SF30 - SPP IDIQ FINAL RFP 70T02025R5900N002 AMD 00007.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

70T02025R5900N0020007 70T050

AMENDMENT CONTROL NUMBER: 70T02025R5900N002

See continuation pages

70T050

CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT

6595 Springfield Center Drive Springfield, VA, 20598, US

Same As Issuing Office

70T02025R5900N002

1 15

03/11/2026

02/11/2025

70T05025R5900N0020007

Summary of Changes The purpose of this Amendment is to 1) revise section TASK ORDER ORDERING PERIOD – 52.216-22(d), 2) update section L.5.1.1, 3) update section L.5.2.1, 4) delete and replace Sections C.3.2, C.5.1, C.5.1.1, C.9 and E.6, 5) update section F.2 – CONTRACT DURATION, 6) revise Section G – CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA, 7) update section I.1 and 8) revise ATTACHMENT F – ESTIMATED CONSUMABLES LIST

1. TASK ORDER ORDERING PERIOD – 52.216-22(d) is revised as follows (changes are bolded and italicized):

(a) This is an indefinite-quantity contract for the supplies or services specified, and effective for the period stated, in the Schedule. The quantities of supplies and services specified in the Schedule are estimates only and are not purchased by this contract.

(b) Delivery or performance shall be made only as authorized by orders issued in accordance with the Ordering clause.

The Contractor shall furnish to TSA, when and if ordered, the supplies or services specified in the Schedule up to and including the quantity designated in the Schedule as the “maximum.” TSA shall order at least the quantity of supplies or services designated in the Schedule as the “minimum.”

(c) Except for any limitations on quantities in the Order Limitations clause or in the Schedule, there is no limit on the number of orders that may be issued. TSA may issue orders requiring delivery to multiple destinations or performance at multiple locations.

(d) The effective period of this contract is the term of the ordering period plus the term of any task order performance that extends beyond the ordering period as allowable by FAR 52.216-22.

2. Section L.5.1.1 Factor 1: Corporate Experience is updated as follows (changes are bolded and italicized):

The Offeror shall provide its corporate experience which is relevant to the work that will be performed under the prospective contract contemplated by this solicitation. This submission will illustrate similar work that the Offeror has performed but does not include the evaluation of the Offeror’s performance. Offerors may submit information on key management personnel, and work performed as part of a team or joint venture, and other previous iterations of its current organization. No substitution for Corporate Experience will be considered. The Offeror’s submission shall include two parts:

1. The Offeror shall provide up to a three page narrative describing the company's corporate experience providing services relevant to those described in the solicitation. The narrative shall refer to the Offeror’s experience providing airport security screening services or non-airport security screening services to either a Government or Commercial entity, and shall include information as to its activities contributing to the development of expertise and capabilities related to the requirements in this solicitation.

2. The Offeror shall provide no more than three one-page contract references which have either been completed within the last three years (no earlier than March 2022) or be on-going. At a minimum, these references shall address the following:

a) Contract name, number, performance time period, contracting entity (government agency or commercial entity), a description of the work and how the experience enables the Offeror to fulfill requirements under possible task orders.

The term “The Offeror” may include an affiliate company, as defined in FAR 2.101, provided that the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates that the affiliate will have a meaningful role in the performance of the contract effort and/or the resources of the affiliate will affect the performance of the Offeror. “The Offeror” does not include subcontractors or “teaming” partners under this solicitation.

3. Section L.5.2.1 Factor 3: Past Performance is updated as follows (changes are bolded and italicized):

The Offeror shall provide up to three contract summaries that demonstrate performance similar, or relevant to, the solicitation’s performance requirements. The contract(s) shall be ongoing efforts or have been completed no earlier than March 1, 2022. Similar or relevant past performance efforts are defined by size, scope, and complexity. Past performance information on work for State and local governments, private sector clients, and as a Subcontractor that is similar to the Government’s requirements will be evaluated equally with similar Federal contracts. Offerors may submit information on key management personnel, and work performed as part of a team or joint venture, and other previous reiterations of its current organization.

References (or summaries) shall include work done by the applicable segment of the firm (division, group, and unit) relevant to this solicitation, and not the firm in general. The Offeror shall clearly define what entity performed the work if other than the prime Contractor’s past performance is submitted.

When using parent or affiliated company past performance, the relevant consideration is whether the resources of the parent or affiliated company - its workforce, management, facilities or other resources - will be provided or relied upon for contract performance such that the parent or affiliate will have meaningful involvement in contract performance.

The contract summaries shall include the following information:

• Identify performance as Prime or Subcontractor

• Contract number(s) and type;

• Name, phone number, and e-mail address of one technical point of contact at the entity for which the contract was performed;

• Contracting Officer’s name, phone number, and e-mail address;

• Contracting Officer’s Representative name, phone number, and e-mail address; if applicable

• Dollar value to the contract;

• Period of performance;

• Detailed description of the work performed;

• Explanation of relevancy to the current requirements being solicited; and

• Statements relative to performance: i.e., statements describing whether the contract(s) were completed on time, performed satisfactorily while conforming to contract terms and conditions and without degradation in performance or customer satisfaction and any applicable information on problems encountered during performance; Note: include severity of any quantity, delivery or cost problems in performing the contract and the corrective action taken and the effectiveness of the corrective action.

• If applicable, Offerors shall note whether the contract met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, HUBZone small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, and women-owned small business utilization and subcontracting goals.

• The Offeror shall identify those demonstrated systemic improvement actions taken to resolve past problems.

Describe the techniques, elements, and tools used to correct problems and, if applicable, how these techniques, elements, and tools will be used during this contract.

Offerors must provide the above information or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant, directly related, or similar past performance.

The Government may at its discretion obtain and evaluate information from sources other than those provided by the Offeror.

Offerors are responsible for ensuring that the information provided in the contract summaries is accurate and the individual(s) identified in the contract summaries are 1) aware that the TSA may be contacting them regarding their past performance, and 2) authorized to respond to TSA’s inquiries related to this solicitation. TSA will not make repeated attempts to contact non-responsive references and reserves the right to not contact all references provided.

Furthermore, an Offeror will be required to complete a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment D) if the contracts that are submitted in accordance with L.5.2.1 are non-federal contracts. This document is essential for evaluating your previous work performance and is a critical component of the proposal evaluation process. Please follow the instructions within the attachment.

Offerors may submit and use the past performance records of their major subcontractors as part of their own past performance. A major subcontractor is defined as one that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement.

4. Sections C.3.2, C.5.1, C.5.1.1, C.9 and E.6 are deleted and replaced as follows:

C.3.2. Transition Plan

The Contractor shall develop and implement a Transition Plan and schedule for the transition of the security screening services and submit to the COR. At the IDIQ level, the Contractor’s Transition Plan shall identify the Contractor’s approach to enable it to successfully assuming responsibility for the provision of security screening services following the transition timeframe.

The IDIQ Transition Plan shall address the conceptual operational implementation and at a minimum include the following:

• General risks specific to the transition period, and mitigation strategies for each identified risk;

• Managerial and key personnel level of commitment (by title), duties, and oversight processes during transition;

• Logistical preparations for consumables and uniforms during transition;

• Intended communications and meetings with TSA during transition and their objective(s);

• Recruitment practices for incumbents to include a strategy to communicate recruitment processes and to ensure adequate staffing levels upon the end of transition;

• Recruitment practices for new hires taking into consideration potential long lead times for background checks and vetting that cannot be averted;

• Mitigation strategy (or strategies) to address potential understaffing upon the end of transition;

• Approach to transition budgeting and its impact on transition efforts (Note: Qualitative price / cost amounts shall not be discussed here.);

• Aspects of transition directly impacted by a Contractor to Contractor transition (transition to awardee from an incumbent security screening services Contractor), and by a Government to Contractor transition (transition to awardee from Federal screeners);

• Approach for passenger security screening services training for new hires during the transition period, as applicable;

• Approach for baggage security screening services training for new hires during the transition period, as applicable;

• A POC identifying who is accountable for this deliverable; and

• Actions and precautions to be taken during the month prior to the transition end date, and on the first day after transition to ensure a successful start of security screening services.

In addition, the IDIQ Transition Plan shall include a conceptual four month transition schedule, expressed by a project timeline. For schedule purposes the transition phase shall begin on the first day of a calendar month and end on the last day of the fourth calendar month after transition begins. The Contractor shall assume responsibility for performing security screening services on the first day of the fifth calendar month after transition begins. At a minimum the project timeline shall include timeframes and milestones for the following activities:

• Passenger security screening services classroom training at the Federally determined site;

• Passenger security screening services training OJT;

• Baggage security screening services classroom training;

• Baggage security screening services training OJT;

• Recruiting and hiring of incumbent security screening services personnel;

• Recruiting and hiring of non-incumbent new hire security screening services personnel to include assessment, vetting, and on-boarding;

• Outfitting security screening services personnel uniforms; and

• Intended meetings with TSA

C.5.1. Screener Training

The Contractor shall comply with TSA security screener training and certification maintenance conventions in order to adhere to the security screener qualification requirements in 49 U.S.C. § 44935.

The Contractor shall also conduct screener training as outlined in TSA MD 1900.8 Transportation Security Officer Training and Certification, and the TSA NTP. The Contractor shall submit an Operational Management Plan that includes the Contractors training approach, using the TSA provided template as specified in Section F.4., for each task order. Additional information on officer annual screening proficiency can be located at the TSA Office of Human Capital website, after contract award.

The NTP specifies screening training curricula for officers based on position and functional certification. The evolution of threats, training content, security equipment, and occurrence of unique security situations, may result in the modification, addition, and removal of training courses and events. The NTP accounts for a significant number of unassigned hours per screener to accommodate emerging and specific airport training requirements. The number of hours is subject to change on a fiscal year basis. All training requirements are accounted for in the overall contract requirement.

Newly hired TSOs shall complete the TSO Basic Training Program (TSO-BTP) within six months of EOD. The TSO-BTP takes place at identified federally determined training sites specified in the task order. Training availability will depend on demand and may vary due to holidays. The Contractor is required to maintain operational readiness by adequately planning and hiring qualified individuals, accounting for seasonal peaks, the lead time for security vetting and adjudication, obtaining network access, etc., for new hires. The requirements for the TSO-BTP training are accounted for in the estimated requirement.

The Contractor shall provide for screening instruction by a qualified STI in order to ensure compliance with training standards and updated screening directives and procedures. Baggage security screening training will be required to be conducted locally, at airport where security screening services occur.

The Contractor shall ensure that the workforce is briefed on and implements any SOP or screening policy changes by the effective and/or implementation date as required by the SOP or policy. The Contractor shall also provide security training briefs, at the place of performance to other FSD staff if requested.

The Contractor shall submit an Operational Management Plan that includes the Contractors training approach, using the TSA provided template as specified in Section F.4., after each task order award. The plan shall articulate how it intends to meet all AQL TSA training requirements as indicated in the NTP. The Contractor shall first implement this plan while transitioning to assume responsibility for security screening operations. Required security screening and screening support technical training curricula and associated equipment provided by TSA to the Contractor are considered GFE.

C.5.1.1. Available Screener Training Options

TSOs shall attend the TSA TSO training class. To satisfy this requirement, the Contractor may administer Local Training, Virtual Training, or at a Federal Facility if directed by TSA.

Contractor Administered Local Training – If the Contractor administers the Contractor-instructed TSO training locally, the Contractor must use TSA approved training curricula. The Contractor shall provide for screening instruction by a qualified STI in order to ensure compliance with training standards and updated screening directives and procedures. All required screener technical training curricula and associated equipment will be provided by TSA as Government Furnished Information (GFI) or Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). Enhancements and modifications may be made to these curricula by the Government to ensure compliance with all applicable SOPs and to further improve screener performance.

Virtual TSO Training Classes - If the Contractor administers the TSA-instructed TSO virtual training, the Contractor must use TSA approved training curricula. The Contractor shall provide for screening instruction by a qualified STI in order to ensure compliance with training standards and updated screening directives and procedures. All required screener technical training curricula and associated equipment will be provided by TSA as GFI or GFE. Enhancements and modifications may be made to these curricula by the Government to ensure compliance with all applicable SOPs and to further improve screener performance.

Federal Facility Training – If directed by TSA, TSOs may be required to attend the TSA TSO training classes at a Federally determined site during Transition. Attendance for this training will be scheduled via the local TSA training manager a minimum of thirty-five (35) days prior to the start of the next available class. The TSO shall be required to have a PIV card, network account, and OLC account, in order to register at Federally determined site. The Contractor shall maintain operational readiness by adequately planning and hiring qualified individuals, accounting for seasonal peaks, lead times for security vetting and adjudication, and obtaining network access, etc., for new hires. The allotted training slots per airport will depend on demand and availability.

C.9. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION REVIEW (ITAR) COMPLIANCE

The Contractor shall follow all applicable requirements contained in Attachment C – ITAR CLAUSES

E.6. PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The Government has robust performance management groups responsible for monitoring and analyzing operational performance. Periodic guidance and reports covering an airport’s operational performance are produced by TSA. The current state of performance management as applicable to SPP is reflected through the CPMP to ensure compliance with provisions in 49 U.S.C. §44920. Due to the dynamic nature of TSA’s mission, performance measures may change rapidly in advance of contract modifications. TSA reserves the right to review applicable performance measures not included in the CPMP and expects the Contractor will respond promptly to TSA requests for improvements.

No. CPMP Performance Measures

1. Annual Proficiency Review (APR)

a. On-Screen Alarm Resolution (OSARP) Annual Assessment (OAA) with initial completion (OAA1) by August 31, 2026

b. Practical Skills Observations (PSO) by September 30, 2026

2. NTP Officers on Pace

3. Enhanced TIP Capability

4. Standard Wait Times

5. Pre✓ Wait Times

6. Selectee Find Rate

7. AIT Utilization

8. ATLAS Utilization

9. ATLAS Weighted Effectiveness

a. Percentage of Employees Physically Screened

b. Balance of Physical Screening

10. Screening Workforce Performance

11. Operational Execution

Please Note: All areas in E.6. marked SSI will be supplied in a separate attachment, as a supplemental to this task order award.

1. Annual Proficiency Review (APR)

Definition: Total percentage of officers that pass APR tests. This measure represents the security screening workforce’s APR completion rate.

Contractors will be evaluated on the following:

1. On-Screen Alarm Resolution (OSARP) Annual Assessment (OAA) with initial completion (OAA1) by August 31, 2026

2. Practical Skills Observations (PSO) Cycle 2 by September 30, 2026

Intent: This measure indicates how well the Contractor works with their security screening officers throughout the year to ensure that the officers skills are at their peak.

Grading Criteria: Number of tested passed

AQL: SSI

Data Source: OLC

Time Period: Semi-Annual

2. NTP Officers On Pace

Definition: This measure tracks the percentage of officers with an active OLC profile who are on pace to complete with the NTP and OLC assigned training monthly goal.

Intent: Ensuring officers maintain their skills and knowledge and that all candidates engaged in security screening operations and management maintain awareness of emerging threats are up to date is critical to the TSA mission.

Grading Criteria: Number of Officers who are on pace with the NTP monthly goal, grouped by workgroup

AQL: SSI

Data Source: OLC

Time Period: Monthly

3. Enhanced TIP Capability

Definition: This measure only counts officers who checked at least 75 Threat Image Projections (TIP) in the identified time period. This measure calculates the number of officers who had a detection rate of < (see AQL) compared to all officers.

Intent: This measure drives accessible property effectiveness, ensuring that TSOs are vigilant and accurately assessing images for the existence of dangerous prohibited items.

Grading Criteria: TIP officers meeting detection rate >= (see AQL) / total TIP officers

AQL: SSI

Data Source: STIP

Time Period: Three (3) month rolling average

4. Standard Wait Times

Definition: Percent of Non-TSA Pre✓® volume that waited less than ten (10) minutes.

Intent: This measure ensures focuses on meeting stakeholder expectations and reducing public area vulnerabilities caused by large crowds of people. These objectives ensure that TSA continues to be able to focus on increasing security effectiveness, without the added scrutiny of stakeholders concerned that TSA is not meeting predefined goals.

Grading Criteria: Number of passengers waiting less than 10 minutes / total number of passengers

AQL: SSI

Data Source: PMIS

5. Pre✓ Wait Times

Definition: Percent of TSA Pre✓® volume that waited less than five minutes.

Intent: This measure focuses on meeting stakeholder expectations and reducing public area vulnerabilities caused by large crowds of people. These objectives ensure that TSA continues to be able to focus on increasing security effectiveness, without the added scrutiny of stakeholders concerned that TSA is not meeting predefined goals.

Grading Criteria: Number of Pre✓ passengers waiting less than 5 minutes / total number of Pre✓ passengers

AQL: SSI

7. AIT Utilization

Definition: Percentage of AIT eligible passengers screened through the AIT. This reflects the percentage of passengers receiving non-metallic threat screening via the AIT.

Intent: This measure ensures TSA is maximizing use of the highest detection assets against a non-metallic threat.

Grading Criteria: AIT throughput – expedited customer throughput / AIT target

AQL: SSI

8. ATLAS Utilization

6. Selectee Find Rate

Definition: This measure represents the rate at which officers fails to provide proper screening to high risk passengers at the checkpoint. Missed selectees in this measure include TDC miss, improper hand off to the security screening officer, and improper marking after screening.

Intent: This measure ensures that Contractors are meeting a key part of security as TSA continues to move away from one-size-fits-all security; accurate routing of passengers based on pre-vetted risk.

Grading Criteria: Total number of selectees initially screened at the TSA checkpoint vs total number of selectees.

AQL: SSI

Data Source: AIM

Definition: Insider Threat Screening which measures TSO FTE hours contributed to physical screening of employees.

Intent: This measure ensures TSA continues to focus on threats outside the passenger checkpoint vector; focusing on insider threat and maximizing exposure in the insider community.

Grading Criteria: Weighted composition of percentage of Employees Physically Screened (see AQL) and Balance of Physical Screening (see AQL)

Data Source: ATLAS AM Cube

AQL: SSI

9. ATLAS Weighted Effectiveness

Definition: Insider Threat Screening which takes a weighted measurement of all utilization performed as part of ATLAS

Intent: This measure ensures TSA continues to focus on threats outside the passenger checkpoint vector; focusing on insider threat and maximizing exposure in the insider community.

Grading Criteria: Weighted composition of Percentage of Employees Physically Screened (see AQL) and Balance of Physical Screening (see AQL)

Data Source: ATLAS AM Cube

9a. Percentage of Employees Physically Screened

Definition: Insider Threat Screening which measures the number of employees physically screened out of the total number of employees encountered

Intent: This measure ensures TSA continues to focus on threats outside the passenger checkpoint vector; focusing on insider threat and maximizing exposure in the insider community

Grading Criteria: Number of employees physically screened / total number of employees encountered

Data Source: ATLAS AM Cube

AQL: SSI

Time Period: Monthly

9b. Balance of Physical Screening

Definition: Insider Threat Screening which measures the ratio between On- Person and In-Property screenings during ATLAS operations.

Intent: This measure ensures TSA continues to focus on threats outside the passenger checkpoint vector; focusing on insider threat and maximizing exposure in the insider community

Grading Criteria: Number of screening (grouped by type) / total number of deployments

Data Source: ATLAS AM Cube

10. Screening Workforce Performance

Definition: This measure assesses the Contractor’s ability to manage and supervise their workforce so they perform security screening functions described in this task order, any TSA written guidance, and that officers present themselves in a professional manner according to the contract's TSA approved uniform and appearance standards and all other applicable SOPs, MD and ODs.

This measure indicates the level at which Contractors continuously reinforce correct TSA policy and procedures.

Intent: Following screening procedures is integral to security effectiveness and threat detection rates. Professional appearance and conduct is a deterrence for adversaries and ensures that officers reflect the TSA mission and values to our stakeholders and the traveling public.

Grading Criteria: Total points earned / total points possible

Data Source: SPP Assessment Tool

AQL: SSI

Time Period: Monthly

11. Operational Execution

Definition: This measure assesses the Contractor’s ability to effectively execute the security screening, to include operational administrative compliance, as outlined in applicable TSA guidance

Intent: To ensure effective and efficient screening operations and the timely and accurate delivery of operational administrative documentation

Grading Criteria: Total points earned / total points possible

Data Source: SPP Assessment Tool

[END OF SECTION]

5. Section F.2 CONTRACT DURATION is revised as follows (changes are bolded and italicized):

F.2. CONTRACT DURATION

The ordering period under the IDIQ will be effective for 10 years from the contract effective date unless otherwise modified at the sole discretion of TSA.

Each task order will have a specified contract duration. The contract duration for each task order may be up to five years (excluding extending services under the authority of FAR 52.217-8). Task orders may have option years that extend beyond the expiration of the IDIQ contract’s ordering period.

6. Section G – CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA is updated as follows (changes are bolded and italicized):

TSA Points of Contact (JUNE 2024)

The primary point of contact for this contract:

Contracting Officer:

NAME: Daniel Adams

PHONE NUMBER: N/A

EMAIL: Daniel.Adams.1@tsa.dhs.gov

7. The following clauses incorporated by reference in Section I.2 – CLAUSES are updated as follows (changes are bolded and italicized):

52.203-12 Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions. (JUN 2020) 52.203-13 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct. (NOV 2021) 52.203-14 Display of Hotline Poster(s). (NOV 2021) 52.203-16 Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest. (NOV 2021) 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance. (OCT 2018) 52.204-14 Service Contract Reporting Requirements. (OCT 2016) 52.204-25 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance or Equipment

(DEVIATION 20-05) (NOV 2025)

52.207-6 Solicitation of Offers from Small Business Concerns and Small Business Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts). (AUG 2024) 52.209-6 Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (JAN 2025) 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns. (JAN 2025) 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan. (JAN 2025) 52.219-28 Post-Award Small Business Program Representation (JAN 2025) 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons. (OCT 2025) 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification. (JAN 2025) 52.225-1 Buy American Act—Supplies. (OCT 2022)

The following clauses incorporated by reference are deleted in its entirety:

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper. (MAY 2011) RESERVED - 52.222-17 Non-displacement of Qualified Workers. (MAY 2014) mailto:Daniel.Adams.1@tsa.dhs.gov

8. ATTACHMENT F – ESTIMATED CONSUMABLES LIST is revised (see attached)

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED