Attach_07_Technical_Proposal_Submission_Aid.pdf
PDF 242 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USFS Colorado Springs Air Tanker Base
- Solicitation number
- 1282BH20R0003
About this file
This document provides guidance for submitting a technical proposal in response to solicitation number 1282BH20R0003 from the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region. Offerors should address technical approach and capability, management approach and capability, safety plans, pandemic response plans, biobased certification, financial capability and bonding capacity in their proposals. The technical proposal should demonstrate a thorough understanding of requirements and describe techniques for achieving statement of work objectives. The management approach should address quality control, subcontractor management, and identify key personnel. Safety documentation and a COVID-19 response plan are also required. The solicitation is for construction services at the Colorado Springs Air Tanker Base to support wildland firefighting operations.
View the file
Other files
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 07 – Technical Proposal Submission Aid
1282BH20R0003
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project USFS Region Two
Pike and San Isabel National Forests and Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AID
Solicitation No.: 1282BH20R0003
Project Title: Colorado Springs Airtanker Base
Technical Proposal (Volume I). The technical proposal will be used to make an evaluation and arrive at a determination as to whether the proposal will meet the requirements of the Government. Therefore, the technical proposal must present sufficient information to reflect a thorough understanding of the requirements and a detailed description of the techniques, procedures, and program for achieving the objectives of the Statement of Work and any additional documentation included through attachments.
1. Technical Approach and Capability: This section of the technical proposal must describe the offeror's proposed approach to performing the requirement as detailed in the solicitation and its attachments.
The contractor must clearly describe their approach to meeting all requirements stated in scope. The Offeror’s Technical Approach and Capability proposal shall include the following:
A. Resource Availability and Allocation.
B. Subcontracting Plans:
i. Work proposed to be self-performed versus work proposed to be sub-contracted.
ii. Past Experience of Proposed Subcontractors.
C. Quality Control Plan.
2. Management Approach and Capability: This section of the technical proposal must describe the offeror's proposed approach to managing the offeror’s employees, as well as any subcontractors and subcontractor employees, to promote timely performance, quality of performance, and customer satisfaction throughout contract performance. In addition, proposals must identify key personnel who will serve in management positions throughout the project. At a minimum, the proposal shall address the following:
3.
A. Plan to Identify, Address, and Resolve Subcontractor Issues proactively.
B. Key Personnel:
i. Identify the key personnel proposed to serve as the following; Site Safety and Health Officer, Quality Control Manager, Project Manager, Superintendent, Scheduler.
ii. Resumes, Experience, Certifications, Trainings, Organizational Charts.
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
Type Here
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
☐ d. Safety Plan. ☐ Not Applicable / ☐ Applicable.
The contractor shall provide an overview of their company Construction Safety Program and a narrative discussion of its assessment of the safety risks associated with the work, including any changes it would make to its company Construction Safety Program to address its assessment of the project risk on the base contract.
The offeror shall include the names, resumes, and specific safety training (i.e., OSHA, etc.) for the proposed Site Safety and Health Officer for this project. Additionally, the contractor must submit a copy of their OSHA 300A logs for the previous three (3) calendar years along with a statement from their insurance company showing their current Experience Modification Rate (EMR) (If this is not submitted, the contractor will received a lower rating).
☐ e. Pandemic COVID-19 Response Plan. Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, offeror is to provide a plan for complying and implementing COVID-19 local (city and county), state and federal laws/restrictions/guidance.
☐ f. Biobased Certification. ☐ Not Applicable / ☐ Applicable. I certify that in accordance with Solicitation 1282X919R0005, Section 1.19, FAR 52.223-1, proposal factor 5, I have completed and returned the Bio-Based Certification (see attached below).
☐ g. Financial Capability and Bonding Capacity. Provide a brief summary of the contract team’s financial capacity, including bonding capacity, working lines of credit, limits of insurance, credit rating (Dunn- Bradstreet) and other relevant information. Must also provide Tax Identification Number (TIN).
Type Here
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
☐ h. Certification:
By signing this letter, I certify to best of my knowledge that the information provided herein/above is true.
Company Name: _______________________________
Representative’s Name: _________________________________
Representative’s Signature: _______________________________
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
Biobased Certification
1. Offerors shall identify the Biobased products to be purchased and used under this contract. For each Biobased product. the offeror shall specify the percentage of Biobased content, and for the USDA-designated Biobased content products, the offeror shall demonstrate that the products to be used under this contract will contain the percentage specified in the USDA recommendations or the highest level of Biobased material practicable, consistent with USDA's recommended percentages of Biobased content
Product Description % Biobased Content
2. The offeror shall document prior experience in specifying, purchasing, using, and installing Biobased products. The offeror shall provide a list for all relevant contracts over the past two years involving the specification, purchase, and/or use of Biobased products. The offeror shall include a list of the Biobased products specified, purchased, used, and installed.
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
Experience Questionnaire
READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to list projects performed that are similar to the work described in this solicitation. Use this form to address your familiarity with the project requirements and with the evaluation criteria described in the solicitation. Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.
It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their experience may be considered by others to be less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s experience.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR:
# PROJECT NAME:
Project Location:
Name of Owner:
Address of Owner:
Telephone Number:
Project Value:
Dates of Construction:
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECTS, SCOPE OF OFFEROR’S WORK, AND SIMILARITY TO PROJECT
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECTS, SCOPE OF OFFEROR’S WORK, AND SIMILARITY TO PROJECT
(continuation)
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
PERFORMANCE REMARKS
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
NOTE: Completed questionnaires shall be submitted along with the Technical Proposal in accordance to instructions in Section L of the solicitation. Forms not received with proposal will not be considered.
Information Provided in Response to Solicitation No.: 1282BH20R0003
1. Offeror:
PART I: Contract Information
2. Customer Organization:
3. Reference Name and Title: (individual completing this questionnaire)
4. Contract Number:
5. Contract Type:
6. Contract Value:
7. Description of Work/Services:
8. Problems: (if problems encountered on this contract, explain corrective action taken)
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
Part II: Performance Assessment (to be completed by reviewer)
Definitions of performance levels are explained on page
1. Quality of product or service: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
E V S M U N
Comment:
2. Safety: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
3. Comment:
3. Schedule: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
4. Documentation/Administration: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
5. Cost Control: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
6. Major Challenges and/or Successes: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
Colorado Springs Airtanker Base Project
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E EXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the reviewer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the reviewer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .