Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionairee.pdf
PDF 290 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91151-21-R-0012
About this file
This document contains a past performance assessment questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for test technology support services. The U.S. Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command - Fort Hood is seeking these services on behalf of the U.S. Army Operational Test Command and Intelligence and Electronic Warfare Test Directorate. Requirements include systems engineering, software support, operations and integration, execution center support, analytical studies, and instrumentation for operational test events at locations in the Continental U.S. and Outside the Continental U.S. The opportunity is set aside for competitive 8(a) small businesses under NAICS code 541330 with a size standard of $41.5 million. The solicitation was issued on March 15th, 2021 with a response due date of April 14th, 2021. The anticipated contract is a single award indefinite delivery indefinite quantity cost-plus-fixed-fee contract with a 60 month ordering period including a 30 day phase in period.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 66 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire Cover Letter
(Insert Command Letterhead)
(Insert Date)
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number (Insert Solicitation Number)
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army (insert command) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] (insert NAICS). You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.
Please complete the enclosure and return to the (insert Contracting Office and address), no later than 15 days after receipt of request or (insert date), whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to (insert Contracting Officer/Specialist’s email address).
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at (insert telephone number and/or email address).
Sincerely, (Insert name) Contracting Officer
Performance Assessment Questionnaire Form
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate, and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does [and/or notify the Contracting Officer]. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
| Final_1 Dec 2020 _SSP_v4 - TTSR0001 FH 20201130_BDE comments 51 |
| Final_1 Dec 2020 _SSP_v4 - TTSR0001 FH 20201130_BDE comments 52 |
| Final_1 Dec 2020 _SSP_v4 - TTSR0001 FH 20201130_BDE comments 53 |
| Final_1 Dec 2020 _SSP_v4 - TTSR0001 FH 20201130_BDE comments 54 |
| Final_1 Dec 2020 _SSP_v4 - TTSR0001 FH 20201130_BDE comments 55 |
| Final_1 Dec 2020 _SSP_v4 - TTSR0001 FH 20201130_BDE comments 56 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .