CO FLAP US50(1) FINAL GEOTECHNICAL Report- Appendicies only.pdf

PDF 30 MB Posted

Attached to
CO FLAP US50(1) Little Blue Creek Canyon
Solicitation number
6982AF20B000008
Issued by

About this file

This federal contract opportunity notice is for reconstruction and improvements to CO FLAP US50(1) Little Blue Creek Canyon in Montrose, Colorado. The project includes reconstructing 4.17 miles of roadway to provide a consistent 12-foot travel way with 4 to 8-foot shoulders and adding 1.5 miles of climbing lanes. Major work items include large scale rock excavation and embankment, roadway realignment and widening, MSE retaining walls, drainage culvert installation, guardrail, aggregate base, asphalt concrete pavement, minor bridge and bridge railing work, pavement markings, and traffic control. Significant quantities listed are 180,000 cubic yards of roadway excavation, 38,500 cubic yards of waste, 580 cubic yards of grouted riprap, 60,000 square feet of mechanically stabilized earth wall, 2,500 linear feet of rock bolt, and 70,000 tons of aggregate base. The opportunity notice provides project details but plans and specifications are not yet available. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the issuing agency.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid Tabs - CO FLAP US50(1).pdf PDF
Bid Opening Summary - US50.pdf PDF
Final QnA 10.20.2020.pdf PDF
QnA 10.19.2020.pdf PDF
A004.pdf PDF
A003.pdf PDF
A002.pdf PDF
QnA 10.14.2020.pdf PDF
QnA 10.13.2020.pdf PDF
A001.pdf PDF
QnA 10.7.2020.pdf PDF
QnA 10.2.2020.pdf PDF
YA 2010- Draft Final Geotechnical Report US50 03-22-10.pdf PDF
QnA 9.23.2020.pdf PDF
YA 2020 218-112 US50 LBC Final Geotechnical Data Report_2020-03-30.pdf PDF
CO FLAP US50(1)_Little Blue Creek Canyon_Y-Sheets.pdf PDF
CO FLAP US50(1)_Little Blue Creek Canyon_Z-Sheets.pdf PDF
QnA 9.17.2020.pdf PDF
K-07-F WIDENING PROJECT BRF_050-2(20).pdf PDF
6982AF20B000008.pdf PDF
CO FLAP US50(1)_Little_Blue_Creek_Canyon_FINAL_PLANS 2 of 2.pdf PDF
CO_FLAP_US50(1)_Hydraulics_Memo_Final.pdf PDF
fp14.pdf PDF
CO.FLAP.US50(1).Little Blue Creek Canyon.Pavement Report.2020.pdf PDF
CO FLAP US50(1)_Little_Blue_Creek_Canyon_FINAL_PLANS 1 of 2.pdf PDF
CO FLAP US50(1)_Little Blue Creek Canyon_X-Sheets 1 of 3.pdf PDF
CO FLAP US50(1)_Little Blue Creek Canyon_X-Sheets 2 of 3.pdf PDF
CO FLAP US50(1) FINAL Geotechnical Report Signed 06.01.2020.pdf PDF
CO FLAP US50(1)_Little Blue Creek Canyon_X-Sheets 3 of 3.pdf PDF
Show all 29

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

APPENDIX A

GRS Wall Analysis Preliminarily Internal and External MathCAD

GRS Retaining Wall Design

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Name: CO US50 Designer: DM

Project No.: CO US50 Checker: JMA

Location: Gunnison County, CO Date: 06/19/2019

WALL GEOMETRY STATION 647+10 LT

70% Reinforcement Length 8-Inch Reinf Spacing

See Figure 1 (page 2) for wall geometry and loading definitions.

Exposed Wall Height ≔H' 34 ft Slope Above Wall ≔βtop 14 deg

Embedment ≔Hemb 6 ft Distance to crest ≔Lcrest 4.0 ft

Embedment Ignored ≔Hig 6 ft

Design Wall Height ≔H =+H' Hemb 40.0 ft Slope Rise ≔Hslope =⋅Lcrest tan ⎛⎝βtop⎞⎠ 0.997 ft

Reinforcement Length ≔L 28 ft Slope Below Wall ≔βbottom 45 deg

Back Batter ≔α 90 deg

L

H %70

Facing Elements Traffic Loading

Assumed Height ≔Hface 8 in

Assumed Depth ≔bface 8 in Traffic Live Load ≔qt 250 ―― lb ft2

Unit Weight ≔γface 140 ―― lb ft3 Offset to Traffic Load ≔d 4 ft check offset

Width of Traffic Load ≔bf 26 ft

Friction Angle ≔ϕface 45 deg Offset to CL ≔dt =+d ⋅0.5 bf 17 ft

Face Batter ≔ω 14 deg

Reinforcement Spacing Guardrail (y/n)? ≔Rail 1

Normal Reinforcement Spacing ≔sv 8 in y=1, n=0

Facing Reinforcement Spacing ≔svf 8 in Guardrail load in reinforcement

≔Thb =| if else

=Rail 1

5 ft sv lb ft2

0 ―― lb ft2

40 ―― lb ft2

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 1 of 17

Figure 1 - Schematic GRS Wall based on AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Chapter 11.

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 2 of 17

Load and Resistance Factors (AAHSTO LRFD, 2015, Strength I)

Dead Load Max ≔γDCmax 1.25 Earth Surcharge Max ≔γESmax 1.5

Dead Load Min ≔γDCmin 0.9 Earth Surcharge Min ≔γESmin 1.0

Hor. Active Earth Pres. Max ≔γEHmax 1.5 Vert. Active Earth Pres. Max ≔γEVmax 1.35

Hor. Active Earth Pres. Min ≔γEHmin 0.9 Vert. Active Earth Pres. Min ≔γEVmin 1.0

Live Load Surcharge ≔γLS 1.75

GRS Capacity ≔Φcap 0.45 Soil-Sliding Resistance ≔Φτ 1.00

Reinforcement resistance ≔Φreinf 0.40 Bearing Resistance ≔Φbc 0.65

Other Constants

Unit Weight of Water ≔γwater 62.4 ―― lb ft3 Wall Friction ≔δ 0 deg

Equivalent Slope Calculations

≔βint if else

≤Lcrest L return atan

Hslope

L

‖‖ return βtop

≔βext if else

≤Lcrest +L H return atan

Hslope

+L H

‖‖ return βtop

=βint 2.04 deg =βext 0.84 deg

SOIL PARAMETERS Assumed angular rock everywhere, need testing to verify properties (MDD)

Foundation Soil Properties

Friction Angle ≔ϕf' 38 deg Cohesion ≔cf' 100 ―― lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γf 125 ―― lb ft3

Bearing Capacity Factors by Friction Angle AASHTO 2015 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-1

≔BC 0 5.14 1.0 0.0

≔ϕf =⋅ϕf' ―― π

≔Nc =BC ,ϕf 1

61.4 ≔Nq =BC ,ϕf 2

48.9 ≔Nγ =BC ,ϕf 3

Retained Soil Properties

Friction Angle ≔ϕb' 32 deg Cohesion ≔cb' 0 ―― lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γb 130 ―― lb ft3

Active Coefficient ≔Kab =―――――――――――――――――― sin ⎛⎝ +α ϕb'⎞⎠

⋅⋅sin ((α)) sin (( -α δ))

+1

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕb' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ -ϕb' βext⎞⎠ ⋅sin (( -α δ)) sin ⎛⎝ +α βext⎞⎠

0.31

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 3 of 17

Reinforced Soil Properties

Friction Angle ≔ϕr' 38 deg Cohesion ≔cr' 0 ―― lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γr 125 ―― lb ft3

Assumed d=1.5 vs previous 1.0,(MDD)

Maximum diameter of fill ≔dmax 1.5 in Fill Type: Well-graded

≔Kar =―――――――――――――――――― sin ⎛⎝ +α ϕr'⎞⎠

⋅⋅sin ((α)) sin (( -α δ))

+1

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕr' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ -ϕr' βint⎞⎠ ⋅sin (( -α δ)) sin ⎛⎝ +α βint⎞⎠

0.242

Active Coefficient

Passive Coefficient ≔Kpr =―――― +1 sin ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠ -1 sin ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠

4.204

Geosynthetic Reinforcement Properties

Ultimate Reinforcement Strength ≔Tult 4800 ― lb ft Strength at 2% Strain ≔T2 2400 ― lb ft

Factored Reinforcement Strength ≔Tf =⋅Tult Φreinf 1920 ― lb ft

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 4 of 17

EXTERNAL STABILITY

Calculated Weights

Reinforced Zone ≔WGRS =⋅⋅H L γr 140000 ― lb ft Slope ≔Wslope =⋅⋅⋅0.5 L2 tan ⎛⎝βint⎞⎠ γr 1745.296 ― lb ft

Facing ≔Wface =⋅⋅H bface γface 3733.333 ― lb ft Facing assumed to have a rectangular cross section.

Calculated Lateral Forces

Retained Soil ≔PA =⋅⋅⋅0.5 Kab γb H2 32217.824 ― lb ft Angle of Action ≔ρ =+(( -90 deg α)) βext 0.84 deg

≔PAH =⋅PA cos ((ρ)) 32214.36 ― lb ft ≔PAV =⋅PA sin ((ρ)) 472.467 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTH =⋅⋅qt Kab H 3097.868 ― lb ft

Factored Vertical Forces

GRS ≔WGRSmax =⋅WGRS γEVmax 189000 ― lb ft ≔WGRSmin =⋅WGRS γEVmin 140000 ― lb ft

Facing ≔Wfacemax =⋅Wface γEVmax 5040 ― lb ft ≔Wfacemin =⋅Wface γEVmin 3733.333 ― lb ft

Slope ≔Wslopemax =⋅Wslope γEVmax 2356.15 ― lb ft ≔Wslopemin =⋅Wslope γEVmin 1745.296 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTVmax =⋅⋅qt γLS ⎛⎝ -L Lcrest⎞⎠ 10500 ― lb ft

Earth Pressure ≔PAVmax =⋅PAV γEVmax 637.831 ― lb ft ≔PAVmin =⋅PAV γEVmin 472.467 ― lb ft

Factored Lateral Forces

Earth Pressure ≔PAHmax =⋅PAH γEHmax 48321.539 ― lb ft ≔PAHmin =⋅PAH γEHmin 28992.924 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTHmax =⋅PTH γLS 5421.268 ― lb ft

Sliding Stability

Total Vertical Force ≔Wmin =++WGRSmin Wfacemin PAVmin 144205.801 ― lb ft

Sliding Friction Factor ≔μf min ⎛⎝ ,tan ⎛⎝ϕf'⎞⎠ tan ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠⎞⎠

Sliding Resistance ≔Rsliding =⋅⋅Wmin μf Φτ 112665.919 ― lb ft

Total Horizontal Force ≔Ptotal =+PAHmax PTHmax 53742.808 ― lb ft

Sliding CDR ≔CDRsliding =――― Rsliding

Ptotal

2.096 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRsliding 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 5 of 17

Overturning

Facing Moments ≔d1 =⋅H tan ((ω)) 9.973 ft ≔d3 =⋅H tan (( -90 deg α)) 0 ft ≔d2 =-bface ⎛⎝ +d1 d3⎞⎠ -9.306 ft

≔Mf1 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅⋅0.5 d1 H γface⎞⎠ d1 γEVmin 1 ft 185664.5 ⋅lb ft

≔Mf2 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅d2 H γface⎞⎠ d2 d1 γEVmin 1 ft -277252.305 ⋅lb ft

≔Mf3 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅⋅0.5 d3 H γface⎞⎠ d3 d1 d2 γEVmin 1 ft 0 ⋅lb ft

GRS Moment ≔MGRS =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅L H γr⎞⎠

L bface γEVmin 1 ft 2053333.333 ⋅lb ft Assumes equal front and back batter

Slope ≔Mslope =⋅⋅⎛⎝Wslopemin⎞⎠

L bface

1 ft 33742.39 ⋅lb ft

Vert. Earth Pressure ≔MAV =⋅⋅PAVmin

+bface L

1 ft 6772.029 ⋅lb ft

Resisting Moments ≔MR =+++++Mf1 Mf2 Mf3 MGRS Mslope MAV 2002259.947 ⋅lb ft

Hor. Earth Pressure ≔MAH =⋅⋅PAHmax H

1 ft 644287.191 ⋅lb ft

Traffic ≔MTH =⋅⋅PTHmax H

1 ft 108425.369 ⋅lb ft

Driving Moments ≔MD =+MAH MTH 752712.561 ⋅lb ft

Overturning CDR ≔CDRoverturn =――

MR

MD

2.66 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRoverturn 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

Total Vertical Force ≔Wmax =++++WGRSmax Wfacemax Wslopemax PAVmax PTHmax 202455.249 ― lb ft

Eccentricity ≔e =――――

-MD MR

⋅Wmax 1 ft -6.172 ft ≔emax =―――

+L bface

7.167 ft

=if ⎛⎝ ,,>e emax “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

≔ebearing =if (( ,,≤e 0 0 ft e)) 0 ft ≔B' =-⎛⎝ +L bface⎞⎠ ⋅2 ebearing 28.667 ft

Bearing Resistance

Factored Vertical Stress ≔σVF =―― Wmax

B'

7062.392 ―― lb ft2

Nominal Bearing Resistance ≔qn =++⋅cf' Nc ⋅⋅⋅0.5 B' γf Nγ ⋅⋅γf ⎛⎝ -Hemb Hig⎞⎠ Nq 145890 ―― lb ft2

Factored Bearing Resistance ≔qR =⋅qn Φbc 94828.5 ―― lb ft2

Bearing CDR ≔CDRbearing =―― qR σVF

13.427 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRbearing 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 6 of 17

INTERNAL STABILITY

GRS Capacity

Revised with 0.2*eqn per 2016 TF revisions,(MDD)GRS Nominal Capacity ≔qGRSn =⋅0.2

⋅0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax

Tf sv

Kpr 1763.471 ―― lb ft2

GRS Factored Capacity ≔qGRSf =⋅qGRSn Φcap 793.562 ―― lb ft2

Applied Load ≔Vappliedf =+―――― Wslopemax

L PTVmax

L

459.148 ―― lb ft2

Capacity CDR ≔CDRcap =――― qGRSf

Vappliedf

1.728 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRcap 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

Reinforcement Strength

Matrix calculations, see summary table below. ≔z1 =-⋅2 dt bf 8 ft

Reinforcement Layers ≔z =, ‥sv +sv sv H 0.667 ft

Surcharge Load Angles of Action ≔βb =atan d z

1.406

≔αb =-atan +d bf z βb 0.143

Matrix size setup ≔i ‥0 -rows ((z)) 1

Reinforcement load due to surcharge ≔σhti qt π

+αbi

⋅sin ⎛ αbi cos ⎛

+αbi ⋅2 βbi

Kar 0.057 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to earth pressure ≔σhwf =⋅⋅⋅γEHmax γr z Kar 30.265 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to traffic ≔σhtf =⋅γLS σht 0.1 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to vehicle impact ≔σhbi =if ⎛

,,≤z i 5 ft Thb 0⎞ lb ft2

Total factored reinforcement load ≔σhf =++σhwf σhtf σhb 70.365 lb ft2

Required factored reinforcement strength ≔Treqf =⋅―――― σhf

0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax sv 64.411 lb ft

Factored Reinforcement CDR ≔CDRreff =―― Tf

Treqf

29.809

Nominal reinforcement load due to earth pressure ≔σhw =⋅⋅γr z Kar 20.177 lb ft2

Total nominal reinforcement load ≔σh =+σhw σht 20.234 lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 7 of 17

Required nominal reinforcement strength ≔Treq =⋅―――― σh

0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax sv 18.522 lb ft

Nominal Reinforcement CDR ≔CDRref =―― T2

Treq

129.577

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 8 of 17

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 9 of 17

FACING STABILITY

Connection

Earth Force at Face ≔Fface =+⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅0.72 γr Kar sv svf γEHmax ⋅⋅σht svf γLS 14.594 lb ft

Assumes that traffic railings are setback to AASHTO minimums and do not impart load directly on the wall face. Other scenarios may require additional loading.

Frictional Resistance ≔Rface =⋅⋅⋅⋅γface bface z ― tan ⎛⎝ϕface⎞⎠

41.481 lb ft

≔CDRface =―― Rface

Fface

2.842

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 10 of 17

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 11 of 17

Seismic Stability

NO SEISMIC ASSUMED (MDD)

Seismic Design Parameters Site Class: Lat Long.:

Peak Ground Acceleration ≔PGA 0 Seismic parameters obtained from USGS Sesimic Design Maps online tool:

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/ application.php? Spectral Acceleration at 1 sec ≔S1 0

Site Factors ≔FPGA 0

≔Fv 0.0 Seismic Load Factor ≔γEQ 1.0

Extreme Event I

Maximum Acceleration ≔kmax =⋅FPGA PGA 0

Peak Ground Velocity ≔PGV =⋅⋅38 Fv S1 0

Site Reduction Factor ≔αsite =+1 ⋅⋅0.01 ―― H

1 ft

-⋅0.5

⋅Fv S1 kmax

Average Ground Acceleration ≔kav =⋅αsite kmax ?

Kv is typically assumed as 0, unless PGA >0.6. More critical for bridge structure than walls. CalTrans Report CA/UCD- SESM-08-01 and Memo "Seismic Design and Selection of Standard Retaining Walls" 06/16/2013

Vertical Ground Acceleration ≔kv 0

Angle of Seismic Action ≔θ =atan kav -1 kv

Forces on GRS

Weight of GRS ≔W =⋅⋅⋅γr H ((L)) γEVmin 140000 ― lb ft

For wall with no bridge abutment, qb, qrb, b, ab, H2, g1 = 0

≔qb 0 ≔b 0 ≔qrb 0 ≔ab 0 ≔H2 0 ≔γ1 0

Bridge Deadload ≔Wb =⋅⋅qb b γDCmin 0

Road Base ≔Wrb =⋅⋅qrb ⎛⎝ --L b ab⎞⎠ γESmin 0 ft

Effective GRS Weight ≔Weff =⋅⋅⋅0.5 ((H)) H γr 100000 ― lb ft

Effective Roadbase Weight ≔Wrbeff =⋅⋅

H b ab

H2 γ1 0 ft

Average Maximum Acceleration ≔Am =⋅⎛⎝ -1.45 kav⎞⎠ kav ?

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 12 of 17

Direct Sliding

Thrust Forces on GRS Wall

Retained Backfill ≔Fb =⋅⋅⋅0.5 γb Kab H2 32217.824 ― lb ft ≔qrb 0 ―― lb ft2

Road Base ≔Frb =⋅⋅qrb Kab H 0 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔Ft =⋅⋅qt Kab H 3097.868 ― lb ft

Inertia of GRS ≔Pir =⋅⋅γEQ Weff Am ?

Inertia of Roadbase ≔Pirb =⋅⋅γEQ Wrbeff Am ?

Inertia of Sill ≔Pis 0 For wall with no bridge, Pis = 0

Dynamic Earth Pressure Coefficient

≔KAE ⋅――――――――――

cos ⎛⎝ --ϕr' θ ω⎞⎠

⋅⋅cos ((θ)) cos ((ω)) cos (( ++δ ω θ))

+1 ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾2

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕr' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ --ϕr' θ βtop⎞⎠ ⋅cos (( ++δ ω θ)) cos ⎛⎝ -βtop ω⎞⎠

-2

=KAE ?

Dynamic Earth Force ≔PAE =⋅⋅⋅⋅0.5 γr H2 ⎛⎝ -KAE Kar⎞⎠ γEQ ?

Factored Driving Forces ≔FR =+++⋅γEHmax Fb ⋅γLS Ft Pir ⋅0.5 PAE ?

Total Vertical Forces ≔V =W 140000 ― lb ft

Factored Resisting Force ≔RR =⋅⋅Φτ V μf 109379.988 ― lb ft

Sliding CDR ≔CDRslidings =――

RR

FR

? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRslidings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

Overturning Stability

Reinforced Soil Moment ≔Mb =⋅⋅γEHmax Fb ― H

644356.481 lb

Roadbase surcharge Moment ≔Mrb =0 0

Inertial Moments ≔Mi ⋅⋅γEQ Pir ― H

Dynamic Moment ≔MAE ⋅⋅⋅0.5 γEQ PAE (( ⋅0.6 H))

Total Factored Driving Moments ≔MD =++Mb Mi MAE ?

Total Factored Resisting Moments ≔MR =⋅W ― L

1960000 lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 13 of 17

Overturning CDR ≔CDRoverturnings =――

MR

MD

? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRoverturnings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

Eccentricity

Eccentricity ≔eseismic =――――

-MD MR

V ? ≔ebear =if ⎛⎝ ,,≤eseismic 0 0 ft eseismic⎞⎠ ?

=if

,,≤eseismic ― L

“OK” “NO”

Effective Width ≔B' =-⎛⎝ +L bface⎞⎠ ⋅2 ebear ?

Bearing Stability

Bearing Capacity Factors =Nc 61.4 =Nq 48.9 =Nγ 78

Factored Vertical Stress ≔σVF =― V

B'

Nominal Bearing Resistance =qn 145890 ―― lb ft2

Factored Bearing Resistance ≔qR =⋅qn Φbc 94828.5 ―― lb ft2

Bearing CDR ≔CDRbearings =―― qR σVF

? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRbearings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 14 of 17

GRS Wall Design Summary

Project Name: Designer:

Project No.: Checker:

Location: Date:

WALL GEOMETRY

See Figure 1 (page 2) for wall geometry and loading definitions.

Exposed Wall Height =H' 34.0 ft Slope Above Wall =βtop 14 ° Slope Rise =Hslope 1.0 ft

Embedment =Hemb 6.0 ft Distance to crest =Lcrest 4.0 ft Slope Below Wall =βbottom 45 °

Design Wall Height =H 40.0 ft

Reinforcement Length =L 28.0 ft =― L

H %70

Back Batter =α 90 °

Facing Elements

Assumed Height =Hface 8 in Unit Weight =γface 140 ―― lb ft3 Friction Angle =ϕface 45 °

Assumed Depth =bface 8 in Face Batter =ω 14 °

Traffic Loading

Traffic Live Load =qt 250 ―― lb ft2 Width of Traffic Load =bf 26.0 ft Offset to Traffic Load =d 4.0 ft

Offset to CL =dt 17.0 ft

Reinforcement Spacing

Normal Reinforcement Spacing =sv 8 in Facing Reinforcement Spacing =svf 8 in

Strength I Limit State

External Stability

=CDRsliding 2.096 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRsliding 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRoverturn 2.66 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRoverturn 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

Eccentricity =e -6.172 ft

=emax 7.167 ft

=if ⎛⎝ ,,>e emax “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRbearing 13.427 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRbearing 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRcap 1.728 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRcap 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 15 of 17

Extreme Event I Limit State

=CDRslidings ? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRslidings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

=CDRoverturnings ? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRoverturnings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

=eseismic ? =if

,,≤eseismic ― L

“OK” “NO”

=CDRbearings ? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRbearings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

Internal Stability

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 16 of 17

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 17 of 17

Project Name: CO US50 Designer: DM

Project No.: CO US50 Checker: JMA

Location: Gunnison County, CO Date: 06/19/2019

WALL GEOMETRY STATION 647+10 LT

70% Reinforcement Length 12-Inch Reinf Spacing

See Figure 1 (page 2) for wall geometry and loading definitions.

Exposed Wall Height ≔H' 34 ft Slope Above Wall ≔βtop 14 deg

Embedment ≔Hemb 6 ft Distance to crest ≔Lcrest 4.0 ft

Embedment Ignored ≔Hig 6 ft

Design Wall Height ≔H =+H' Hemb 40.0 ft Slope Rise ≔Hslope =⋅Lcrest tan ⎛⎝βtop⎞⎠ 0.997 ft

Reinforcement Length ≔L 28 ft Slope Below Wall ≔βbottom 45 deg

Back Batter ≔α 90 deg

L

H %70

Facing Elements Traffic Loading

Assumed Height ≔Hface 8 in

Assumed Depth ≔bface 8 in Traffic Live Load ≔qt 250 ―― lb ft2

Unit Weight ≔γface 140 ―― lb ft3 Offset to Traffic Load ≔d 4 ft check offset

Width of Traffic Load ≔bf 26 ft

Friction Angle ≔ϕface 45 deg Offset to CL ≔dt =+d ⋅0.5 bf 17 ft

Face Batter ≔ω 14 deg

Reinforcement Spacing Guardrail (y/n)? ≔Rail 1

Normal Reinforcement Spacing ≔sv 12 in y=1, n=0

Facing Reinforcement Spacing ≔svf 12 in Guardrail load in reinforcement

≔Thb =| if else

=Rail 1

5 ft sv lb ft2

0 ―― lb ft2

60 ―― lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 1 of 16

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 2 of 16

Dead Load Min ≔γDCmin 0.9 Earth Surcharge Min ≔γESmin 1.0

Hor. Active Earth Pres. Max ≔γEHmax 1.5 Vert. Active Earth Pres. Max ≔γEVmax 1.35

Hor. Active Earth Pres. Min ≔γEHmin 0.9 Vert. Active Earth Pres. Min ≔γEVmin 1.0

Live Load Surcharge ≔γLS 1.75

GRS Capacity ≔Φcap 0.45 Soil-Sliding Resistance ≔Φτ 1.00

Reinforcement resistance ≔Φreinf 0.40 Bearing Resistance ≔Φbc 0.65

Other Constants

Unit Weight of Water ≔γwater 62.4 ―― lb ft3 Wall Friction ≔δ 0 deg

Equivalent Slope Calculations

≔βint if else

≤Lcrest L return atan

Hslope

L

‖‖ return βtop

≔βext if else

≤Lcrest +L H return atan

Hslope

+L H

‖‖ return βtop

=βint 2.04 deg =βext 0.84 deg

SOIL PARAMETERS Assumed angular rock everywhere, need testing to verify properties (MDD)

Foundation Soil Properties

Friction Angle ≔ϕf' 38 deg Cohesion ≔cf' 100 ―― lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γf 125 ―― lb ft3

Bearing Capacity Factors by Friction Angle AASHTO 2015 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-1

≔BC 0 5.14 1.0 0.0

≔ϕf =⋅ϕf' ―― π

≔Nc =BC ,ϕf 1

61.4 ≔Nq =BC ,ϕf 2

48.9 ≔Nγ =BC ,ϕf 3

Retained Soil Properties

Friction Angle ≔ϕb' 32 deg Cohesion ≔cb' 0 ―― lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γb 130 ―― lb ft3

Active Coefficient ≔Kab =―――――――――――――――――― sin ⎛⎝ +α ϕb'⎞⎠

⋅⋅sin ((α)) sin (( -α δ))

+1

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕb' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ -ϕb' βext⎞⎠ ⋅sin (( -α δ)) sin ⎛⎝ +α βext⎞⎠

0.31

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 3 of 16 lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γr 125 ―― lb ft3

Assumed d=1.5 vs previous 1.0,(MDD)

Maximum diameter of fill ≔dmax 1.5 in Fill Type: Well-graded

≔Kar =―――――――――――――――――― sin ⎛⎝ +α ϕr'⎞⎠

⋅⋅sin ((α)) sin (( -α δ))

+1

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕr' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ -ϕr' βint⎞⎠ ⋅sin (( -α δ)) sin ⎛⎝ +α βint⎞⎠

0.242

Active Coefficient

Passive Coefficient ≔Kpr =―――― +1 sin ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠ -1 sin ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠

4.204

Geosynthetic Reinforcement Properties

Ultimate Reinforcement Strength ≔Tult 8000 ― lb ft Strength at 2% Strain ≔T2 2400 ― lb ft

Factored Reinforcement Strength ≔Tf =⋅Tult Φreinf 3200 ― lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 4 of 16

Reinforced Zone ≔WGRS =⋅⋅H L γr 140000 ― lb ft Slope ≔Wslope =⋅⋅⋅0.5 L2 tan ⎛⎝βint⎞⎠ γr 1745.296 ― lb ft

Facing ≔Wface =⋅⋅H bface γface 3733.333 ― lb ft Facing assumed to have a rectangular cross section.

Calculated Lateral Forces

Retained Soil ≔PA =⋅⋅⋅0.5 Kab γb H2 32217.824 ― lb ft Angle of Action ≔ρ =+(( -90 deg α)) βext 0.84 deg

≔PAH =⋅PA cos ((ρ)) 32214.36 ― lb ft ≔PAV =⋅PA sin ((ρ)) 472.467 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTH =⋅⋅qt Kab H 3097.868 ― lb ft

Factored Vertical Forces

GRS ≔WGRSmax =⋅WGRS γEVmax 189000 ― lb ft ≔WGRSmin =⋅WGRS γEVmin 140000 ― lb ft

Facing ≔Wfacemax =⋅Wface γEVmax 5040 ― lb ft ≔Wfacemin =⋅Wface γEVmin 3733.333 ― lb ft

Slope ≔Wslopemax =⋅Wslope γEVmax 2356.15 ― lb ft ≔Wslopemin =⋅Wslope γEVmin 1745.296 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTVmax =⋅⋅qt γLS ⎛⎝ -L Lcrest⎞⎠ 10500 ― lb ft

Earth Pressure ≔PAVmax =⋅PAV γEVmax 637.831 ― lb ft ≔PAVmin =⋅PAV γEVmin 472.467 ― lb ft

Factored Lateral Forces

Earth Pressure ≔PAHmax =⋅PAH γEHmax 48321.539 ― lb ft ≔PAHmin =⋅PAH γEHmin 28992.924 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTHmax =⋅PTH γLS 5421.268 ― lb ft

Sliding Stability

Total Vertical Force ≔Wmin =++WGRSmin Wfacemin PAVmin 144205.801 ― lb ft

Sliding Friction Factor ≔μf min ⎛⎝ ,tan ⎛⎝ϕf'⎞⎠ tan ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠⎞⎠

Sliding Resistance ≔Rsliding =⋅⋅Wmin μf Φτ 112665.919 ― lb ft

Total Horizontal Force ≔Ptotal =+PAHmax PTHmax 53742.808 ― lb ft

Sliding CDR ≔CDRsliding =――― Rsliding

Ptotal

2.096 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRsliding 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 5 of 16

Facing Moments ≔d1 =⋅H tan ((ω)) 9.973 ft ≔d3 =⋅H tan (( -90 deg α)) 0 ft ≔d2 =-bface ⎛⎝ +d1 d3⎞⎠ -9.306 ft

≔Mf1 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅⋅0.5 d1 H γface⎞⎠ d1 γEVmin 1 ft 185664.5 ⋅lb ft

≔Mf2 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅d2 H γface⎞⎠ d2 d1 γEVmin 1 ft -277252.305 ⋅lb ft

≔Mf3 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅⋅0.5 d3 H γface⎞⎠ d3 d1 d2 γEVmin 1 ft 0 ⋅lb ft

GRS Moment ≔MGRS =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅L H γr⎞⎠

L bface γEVmin 1 ft 2053333.333 ⋅lb ft Assumes equal front and back batter

Slope ≔Mslope =⋅⋅⎛⎝Wslopemin⎞⎠

L bface

1 ft 33742.39 ⋅lb ft

Vert. Earth Pressure ≔MAV =⋅⋅PAVmin

+bface L

1 ft 6772.029 ⋅lb ft

Resisting Moments ≔MR =+++++Mf1 Mf2 Mf3 MGRS Mslope MAV 2002259.947 ⋅lb ft

Hor. Earth Pressure ≔MAH =⋅⋅PAHmax H

1 ft 644287.191 ⋅lb ft

Traffic ≔MTH =⋅⋅PTHmax H

1 ft 108425.369 ⋅lb ft

Driving Moments ≔MD =+MAH MTH 752712.561 ⋅lb ft

Overturning CDR ≔CDRoverturn =――

MR

MD

2.66 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRoverturn 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

Total Vertical Force ≔Wmax =++++WGRSmax Wfacemax Wslopemax PAVmax PTHmax 202455.249 ― lb ft

Eccentricity ≔e =――――

-MD MR

⋅Wmax 1 ft -6.172 ft ≔emax =―――

+L bface

7.167 ft

=if ⎛⎝ ,,>e emax “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

≔ebearing =if (( ,,≤e 0 0 ft e)) 0 ft ≔B' =-⎛⎝ +L bface⎞⎠ ⋅2 ebearing 28.667 ft

Bearing Resistance

Factored Vertical Stress ≔σVF =―― Wmax

B'

7062.392 ―― lb ft2

Nominal Bearing Resistance ≔qn =++⋅cf' Nc ⋅⋅⋅0.5 B' γf Nγ ⋅⋅γf ⎛⎝ -Hemb Hig⎞⎠ Nq 145890 ―― lb ft2

Factored Bearing Resistance ≔qR =⋅qn Φbc 94828.5 ―― lb ft2

Bearing CDR ≔CDRbearing =―― qR σVF

13.427 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRbearing 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 6 of 16

Revised with 0.2*eqn per 2016 TF revisions,(MDD)GRS Nominal Capacity ≔qGRSn =⋅0.2

⋅0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax

Tf sv

Kpr 1672.17 ―― lb ft2

GRS Factored Capacity ≔qGRSf =⋅qGRSn Φcap 752.477 ―― lb ft2

Applied Load ≔Vappliedf =+―――― Wslopemax

L PTVmax

L

459.148 ―― lb ft2

Capacity CDR ≔CDRcap =――― qGRSf

Vappliedf

1.639 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRcap 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

Reinforcement Strength

Matrix calculations, see summary table below. ≔z1 =-⋅2 dt bf 8 ft

Reinforcement Layers ≔z =, ‥sv +sv sv H 1 ft

Surcharge Load Angles of Action ≔βb =atan d z

1.326

≔αb =-atan +d bf z βb 0.212

Matrix size setup ≔i ‥0 -rows ((z)) 1

Reinforcement load due to surcharge ≔σhti qt π

+αbi

⋅sin ⎛ αbi cos ⎛

+αbi ⋅2 βbi

Kar 0.186 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to earth pressure ≔σhwf =⋅⋅⋅γEHmax γr z Kar 45.397 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to traffic ≔σhtf =⋅γLS σht 0.326 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to vehicle impact ≔σhbi =if ⎛

,,≤z i 5 ft Thb 0⎞ lb ft2

Total factored reinforcement load ≔σhf =++σhwf σhtf σhb 105.723 lb ft2

Required factored reinforcement strength ≔Treqf =⋅―――― σhf

0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax sv 170.101 lb ft

Factored Reinforcement CDR ≔CDRreff =―― Tf

Treqf

18.812

Nominal reinforcement load due to earth pressure ≔σhw =⋅⋅γr z Kar 30.265 lb ft2

Total nominal reinforcement load ≔σh =+σhw σht 30.451 lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 7 of 16

0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax sv 48.994 lb ft

Nominal Reinforcement CDR ≔CDRref =―― T2

Treq

48.986

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 8 of 16

Earth Force at Face ≔Fface =+⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅0.72 γr Kar sv svf γEHmax ⋅⋅σht svf γLS 33.012 lb ft

Assumes that traffic railings are setback to AASHTO minimums and do not impart load directly on the wall face. Other scenarios may require additional loading.

Frictional Resistance ≔Rface =⋅⋅⋅⋅γface bface z ― tan ⎛⎝ϕface⎞⎠

62.222 lb ft

≔CDRface =―― Rface

Fface

1.885

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 9 of 16

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 10 of 16

Seismic Design Parameters Site Class: Lat Long.:

Peak Ground Acceleration ≔PGA 0 Seismic parameters obtained from USGS Sesimic Design Maps online tool:

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/ application.php? Spectral Acceleration at 1 sec ≔S1 0

Site Factors ≔FPGA 0

≔Fv 0.0 Seismic Load Factor ≔γEQ 1.0

Extreme Event I

Maximum Acceleration ≔kmax =⋅FPGA PGA 0

Peak Ground Velocity ≔PGV =⋅⋅38 Fv S1 0

Site Reduction Factor ≔αsite =+1 ⋅⋅0.01 ―― H

1 ft

-⋅0.5

⋅Fv S1 kmax

Average Ground Acceleration ≔kav =⋅αsite kmax ?

Kv is typically assumed as 0, unless PGA >0.6. More critical for bridge structure than walls. CalTrans Report CA/UCD- SESM-08-01 and Memo "Seismic Design and Selection of Standard Retaining Walls" 06/16/2013

Vertical Ground Acceleration ≔kv 0

Angle of Seismic Action ≔θ =atan kav -1 kv

Forces on GRS

Weight of GRS ≔W =⋅⋅⋅γr H ((L)) γEVmin 140000 ― lb ft

For wall with no bridge abutment, qb, qrb, b, ab, H2, g1 = 0

≔qb 0 ≔b 0 ≔qrb 0 ≔ab 0 ≔H2 0 ≔γ1 0

Bridge Deadload ≔Wb =⋅⋅qb b γDCmin 0

Road Base ≔Wrb =⋅⋅qrb ⎛⎝ --L b ab⎞⎠ γESmin 0 ft

Effective GRS Weight ≔Weff =⋅⋅⋅0.5 ((H)) H γr 100000 ― lb ft

Effective Roadbase Weight ≔Wrbeff =⋅⋅

H b ab

H2 γ1 0 ft

Average Maximum Acceleration ≔Am =⋅⎛⎝ -1.45 kav⎞⎠ kav ?

Direct SlidingFHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 11 of 16

Direct Sliding

Retained Backfill ≔Fb =⋅⋅⋅0.5 γb Kab H2 32217.824 ― lb ft ≔qrb 0 ―― lb ft2

Road Base ≔Frb =⋅⋅qrb Kab H 0 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔Ft =⋅⋅qt Kab H 3097.868 ― lb ft

Inertia of GRS ≔Pir =⋅⋅γEQ Weff Am ?

Inertia of Roadbase ≔Pirb =⋅⋅γEQ Wrbeff Am ?

Inertia of Sill ≔Pis 0 For wall with no bridge, Pis = 0

Dynamic Earth Pressure Coefficient

≔KAE ⋅――――――――――

cos ⎛⎝ --ϕr' θ ω⎞⎠

⋅⋅cos ((θ)) cos ((ω)) cos (( ++δ ω θ))

+1 ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾2

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕr' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ --ϕr' θ βtop⎞⎠ ⋅cos (( ++δ ω θ)) cos ⎛⎝ -βtop ω⎞⎠

-2

=KAE ?

Dynamic Earth Force ≔PAE =⋅⋅⋅⋅0.5 γr H2 ⎛⎝ -KAE Kar⎞⎠ γEQ ?

Factored Driving Forces ≔FR =+++⋅γEHmax Fb ⋅γLS Ft Pir ⋅0.5 PAE ?

Total Vertical Forces ≔V =W 140000 ― lb ft

Factored Resisting Force ≔RR =⋅⋅Φτ V μf 109379.988 ― lb ft

Sliding CDR ≔CDRslidings =――

RR

FR

? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRslidings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

Overturning Stability

Reinforced Soil Moment ≔Mb =⋅⋅γEHmax Fb ― H

644356.481 lb

Roadbase surcharge Moment ≔Mrb =0 0

Inertial Moments ≔Mi ⋅⋅γEQ Pir ― H

Dynamic Moment ≔MAE ⋅⋅⋅0.5 γEQ PAE (( ⋅0.6 H))

Total Factored Driving Moments ≔MD =++Mb Mi MAE ?

Total Factored Resisting Moments ≔MR =⋅W ― L

1960000 lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 12 of 16

MD

? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRoverturnings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

Eccentricity

Eccentricity ≔eseismic =――――

-MD MR

V ? ≔ebear =if ⎛⎝ ,,≤eseismic 0 0 ft eseismic⎞⎠ ?

=if

,,≤eseismic ― L

“OK” “NO”

Effective Width ≔B' =-⎛⎝ +L bface⎞⎠ ⋅2 ebear ?

Bearing Stability

Bearing Capacity Factors =Nc 61.4 =Nq 48.9 =Nγ 78

Factored Vertical Stress ≔σVF =― V

B'

Nominal Bearing Resistance =qn 145890 ―― lb ft2

Factored Bearing Resistance ≔qR =⋅qn Φbc 94828.5 ―― lb ft2

Bearing CDR ≔CDRbearings =―― qR σVF

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 13 of 16

Project Name: Designer:

Project No.: Checker:

Location: Date:

WALL GEOMETRY

See Figure 1 (page 2) for wall geometry and loading definitions.

Exposed Wall Height =H' 34.0 ft Slope Above Wall =βtop 14 ° Slope Rise =Hslope 1.0 ft

Embedment =Hemb 6.0 ft Distance to crest =Lcrest 4.0 ft Slope Below Wall =βbottom 45 °

Design Wall Height =H 40.0 ft

Reinforcement Length =L 28.0 ft =― L

H %70

Back Batter =α 90 °

Facing Elements

Assumed Height =Hface 8 in Unit Weight =γface 140 ―― lb ft3 Friction Angle =ϕface 45 °

Assumed Depth =bface 8 in Face Batter =ω 14 °

Traffic Loading

Traffic Live Load =qt 250 ―― lb ft2 Width of Traffic Load =bf 26.0 ft Offset to Traffic Load =d 4.0 ft

Offset to CL =dt 17.0 ft

Reinforcement Spacing

Normal Reinforcement Spacing =sv 12 in Facing Reinforcement Spacing =svf 12 in

Strength I Limit State

External Stability

=CDRsliding 2.096 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRsliding 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRoverturn 2.66 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRoverturn 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=if ⎛⎝ ,,>e emax “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRbearing 13.427 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRbearing 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRcap 1.639 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRcap 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 14 of 16

=CDRoverturnings ? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRoverturnings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

=eseismic ? =if

,,≤eseismic ― L

“OK” “NO”

=CDRbearings ? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRbearings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 15 of 16

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 16 of 16

Project Name: CO US50 Designer: DM

Project No.: CO US50 Checker: JMA

Location: Gunnison County, CO Date: 06/19/2019

WALL GEOMETRY STATION 659+00 LT

50% Reinforcement Length 8-Inch Reinf Spacing

See Figure 1 (page 2) for wall geometry and loading definitions.

Exposed Wall Height ≔H' 19 ft Slope Above Wall ≔βtop 14 deg

Embedment ≔Hemb 6 ft Distance to crest ≔Lcrest 4.0 ft

Embedment Ignored ≔Hig 6 ft

Design Wall Height ≔H =+H' Hemb 25.0 ft Slope Rise ≔Hslope =⋅Lcrest tan ⎛⎝βtop⎞⎠ 0.997 ft

Reinforcement Length ≔L 12.5 ft Slope Below Wall ≔βbottom 45 deg

Back Batter ≔α 90 deg

L

H %50

Facing Elements Traffic Loading

Assumed Height ≔Hface 8 in

Assumed Depth ≔bface 8 in Traffic Live Load ≔qt 250 ―― lb ft2

Unit Weight ≔γface 140 ―― lb ft3 Offset to Traffic Load ≔d 4 ft check offset

Width of Traffic Load ≔bf 26 ft

Friction Angle ≔ϕface 45 deg Offset to CL ≔dt =+d ⋅0.5 bf 17 ft

Face Batter ≔ω 14 deg

Reinforcement Spacing Guardrail (y/n)? ≔Rail 1

Normal Reinforcement Spacing ≔sv 8 in y=1, n=0

Facing Reinforcement Spacing ≔svf 8 in Guardrail load in reinforcement

≔Thb =| if else

=Rail 1

5 ft sv lb ft2

0 ―― lb ft2

40 ―― lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 1 of 16

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 2 of 16

Dead Load Min ≔γDCmin 0.9 Earth Surcharge Min ≔γESmin 1.0

Hor. Active Earth Pres. Max ≔γEHmax 1.5 Vert. Active Earth Pres. Max ≔γEVmax 1.35

Hor. Active Earth Pres. Min ≔γEHmin 0.9 Vert. Active Earth Pres. Min ≔γEVmin 1.0

Live Load Surcharge ≔γLS 1.75

GRS Capacity ≔Φcap 0.45 Soil-Sliding Resistance ≔Φτ 1.00

Reinforcement resistance ≔Φreinf 0.40 Bearing Resistance ≔Φbc 0.65

Other Constants

Unit Weight of Water ≔γwater 62.4 ―― lb ft3 Wall Friction ≔δ 0 deg

Equivalent Slope Calculations

≔βint if else

≤Lcrest L return atan

Hslope

L

‖‖ return βtop

≔βext if else

≤Lcrest +L H return atan

Hslope

+L H

‖‖ return βtop

=βint 4.562 deg =βext 1.523 deg

SOIL PARAMETERS Assumed angular rock everywhere, need testing to verify properties (MDD)

Foundation Soil Properties

Friction Angle ≔ϕf' 36 deg Cohesion ≔cf' 100 ―― lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γf 125 ―― lb ft3

Bearing Capacity Factors by Friction Angle AASHTO 2015 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-1

≔BC 0 5.14 1.0 0.0

≔ϕf =⋅ϕf' ―― π

≔Nc =BC ,ϕf 1

50.6 ≔Nq =BC ,ϕf 2

37.8 ≔Nγ =BC ,ϕf 3

56.3

Retained Soil Properties

Friction Angle ≔ϕb' 32 deg Cohesion ≔cb' 0 ―― lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γb 130 ―― lb ft3

Active Coefficient ≔Kab =―――――――――――――――――― sin ⎛⎝ +α ϕb'⎞⎠

⋅⋅sin ((α)) sin (( -α δ))

+1

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕb' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ -ϕb' βext⎞⎠ ⋅sin (( -α δ)) sin ⎛⎝ +α βext⎞⎠

0.312

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 3 of 16 lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γr 125 ―― lb ft3

Assumed d=1.5 vs previous 1.0,(MDD)

Maximum diameter of fill ≔dmax 1.5 in Fill Type: Well-graded

≔Kar =―――――――――――――――――― sin ⎛⎝ +α ϕr'⎞⎠

⋅⋅sin ((α)) sin (( -α δ))

+1

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕr' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ -ϕr' βint⎞⎠ ⋅sin (( -α δ)) sin ⎛⎝ +α βint⎞⎠

0.248

Active Coefficient

Passive Coefficient ≔Kpr =―――― +1 sin ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠ -1 sin ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠

4.204

Geosynthetic Reinforcement Properties

Ultimate Reinforcement Strength ≔Tult 4800 ― lb ft Strength at 2% Strain ≔T2 2400 ― lb ft

Factored Reinforcement Strength ≔Tf =⋅Tult Φreinf 1920 ― lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 4 of 16

Reinforced Zone ≔WGRS =⋅⋅H L γr 39062.5 ― lb ft Slope ≔Wslope =⋅⋅⋅0.5 L2 tan ⎛⎝βint⎞⎠ γr 779.15 ― lb ft

Facing ≔Wface =⋅⋅H bface γface 2333.333 ― lb ft Facing assumed to have a rectangular cross section.

Calculated Lateral Forces

Retained Soil ≔PA =⋅⋅⋅0.5 Kab γb H2 12670.491 ― lb ft Angle of Action ≔ρ =+(( -90 deg α)) βext 1.523 deg

≔PAH =⋅PA cos ((ρ)) 12666.013 ― lb ft ≔PAV =⋅PA sin ((ρ)) 336.852 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTH =⋅⋅qt Kab H 1949.306 ― lb ft

Factored Vertical Forces

GRS ≔WGRSmax =⋅WGRS γEVmax 52734.375 ― lb ft ≔WGRSmin =⋅WGRS γEVmin 39062.5 ― lb ft

Facing ≔Wfacemax =⋅Wface γEVmax 3150 ― lb ft ≔Wfacemin =⋅Wface γEVmin 2333.333 ― lb ft

Slope ≔Wslopemax =⋅Wslope γEVmax 1051.853 ― lb ft ≔Wslopemin =⋅Wslope γEVmin 779.15 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTVmax =⋅⋅qt γLS ⎛⎝ -L Lcrest⎞⎠ 3718.75 ― lb ft

Earth Pressure ≔PAVmax =⋅PAV γEVmax 454.751 ― lb ft ≔PAVmin =⋅PAV γEVmin 336.852 ― lb ft

Factored Lateral Forces

Earth Pressure ≔PAHmax =⋅PAH γEHmax 18999.019 ― lb ft ≔PAHmin =⋅PAH γEHmin 11399.412 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTHmax =⋅PTH γLS 3411.286 ― lb ft

Sliding Stability

Total Vertical Force ≔Wmin =++WGRSmin Wfacemin PAVmin 41732.686 ― lb ft

Sliding Friction Factor ≔μf min ⎛⎝ ,tan ⎛⎝ϕf'⎞⎠ tan ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠⎞⎠

Sliding Resistance ≔Rsliding =⋅⋅Wmin μf Φτ 30320.571 ― lb ft

Total Horizontal Force ≔Ptotal =+PAHmax PTHmax 22410.305 ― lb ft

Sliding CDR ≔CDRsliding =――― Rsliding

Ptotal

1.353 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRsliding 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 5 of 16

Facing Moments ≔d1 =⋅H tan ((ω)) 6.233 ft ≔d3 =⋅H tan (( -90 deg α)) 0 ft ≔d2 =-bface ⎛⎝ +d1 d3⎞⎠ -5.567 ft

≔Mf1 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅⋅0.5 d1 H γface⎞⎠ d1 γEVmin 1 ft 45328.247 ⋅lb ft

≔Mf2 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅d2 H γface⎞⎠ d2 d1 γEVmin 1 ft -67214.593 ⋅lb ft

≔Mf3 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅⋅0.5 d3 H γface⎞⎠ d3 d1 d2 γEVmin 1 ft 0 ⋅lb ft

GRS Moment ≔MGRS =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅L H γr⎞⎠

L bface γEVmin 1 ft 270182.292 ⋅lb ft Assumes equal front and back batter

Slope ≔Mslope =⋅⋅⎛⎝Wslopemin⎞⎠

L bface

1 ft 7012.35 ⋅lb ft

Vert. Earth Pressure ≔MAV =⋅⋅PAVmin

+bface L

1 ft 2217.612 ⋅lb ft

Resisting Moments ≔MR =+++++Mf1 Mf2 Mf3 MGRS Mslope MAV 257525.908 ⋅lb ft

Hor. Earth Pressure ≔MAH =⋅⋅PAHmax H

1 ft 158325.161 ⋅lb ft

Traffic ≔MTH =⋅⋅PTHmax H

1 ft 42641.077 ⋅lb ft

Driving Moments ≔MD =+MAH MTH 200966.238 ⋅lb ft

Overturning CDR ≔CDRoverturn =――

MR

MD

1.281 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRoverturn 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

Total Vertical Force ≔Wmax =++++WGRSmax Wfacemax Wslopemax PAVmax PTHmax 60802.264 ― lb ft

Eccentricity ≔e =――――

-MD MR

⋅Wmax 1 ft -0.93 ft ≔emax =―――

+L bface

3.292 ft

=if ⎛⎝ ,,>e emax “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

≔ebearing =if (( ,,≤e 0 0 ft e)) 0 ft ≔B' =-⎛⎝ +L bface⎞⎠ ⋅2 ebearing 13.167 ft

Bearing Resistance

Factored Vertical Stress ≔σVF =―― Wmax

B'

4617.894 ―― lb ft2

Nominal Bearing Resistance ≔qn =++⋅cf' Nc ⋅⋅⋅0.5 B' γf Nγ ⋅⋅γf ⎛⎝ -Hemb Hig⎞⎠ Nq 51390.208 ―― lb ft2

Factored Bearing Resistance ≔qR =⋅qn Φbc 33403.635 ―― lb ft2

Bearing CDR ≔CDRbearing =―― qR σVF

7.234 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRbearing 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 6 of 16

Revised with 0.2*eqn per 2016 TF revisions,(MDD)GRS Nominal Capacity ≔qGRSn =⋅0.2

⋅0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax

Tf sv

Kpr 1763.471 ―― lb ft2

GRS Factored Capacity ≔qGRSf =⋅qGRSn Φcap 793.562 ―― lb ft2

Applied Load ≔Vappliedf =+―――― Wslopemax

L PTVmax

L

381.648 ―― lb ft2

Capacity CDR ≔CDRcap =――― qGRSf

Vappliedf

2.079 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRcap 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

Reinforcement Strength

Matrix calculations, see summary table below. ≔z1 =-⋅2 dt bf 8 ft

Reinforcement Layers ≔z =, ‥sv +sv sv H 0.667 ft

Surcharge Load Angles of Action ≔βb =atan d z

1.406

≔αb =-atan +d bf z βb 0.143

Matrix size setup ≔i ‥0 -rows ((z)) 1

Reinforcement load due to surcharge ≔σhti qt π

+αbi

⋅sin ⎛ αbi cos ⎛

+αbi ⋅2 βbi

Kar 0.059 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to earth pressure ≔σhwf =⋅⋅⋅γEHmax γr z Kar 30.96 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to traffic ≔σhtf =⋅γLS σht 0.103 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to vehicle impact ≔σhbi =if ⎛

,,≤z i 5 ft Thb 0⎞ lb ft2

Total factored reinforcement load ≔σhf =++σhwf σhtf σhb 71.063 lb ft2

Required factored reinforcement strength ≔Treqf =⋅―――― σhf

0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax sv 65.049 lb ft

Factored Reinforcement CDR ≔CDRreff =―― Tf

Treqf

29.516

Nominal reinforcement load due to earth pressure ≔σhw =⋅⋅γr z Kar 20.64 lb ft2

Total nominal reinforcement load ≔σh =+σhw σht 20.699 lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 7 of 16

0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax sv 18.947 lb ft

Nominal Reinforcement CDR ≔CDRref =―― T2

Treq

126.667

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 8 of 16

Earth Force at Face ≔Fface =+⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅0.72 γr Kar sv svf γEHmax ⋅⋅σht svf γLS 14.929 lb ft

Assumes that traffic railings are setback to AASHTO minimums and do not impart load directly on the wall face. Other scenarios may require additional loading.

Frictional Resistance ≔Rface =⋅⋅⋅⋅γface bface z ― tan ⎛⎝ϕface⎞⎠

41.481 lb ft

≔CDRface =―― Rface

Fface

2.779

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 9 of 16

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 10 of 16

Seismic Design Parameters Site Class: Lat Long.:

Peak Ground Acceleration ≔PGA 0 Seismic parameters obtained from USGS Sesimic Design Maps online tool:

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/ application.php? Spectral Acceleration at 1 sec ≔S1 0

Site Factors ≔FPGA 0

≔Fv 0.0 Seismic Load Factor ≔γEQ 1.0

Extreme Event I

Maximum Acceleration ≔kmax =⋅FPGA PGA 0

Peak Ground Velocity ≔PGV =⋅⋅38 Fv S1 0

Site Reduction Factor ≔αsite =+1 ⋅⋅0.01 ―― H

1 ft

-⋅0.5

⋅Fv S1 kmax

Average Ground Acceleration ≔kav =⋅αsite kmax ?

Kv is typically assumed as 0, unless PGA >0.6. More critical for bridge structure than walls. CalTrans Report CA/UCD- SESM-08-01 and Memo "Seismic Design and Selection of Standard Retaining Walls" 06/16/2013

Vertical Ground Acceleration ≔kv 0

Angle of Seismic Action ≔θ =atan kav -1 kv

Forces on GRS

Weight of GRS ≔W =⋅⋅⋅γr H ((L)) γEVmin 39062.5 ― lb ft

For wall with no bridge abutment, qb, qrb, b, ab, H2, g1 = 0

≔qb 0 ≔b 0 ≔qrb 0 ≔ab 0 ≔H2 0 ≔γ1 0

Bridge Deadload ≔Wb =⋅⋅qb b γDCmin 0

Road Base ≔Wrb =⋅⋅qrb ⎛⎝ --L b ab⎞⎠ γESmin 0 ft

Effective GRS Weight ≔Weff =⋅⋅⋅0.5 ((H)) H γr 39062.5 ― lb ft

Effective Roadbase Weight ≔Wrbeff =⋅⋅

H b ab

H2 γ1 0 ft

Average Maximum Acceleration ≔Am =⋅⎛⎝ -1.45 kav⎞⎠ kav ?

Direct Sliding

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 11 of 16

Retained Backfill ≔Fb =⋅⋅⋅0.5 γb Kab H2 12670.491 ― lb ft ≔qrb 0 ―― lb ft2

Road Base ≔Frb =⋅⋅qrb Kab H 0 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔Ft =⋅⋅qt Kab H 1949.306 ― lb ft

Inertia of GRS ≔Pir =⋅⋅γEQ Weff Am ?

Inertia of Roadbase ≔Pirb =⋅⋅γEQ Wrbeff Am ?

Inertia of Sill ≔Pis 0 For wall with no bridge, Pis = 0

Dynamic Earth Pressure Coefficient

≔KAE ⋅――――――――――

cos ⎛⎝ --ϕr' θ ω⎞⎠

⋅⋅cos ((θ)) cos ((ω)) cos (( ++δ ω θ))

+1 ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾2

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕr' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ --ϕr' θ βtop⎞⎠ ⋅cos (( ++δ ω θ)) cos ⎛⎝ -βtop ω⎞⎠

-2

=KAE ?

Dynamic Earth Force ≔PAE =⋅⋅⋅⋅0.5 γr H2 ⎛⎝ -KAE Kar⎞⎠ γEQ ?

Factored Driving Forces ≔FR =+++⋅γEHmax Fb ⋅γLS Ft Pir ⋅0.5 PAE ?

Total Vertical Forces ≔V =W 39062.5 ― lb ft

Factored Resisting Force ≔RR =⋅⋅Φτ V μf 28380.568 ― lb ft

Sliding CDR ≔CDRslidings =――

RR

FR

? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRslidings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

Overturning Stability

Reinforced Soil Moment ≔Mb =⋅⋅γEHmax Fb ― H

158381.142 lb

Roadbase surcharge Moment ≔Mrb =0 0

Inertial Moments ≔Mi ⋅⋅γEQ Pir ― H

Dynamic Moment ≔MAE ⋅⋅⋅0.5 γEQ PAE (( ⋅0.6 H))

Total Factored Driving Moments ≔MD =++Mb Mi MAE ?

Total Factored Resisting Moments ≔MR =⋅W ― L

244140.625 lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 12 of 16

MD

? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRoverturnings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

Eccentricity

Eccentricity ≔eseismic =――――

-MD MR

V ? ≔ebear =if ⎛⎝ ,,≤eseismic 0 0 ft eseismic⎞⎠ ?

=if

,,≤eseismic ― L

“OK” “NO”

Effective Width ≔B' =-⎛⎝ +L bface⎞⎠ ⋅2 ebear ?

Bearing Stability

Bearing Capacity Factors =Nc 50.6 =Nq 37.8 =Nγ 56.3

Factored Vertical Stress ≔σVF =― V

B'

Nominal Bearing Resistance =qn 51390.208 ―― lb ft2

Factored Bearing Resistance ≔qR =⋅qn Φbc 33403.635 ―― lb ft2

Bearing CDR ≔CDRbearings =―― qR σVF

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 13 of 16

Project Name: Designer:

Project No.: Checker:

Location: Date:

WALL GEOMETRY

See Figure 1 (page 2) for wall geometry and loading definitions.

Exposed Wall Height =H' 19.0 ft Slope Above Wall =βtop 14 ° Slope Rise =Hslope 1.0 ft

Embedment =Hemb 6.0 ft Distance to crest =Lcrest 4.0 ft Slope Below Wall =βbottom 45 °

Design Wall Height =H 25.0 ft

Reinforcement Length =L 12.5 ft =― L

H %50

Back Batter =α 90 °

Facing Elements

Assumed Height =Hface 8 in Unit Weight =γface 140 ―― lb ft3 Friction Angle =ϕface 45 °

Assumed Depth =bface 8 in Face Batter =ω 14 °

Traffic Loading

Traffic Live Load =qt 250 ―― lb ft2 Width of Traffic Load =bf 26.0 ft Offset to Traffic Load =d 4.0 ft

Offset to CL =dt 17.0 ft

Reinforcement Spacing

Normal Reinforcement Spacing =sv 8 in Facing Reinforcement Spacing =svf 8 in

Strength I Limit State

External Stability

=CDRsliding 1.353 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRsliding 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRoverturn 1.281 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRoverturn 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=if ⎛⎝ ,,>e emax “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRbearing 7.234 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRbearing 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRcap 2.079 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRcap 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 14 of 16

=CDRoverturnings ? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRoverturnings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

=eseismic ? =if

,,≤eseismic ― L

“OK” “NO”

=CDRbearings ? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRbearings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 15 of 16

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 04/16/2020 Page 16 of 16

Project Name: CO US50 Designer: DM

Project No.: CO US50 Checker: JMA

Location: Gunnison County, CO Date: 06/19/2019

WALL GEOMETRY STATION 659+00 LT

50% Reinforcement Length 12-Inch Reinf Spacing

See Figure 1 (page 2) for wall geometry and loading definitions.

Exposed Wall Height ≔H' 19 ft Slope Above Wall ≔βtop 14 deg

Embedment ≔Hemb 6 ft Distance to crest ≔Lcrest 4.0 ft

Embedment Ignored ≔Hig 6 ft

Design Wall Height ≔H =+H' Hemb 25.0 ft Slope Rise ≔Hslope =⋅Lcrest tan ⎛⎝βtop⎞⎠ 0.997 ft

Reinforcement Length ≔L 12.5 ft Slope Below Wall ≔βbottom 45 deg

Back Batter ≔α 90 deg

L

H %50

Facing Elements Traffic Loading

Assumed Height ≔Hface 8 in

Assumed Depth ≔bface 8 in Traffic Live Load ≔qt 250 ―― lb ft2

Unit Weight ≔γface 140 ―― lb ft3 Offset to Traffic Load ≔d 4 ft check offset

Width of Traffic Load ≔bf 26 ft

Friction Angle ≔ϕface 45 deg Offset to CL ≔dt =+d ⋅0.5 bf 17 ft

Face Batter ≔ω 14 deg

Reinforcement Spacing Guardrail (y/n)? ≔Rail 1

Normal Reinforcement Spacing ≔sv 12 in y=1, n=0

Facing Reinforcement Spacing ≔svf 12 in Guardrail load in reinforcement

≔Thb =| if else

=Rail 1

5 ft sv lb ft2

0 ―― lb ft2

60 ―― lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 1 of 14

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 2 of 14

Dead Load Min ≔γDCmin 0.9 Earth Surcharge Min ≔γESmin 1.0

Hor. Active Earth Pres. Max ≔γEHmax 1.5 Vert. Active Earth Pres. Max ≔γEVmax 1.35

Hor. Active Earth Pres. Min ≔γEHmin 0.9 Vert. Active Earth Pres. Min ≔γEVmin 1.0

Live Load Surcharge ≔γLS 1.75

GRS Capacity ≔Φcap 0.45 Soil-Sliding Resistance ≔Φτ 1.00

Reinforcement resistance ≔Φreinf 0.40 Bearing Resistance ≔Φbc 0.65

Other Constants

Unit Weight of Water ≔γwater 62.4 ―― lb ft3 Wall Friction ≔δ 0 deg

Equivalent Slope Calculations

≔βint if else

≤Lcrest L return atan

Hslope

L

‖‖ return βtop

≔βext if else

≤Lcrest +L H return atan

Hslope

+L H

‖‖ return βtop

=βint 4.562 deg =βext 1.523 deg

SOIL PARAMETERS Assumed angular rock everywhere, need testing to verify properties (MDD)

Foundation Soil Properties

Friction Angle ≔ϕf' 36 deg Cohesion ≔cf' 100 ―― lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γf 125 ―― lb ft3

Bearing Capacity Factors by Friction Angle AASHTO 2015 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-1

≔BC 0 5.14 1.0 0.0

≔ϕf =⋅ϕf' ―― π

≔Nc =BC ,ϕf 1

50.6 ≔Nq =BC ,ϕf 2

37.8 ≔Nγ =BC ,ϕf 3

56.3

Retained Soil Properties

Friction Angle ≔ϕb' 32 deg Cohesion ≔cb' 0 ―― lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γb 130 ―― lb ft3

Active Coefficient ≔Kab =―――――――――――――――――― sin ⎛⎝ +α ϕb'⎞⎠

⋅⋅sin ((α)) sin (( -α δ))

+1

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕb' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ -ϕb' βext⎞⎠ ⋅sin (( -α δ)) sin ⎛⎝ +α βext⎞⎠

0.312

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 3 of 14 lb ft2 Unit Weight ≔γr 125 ―― lb ft3

Assumed d=1.5 vs previous 1.0,(MDD)

Maximum diameter of fill ≔dmax 1.5 in Fill Type: Well-graded

≔Kar =―――――――――――――――――― sin ⎛⎝ +α ϕr'⎞⎠

⋅⋅sin ((α)) sin (( -α δ))

+1

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕr' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ -ϕr' βint⎞⎠ ⋅sin (( -α δ)) sin ⎛⎝ +α βint⎞⎠

0.248

Active Coefficient

Passive Coefficient ≔Kpr =―――― +1 sin ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠ -1 sin ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠

4.204

Geosynthetic Reinforcement Properties

Ultimate Reinforcement Strength ≔Tult 4800 ― lb ft Strength at 2% Strain ≔T2 2400 ― lb ft

Factored Reinforcement Strength ≔Tf =⋅Tult Φreinf 1920 ― lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 4 of 14

Reinforced Zone ≔WGRS =⋅⋅H L γr 39062.5 ― lb ft Slope ≔Wslope =⋅⋅⋅0.5 L2 tan ⎛⎝βint⎞⎠ γr 779.15 ― lb ft

Facing ≔Wface =⋅⋅H bface γface 2333.333 ― lb ft Facing assumed to have a rectangular cross section.

Calculated Lateral Forces

Retained Soil ≔PA =⋅⋅⋅0.5 Kab γb H2 12670.491 ― lb ft Angle of Action ≔ρ =+(( -90 deg α)) βext 1.523 deg

≔PAH =⋅PA cos ((ρ)) 12666.013 ― lb ft ≔PAV =⋅PA sin ((ρ)) 336.852 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTH =⋅⋅qt Kab H 1949.306 ― lb ft

Factored Vertical Forces

GRS ≔WGRSmax =⋅WGRS γEVmax 52734.375 ― lb ft ≔WGRSmin =⋅WGRS γEVmin 39062.5 ― lb ft

Facing ≔Wfacemax =⋅Wface γEVmax 3150 ― lb ft ≔Wfacemin =⋅Wface γEVmin 2333.333 ― lb ft

Slope ≔Wslopemax =⋅Wslope γEVmax 1051.853 ― lb ft ≔Wslopemin =⋅Wslope γEVmin 779.15 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTVmax =⋅⋅qt γLS ⎛⎝ -L Lcrest⎞⎠ 3718.75 ― lb ft

Earth Pressure ≔PAVmax =⋅PAV γEVmax 454.751 ― lb ft ≔PAVmin =⋅PAV γEVmin 336.852 ― lb ft

Factored Lateral Forces

Earth Pressure ≔PAHmax =⋅PAH γEHmax 18999.019 ― lb ft ≔PAHmin =⋅PAH γEHmin 11399.412 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔PTHmax =⋅PTH γLS 3411.286 ― lb ft

Sliding Stability

Total Vertical Force ≔Wmin =++WGRSmin Wfacemin PAVmin 41732.686 ― lb ft

Sliding Friction Factor ≔μf min ⎛⎝ ,tan ⎛⎝ϕf'⎞⎠ tan ⎛⎝ϕr'⎞⎠⎞⎠

Sliding Resistance ≔Rsliding =⋅⋅Wmin μf Φτ 30320.571 ― lb ft

Total Horizontal Force ≔Ptotal =+PAHmax PTHmax 22410.305 ― lb ft

Sliding CDR ≔CDRsliding =――― Rsliding

Ptotal

1.353 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRsliding 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 5 of 14

Facing Moments ≔d1 =⋅H tan ((ω)) 6.233 ft ≔d3 =⋅H tan (( -90 deg α)) 0 ft ≔d2 =-bface ⎛⎝ +d1 d3⎞⎠ -5.567 ft

≔Mf1 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅⋅0.5 d1 H γface⎞⎠ d1 γEVmin 1 ft 45328.247 ⋅lb ft

≔Mf2 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅d2 H γface⎞⎠ d2 d1 γEVmin 1 ft -67214.593 ⋅lb ft

≔Mf3 =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅⋅0.5 d3 H γface⎞⎠ d3 d1 d2 γEVmin 1 ft 0 ⋅lb ft

GRS Moment ≔MGRS =⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ ⋅⋅L H γr⎞⎠

L bface γEVmin 1 ft 270182.292 ⋅lb ft Assumes equal front and back batter

Slope ≔Mslope =⋅⋅⎛⎝Wslopemin⎞⎠

L bface

1 ft 7012.35 ⋅lb ft

Vert. Earth Pressure ≔MAV =⋅⋅PAVmin

+bface L

1 ft 2217.612 ⋅lb ft

Resisting Moments ≔MR =+++++Mf1 Mf2 Mf3 MGRS Mslope MAV 257525.908 ⋅lb ft

Hor. Earth Pressure ≔MAH =⋅⋅PAHmax H

1 ft 158325.161 ⋅lb ft

Traffic ≔MTH =⋅⋅PTHmax H

1 ft 42641.077 ⋅lb ft

Driving Moments ≔MD =+MAH MTH 200966.238 ⋅lb ft

Overturning CDR ≔CDRoverturn =――

MR

MD

1.281 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRoverturn 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

Total Vertical Force ≔Wmax =++++WGRSmax Wfacemax Wslopemax PAVmax PTHmax 60802.264 ― lb ft

Eccentricity ≔e =――――

-MD MR

⋅Wmax 1 ft -0.93 ft ≔emax =―――

+L bface

3.292 ft

=if ⎛⎝ ,,>e emax “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

≔ebearing =if (( ,,≤e 0 0 ft e)) 0 ft ≔B' =-⎛⎝ +L bface⎞⎠ ⋅2 ebearing 13.167 ft

Bearing Resistance

Factored Vertical Stress ≔σVF =―― Wmax

B'

4617.894 ―― lb ft2

Nominal Bearing Resistance ≔qn =++⋅cf' Nc ⋅⋅⋅0.5 B' γf Nγ ⋅⋅γf ⎛⎝ -Hemb Hig⎞⎠ Nq 51390.208 ―― lb ft2

Factored Bearing Resistance ≔qR =⋅qn Φbc 33403.635 ―― lb ft2

Bearing CDR ≔CDRbearing =―― qR σVF

7.234 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRbearing 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 6 of 14

Revised with 0.2*eqn per 2016 TF revisions,(MDD)GRS Nominal Capacity ≔qGRSn =⋅0.2

⋅0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax

Tf sv

Kpr 1003.302 ―― lb ft2

GRS Factored Capacity ≔qGRSf =⋅qGRSn Φcap 451.486 ―― lb ft2

Applied Load ≔Vappliedf =+―――― Wslopemax

L PTVmax

L

381.648 ―― lb ft2

Capacity CDR ≔CDRcap =――― qGRSf

Vappliedf

1.183 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRcap 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

Reinforcement Strength

Matrix calculations, see summary table below. ≔z1 =-⋅2 dt bf 8 ft

Reinforcement Layers ≔z =, ‥sv +sv sv H 1 ft

Surcharge Load Angles of Action ≔βb =atan d z

1.326

≔αb =-atan +d bf z βb 0.212

Matrix size setup ≔i ‥0 -rows ((z)) 1

Reinforcement load due to surcharge ≔σhti qt π

+αbi

⋅sin ⎛ αbi cos ⎛

+αbi ⋅2 βbi

Kar 0.19 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to earth pressure ≔σhwf =⋅⋅⋅γEHmax γr z Kar 46.44 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to traffic ≔σhtf =⋅γLS σht 0.333 lb ft2

Factored reinforcement load due to vehicle impact ≔σhbi =if ⎛

,,≤z i 5 ft Thb 0⎞ lb ft2

Total factored reinforcement load ≔σhf =++σhwf σhtf σhb 106.774 lb ft2

Required factored reinforcement strength ≔Treqf =⋅―――― σhf

0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax sv 171.791 lb ft

Factored Reinforcement CDR ≔CDRreff =―― Tf

Treqf

11.176

Nominal reinforcement load due to earth pressure ≔σhw =⋅⋅γr z Kar 30.96 lb ft2

Total nominal reinforcement load ≔σh =+σhw σht 31.151 lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 7 of 14

0.7 sv

⋅6 dmax sv 50.119 lb ft

Nominal Reinforcement CDR ≔CDRref =―― T2

Treq

47.886

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 8 of 14

Earth Force at Face ≔Fface =+⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅0.72 γr Kar sv svf γEHmax ⋅⋅σht svf γLS 33.77 lb ft

Assumes that traffic railings are setback to AASHTO minimums and do not impart load directly on the wall face. Other scenarios may require additional loading.

Frictional Resistance ≔Rface =⋅⋅⋅⋅γface bface z ― tan ⎛⎝ϕface⎞⎠

62.222 lb ft

≔CDRface =―― Rface

Fface

1.843

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 9 of 14

Seismic Design Parameters Site Class: Lat Long.:

Peak Ground Acceleration ≔PGA 0 Seismic parameters obtained from USGS Sesimic Design Maps online tool:

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/ application.php? Spectral Acceleration at 1 sec ≔S1 0

Site Factors ≔FPGA 0

≔Fv 0.0 Seismic Load Factor ≔γEQ 1.0

Extreme Event I

Maximum Acceleration ≔kmax =⋅FPGA PGA 0

Peak Ground Velocity ≔PGV =⋅⋅38 Fv S1 0

Site Reduction Factor ≔αsite =+1 ⋅⋅0.01 ―― H

1 ft

-⋅0.5

⋅Fv S1 kmax

Average Ground Acceleration ≔kav =⋅αsite kmax ?

Kv is typically assumed as 0, unless PGA >0.6. More critical for bridge structure than walls. CalTrans Report CA/UCD- SESM-08-01 and Memo "Seismic Design and Selection of Standard Retaining Walls" 06/16/2013

Vertical Ground Acceleration ≔kv 0

Angle of Seismic Action ≔θ =atan kav -1 kv

Forces on GRS

Weight of GRS ≔W =⋅⋅⋅γr H ((L)) γEVmin 39062.5 ― lb ft

For wall with no bridge abutment, qb, qrb, b, ab, H2, g1 = 0

≔qb 0 ≔b 0 ≔qrb 0 ≔ab 0 ≔H2 0 ≔γ1 0

Bridge Deadload ≔Wb =⋅⋅qb b γDCmin 0

Road Base ≔Wrb =⋅⋅qrb ⎛⎝ --L b ab⎞⎠ γESmin 0 ft

Effective GRS Weight ≔Weff =⋅⋅⋅0.5 ((H)) H γr 39062.5 ― lb ft

Effective Roadbase Weight ≔Wrbeff =⋅⋅

H b ab

H2 γ1 0 ft

Average Maximum Acceleration ≔Am =⋅⎛⎝ -1.45 kav⎞⎠ kav ?

Direct Sliding

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 10 of 14

Retained Backfill ≔Fb =⋅⋅⋅0.5 γb Kab H2 12670.491 ― ft ≔qrb 0 ―― lb ft2

Road Base ≔Frb =⋅⋅qrb Kab H 0 ― lb ft

Traffic ≔Ft =⋅⋅qt Kab H 1949.306 ― lb ft

Inertia of GRS ≔Pir =⋅⋅γEQ Weff Am ?

Inertia of Roadbase ≔Pirb =⋅⋅γEQ Wrbeff Am ?

Inertia of Sill ≔Pis 0 For wall with no bridge, Pis = 0

Dynamic Earth Pressure Coefficient

≔KAE ⋅――――――――――

cos ⎛⎝ --ϕr' θ ω⎞⎠

⋅⋅cos ((θ)) cos ((ω)) cos (( ++δ ω θ))

+1 ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾2

⋅sin ⎛⎝ +ϕr' δ⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝ --ϕr' θ βtop⎞⎠ ⋅cos (( ++δ ω θ)) cos ⎛⎝ -βtop ω⎞⎠

-2

=KAE ?

Dynamic Earth Force ≔PAE =⋅⋅⋅⋅0.5 γr H2 ⎛⎝ -KAE Kar⎞⎠ γEQ ?

Factored Driving Forces ≔FR =+++⋅γEHmax Fb ⋅γLS Ft Pir ⋅0.5 PAE ?

Total Vertical Forces ≔V =W 39062.5 ― lb ft

Factored Resisting Force ≔RR =⋅⋅Φτ V μf 28380.568 ― lb ft

Sliding CDR ≔CDRslidings =――

RR

FR

? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRslidings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

Overturning Stability

Reinforced Soil Moment ≔Mb =⋅⋅γEHmax Fb ― H

158381.142 lb

Roadbase surcharge Moment ≔Mrb =0 0

Inertial Moments ≔Mi ⋅⋅γEQ Pir ― H

Dynamic Moment ≔MAE ⋅⋅⋅0.5 γEQ PAE (( ⋅0.6 H))

Total Factored Driving Moments ≔MD =++Mb Mi MAE ?

Total Factored Resisting Moments ≔MR =⋅W ― L

244140.625 lb

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 11 of 14

MD

? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRoverturnings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

Eccentricity

Eccentricity ≔eseismic =――――

-MD MR

V ? ≔ebear =if ⎛⎝ ,,≤eseismic 0 0 ft eseismic⎞⎠ ?

=if

,,≤eseismic ― L

“OK” “NO”

Effective Width ≔B' =-⎛⎝ +L bface⎞⎠ ⋅2 ebear ?

Bearing Stability

Bearing Capacity Factors =Nc 50.6 =Nq 37.8 =Nγ 56.3

Factored Vertical Stress ≔σVF =― V

B'

Nominal Bearing Resistance =qn 51390.208 ―― lb ft2

Factored Bearing Resistance ≔qR =⋅qn Φbc 33403.635 ―― lb ft2

Bearing CDR ≔CDRbearings =―― qR σVF

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 12 of 14

Project Name: Designer:

Project No.: Checker:

Location: Date:

WALL GEOMETRY

See Figure 1 (page 2) for wall geometry and loading definitions.

Exposed Wall Height =H' 19.0 ft Slope Above Wall =βtop 14 ° Slope Rise =Hslope 1.0 ft

Embedment =Hemb 6.0 ft Distance to crest =Lcrest 4.0 ft Slope Below Wall =βbottom 45 °

Design Wall Height =H 25.0 ft

Reinforcement Length =L 12.5 ft =― L

H %50

Back Batter =α 90 °

Facing Elements

Assumed Height =Hface 8 in Unit Weight =γface 140 ―― lb ft3 Friction Angle =ϕface 45 °

Assumed Depth =bface 8 in Face Batter =ω 14 °

Traffic Loading

Traffic Live Load =qt 250 ―― lb ft2 Width of Traffic Load =bf 26.0 ft Offset to Traffic Load =d 4.0 ft

Offset to CL =dt 17.0 ft

Reinforcement Spacing

Normal Reinforcement Spacing =sv 12 in Facing Reinforcement Spacing =svf 12 in

Strength I Limit State

External Stability

=CDRsliding 1.353 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRsliding 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRoverturn 1.281 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRoverturn 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=if ⎛⎝ ,,>e emax “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRbearing 7.234 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRbearing 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

=CDRcap 1.183 =if ⎛⎝ ,,<CDRcap 1.0 “NO” “OK”⎞⎠ “OK”

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 13 of 14

=CDRoverturnings ? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRoverturnings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

=eseismic ? =if

,,≤eseismic ― L

“OK” “NO”

=CDRbearings ? =if ⎛⎝ ,,≥CDRbearings 1.0 “OK” “NO”⎞⎠ ?

FHWA-CFL GRS Wall Calculations 03/26/2020 Page 14 of 14

APPENDIX B

GRS Wall Analysis Preliminarily

Global Stability

1.471.471.471.47

Material Name Color Unit Weight (lbs/ 3) Strength Type Cohesion

(psf) Phi (deg)

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .