Attachment 17 - PAST PERF SURVEY _Template TMB ATCT Design.pdf
PDF 533 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-24-N-00333
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Survey for an Architect and Engineering firm that provided design services for the Miami Executive Airport (TMB) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) project. The survey evaluates the firm's performance on factors such as adherence to the Statement of Work, schedule and cost management, quality of documentation and submittals, quality control, and overall responsiveness and timeliness. The survey includes quantitative ratings as well as opportunities for the respondent to provide additional details, particularly for any areas rated below "Satisfactory." This survey is being used by the Federal Aviation Administration to evaluate the past performance of the A/E firm in relation to a solicitation for the design of a new ATCT, Administrative Base Building, and Remote Transmitter Receiver Facility at the TMB Airport.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Architect and Engineering
TMB ATCT Design
Page | 1
To: (Point of Contact) (Company) (Phone) (Email)
The Federal Aviation Administration is currently evaluating and you were listed you as a performance reference. It would be greatly appreciated if you would take 5 or 10 minutes to complete the following information and respond via email to:
sonia.o.holguin@faa.gov.
1. A/E Firm’s Name: 2. Contract Number:
3. A/E Firm Address: 4. Contract Type:
5. Your Company Name: 6. Your Company POC/Phone/email/Fax:
7. Period of Performance: 8. Dollar Amount of Award: $ Total Dollar Value with Mods: $
9. Title of Contract:
10. Description of Contract Service:
11. Type of Work:
Design Service Other
TMB ATCT Design
Page | 2
PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE :
1-Unsatisfactory 2-Marginal 3-Satisfactory 4-Good 5-Outstanding NA-Not Applicable
Please provide brief explanations for ratings of 3 and below.
1. How well did the A/E firm adhere to the Statement of Work?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
2. How well did the A/E firm managed the schedule and cost of the design?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
3. To what extent were the A/E firm’s documenation and submittals accurate and complete?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
4. How would you rate the A/E firm’s quality control program?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
5. How would you rate the quality of the design developed by the A/E firm?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
6. To what extent did the A/E firm respond positively and promptly to technical direction, contract change orders, etc.?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
7. Did the A/E firm commit adequate resources in a timely fashion to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
8. How well did the A/E firm comply with the contract time of performance and critical schedule milestones?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
9. To what extent did the A/E firm submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
TMB ATCT Design
Page | 3
10. Were the A/E firms projects managed adequately by the Project Manager assigned?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
11. How responsive do you think the A/E firm was to information requests, issues, or problems during the course of the contract?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
12. Did the A/E firm take corrective action promptly when issues arised?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
13. Were any contract changes reasonably negotiated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
14. Were accepted contract changes implemented promptly by the firm?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
15. How well did the firm managed any sub-consultants?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
16. How well did the A/E firm coordinated work between all engineering diciplines participating in the design?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
17. To what extent were the firm’s employees experienced and qualified?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
18. How would you rate the level of responsiveness by the A/E firm personnel to project related emails and/or calls?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
19. How well did the A/E firm personnel conducted and coordinated meetings?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
20. What was your level of satisfaction with the firm’s overall quality of service?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
TMB ATCT Design
Page | 4
21. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Owner’s staff?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
22. What was your level of overall customer satisfaction?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Please Respond Yes or No
23. Was the firm pro-active?
Yes No
24. Did the firm suggest cost-saving changes?
Yes No
25. Would you recommend this A/E firm?
Yes No
Questions 26-30 (For Federal Contracts ONLY)
26. Was there a partial or complete termination for default or convenience?
Yes No 26a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
27. Are there any pending terminations?
Yes No
28. What is/was the duration of the contract?
29. Were there any performance issues regarding the contractor’s work?
Yes No
29a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
30. Please provide other comments:
Signature: Date:
| Point of Contact: |
| Company: |
| Phone: |
| Email: |
| 1 AE Firms Name: |
| 2 Contract Number: |
| 3 AE Firm Address: |
| 4 Contract Type: |
| 5 Your Company Name: |
| 6 Your Company POCPhoneemailFax: |
| 7 Period of Performance: |
| 11 Type of Work: Off |
| undefined_2: Off |
| Service Other: |
| 1_2: |
| 2_2: |
| 1_4: |
| 2_4: |
| 1_6: |
| 2_6: |
| 1_8: |
| 2_8: |
| 1_10: |
| 2_10: |
| 1_12: |
| 2_12: |
| 1_14: |
| 3_8: |
| 1_16: |
| IDIQ: |
| 1_19: |
| 2_19: |
| 1_21: |
| 2_21: |
| 1_23: |
| 2_23: |
| 1_25: |
| 2_25: |
| 1_27: |
| 2_27: |
| 1_33: |
| 2_33: |
| IDIQ_2: |
| 1_36: |
| 2_36: |
| 26a If yes please describe reason and final outcome: |
| 28 What iswas the duration of the contract: |
| 29a If yes please describe reason and final outcome: |
| 30 Please provide other comments: |
| undefined_4: |
| Dollar Amount: |
| With Mods: |
| Contract Title: |
| Description: |
| How well did the AE firm adhere to the Statement of Work: Choice2 |
| Text5: |
| Text6: |
| 2_16: |
| Text7: |
| AE Firm Name: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .