Att L-2 Vol 2 PPQ.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) Follow-On, FY 27-30
Solicitation number
N0001926R1000
Issued by

About this file

This file is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for evaluating contractor performance on federal contracts. Respondents must return the completed form within two weeks of receipt to Sharina Miller (Sharina.n.miller.civ@us.navy.mil) or Kristina Johnson (kristina.m.johnson79.civ@us.navy.mil) at the Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command. The questionnaire requests contractor identification information, respondent details, and program characteristics including applicable activities such as aircraft modifications, field maintenance, management of government-furnished property, major aircraft repairs and inspections, computerized management information systems operation, configuration management, flight operations, hazmat/environmental programs, safety and quality assurance, aviation maintenance program oversight, supply support, personnel management, aircraft strip and paint, engine overhaul and repair, and support equipment maintenance.

The questionnaire evaluates contractor performance across five primary assessment areas using a standardized five-level rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory): technical and quality performance; schedule and delivery performance; cost performance including earned value metrics and cost performance indices; management performance encompassing responsiveness, subcontract management, program management, risk management, and small business utilization compliance; and other relevant information. The form concludes with a summary question asking whether the respondent would award the contract to the contractor if given the option, requiring selection from six choices ranging from "definitely not" to "definitely." This template is designed as a tool for past performance evaluation in support of the Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) Follow-On solicitation (N0001926R1000) for MQ-9A Unmanned Aircraft System support services.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
CLS_Next_RFP_QA_PDF_2_23_26.pdf PDF
Attachment 7_Resource Distribution Table (RDT)_22 January 2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att L-7 Vol 4 Price Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1_CLS Next Draft Performance Work Statement (PWS)_18 Feb 2026.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4_DD254 N00019-26-R-1000 PMA-266_signed_03 December 2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 8_Wage Determination (NC_HI _AZ)_03 Dec 2025.pdf PDF
Section L MQ-9 Instructions Conditions Notices to Offerors or Quoters.docx DOCX document
Att L-1 Vol 1 KA Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation - N0001926R1000_Final.pdf PDF
Attachment 3_PMA-266 Corrective Action Request Process_04 December 2025.docx DOCX document
Attachment 5_MQ-9 Enterprise PPP (Including Annexes A-O)_01 July 2024.pdf PDF
Attachment 6_Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR)_22 January 2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 9_RFP CSP.pdf PDF
Exhibit A_Contract Data Requirements List (CDRLS)_020426.pdf PDF
Att L-3 Vol 2 PP-1 PP Cont Data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att L-4 Vol 3 CRM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att L-5 Vol 3 PFBM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att L-6 Vol 3 Site Manning Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section M MQ-9 Evaluation Factors for Award.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2_Corrective Action Process Form_04 December 2025.pdf PDF
Att L-8 Vol 5 SBPCD.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION L – VOLUME 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Within 2 weeks from receipt of this questionnaire return this form to Sharina Miller, Contract Specialist, at Sharina.n.miller.civ@us.navy.mil, or Kristina Johnson, Procuring Contracting Officer, at kristina.m.johnson79.civ@us.navy.mil.

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor:

b. Program Title:

c. Contract Number:

d. Type of Contract: Percent Complete:

e. Period of Performance being assessed: _________________________________________________

Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

a. Name:

b. Agency:

c. Position:

d. Relation to Program:

e. Phone:

f. Fax Number:

g. Email Address:

f. Date Questionnaire Completed:

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

3a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

3b. Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program:

a. ____Aircraft Modifications

b. ____Aircraft Field Maintenance at multiple sites in support of flight operations

c. ____Management of Government Furnished Property (GFP)

d. ____Aircraft Maintenance to include major aircraft repairs/inspections, engine, propeller and aircraft component overhaul, repair and configuration tracking

e. ____Operation, Development and Maintenance of Computerized Management Information Systems in support Aircraft Field Maintenance requirements at multiple sites

f. ____Configuration Management of Aircraft and Aircraft Components

g. ____Aircraft Flight Operations on Military sites

h. ____Hazmat/Environmental Program Development, Control and Management

i. ____Flight/Industrial Safety/Quality Assurance Management and Oversight of Field Maintenance activities

j. ____Corporate Oversight and Management of Aviation Maintenance Programs to include use of subcontract(s) in support of aircraft operating out of multiple sites

k. ____Supply Support for Field Maintenance activities supporting multiple aircraft sites

l. ____Management of Personnel performing aircraft maintenance at multiple sites to include training, recruitment and transfer of personnel between sites

m. ____Aircraft Strip and Paint

n. ____Engine Overhaul and Repair

o. ____Support Equipment Maintenance

4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4.1 PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4.2 QUESTIONS

4.2.1. TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE

a. What kind of technical performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these technical problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated ________________________.

|_|Exceptional |_|Very Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

4.2.2. SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated _________________.

|_|Exceptional |_|Very Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

4.2.3. COST PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of Cost problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. If the contractor experienced an overrun please provide the percentage. _________

c. What was the cause of these Cost problems or strengths?

d. If available, provide earned value cost performance measures including indices for cost efficiency (CPI) and schedule efficiency (SPI). Based on this information, please provide a narrative assessment of their performance.

e. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

f. Overall, the contractor's Cost performance is rated ________________________.

4.2.4 MANAGEMENT

4.2.4.1 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENSS

What was the contractor’s record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?

4.2.4.2 SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT

What was the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUBZone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran owned small business, women-owned small business participation and subcontracting goals?

4.2.4.3 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MANAGEMENT

a. To what extent does the contractor discharge their responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identify and apply resources required to meet schedule requirements; assign responsibilities for tasks/actions required by contract; and communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner?

b. What were the contractor’s risk management practices, especially the ability to identify risks and formulate and implement risk mitigation plans?

c. If applicable, identify and provide information on any other areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere under the Management Assessment.

4.2.4.4 Small Business Utilization

If this contract contains a small business subcontracting goal, assess compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to Small Business participation (including FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Businesses and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (when required). Assess any small business participation goals which are stated separately in the contract Assess achievement on each individual goal stated within the contract or subcontracting plan including good faith effort if the goal was not achieved. Check one of the boxes below, noting however when applying the rating definitions for this assessment equate “small business goals” to requirements.

4.2.4.5 Overall Management Assessment

Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated____________________.

4.2.5. OTHER. Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain. Examples of additional information that could be helpful to our evaluation include information on (1) problems or strengths with regard to key personnel and (2) the kind of business relationship problems or strengths with regard to management of subcontracts, cooperation with business partners/customers, customer satisfaction, etc.

4.3 SUMMARY: If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you (pick one), award this contract to this contractor, given the choice? Please explain.

a.definitely not
b.probably not
c.maybe not
d.maybe
e.probably
f.definitely

Signature _____________________________________________ Date _____________ Please note that electronic signatures are acceptable. An e-mail from the originator of this document will suffice. Signatures (electronic or hand written) verify that the signator completed this form and agrees with the information contained within it.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .