Amendment 1 SAI SIR Section J.9 12.27.23.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Surface Awareness Initiative Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693KA7SAI
About this file
This past performance questionnaire is for a contractor providing services under the Surface Awareness Initiative, a program led by the Federal Aviation Administration to improve surface situational awareness. The questionnaire collects performance ratings on quality, timeliness, administration, cost control, and customer satisfaction for a contractor's past work on programs over $5 million involving systems engineering, software development, testing, implementation, training, maintenance and program management. Respondents are asked to indicate whether they would hire or recommend the contractor again and may provide additional comments. Completed questionnaires are due to the FAA no later than March 22, 2024.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Surface Awareness Initiative 12/27/23 Attachment J.9 Past Performance Questionnaire
Offeror/Contractor Name:
Contract Number:
Contract Period of Performance:
Dollar value including options:
Number of systems delivered:
Detailed Description of Product Provided:
| Observed Performance History for our Relevance Evaluation |
| (O) Observed |
(N) Not Observed
Did the contractor perform Systems Engineering functions for a program over $5M?
Did the contractor perform Software and System development functions for a program over $5M?
Did the contractor perform Test and functions for a program over $5M where customer was actively involved?
Did the contractor perform Implementation and Transition for a program over $5M at multiple locations simultaneously with multiple users?
Did the contractor perform Maintenance, Operations, and Logistics for a program over $5M with the customer assuming maintenance and operation of the system?
Did the contractor perform Training for this program at multiple locations, over a period of several years?
Was the contractor responsible for overall Program Management on this contract?
Using the scale below, please select one response, which best describes the Contractor’s Past Performance
| 1 |
| Not meeting |
| 2 |
| Meeting |
| 3 |
| Exceeding |
| 4 |
| Far exceeding |
N/A - Not Applicable
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| N/A |
Quality – Delivered product meeting the technical and contractual requirements
Quality – Demonstrated ability to overcome technical or programmatic conflicts
Quality – Systems Engineering process was effective
Quality – Software Engineering process was effective
Quality – Software and System development was effective
Quality – Maintenance, Operations, and Logistics efforts were effective
Quality – Understood the activities and resources required to successfully transition workload requirements for continuity of mission support
Quality – Identified and mitigated transition risks
Quality – Implemented a transition process/plan that was reasonable and realistic for assumption of full operations and maintenance responsibility by the customer
Quality – Accomplished effective knowledge transfer throughout the system lifecycle to the customer
Quality – Contractor conducted effective training program
Quality – Product Quality Assurance process was effective
Quality – Contractor responsiveness to technical direction was effective
Timeliness – Record of meeting submission of contract or task order deliverables
Timeliness – Record of delivering Systems Engineering products
Timeliness – Record of meeting test milestones and completion of the test phase
Timeliness – Record of delivering software in accordance with a release schedule
Timeliness – Record of delivering developed system in accordance with a contractually agreed to schedule
Timeliness – Record of installing system at customer facilities in accordance with schedule and with minimal revisits
Timeliness – Record of deploying system in accordance with contractually agreed to schedule.
Administration – Compliance with contract terms and conditions and/or task order requirements
Administration – Effectiveness of contractor’s ability to manage contract/task efforts
Administration – Contractor’s willingness to negotiate contractual modifications resulting from changes in contractual and/or technical requirements
Administration – Accuracy and timeliness of administrative reports
Administration Socioeconomic Goals. Met contractual subcontracting goals for utilization of:
Small Businesses (SB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB), Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB), Administration – Ability to provide subcontract management
Cost Control – Accuracy of cost targets and estimates
Cost Control – Ability to alert government of potential future cost issues
Customer Satisfaction – Responsiveness and willingness to meet customer needs
Customer Satisfaction – Promptness of notification to customer in case of program or delivery delays or problems
Customer Satisfaction – Contractor reasonableness, cooperation, and flexibility
Customer Satisfaction – Effectiveness of contractor’s recommended solutions
Other Performance Indicators. Please expand on contractor’s successes and failures.
| Yes |
| No |
Given the choice/authority, I would hire this contractor again?
I would recommend this contractor for other Government contracts.
I have attached additional comments regarding the contractor’s performance.
Respondent Information
Signature:
Phone Number:
Name:
Position/Title/Grade:
Email:
| Length of involvement with Contractor (in years): _____ |
| Address: |
Not later than 1:00PM on March 22th, 2024, please e-mail or mail to:
Federal Aviation Administration
ATTN:
Phillip Moyers, Contracting Officer 600 Independence Ave, SW Washington DC 20001
(202) 267-7165 Phillip.L.Moyers@faa.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .