SWPPP_WA_PRA_OLYM12(2)_Hurricane_Ridge_Rd..pdf

TAB 1: SWPPP/ESCP Narrative

TAB 2: NPDES Permit (Construction General Permit or Correspo:m:ling State Permit)

TAB 3: NOI, EPA/State Acknowledgement, Other Applicable EPA/State Correspondence

TAB 4: Delegation of Authority

TABS: Maps

TAB 6: Erosion/Sediment Control Plan Sheets (phm set and BMP typical details)

TAB 7: Permanent Stabilization and Revegetation Plan (plan sets and details)

TAB 8: SWPPP Amendment Log

TAB 9: Erosion/Sediment Control Inspection Reports and Requirements

TAB 10: Corrective Action Log

TAB 11: Water Quality Monitoring, Reporting Requirements, and Reports

TAB 12: Training Log

TAB 13: Waste and/or Borrow Site Information

TAB 14: Grading and Stabilization.Log

TAB 15: Hazardous Spill Plan

TAB 16: Other Applicable Permits(§ 404, § 401, Oregon Remove-Fill Permit)

TAB 17: NPDES Quality Assurance Checklist

TAB 18: NPDES Notice of Termination (NOT)

TAB 1:

TAB2:

TAB3:

TAB4:

TABS:

TAB6:

TAB7:

TAB8:

TAB9:

TAB 10:

TAB 11:

TAB 12:

TAB 13:

TAB 14:

TAB 15:

TAB 16:

TAB 17:

TAB 18:

SWPPP T ABs (SWPPP Inclusions)

SWPPP/ESCP Narrative

NPDES Permit (Construction General Permit or Corresponding State Permit)

NOi, EPA/State Acknowledgement, Other Applicable EPA/State Correspondence

Delegation of Authority

Maps

Erosion/Sediment Control Plan Sheets (plan set and BMP typical details)

Revegetation Plan (if applicable)

SWPPP Amendment Log

Inspection Reports

Corrective Action Log

Water Quality Monitoring, Reporting Requirements, and Reports (if applicable)

Training/Certification Log

Government-Selected Waste, Borrow, Staging Sites

Grading and Stabilization Log

Hazardous Spill Plan or SPCC

Threatened and Endangered Species and Historic Preservation (Section 106) Documentation

NPDES Quality Assurance Checklist

NPDES Notice of Termination (NOT)

Maintenance requirements: Care must be taken that runoff is directed within construction perimeter to be managed by established control methods already in place. Any uncontrollable runoff must be remedied and additional BMPs put in place.

Control measure: Click here to enter text.

Implementation: Click here to enter text.

Maintenance requirements: Click here to enter text.

Add other measures as needed.

7.4 Stockpiled Soil or Other Erodible Materials

Stockpile management includes measures to minimize surface erosion and sediment transport from soil stockpiles or other erodible materials.

Locate erodible stockpiles away from drainages including storm sewer inlets and culvert inlets.

Locations of stockpiles are shown on the erosion and sediment control plan sheets in TAB 6.

D Not applicable to this project. Reason: Click here to enter text.

If applicable:

Control measure: Silt Fence

Implementation: The silt fence shall be functional before other land disturbing activities take place. Silt fence should be functional throughout the duration of construction and for a long enough duration following construction to allow disturbed areas to stabilize following revegetation and seeding. Please also refer to project schedule, contract, and plan set (Erosion Control section).

Maintenance requirements: Silt fences should be inspected periodically for damage (such as tearing by wind, animals, or equipment) and for sediment that has accumulated. Remove the sediment when it reaches one-half the height of the silt fence. In situations where access is available, machinery can be used. Otherwise, silt should be removed manually. The following are key elements to remember:

• The sediment deposits should be removed when heavy rain or high water is anticipated.

• The sediment deposits should be placed in an area where there is little danger of erosion.

• The silt fence should not be removed until adequate vegetative growth ensures no further erosion of the slopes. Generally, the fabric is cut at ground level, the wire and posts are removed, then the sediment is spread, seeded, and protected (mulched) immediately.

[23]

2017 Construction General Permit (CGP) more than $1,000,000 and can fined up to $2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions.

d. False Statement. The CWA provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or both. If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both. The Act further provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or non-compliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 6 months per violation, or by both.

I. 1 .2.2 Civil Penalties. The CW A provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 30 l, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed the maximum amount authorized by Section 309(d) of the Act, as adjusted pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act (28 U.S.C. § 246 l note) as amended (28 U.S.C. § 246 l note), and codified at 40 CFR § 19 .4.

I. l .2.3 Administrative Penalties. The CW A provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act is subject to an administrative penalty, as follows

a. Class I Penalty. Not to exceed the maximum amounts authorized by Section 309(g) (2) (A) of the Act, as adjusted pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act (28 U.S.C. § 246 l note), as amended (28 U.S.C. § 246 l note), and codified at 40 CFR § 19.4.

b. Class II Penalty. Not to exceed the maximum amounts authorized by Section 309(g)(2)(B) of the Act, as adjusted pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act (28 U.S.C. § 2461 note), as amended, (28 U.S.C. § 2461 note), and codified at 40 CFR § 19 .4.

1.2 Duty to Reapply.

If you wish to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, you must apply for and obtain authorization as required by the new permit once EPA issues it.

1.3 Need to Halt or Reduce Activity Not a Defense.

It shall not be a defense for you in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.

1.4 Duty to Mitigate.

You must take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment.

Page 1-2 of 8

7:

Inspection Requirements for NPDES Compliance

EPA Construction General Permit Part 4 inspection requirements for NPDES compliance:

Inspection Frequency: You must conduct inspections in accordance with one of the two schedules listed below.

You must specify in your SWPPP which schedule you will be following.

1. At least once every 7 calendar days, OR

2. At least once every 14 calendar days and within 24 hours of the end of a storm event of 0.5 inches or greater. (If this option is chosen, a rain gauge is required to be on-site~ The SWPPP should also include a daily rainfall log.)

Case-by-Case Red11cti01ts in Inspection Frequetzcy: You may reduce your inspection frequency to at least once every month if: ·

1. The entire site is temporarily stabilized, 2~ Runoff is unlikely due to winter_conditions (e.g., site is covered with snow, ice, or the ground is frozen), or

3. Construction is occurring during seasonal arid periods in arid areas and semi-arid areas.

Inspection Waiver for Frozen Cotzditions: A waiver of the inspection requirements is av~ilable until one month before thawing conditions are e.xpected to result in a discharge if all of the following requirements are met:

· 1. The project is located in an area where frozen conditions are anticipated to continue for extended periods of time (i.e., more than one month);

2. Land disturbance activities have been suspended; and

3. The beginning and ending dates of the waiver period are documented in the SWPPP.

Qualified Personnel: Inspections must be .conducted by qualified personnel (provided by the operator or cooperatively by multiple operators). "Qualified personnel" means a person knowledgeable in the principles and practice of erosion and sediment controls who possesses the skills to assess conditions at the construction site that could impact stormwater quality and to assess the effectiveness of any sediment and erosion control measures · selected to control the quality of stormwater discharges from the construction activity. ·

Scope of ltzspections: Inspections must include all areas of the site disturbed by construction activity and areas used for storage ofm!lterials that are exposed to precipitation. Inspectors must look for evidence of, or the potential for, pollutants entering the stormwater conveyance system. Sedimentation and erosion control measures must be observed to ensure proper operation. Discharge locations must be inspected to aseertain whether erosion control measures are effective in preventing significant impacts to waters of the United States, where accessible. Where discharge locations are inaccessible, nearby downstream locations must be inspected to the extent that such inspections are practicable. Locations where vehicles enter or exit the site must be inspected for evidence of off-site sediment tracking.

All reports required by tltis permit, including th"e SWPPP, S.WPPP amendnients, and inspection reports must be signed by a person described in Appendix G, Subsection 11.A (below) or by a duly authorized representative of that person.

1. For a corporation: By a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Part, a responsible corporate officer ineans: (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge .of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy- or decision-making functions for the corporation, or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental eompliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.

2. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: By a general partner or the proprietor, respectiv~ly; or

· 3. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: By either a principal executiv~ officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this Part, a principal executive officer of a federal agency includes (i) the chief executive officer of the agency, or (ii) a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit 9fthe agency (e.g., Regional Administrator of EPA). ·

A person is a duly authorized representative only if:

The authorization is made ~n writing by a person described in Appendix G, Subsection 11.A;

The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, positfon of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position); and ·

The signed and dated written authorization is included in the SWPPP. A copy must be submitted to EPA, if requested. ·

SWP~P CONSl'RUCTION SlTE INSPECllON REPO:Q;T

Date oflnspectio~: Start/End Times:

Project Name:

Inspector's Names:

lnspector's Com~~my:

Inspector's Con.tact Information:

Inspectoir's Qualifications (CES.CL or other ceirtification number): Inspector's Qualifications expiration date:

Descdbe present phase of construction

Type ofinspection:

0Regular D Post-storm.event D Reduced inspection frequency period

Has there been a stor~ event since the fasfinspection?

If yes, provide:

Estimated Stom). Start Date & Time:_. -----~- Estimated Storm Duratio:p. (hrs):

Approximate Amount of Precipitation (in): _____ _

Weather at ti:me of this inspection?

D Clear 0Cloudy D Rain D Sleet 0Fog D Snowing D High Winds D Other:

Temperature: ______ _

WFLlID 157-2 (5/201i) l

Site-specific BMPs

• BMP - Describe and give the location of the structural and non-structural BMPs identified in your SWPPP in the BMP column below (add as many BMPs as necessary on the continuation sheets. Include areas that are required to be inspected by the CGP, such as material storage areas that are exposed to precipitation.

• BMP Installed - If a BMP should be installed at the current phase of the project and you marked "No" in the "BMP Installed" column, then you must check "Yes" in the "BMP Action Required?" column

• BMP Action Required? - .If a BMP needs repair, modification, replacement, maintenance or a new BMP is needed or a SWPPP amendment is needed, then a BMP Action is required.

• BMP Action Required, Complete by Date - Before certifying the report, fill in the date when the BMP Action can reasonably be expected to be completed. When a BMP Action is NOT required, leave the "Complete by Date" blank. · ·

• Describe BMP Action, if Needed -Anytime you check "Yes" for "BMP Action Required", then you must also fill in the "Describe BMP Action" column.

• Delay~d Action Item Report - When a BMP Action is required and the Complete by Date is not met, you must then fill out the Delayed Action Item Report to explain why the date was not met Keep the Delayed A~tion Item Report in the SWPPP. ·

• Corrective Action Log - When a BMP Action is required as noted in this report, you must also enter all the

· information for this action in the Corrective Action Log.

BMP & Location BMP BMPAction Describe BMP Action, if Needed Installed? Required?

0Yes 0No LJYes 0No

Complete by Date:

0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No

Comple~ by Date:

0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No

Complete by Date:

0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No

Complete by Date:

0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No

Complete by Date:

0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No

Complete by Date:

0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No

Complete by Date:

0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No

Complete by Date:

Page2 Project Name:

Inspection Date:

Overall Site Issues

• BMP or Activity · -- These are some general ~ite issues that must be assessed during inspections.

• Implemented? - If a BMP or activity shouldbe implemented at the current phase· of the project and you check "No", then you must mark "Yes" in the "Corrective Action Required?" column.

• Corrective Action Required? - When maintenance or some other corrective action is required, ~heck

"Yes" in this co.lumn

• Corrective Action Required, Complete by Date - When a corrective action is required, before certifying the report, fill in the date when the corrective action can re.asonably be expected to be completed. When a corrective action is NOT required, leave thl; "Complete by Date" blank.

• Describe Corrective Action, if Needed -Anytime you check "Yes" in the "Corrective Action Required?"

column, you must fill in the "Describe Corrective Action" column as well.

• Delayed Action Item Report - When a Corrective Action is required and the Complete by Date is not met, you must then fill out the Delayed Action Item Report to explain why the date was not met. Keep the DelayedAction Item Report in the SWPPP.

• Corrective Action Log -When a Corrective Action is required as noted in this report, you must also enter all the information for this action in the Corrective Action Log.

BMP or Activity Implemented? Corrective Describe Corrective Action and Location, if Needed Action Required?

Have stabilization 0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No measures been initiated on slopes and disturbed Complete.by areas not actively being Date:

worked?

Are natural resource 0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No areas (e.g., streams, wetlands, mature trees, Complete by etc.) required by the Date:

SWPPP to be delineated in the field, identified with barriers or markin,gs?

Are perimeter controls LJYes 0No 0Yes 0No and sediment barriers adequately installed Complete by (keyed into substrate) .Date:

and maintained?

Are .storm drain inlets 0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No prpperly protected? Complete by

Date:

Are the construction LJYes LJNo OY~s LJNo exits preventing sediment from being Complete by tracked into the street? Date:

Is trash/litter from work 0Yes lJNo 0Yes LJNo areas collected and placed in covered Complete by dumpsters? Date:

Are washout faciliti~ LJYes 0No 0Yes 0No (e.g., paint, concrete) available, clearly Complete by marked, and maintained? Date:

Page4 Project Name:

BMP or Activity Implemented? Corrective Describe Corrective Action and Location, if Needed Action Required?

8 Are vehicle and 0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No equipment fueling, cleaning, and Complete by maintenance areas free Date:

of spills, leaks, or any other deleterious material?

9 Are materials that are 0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No potential stormwater Complete by contaminants stored Date:

inside or under cover?

IO Are non-stormwater 0Yes 0No 0Yes 0No discharges (e.g., wash Complete by water, dewatering) Date:

properly controlled?

Overall Site Issue Answer to Corrective Question Action Describe Corrective Action and Location, if Needed

Required?

1· At the time of 0Yes UNo 0Yes 0No inspection, are the Complete by discharge points and Date:

receiving waters free of pollutant discharges (sediment deposits, sediment plume or oil

\; sheen)? (See continuation page for list of discharge points)

2 Since the last inspection, 0Yes 0No lJYes 0No are the discharge points Complete by and receiving waters free Date:

of evidence that pollutants had left the project site (for example, sediment deposits, oily residue)? (See continuation page for list .of discharge points)

3 Has Spill Response kit LJYes 0No 0Yes 0No been used since the last Complete by inspection? If yes, has Date:

stock been maintained?

4 Are any additional 0Yes 0No OYes 0No BMPs needed? Complete by

Date:

5 (Other) LJYes QNo LJYes 0No 0 Complete by

Date:

Page5 Project Name:

Scope of Inspection

Did you inspect all areas of the project that are LJYes LJNo If you did not inspect any required.areas, list those required to be inspected by the CGP (areas locations here and explain why they weren't inspected.

disturbed by construction activity, areas used for storage of materials that are exposed to precipitation, discharge locations and locations .where vehiCles enter or exit the site)?

• Check the box below if the project is in compliance with the CGP and the SWPPP:

DI certify that on the date of this inspection, this project was found to be in compliance with the terms of its Storm Water·Pollution Prevention Plan and the current Construction General Permit.

• If there are incidences of non-compliance, then do not check the box above.

• When you don 't check the box above, then you must describe each incident of non-compliance and tlie actions that are·needed to bring the project into compliance.

• If there is an Action Item described in the non-compliance box· that does not already have a "Complete by

Date" assigned elsewhere in this report, then add a completion date Within the box.

Non-Compliance

Incidence of Non-compliance:

Action Item and Complete by Date:

CERTIFICATION STATEMENT

"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there· are signifieant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."

Contractor's Duly Authorized Representative FHW A's Duly Authorized Representative

Print name: Print Name:

Title: Superintendent Title: Project Engineer

Signature: Signature:

Page6 Project Name:

Samples and measurements taken for the purpose of monitoring will be representative of the monitored activity. Records of all monitoring information will be retained, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application.

Records of monitoring information will include:

1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;

2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements;

3. The date(s) analyses were performed

4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;

5. The analytical techniques .or methods used; and

6. The results of such analyses.

.TAB 13: Waste

TAB 16: Agency Correspond~nce Permits ·

Hurricane Ridge Phase II - WA PRA OL YM 12(2) NEPA Re-Evaluation of Environmental Assessment and FONSI

Need for Protect:

The purpose and need of the current project (Phase II) remains as identified in the FONSl and EA which is to rehabilitate and resurface Hurricane Ridge Road from the intersection at Mount Angeles Road to the Hurricane Ridge Visitor Center. Phase I of the project has already been completed.

Selected Alternative:

As part of the EA two alternatives were evaluated. Alternative 1 was the no-action alternative and Alternative 2 the preferred alternative. The current project is Phase II of Alternative 2.

There are no substantial changes between what is currently proposed and what was proposed in the original NEPA documentation. This is addressed in further detail under Affected Environment.

Affected Environment:

Olympic National Park has completed a NEPA reevaluation as the NEPA Lead Agency. Refer to Appendix A for their reevaluation document. The information from their reevaluation document is summarized below.

NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT SECTION 106

No change. The Preferred Alternative had previously been determined to have no effect on historic properties or any properties eligible for listing on the National Register. The current project does not result in any change to the previous determination.

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

The NPS prepared a Biological Assessment (BA) evaluating the effects of Alternative 2, , would have on the threatened northern spotted owl and marbled murrelet. The BA was submitted on May 20, 2004 and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issued its Biological Opinion (BO) on June 22, 2005 determining the proposed action will not jeopardize the continued existence of these species. Per an e-mail from USFWS (see Appendix B), no further consultation is required for the current project.

USDOT ACT OF 1966 - SECTION 4(f)

No change. As legislated in Moving Ahead for Progress for the 21st Century, Section 1119(c)(2), Section 4(f) does not apply to the current project as Federal lands transportation facility, as defined under 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(8), are exempt from Section 4(f); and Hurricane Ridge as part of the National Park System, qualifies as a "Federal lands transportation facility."

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11990 PROTECTION OF WETLANDS

In accordance with Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands FHWA is directed to avoid to the extent possible the long and short term adverse impacts associated with the destruction

Hurricane Ridge Phase II - WA PRA OLYM 12(2) NEPA Re-Evaluation of Environmental Assessment and FONS!

or modification of wetlands and to avoid direct or indirect support of new construction in wetlands wherever there is a practicable alternative. Alternative 2 and the current project are both designed to remain within the roadway prism and wilf not have any impact on wetlands or other Waters of the United States.

Conclusion

The proposed action has also been evaluated for impacts to environmental resources and recreational experiences valued by NPS and visitors to Olympic National Park.

After analyzing the resource data previously collected by the NPS and WFLHD, no substantial or unusual project impacts are anticipated as a result of the currently proposed project.

Environmental concerns identified through interagency coordination can be addressed through appropriate contract restrictions and mitigation. The original NEPA review remains valid and no further environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDED BY:

·scott Smithline Environmental Manager

~Potentially affect pr8$ently unidentified cultural resources

Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic features, terrain, setting, landscape ~elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

~Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures)

Other (please specify):

6. Supporting Study Data:

(Attach if feasible; if action is· in a plan, EA or EIS, give name and project or page number.)

B. REVIEWS BY CULTURAL RESOURCE SPECIALISTS

. The park 106 coordinator requested review by the park's cultural resource specialist/advisors as Indicated by check-off boxes or as follows:

[ x ] 106 Advisor Name: Dave Conca Date: 08/0512016

Check If project does not Involve ground disturbance [ ] Assessment of Effect: No Potential to Cause Effect _x_ No Historic Properties Affected No Adverse Effect Adverse Effect _x_ Streamlined Review Recommendations for conditions or stipulations:

Doc Method: Streamlined Review (PA) Streamlined Activity:

3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking Areas

No Reviews From: Curator, Archeologist, Historical Architect, Historian, Other Advisor, Anthropologist, Historical Landscape Architect

C. PARK SECTION 106 COORDINATOR'S REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Assessment of Effect:

No Potential to Cause Effects ----x No Historic Properties Affected

No Adverse Effect ---- Adverse Effect ----

2. Documentation Method:

[ ] A. STANDARD 36 CFR PART 800 CONSULTATION

Further consultation under 36 CFR Part 800 is needed.

[ X) B. STREAMLINED REVIEW UNDER THE 2008 SERVICEWIDE PROGRAMMATIC 'AGREEMENT (PA)

Assessment of Effect Form - Hurricane Ridge Road Rehabilitation - Section III - PEPC ID: 66659 i•

• NOT)