offeror provides a plan describing how it will meet these response requirements.

(8) Subfactor 8: Asbestos Removal (SOW Sections 3.1.2 to 3.1.8, SOW Section 5.12, and Appendix B

(Section 01 35 43))

Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s understanding of and ability to meet all of the requirements concerning asbestos removal, handling, and disposal of Asbestos Containing Material.

Measure of Merit: The measure of merit is met when the offeror adequately demonstrates an understanding of all of the applicable publications pertaining to asbestos work; offers evidence of employees or subcontractors with all appropriate qualifications, licenses, and certifications; and demonstrates an understanding and adequate description for the offeror’s plan to meet all of the requirements pertaining to asbestos work.

(9) Subfactor 9: Prior Experience

Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s prior experience, based on prior experience, relevancy, and size. Prior experience, for the purpose of this evaluation, is considered to be a flooring contract that either began or ended within the last five years. Provide at least 3 contracts/jobs your relevant experience as it relates to:

1. Performing flooring requirements

2. For each relevant contract provided, please provide the following administrative data:

a. Company/Division Name

b. Program Title

c. Contracting Agency

d. Contract Number

e. Type of Contract (e.g. Fixed Price)

f. Dates Performed

g. Contract Value (including any exercised option years)

h. Square footage of the flooring contract

Measure of Merit: This subfactor is met when the offeror provides acceptable prior experience IAW the description above, and includes (in at least one of their three references) an effort that is similar in scope and complexity.

Compliance with the requirements as stated in the SOW; and each proposal will be evaluated by application of the above assessment criteria to each factor, sub-factor, and element in the mission/technical capability proposal. Only those mission/technical capability proposals determined technically acceptable will be considered for award.