Att_L-3_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Engineering Contractor Instructor Services (ECIS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6134021R0048
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by a point of contact for an offeror on Contract Number/Task Order N6134021R0048. It requests ratings and examples to assess the offeror's performance in quality, schedule, and program/subcontract management. The federal contract opportunity is solicitation number N6134021R0048 to provide Engineering Contractor Instructor Services for seven Navy training sites. The services include fire fighting, damage control, and specialized engineering courses. This procurement will be a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
I. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATIVE DATA (To be completed by the Offeror)
Offeror / Contractor Name:
Contract Number/Task Order:
Contract Name:
Period of Performance:
Contract Type:
Offeror Role in Contract (Prime Contractor / Subcontractor / JV Team Member):
Annualized Dollar Amount of Contract (Not Including unexercised options):
Dollar Value of Offeror Role in Contract:
Administrative Place of Contract:
Cage Code:
DUNS:
Customer:
Contracting Agency:
II. POINT OF CONTACT (POC) Data for PPQ Respondent (To be completed by the Offeror)
Name:
Position or role:
Agency:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
Other:
III. INFORMATION TO THE PPQ POC
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection. Please complete the assessment below and send all pages of this questionnaire to: danielle.n.walker4.civ@us.navy.mil within two (2) weeks of receipt.
Assessment: (To be completed by the PPQ POC) Instructions to complete the assessment: Please provide responses to 1 through 4 that are listed below the assessment rating system table. Place an “X” in the rating that best assesses the Offeror’s performance in the areas listed below. Then provide examples (two examples are requested) to substantiate your rating.
Rating System Table:
A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor's performance. Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here's a breakdown of each category:
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
1. Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I WOULD or WOULD NOT award to him today given that I had a choice.
2. Quality: (How would you rate the Offeror’s past performance in the delivery of quality supplies and services, which includes meeting technical requirements?)
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A
Provide examples that substantiate rating:
3. Schedule: ( How would you rate the Offeror’s past performance in meeting schedule requirements, to include on-time or late deliveries, modifications of original schedules?)
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A
4. Program Management and Subcontract Management: (How would you rate the Offeror’s past performance in managing the contracted effort, to include program management, subcontract management, and cooperation with the customer?)
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A
Signature ______________________________ Date _____________ Please note that electronic signatures are acceptable. An e-mail from the originator of this document will suffice. Signatures (electronic or hand written) verify that the signatory completed this form and agrees with the information
N6134021R0048 Attachment L-3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .