GXS Instrument DRFP Questions and Responses.pdf

PDF 513 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Proposal Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Sounder (GXS) Instrument Implementation
Solicitation number
80GSFC22R0055
Issued by

About this file

This document provides questions and responses related to a draft request for proposal for the Geostationary Extended Observations Sounder instrument implementation. The solicitation seeks the design, development, fabrication, integration, calibration, testing, verification, evaluation, launch support, and 10 years of operations and 5 years of on-orbit storage for three flight models of the GXS instrument. Key details include that the number of instrument builds is three, not five as stated in the draft; offerors can assume option periods will be exercised by September 2029; acceptance locations and material inspection requirements will be clarified in the final RFP; and the tailored class C risk classification reflects meeting level 3 requirements.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
GXS RFP Cost Exhibits Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Amendment 1 Attachment D GXSUIID.pdf PDF
Amendment 1 Attachment E IMAR.pdf PDF
Amendment 1 Cover page - SF 30.pdf PDF
Amendment 1 - Continuation pages.pdf PDF
Final RFP 80GSFC22R0055 Questions and Responses 2.23.23.pdf PDF
Final Attach R.pdf PDF
Final GXS RFP Cost Exhibits Feb 2023.pdf PDF
Final Attachment A SOW.pdf PDF
Final Attachment B PORD.pdf PDF
Final Attach K SB plan.pdf PDF
GXS 80GSFC22R0055 Final .pdf PDF
Final Attachment M IT ADL.pdf PDF
Final Attach J.pdf PDF
Final Attachment E IMAR.pdf PDF
Final Attachment G EDM.pdf PDF
Final GXS RFP Cover Letter 1.pdf PDF
Final Attachment W OCI Plan.pdf PDF
Final Attach H.pdf PDF
Final Attach V.pdf PDF
Final RFP SF33 GXS.pdf PDF
Final Encl A ITSMP.pdf PDF
Final Attachment D GXSUIID.pdf PDF
Final Attachment C GIRD.pdf PDF
Final Attachment N QASP.pdf PDF
Final Attachment I OCI DRD.pdf PDF
Final Encl B Perf Eval Plan.pdf PDF
Final Attachment F CDRL.pdf PDF
Final Attachment P.pdf PDF
Final Attachment X DEIA Plan.pdf PDF
Final Attach L.pdf PDF
Final RFP WBS Dic Rev.pdf PDF
Final Attach T DEIA DRD.pdf PDF
Final Attachment S CONOPS.pdf PDF
Final Attachment Q GRDDP.pdf PDF
Final Exhibit 8 PPQ.pdf PDF
Final Attachment U FPGA.pdf PDF
Attachment O GXS WBS dictionary.pdf PDF
Attachment W - OCI Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure A ITSMP TMPLT.pdf PDF
Attachment S GeoXO_ConOps.pdf PDF
Attachment B GXSPORD.pdf PDF
GXS DRFP 80GSFC22R0055 Final.pdf PDF
Attachment P GXS Rad Upwelling.pdf PDF
Attachment T DEIA Plan DRD.pdf PDF
Attachment R GeoXO REED.pdf PDF
Attachment G EDM.pdf PDF
Attachment V Req Statements List.pdf PDF
Attachment U GeoXO FPGA.pdf PDF
GXS DRFP Cover Letter.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 67 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

GXS Instrument Implementation Draft RFP 80GSFC22R0055 Q&A

6 DRFP, Section L.13, Subfactor B, Management Approach, B.6 Staffing

RFP Section B.5 states that we are to have “staffing adequate to conduct the 5 GXS builds.” Is this number correct?

This is an error. The correct number is 3 GXS builds and this will be corrected in the Final

RFP.

7 Statement of Work Sec. 1.8.7 and 2.2 require the contractor to attend Spacecraft Contractor meetings and reviews. Is there any guidance on the timing of when those meetings start? For example, when should the instrument supplier expect the S/C SDR to occur?

The dates will not be known until the Spacecraft contract is awarded. For costing purposes general assumptions can made, e.g.

SC SDR - SC CA +6m.

8 DRFP, Section B, paragraph B.1 Section B.1, items 4 and 5 - for costing, what dates should be presumed for when Options 1 and 2 will be exercised?

a. Can the Contractor propose additional options beyond those currently listed in the (D)RFP?

b. Are there any funding limitations?

Offerors can assume any date NLT 09/30/2029 for Option 1 and Option 2 exercise date as specified in H.12 Options

a. Additional proposed options will not be evaluated.

b. See the Limitations of Funds clause in Section I of the RFP.

9 Statement of Work Please define in GXSSOW5 1.0-4(a), what the

Government is requesting when they ask for “two Flight Models for Instrument” if,

a. The contractor is not proposing an EDM, and/or;

b. Are these two Flight Models in addition to the FM 1, 2 and 3 referenced in GXSSOW5 1.0-4(b) and GXS SOW5 1.05(a) and (b).

a. The Government does not require an EDM. It’s up to the offeror(s) to determine if they are going to propose an EDM based on their design risk.

b. No, these are not in addition to FM 1, 2, and 3.

The parts in GXS SOW 1.04(a) are the parts for FM 1 and the FM 2 option.

10 Statement of Work In GXSSOW5 1.0-5(b) you list parts requested to be costed for FM-3, but do not request the same for FM 1 or FM 2. Did you only want parts for FM-3 and to what level parts are you requesting costing:

The parts required for FM 3 are to be procured at the time of the exercise of Option for FM 3.

GXS Instrument Implementation Draft RFP 80GSFC22R0055 Q&A

11 DRFP Cover Letter Page 2, Paragraph 3, (Proposal submittal timeline)

For a proposal this large, we request the Government to extend the proposal due date from 30 days after Final RFP release to 45 days.

The proposal due date will be specified in the Cover letter issued with the Final RFP.

12 DRFP Section E.5 (Acceptance locations) Section E.6 (Material Inspection and Receiving Report not required)

Please clarify/update in Section E.5 the acceptance locations specified for the deliverable items identified in Section B.1.

Based on clarification of Section E.5, please clarify/update in Section E.6 which deliverable items identified in Section B.1 will need Material Inspection and Receiving Reports.

Section E.5 GSFC 52.246-93 Acceptance Locations will be revised in the Final RFP to identify the deliverable items.

Section E.6 GSFC 52.246-94 Material Inspection and Receiving Report Not Required will be revised in the Final RFP to identify the deliverable items.

13 GXSSOW3 (Instrument risk classification)

GXSSOW3 states that the GXS instrument risk classification is "tailored class C." Please provide clarification on the tailoring of class C for GXS: what items from the standard class C definition are tailored, and how are they tailored?

The Tailored Class-C designation reflects the Level-3 requirements. Compliance with the Level-3 requirement will achieve the Tailored Class-C mission classification.

14 GXSSOW663 (RESERVED):

In the GXISOW, GXISOW663 specified delivery of CDRL #I&T-05, Operations Procedures for the Lifting and Handling Fixture and GN2 Purge Cart, but the requirement is deleted in the GXSSOW. We recommend including a requirement for this CDRL.

For a Class C Instrument the Government does not require the delivery of this CDRL, however the offeror(s) should follow their internal procedures.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .