Amendment 2 - 47PH0825R0001 2024 12 13.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Kika De La Garza Land Port of Entry Border Roadway Improvement and Construction (BRIC)

Pharr, TX - RFP No. 47PH0825R0001

See Attached.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

GSA, PBS, Acquisition Management Division 819 Taylor Street, Floor 11 Fort Worth, TX 76210 Attn: Ashley Morgan, Contracting Officer

12/13/2024

1 28

AMENDMENT 2 – Kika De La Garza Land Port of Entry Border Roadway Improvement and Construction (BRIC), Pharr, TX , RFP No. 47PH0825R0001

This amendment is issued to update the following:

1. Pre-Proposal/Site Visit Sign In Sheets

2. Pre-Proposal Conference Meeting Minutes

3. Updated Bid Sheets

4. Updated Factor 1 and Factor 2 Questionnaires

5. Questions received and Government response

1. See attached sign in sheets from the pre-proposal conference held on December 10, 2024 and site visit held of December 11, 2024.

2. See attached Pre-Proposal conference meeting minutes.

3. See updated bid sheets – corrected CLIN numbers.

4. See updated Factor 1 and 2 Questionnaires to include the project title and Solicitation number.

5. See attached questions received and official Government response.

GSA Public Buildings Service Greater Southwest Region

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE MINUTES

KIKA DE LA GARZA LAND PORT OF ENTRY (LPOE) BORDER ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION (BRIC) PROJECT, PHARR, TX

SOLICITATION NUMBER: 47PH0825R0001

DATE AND TIME: December 10, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. CST LOCATION: Virtual/Google Meet

I. PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION

Design-Build construction services for the Kika De La Garza Land Port of Entry (LPOE) Border Roadway Improvements and Construction (BRIC) project, located at 9901 S. Cage Blvd, Pharr, TX 78577.

II. INTRODUCTIONS

• GSA Contracting Officer: Ashley Morgan

• GSA Project Manager & Contracting Officer’s Representative: Adena Alarcon

• GSA Site Visit Coordinator: Stephen Cox

• GSA Civil Subject Matter Expert (SME): Mark Woods

III. MEETING PURPOSE

This meeting is to brief prospective offerors on the nature of the work, to clarify the solicitation, to identify any ambiguities in the solicitation, and to answer any questions.

During this meeting, all technical questions will be directed to the GSA Project Manager.

All administrative and contracting questions will be directed to the Contracting Officer.

"No oral statement made by a government representative during this pre-proposal conference, nor any written record of such oral statements as may be made and subsequently furnished to the offeror, will be deemed to have the effect of adding to, modifying, or otherwise varying from the written provisions of the solicitation (including, but not limited to specifications, drawings, and written amendments to the solicitation). In the event the discussion or questions raised during the pre-proposal conference and site walk indicate a need to modify the solicitation, an amendment to the solicitation shall be issued in writing; and such amendment to the solicitation shall be acknowledged in the same manner and under the same conditions as all other written amendments to a solicitation."

IV. PROJECT OVERVIEW (PM)

A. Background

The Kika De La Garza LPOE is the facility that provides controlled entry into or departure from the United States (U.S.) for persons and cargo arriving as commercial, non-commercial, or pedestrian traffic. The LPOE houses the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other federal inspection services (FIS) agencies responsible for the enforcement of federal laws pertaining to immigration, drugs, agriculture, wildlife, smuggling, and commerce. Note, CBP is primary customer agency for this project.

B. Description of Project

This design-build project involves roadway repair and replacement of approximately 565,700 square feet (sf) of concrete pavement, using Low Embodied Carbon (LEC) materials, to include LEC asphalt, concrete and steel. The repairs consist of complete reconstruction, surface reconstruction, mill and 2” asphalt overlay, joint sealing, patching, and the select replacement of 8” – 13” thick reinforced concrete. Construction phasing will be required to allow for continued LPOE traffic flow and operation during construction. This project consists of twenty-two (22) sites within the LPOE.

C. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022, Pub. L. No. 117-169, enacted in August 2022, provided GSA with significant funding for (a) measures necessary to convert facilities to high-performance green buildings, (b) acquisition and installation of construction materials and products with substantially lower levels of embodied greenhouse gas emissions, and (c) emerging and sustainable technologies. The Contract resulting from this Solicitation will be funded in part by IRA appropriations, and it contains numerous IRA-specific requirements. Requirements include, but are not limited to, requirements regarding pricing, invoicing, submittals, materials, and construction. In addition, please note that this Solicitation contains an evaluation factor favoring certain construction materials with the lowest possible levels of embodied carbon. Offerors shall carefully review this Solicitation, the Agreement, the Statement of Work, the Specifications, and the Drawings. Offerors are responsible for accurately pricing and, if successful, fully performing all Contract requirements.

D. Other information (i.e. site hours of operation, emergency building contacts, etc)

1. Building Management Specialist:

Eluid Barron 956-489-1772

Port Hours of Operations: 6am -11:50pm

V. PROCUREMENT INFORMATION (CO)

A. General Information

1. This requirement is set-aside for small business concerns, in accordance with FAR 19.

2. The Government contemplates award of a Firm-Fixed-Price contract resulting from this solicitation.

NOTE: Issuance of the Solicitation does not warrant that funds are presently available for award of a Contract. Award of the contract shall be subject to the availability of appropriated funds, and the Government shall incur no obligation under this Solicitation in advance of such time as funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for the purpose of contract award.

3. The selected contractor must agree to hold the pricing for 120 days.

4. The contract will include a base award for design services, and twenty-two (22) construction options (for each site) as described in the Statement of Work (SOW) dated November 4, 2024.

a. The total period of performance (POP) for this project is 460 calendar days from issuance of the Design Notice to Proceed

(NTP).

5. Davis-Bacon Wage Rates will be applicable to the project and the selected contractor must adhere to the current wage rates. See Amendment 1 for updated wage determination.

6. A bid guarantee is required and shall be submitted electronically with proposals.

7. Payment and Performance bonds will be required within ten days after notice of acceptance of proposal, and shall be sent via email to the Contracting Officer, Ashley Morgan at ashley.morgan@gsa.gov.

8. The selected contractor (and all its employees) must go through a security clearance and all employees are required to have an ID badge.

9. An Offeror is required to be registered in System for Award Management (SAM) when submitting an offer or quotation and at time of award.

10. Four Factors:

mailto:ashley.morgan@gsa.gov

(1) Past Experience and Performance of the Company 35%

(2) Past Performance, Experience, and Qualifications of Key Personnel 30%

(3) Management Plan 20%

(4) Sustainability - LEC Materials 15% *Offerors shall complete the “IRA Sustainability Factor Table” attached to this solicitation (attachment 4) by filling out the applicable IRA Limit they commit to meet for each IRA-Eligible Material (concrete, asphalt, cement and steel). Based upon the offeror’s selection in the “IRA Limit Commitment” column, the associated Raw Score, the Weighted Score, and the Total Weighted Score will be automatically calculated.

In addition, for each IRA-Eligible Material identified in the IRA Sustainability Factor Table, offerors shall submit Environmental Product Declaration (EPDs) listing that material’s Global warming Potential (GWP). Such EPDs must meet the standards reflected in GSA’s IRA Low Embodied Carbon asphalt, concrete, cement, and steel requirements (see Compliance Documentation criteria listed for each IRA-Eligible Material).

B. Requests for Information (RFIs)/Questions

1. RFIs/Questions due date:

All questions shall be submitted in writing and sent via email to the Contracting Officer, Ashley Morgan at ashley.morgan@gsa.gov, no later than December 18, 2024. Answers to all questions received will be included in an amendment to the solicitation.

C. Site Visit

1. A site visit has been scheduled for 10:00 a.m. CST on December 11, 2024 at the Kika De La Garza LPOE, located at 9901 S. Cage Blvd, Pharr, TX 78577. Mr. Stephen Cox will be your Point of Contact. He can be reached at 361-251-9973

2. No walk-ins without an invitation will be permitted to attend the site visit. The maximum number of attendees for a company is three (3).

Those persons participating in the site visit should have already sent in their information per the solicitation.

3. Map – meeting location

D. Proposal Requirements

1. Proposal due date:

Offers conforming to the requirements of the Solicitation must be submitted via email to the Contracting Officer, Ashley Morgan at ashley.morgan@gsa.gov, no later than 2:00 p.m. CST January 6, 2024 (See Solicitation Section I.H Receipt of Offers for additional details).

2. Proposal Contents:

Proposals shall consist of the following documents, completed and executed in accordance with the Solicitation:

a. Price Proposal (Solicitation Section II.C)

b. Technical Proposal (Solicitation Section II.D)

c. Representations and Certifications (Solicitation Section II.E(1))

d. Standard Form 24, Bid Bond

e. GSA Form 527 – Contractor’s Qualification and Financial Information

(Solicitation Section II.E(2)) (See Solicitation Section I.H Receipt of Offers for additional details).

E. Basis for Award

1. The approach to Proposal Evaluation for this procurement will be pursuant to the best value tradeoff concept. After evaluation of Final Proposal Revisions are completed, the Government will make an award to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the Solicitation and provides the best value to the Government, cost or price and technical factors as listed in the Solicitation.

2. For this Solicitation, technical quality is significantly more important than cost or price. As proposals become more equal in their technical merit, the cost or price becomes more important.

VI. QUESTIONS – PLEASE SUBMIT ALL QUESTIONS VIA EMAIL TO

ASHLEY.MORGAN@GSA.GOV BY DECEMBER 18, 2024.

mailto:Ashley.morgan@gsa.gov

Sign In Sheet – Pre-Proposal Conference (Virtual) Solicitation/RFP #47PH0825R0001 – Kika De La Garza LPOE BRIC Project, Pharr, TX

Name Company Email Phone

Adena Alarcon GSA Adena.alarcon@gsa.gov (915) 222-1089

Ashley Morgan GSA Ashley.morgan@gsa.gov

(817) 223-9839

Temica Stewart GSA Temica.stewart@gsa.gov (817) 201-7945

Jeff Kang GSA Jeffrey.kang@gsa.gov

(682) 210-1163

Stephen Cox GSA Stephen.t.cox@gsa.gov

(361) 251-9973

Mark Woods GSA Mark.woods@gsa.gov

(817) 271-2094

Sarah Bigger Wilson & Company Sarah.bigger@wilsonco.com (505) 348-4064

Alexander Cadet Wilson & Company Alexander.cadet@wilsonco.com (915) 298-8512

Rudy De La Rosa McKenzie Construction & Site Development rudy@mckenzieconst.com (361) 228-6629

David De Leon CBP david.deleon1@cbp.dhs.gov (956) 753-1742

Jorge Fernandez Miranda Williams Charles jorge.fernandez@williamcharles.com (773) 951-6654

Scott Foster Benham Design, LLC scott.foster@benham.com (918)521-7338

Alfonso Garcia Ultimate Concrete

LLC

aagarcia.uc@gmail.com (915) 408-1871

Ashley Hardy McKenzie Construction & Site Development ashley@mckenzieconst.com

(919) 437-9109

Vincent Martinez Wilson & Company, Inc.

vincent.martinez@vitalgrp.net Unknown

Valeri Poyato Alamo City Constructors, Inc.

v.poyato@alamocityconstructors.com (786) 214 - 0567

Juan C. Salcido Ultimate Concrete

LLC

jcsalcidouc@gmail.com

(915) 238-9890

Victoria Smith McKenzie Construction & Site Development

Victoria@mckenzieconst.com (703) 505-8346

Alex Q Unknown Unknown Unknown

Robert Saenz

Halff Associates rsaenz@halff.com (956) 445-5220

Richard Eden AIS BCSS, LLC reden@ais-infrastructurellc.com (470) 806-6770 mailto:Adena.alarcon@gsa.gov mailto:Ashley.morgan@gsa.gov mailto:Temica.stewart@gsa.gov mailto:Jeffrey.kang@gsa.gov mailto:Stephen.t.cox@gsa.gov mailto:Mark.woods@gsa.gov mailto:Sarah.bigger@wilsonco.com mailto:Alexander.cadet@wilsonco.com mailto:rudy@mckenzieconst.com mailto:david.deleon1@cbp.dhs.gov mailto:jorge.fernandez@williamcharles.com mailto:scott.foster@benham.com mailto:aagarcia.uc@gmail.com mailto:ashley@mckenzieconst.com mailto:vincent.martinez@vitalgrp.net mailto:v.poyato@alamocityconstructors.com mailto:jcsalcidouc@gmail.com mailto:Victoria@mckenzieconst.com mailto:rsaenz@halff.com mailto:reden@ais-infrastructurellc.com

Antonio Sweezey AIS BCSS, LLC tswezey@ais-infrastructurellc.com (470) 829- 5045 mailto:tswezey@ais-infrastructurellc.com

U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Greater Southwest Region

Pre-Bid Site Visit (Solicitation #47PH0825R0001) IRA Border Roadway Improvements Pharr LPOE

December 11, 2024 @ 10:00 am CST

Location: Pharr LPOE, Pharr, Texas

Name (Print) Signature Organization Phone Email Address Scott Tyler Foster Benham Design LLC (918)521-7338 scott.foster@benham.com

Randy Price William Charles Construction (815)509-4274 randy.price@williamcharles.com

Richard Eden AIS BCSS, LLC (470) 806-6770 reden@ais-infrastructurellc.com

Antonio L Swezey AIS BCSS, LLC (470) 829- 5045 tswezey@ais-infrastructurellc.com

Jesse Mark Guzman Ultimate Concrete LLC 810-542-5525 jesse.m.guzman@gmail.com

Timothy Robert Noe Ultimate Concrete LLC 619-454-1497 timrnoe@gmail.com

Rudy De La Rosa McKenzie Construction & Site Development

(361) 228-6629 rudy@mckenzieconst.com

Robert Saenz Halff Associates, Inc. (956) 522-0395 rsaenz@halff.com mailto:scott.foster@benham.com mailto:randy.price@williamcharles.com mailto:reden@ais-infrastructurellc.com mailto:tswezey@ais-infrastructurellc.com mailto:jesse.m.guzman@gmail.com mailto:timrnoe@gmail.com mailto:rudy@mckenzieconst.com

PLEASE SEE THE BELOW QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES RECEIVED AS OF THE DATE OF

THIS AMENDMENT.

Q1: Would GSA consider alternative means of construction? Primarily by reconsidering all areas calling for HMAC overlay or reconstruction to instead be replaced with concrete pavement, and for the HMAC base under proposed areas of CRCP replacement to either be a pre-engineered geogrid material or any other possible base layer which could act in the same capacity.

A1: No, not at this time.

Q2: If CBP or port authority activity directly impacts the construction schedule, causing delays, will contractors be entitled to claims for time extensions or general conditions?

A2: As referenced in The Agreement, please refer to GSAR Clause 552.211-13, Time Extensions.

Q3: The contractor is bidding on several Border Roadway Improvement and construction (BRIC) projects, with bids scheduled just a few days apart. For Factor 1:

Past Experience and Performance of the Company, the same projects will be used to demonstrate past experience.

Would it be acceptable to submit the same questionnaire completed once by the end user, instead of asking them to fill out the same form multiple times?

A3: It is up to the Offeror to submit the questionnaire or Final CPARs with their technical proposal by the due date and time set forth in the Solicitation. Each response should annotate the solicitation # and project title. See updated Questionnaires for Factor 1 & 2.

Q4: According to the Solicitation Document, Section II.B "Proposal Format," paragraph 2, the technical proposal is limited to 40 pages in 8.5" x 11" vertical (portrait) format.

Can the contractor include some pages in horizontal (landscape) format for specific items, such as past performance project resumes, the project organizational chart, and/or the proposed/planned schedule?

A4: The schedule is not included in the Factor or proposal page count limit; therefore it can be submitted in horizontal (landscape) format. All other proposal contents shall be submitted in accordance with the solicitation requirements.

Q5: According to the solicitation documents, the contractor must submit three specific attachments (pricing, technical, and LEC - PDF & Excel) as part of their proposal. As an instance, the technical section of the proposal is limited to 40 pages, with additional information such as experience questionnaires and other relevant details not counting toward the 40-page limit.

Can the contractor include additional information, such as past experience questionnaires (for the technical proposal), GSA Form 527, and financial statements, as appendices in a separate attachment? Additionally, is it permissible to submit an additional attachment with the proposal overview, including a cover page and other relevant information not covered in all other sections?

A5: The GSA Form 527, Bid Bond, Representations and Certifications do not count towards the page limit and shall be submitted with the Price Proposal. Past experience questionnaires or Final CPARS, and Environmental Product Declarations (EPD’s) required will not count toward the page number limit. The solicitation describes what is included in the cover page; the cover page will not count towards the page limit.

Q6: To confirm what was mentioned during the World Trade Bridge pre-proposal meeting on 12/10/2024:

Under attachment 4 "LEC Material IRA Sustainability Factor Table", for the "Cement" data input, if contractors are able to procure concrete which meets the GSA IRA Limits, they are to assign the GWP value for that concrete to the cement as well. Could you please verify this is correct?

A6: Pending

Solicitation #47PH0825R0001 Pharr BRIC

PAST EXPERIENCE AND

PERFORMANCE OF THE COMPANY

QUESTIONNAIRE

FACTOR 1

A. Construction Firm: _________________________________________________

B. Reference Information:

Name:___________________________________________________________

Company:________________________________________________________ Telephone No.:____________________________________________________ Title:____________________________________________________________ ContractNo._______________________________________________________ Location of Contract Performance:____________________________________ Completion Date:__________________________________________________ Estimated price/cost for services:______________________________________ Type of space/building: _____________________________________________ Type of Contract:_________________________________________________

Actual Sq. Ft. In Project: _____________ New Construction_____________

Number of Stories in Bldg: ___________ Renovation___________________

C. Questions: (Some questions may not apply to your contract)

1. What was the actual work performed by the Contractor?

SCHEDULE

1. Did the Contractor complete the project on schedule?

____Completed prior to originally scheduled completion date.

____Completed by original scheduled completion date.

____Completed within agreed to extended completion date.

____Failed to meet project completion date.

____Not applicable or don’t know

GSolicitation #47PH0825R0001 Pharr BRIC

2. To what extent did the Contractor adhere to significant milestones during the Preconstruction Phase?

____Consistently improved scheduled milestone dates.

____Exceeded scheduled milestone requirements.

____Typically delivered as scheduled but occasionally missed milestone dates.

____Contractor rarely met scheduled milestone requirements.

____Not applicable or don’t know

3. How responsive was the Contractor in addressing unforeseen /unanticipated conditions?

____Consistently exercised a pro-active approach.

____Demonstrated some initiative in exercising a pro-active approach.

____Rarely demonstrated a pro-active approach.

____Never demonstrated a pro-active approach.

____Not applicable or don’t know

4. How effectively was the official CPM schedule used as a working tool?

____Consistently used to manage including fragnets.

____Used primarily to measure major milestone progress.

____Approached as a contract requirement nuisance.

____Did not submit an acceptable CPM schedule.

____Not applicable or don’t know

BUDGET

1. Did the Contractor complete the project on budget?

____Completed under budget.

____Completed on budget.

____Completed over budget without outstanding claims.

____Completed over budget with outstanding claims.

____Not applicable or don’t know

2. Did the Contractor submit reasonably priced change proposals from Subcontractors?

____Consistently submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

____Typically submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

____Submitted fair and reasonably priced proposals some of the time.

____Rarely submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

____Not applicable or don’t know

3. How did the Contractor manage Contractor and subcontractor claims?

____Resolved without requiring Owner intervention.

____Agreed and resolved through formal or informal ADR process.

____Submitted as a fully articulated well rationalized claim.

____Sponsored subcontractor claim to owner without independent analysis or validation.

____Not applicable or don’t know

QUALITY

1. How well did the Contractor comply with contract requirements?

____Consistently surpassed contract requirements.

____Exceeded contract requirements.

____Met the minimum requirements.

____Did not meet the minimum requirements.

____Not applicable or don’t know

2. Did they conform to standards of good workmanship?

____Consistently surpassed standards.

____Exceeded standards.

____Met the standards.

____Did not meet standards.

____Not applicable or don’t know

3. How well did the Contractor adapt to changing requirements while maintaining a desired level of quality?

____Extremely effective.

____Considerably effective.

____Effective.

____Ineffective.

____Not applicable or don’t know

4. Did Contractor adhere to the Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan?

____Proactive in implementing the Plan.

____Used basically as a general guide.

____Approached as a Contract requirement but not a working tool.

____Not able to produce an acceptable QC/QA Plan.

____Not applicable or don’t know

TEAMWORKING

1. How well did the Contractor work with the Owner, Architect and the other technical advisors?

____Extremely cooperative.

____Very cooperative.

____Generally cooperative.

____Not cooperative.

____Not applicable or don’t know

2. How effective was the Contractor’s on-site management team?

____Extremely effective.

____Very effective.

____Generally effective.

____Ineffective.

____Not applicable or don’t know

3. Is the Contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of project related third party entities (i.e. tenants, other contractors or vendors)?

____Extremely cooperative.

____Very cooperative.

____Generally cooperative.

____Not cooperative.

____Not applicable or don’t know

4. Did the Contractor maintain an excellent project team throughout the duration of the project?

____Maintained the same team throughout the duration of the project.

____Minor adjustments to the support team were made during the project.

____Significant changes to key personnel of the project team were made during the project.

____Contractor maintained no consistency in key personnel during the project.

____Not applicable or don’t know

5. How effective was the Contractor in selecting and managing the Subcontractors?

____Subcontractors were proactive in problem resolution ____Subcontractors generally responded to Contractor’s direction with a positive attitude ____Subcontractors responded to Contractor’s direction with some hesitancy ____Subcontractors responded to Contractor’s direction with some resistance ____Not applicable or don’t know

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

1. How well did the Contractor coordinate the work of the subcontractors?

____Proactive.

____Moderately active.

____Relied primarily on subcontractors coordinating between themselves.

____Provided virtually no direct coordination of work.

____Not applicable or don’t know

2. How well did the Contractor control the quality & timeliness of submittals?

____Completed in accordance with approved schedule.

____Did not always meet the schedule, however, project schedule was not impacted by this.

____Completed with only a few concessions from the Owner.

____Significantly impacted the project schedule and quality.

____Not applicable or don’t know

3. How appropriately did the Contractor utilize the RFI process?

____Primarily used to document resolution of drawing and specification clarifications.

____Primarily used to document a question, if the answer is not immediately apparent.

____Primarily used to pass-through subcontractor questions.

____Primarily used as a mechanism to pursue change orders and claims.

____Not applicable or don’t know

4. How efficiently did the Contractor complete the punchlist and close out the contract?

____Punchlist and Close-out completed within 1 month of substantial completion.

____Punchlist and Close-out completed within 4 months of substantial completion.

____Punchlist and Close-out completed within 1 year of substantial completion.

____Punchlist and Close-out completed later than 1 year after substantial completion.

____Not applicable or don’t know

SAFETY

1. Did the Contractor implement an effective accident prevention program?

____Extremely safety conscious.

____Generally safety conscious.

____Occasionally safety conscious.

____Rarely safety conscious.

____Not applicable or don’t know

2. What was the actual Safety record?

____No actual loss time accidents.

____Minimal minor accidents.

____Minimal actual loss time accidents.

____One or more major loss time accidents.

____Not applicable or don’t know

3. How was the Contractor’s Safety Incentive program received by the workers?

____Virtually all worker enforced construction safety practices.

____Most workers enforced construction safety practices.

____Supervisors were often needed to enforce safety practices.

____Owner had to consistently remind Contractor to enforce safety practices.

____Not applicable or don’t know

GENERAL

1. List the names of the Contractor’s Key Staff and circle their Overall Performance:

Project Manager ________________________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor) Project Superintendent____________________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor) Project Engineer________________________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor) Quality Control Superintendent____________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor)

Project Scheduler_______________________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor)

2. Circle the Contractor’s Overall Performance (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor)

3. If you had a choice, would you contract with the Contractor again? Why or Why not?

4. Do you know of any other projects performed by this Contractor? Do you have any other comments?

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR CLARIFICATIONS:

Evaluator:_______________________________________ Date:________________

PAST PERFORMANCE, EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

OF KEY PERSONNEL QUESTIONNAIRE

FACTOR 2

CONTRACTOR:_________________________________________________

KEY PERSONNEL:_______________________________________________

Reference Information:

Name:_______________________________________________________ Company:____________________________________________________ Telephone No.:________________________________________________ Title:_________________________________________________________ Contract No.:__________________________________________________ Location of Contract Performance:_________________________________ Completion date:_______________________________________________ Length of time contractor employed:________________________________ Estimated price/cost for services:__________________________________ Type of space/building:__________________________________________ Type of Contract:_______________________________________________ Actual Square Footage:____________ New Construction_______________

Number of Stories of Bldg.:______ Renovation______________________

Questions:(Some questions may not apply to roles.)

1. What position/role did this person hold during this project? What was the actual work performed by the individual? Did the individual work on the entire project? If not, what percentage of the project did this individual work?

2. How well did the individual coordinate the work of his subcontractors/consultants/workers?

Unacceptable ____ Poor ____ Marginal ____ Acceptable ____ Very Good _____ Excellent _____

COMMENTS:

3. How would you describe the cooperation and commitment of the key personnel to the project?

Unacceptable ____ Poor ____ Marginal ____ Acceptable ____ Very Good _____ Excellent _____

COMMENTS:

4. How responsive was the person in administrative areas (e.g. submitting/processing necessary paperwork)?

Unacceptable ____ Poor ____ Marginal ____ Acceptable ____ Very Good _____ Excellent _____

COMMENTS:

5. Was this individual responsible for processing RFIs? If so, did he/she process them successfully?

6. Did the key personnel complete the project within the original contract schedule and budget? If not, why not?

7. Did the key personnel ensure that the finished product/project met your requirements as set forth in the contract documents?

8. Did the individual readily address ripple effect, such as time extensions, on change orders?

9. How would you describe the quality of work? How would you rate the key personnel’s overall performance?

Unacceptable ____ Poor ____ Marginal ____ Acceptable ____ Very Good _____ Excellent _____

COMMENTS:

10. Was the person active in solving problems? Did the person possess the capability to do his/her job well?

11. If you had a choice, would you work with the key personnel again? Why or Why not?

12. Do you know of any other projects performed by this individual? Any other comments?

Evaluator:_______________________________________ Date:________________

DESCRIPTION TOTAL

CLIN 0001 ‐ IRA BASE SCOPE (Design) ‐$

CLIN 0002 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0003 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0004 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0005 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0006 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0007 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0008 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0009 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

Pharr LPOE Price Proposal

Construction

Option 2 ‐ CIDOCKPK1

Option 8 ‐ POVSPK1

Low Embodied Carbon Materials

Base Scope

Pharr LPOE Cost Summary

GSA RFP Number ‐ #47PH0825R0001

Option 7 ‐ KENNELRD1

Option 1 ‐ PORTRD1

Option 3 ‐ CIDOCKPK2

Option 4 ‐ CIDOCKPK3

Option 5 ‐ CIDOCKRD1

Option 6 ‐ GANTRYRD1

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0010 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0011 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$ LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0012 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0013 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0014 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0015 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0016 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0017 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0018 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

Option 9 ‐ POVSRD3

Option 10 ‐ KENNELPK1

Option 11 ‐ KENNELPK2

Option 12 ‐ POVPPK1

Option 13 ‐ ADMINPK1

Option 14 ‐ ADMINPK2

Option 15 ‐ CARGORD1

Option 16 ‐ COMMPRD1

Option 17 ‐ COMMSRD1

Quantity Unit

C.Y

C.Y

Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 0003AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKPK1 C.Y

Clin 0003AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKPK1 C.Y

Clin 0003AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKPK1 Tons

Quantity Unit

C.Y

C.Y

Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 0005AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKPK3 C.Y

Clin 0005AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKPK3 C.Y

Clin 0005AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKPK3 Tons

Quantity Unit

C.Y

C.Y

Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 0007AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ GANTRYRD1 C.Y

Clin 0007AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ GANTRYRD1 C.Y

Clin 0007AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ GANTRYRD1 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 0008AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ KENNELRD1 C.Y

Clin 0008AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ KENNELRD1 C.Y

Clin 0002AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ PORTRD1

Clin 0002AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ PORTRD1

Clin 0002AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ PORTRD1

CLIN 0006 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0005 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction)

CLIN 0003 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (CONSTRUCTION) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0004 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (CONSTRUCTION) COST / TOTAL

IRA LEC OPTIONS (CONSTRUCTION) IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS

Clin 0001 ‐ DESIGN AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES

CLIN 0002 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (CONSTRUCTION) COST / TOTAL

Low Embodied Carbon Materials

Kika De La Garza (Pharr) LPOE Paving GSA RFP Number ‐ #47PH0825R0001

Description

BASE SCOPE CLIN 0001 ‐ (Design) IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS COST / TOTAL

COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0007 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

Clin 0004AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKPK2

Clin 0004AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKPK2

Clin 0004AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKPK2

CLIN 0008 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

‐$ Clin 0006AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKRD3

Clin 0006AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKRD1

Clin 0006AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CIDOCKRD2

Clin 0008AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ KENNELRD2 Tons

Clin 009AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVSPK1 C.Y

Clin 009AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVSPK1 C.Y

Clin 009AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVSPK1 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 010AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVSRD3 C.Y

Clin 010AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVSRD3 C.Y

Clin 010AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVSRD3 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 011AA‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ KENNELPK1 C.Y

Clin 011AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ KENNELPK1 C.Y

Clin 011AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ KENNELPK1 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 004AJ ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ KENNELPK2 C.Y

Clin 004AK ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ KENNELPK2 C.Y

Clin 004AL ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ KENNELPK2 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 013AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVPPK1 C.Y

Clin 005AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVPPK1 C.Y

Clin 005AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVPPK1 Tons

Quantity Unit

C.Y

C.Y

Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 015AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ ADMINPK2 C.Y

Clin 015AB‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ ADMINPK2 C.Y

Clin 015AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ ADMINPK2 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 016AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CARGORD1 C.Y

Clin 016AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CARGORD1 C.Y

CLIN 0011 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction)

CLIN 0012 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction)

COST / TOTAL

COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0009 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction)

CLIN 0013 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction)

COST / TOTAL

COST / TOTAL

Clin 014AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ ADMINPK1

Clin 014AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ ADMINPK1

Clin 014AC‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ ADMINPK1

CLIN 0010 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0014 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0015 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0016 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

Clin 016AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ CARGORD1 Tons

Clin 017AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ COMMPRD1 C.Y

Clin 017AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ COMMPRD1 C.Y

Clin 017AC‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ COMMPRD1 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 018AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ COMMSRD1 C.Y

Clin 018AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ COMMSRD1 C.Y

Clin 018AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ COMMSRD1 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 006AG ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ COMMPRD2 C.Y

Clin 006AH ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ COMMPRD2 C.Y

Clin 006AI ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ COMMPRD2 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 020AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVPRD1 C.Y

Clin 020AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVPRD1 C.Y

Clin 020AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ POVPRD1 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 021AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ADMINRD1 C.Y

Clin 021AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ ADMINRD1 C.Y

Clin 021AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ ADMINRD1 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 022AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ FMCSAPK1 C.Y

Clin 022AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ FMCSAPK1 C.Y

Clin 022AC ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ FMSCAPK1 Tons

Quantity Unit

Clin 023AA ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ FMCSARD1 C.Y

Clin 023AB ‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON ASPHALT AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ FMCSARD1 C.Y

Clin 023AC‐ LOW EMBODIED CARBON STEEL AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES ‐ FMSCARD1 Tons

CLIN 0020 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

COST / TOTAL

Subtotal ‐ Construction Costs

CLIN 0017 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0024 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS

CLIN 0022 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0023 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0018 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0019 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

CLIN 0021 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS (Construction) COST / TOTAL

Type or Print Name

Title

Signature

Firm Name

Date

Clin 0026AA ‐ Div. 32 Exterior Improvements ‐$

COST / TOTAL

Clin 0024AA ‐ Division 1

Subtotal ‐ Bond, Insurance

Total Evaluated Price ‐$

Insurance 0.00% ‐$

Profit 0.00%

0.00%

CLIN 0025 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS

Clin 0025AA ‐ Div. 31 Earthwork

CLIN 0026 ‐ IRA ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF LOW EMBODIED CARBON MATERIALS COST / TOTAL

Overhead 0.00% ‐$

Subtotal ‐ Overhead, Profit

Bond

CLIN 0019 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0020 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0021 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0022 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$

LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0023 ‐ IRA LEC MATERIALS

LEC Concrete ‐$

LEC Asphalt ‐$ LEC Steel ‐$

CLIN 0024 ‐ DIVISION 1 ‐$

CLIN 0025 ‐ DIVISION 31 ‐$

CLIN 0026 ‐ DIVISION 32 ‐$

TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE ‐$

Type or Print Name

Title

Signature

Firm Name

Date

Option 18 ‐ COMMPRD2

Option 19 ‐ POVPRD1

Option 20 ‐ ADMINRD1

Option 21 ‐ FMCSAPK1

Option 22 ‐ FMCSARD1