Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire -PPQ.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Y1DA--521-23-121 | SPS Renovation Phase 2
- Solicitation number
- 36C24725R0079
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a VA construction project (RFP 36C24725R0079) involving SPS Renovation Phase 2 at the Birmingham, AL VAMC. The PPQ is designed for previous clients to evaluate a contractor's performance across 14 specific criteria, using a 5-point rating scale ranging from Unacceptable (1) to Superior (5). Key evaluation areas include contract compliance, on-site management, personnel appropriateness, documentation timeliness, schedule adherence, safety responsiveness, subcontractor coordination, customer interactions, problem-solving abilities, and overall project performance. The questionnaire requires direct submission by reference clients to specific VA email addresses (gregory.snyder@va.gov and margaret.yeaton@va.gov), with the goal of providing a comprehensive assessment of the contractor's past performance for the upcoming renovation project.
View the file
Other files
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
RFP 36C24725R0079 | SPS Renovation Phase 2 | 521-23-121
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER SHEET
Offerors submitting PPQs need to include this cover sheet with their proposal submission. The entire questionnaire should be forwarded to your previous clients. Clients shall directly return the cover sheet and questionnaire to e-mail address gregory.snyder@va.gov and copy margaret.yeaton@va.gov.
It is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure correct and verifiable point of contact information.
Offeror, Fill-In Section I Only Below:
SECTION I
1. Offeror Name (Name of Organization/Firm being Evaluated):
2. Name of Organization/Firm Providing Reference:
3. Address of Organization/Firm Providing Reference:
4. Contract Number:
5. Project Description:
6. Contract/Task Order Amount:
7. Performance Period:
8. Role of contractor (Prime or sub-contractor)
SECTION II, EVALUATOR: PLEASE ENTER THE NUMERICAL RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
| 5 – Represents Superior Performance | |
| 4 – Represents Very Good Performance | |
| 3- Represents Satisfactory Performance | |
| 2 – Represents Marginal Performance | |
| 1 – Represents Unacceptable Performance - | |
| N/A – Not Applicable |
| QUESTION |
| ENTER NUMERICAL RATING |
1. Compliance with the contract requirements?
2. Effectiveness of on-site management?
3. Use of appropriate personnel for contract requirements
4. Timeliness in submission of required documentation (i.e. schedule, reports, submittals, and payrolls)
5. Adherence to the construction schedule?
6. Responsiveness towards safety issues?
7. Coordination and control of subcontractors?
8. Ability to effectively deal with the customer(s) and other Government personnel?
9. Cooperativeness in solving problems and negotiating changes?
10. Ability to address financial difficulties? (i.e. payment of subcontractors, and/or vendors, labor disputes, etc.)
11. Responsiveness to letters of concern and cure notices?
12. Response to warranty notifications?
13. Overall performance on this project?
14. Would you recommend or work this contractor again? Enter Yes or No
Evaluator’s Point of Contact Information:
Signature and Title:____________________________________________________________________ Phone Number:_______________________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address:_______________________________________________________________________
SECTION III, EVALUATOR: Please use the following space to provide any additional comments regarding the contractor’s performance on this project (Explain low ratings).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .