Att_L-3_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Engineering Contractor Instructor Services (ECIS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N6134021R0048
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by a point of contact for an offeror on Contract Number/Task Order N6134021R0048. It requests ratings and examples to assess the offeror's performance in quality, schedule, and program/subcontract management. The federal contract opportunity is solicitation number N6134021R0048 to provide Engineering Contractor Instructor Services for seven Navy training sites. The services include fire fighting, damage control, and specialized engineering courses. This procurement will be a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Engineering Contractor Instructor Services (ECIS), newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_4_N6134021R0048-0004.pdf PDF
Amendment_4_Attachments.zip ZIP file
Amendment_4_N6134021R0048-0004_Conformed.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_N6134021R0048-0003_Conformed.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_N6134021R0048-0003.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_Attachments.zip ZIP file
Amendment_2_Attachments.zip ZIP file
Amendment_2_N6134021R0048-0002_Conformed.pdf PDF
Amendment_2_N6134021R0048-0002.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_N6134021R0048-0001.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_N6134021R0048-0001_Conformed.pdf PDF
Att_L-2_PEW.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A003 - ECIS INVENTORY FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_6_Appendix_2_Norfolk_VA_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_17_Wage_Determination_No._2015-4111.pdf PDF
Att_L-4_Staffing_Chart.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_L-1_Solicitation_QA_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A001 - ECIS CFSR FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_15_Wage_Determination_No._2015-5689.pdf PDF
Att_9_Appendix_5_Newport_RI_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_10_Appendix_6_ZTF_San_ Diego_CA_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_13_Wage_Determination_No._2015-4342.pdf PDF
Att_18_PACT-User-Guide.pdf PDF
Att_02_DD 254.pdf PDF
A007 - ECIS OPSEC FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_14_Wage_Determination_No._2015-4936.pdf PDF
Att_01_ECIS_PWS_15_Sep_21_Final.pdf PDF
Att_5_Appendix_1_San_Diego_CA_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_7_Appendix_3_Great_Lakes_IL_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_03_Data-Item-Transmittal-2018.pdf PDF
Att_12_Wage_Determination_No._2015-5635.pdf PDF
N6134021R0048 - Final RFP.docx DOCX document
A006 - ECIS QSP FINAL.pdf PDF
A005 - ECIS CPSR FINAL.pdf PDF
A008 - TESTING AND EVALUATION REPORT FINAL.pdf PDF
A004 - ECIS MOB CPSR FINAL.pdf PDF
A009 - INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE REPORT FINAL.pdf PDF
A002 - ECIS CONFERENCE MEETING MIN FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_11_Appendix_7_New_London_CT_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_8_Appendix_ 4_Pearl_Harbor_HI_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_04_PBW 15SEP21 FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_16_Wage_Determination_No._2015-4089.pdf PDF
Show all 42

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

I. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATIVE DATA (To be completed by the Offeror)

Offeror / Contractor Name:

Contract Number/Task Order:

Contract Name:

Period of Performance:

Contract Type:

Offeror Role in Contract (Prime Contractor / Subcontractor / JV Team Member):

Annualized Dollar Amount of Contract (Not Including unexercised options):

Dollar Value of Offeror Role in Contract:

Administrative Place of Contract:

Cage Code:

DUNS:

Customer:

Contracting Agency:

II. POINT OF CONTACT (POC) Data for PPQ Respondent (To be completed by the Offeror)

Name:

Position or role:

Agency:

Address:

Phone:

Email:

Other:

III. INFORMATION TO THE PPQ POC

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection. Please complete the assessment below and send all pages of this questionnaire to: danielle.n.walker4.civ@us.navy.mil within two (2) weeks of receipt.

Assessment: (To be completed by the PPQ POC) Instructions to complete the assessment: Please provide responses to 1 through 4 that are listed below the assessment rating system table. Place an “X” in the rating that best assesses the Offeror’s performance in the areas listed below. Then provide examples (two examples are requested) to substantiate your rating.

Rating System Table:

A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor's performance. Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here's a breakdown of each category:

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

1. Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I WOULD or WOULD NOT award to him today given that I had a choice.

2. Quality: (How would you rate the Offeror’s past performance in the delivery of quality supplies and services, which includes meeting technical requirements?)

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

N/A

Provide examples that substantiate rating:

3. Schedule: ( How would you rate the Offeror’s past performance in meeting schedule requirements, to include on-time or late deliveries, modifications of original schedules?)

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

N/A

4. Program Management and Subcontract Management: (How would you rate the Offeror’s past performance in managing the contracted effort, to include program management, subcontract management, and cooperation with the customer?)

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

N/A

Signature ______________________________ Date _____________ Please note that electronic signatures are acceptable. An e-mail from the originator of this document will suffice. Signatures (electronic or hand written) verify that the signatory completed this form and agrees with the information

N6134021R0048 Attachment L-3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .