SF330 36C77624R0022.pdf

Standard Form PDF 194 KB Posted

Attached to
C1DA--EHRM Infrastructure Upgrade Design NYH Manhattan VAMC Project 630-22-700
Solicitation number
36C77624R0022
Issued by

About this file

This presolicitation notice requests Standard Form 330 Architect-Engineer Qualifications packages for an EHRM Infrastructure Upgrade Design project at the Manhattan VA Medical Center campus in New York. The Department of Veterans Affairs intends to award a firm-fixed price design contract with an anticipated period of performance of 400 calendar days from notice to proceed. The project value is estimated between $50-100 million. The solicitation is a 100% set-aside for SDVOSB concerns offering engineering services. Submissions are due by December 14, 2023 and the agency expects to award the contract in April 2024 to the highest rated firm following an evaluation of SF330 qualifications and written discussions. The selected firm will be responsible for developing construction documents, providing construction period services, and meeting requirements for various engineering disciplines involved in upgrading network infrastructure, electrical and mechanical systems, and physical security.

View the file

Other versions and copies of SF 330

File Revision Posted Attached to
SF330-21b.pdf Revision not stated HUD Emerg. Grant: Water Line Design-Build RFQ A&E
SF330-21b.pdf Revision not stated HUD Emerg. Grant: Water Line Design-Build RFQ A&E
1-Standard Form 330 Part II.pdf.pdf Revision not stated Waters Avenue Force Main Replacement CEI Services
Standard_Form_330-21b_-_Architect-Engineering_Qualifications.pdf Revision not stated Cooper City Stormwater Master Plan (H1470 | 4673-305-P14)
SF330-21b.pdf Revision not stated PARAMARIBO: A&E Services, MSGR
15. Exhibit M - SF330 - Architect-Engineer Qualifications_VA-GP.pdf Revision not stated Request for Lease Proposals (RLP) for Olympia, WA CBOC
1-Standard Form 330 Part II.pdf.pdf Revision not stated Miscellaneous Subsurface Investigation & Testing
1-Standard Form 330 Part II.pdf.pdf Revision not stated Miscellaneous Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Services - CDBG-DR
1-Standard Form 330 Part II.pdf.pdf Revision not stated Misc. Professional Stormwater Services
SF-330 AE Qualifications.pdf Revision not stated IDIQ For Architect Engineer (A/E) Services for Central Office
Appendix-4-AE-Qualifications-SF-330-Forms.pdf Revision not stated Construction Management for the 30th Street WestCatenary Replacement Project – Phase 1A
HR001126RE008 Public Announcement Attachment 2 - SF 330.pdf Revision not stated DARPA Modernization Project: Request for Qualifications for A&E Services
SF 330 Instructions.pdf Revision not stated DARPA Modernization Project: Request for Qualifications for A&E Services
SF330 21AE FILLABLE.pdf Revision not stated DOC Architect and Engineering IDIQ
Attachment 1b - ArchitectEngineerQualifications (SF330-FAA 4400-37).docx Revision not stated Architecture and Engineering Services - MMAC
EXHIBIT M_SF330 - Architect-Engineer Qualifications.pdf Revision not stated Request for Lease Proposal (RLP): Las Vegas, NV Medical Facility
Attachment 5 - Standard Form 330 (SF330) - Architect-Engineer Qualifications.pdf Revision not stated FY 27 A-E IDIQ Solicitation
SF330-21a.pdf Revision not stated Architect & Engineering Services CFAC FY26 QA1
SF330-21a.pdf Revision not stated CC-623-250-001 BCCC Nursing Building Renovation and Addition
12-EXHIBIT L SF 330 Architect Engineer Qualifications.pdf Revision not stated Oklahoma City OK Fiscal Building Superseding Lease
Show all 20

Who attaches SF 330

State Files
Florida 97
Maryland 41
Pennsylvania 23
Washington 21
Texas 19

Other files

File Type Posted
SOW - EHRM Manhattan Infrastructure Upgrades - 11-2-23 VAAR.pdf PDF
36C77624R0022.docx DOCX document
PPQ - EHRM Design - Manhattan.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Presolicitation Notice

*=Required Field Presolicitation Notice

SUBJECT* EHRM Infrastructure Upgrade Design NYH Manhattan VAMC Project 630-22-700

GENERAL INFORMATION

CONTRACTING OFFICE’S ZIP CODE* 44131

SOLICITATION NUMBER* 36C77624R0022

RESPONSE DATE/TIME/ZONE 12-14-2023 2PM EASTERN TIME, NEW YORK,

USA

ARCHIVE 99 DAYS AFTER THE RESPONSE DATE

SET-ASIDE SDVOSBC

PRODUCT SERVICE CODE* C1DA

NAICS CODE* 541330

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE VA New York Harbor health care

Margaret Cochran Corbin VA Campus

Manhattan VA Medical Center

423 E 23rd Street

New York NY

POSTAL CODE 10010-5011

COUNTRY US

CONTACT INFORMATION

CONTRACTING OFFICE ADDRESS Department of Veterans Affairs

Program Contracting Activity Central

6100 Oak Tree Blvd, Suite 490

Independence OH 44131

POINT OF CONTACT*

Contract Specialist

Jason Phillip jason.phillip@va.gov

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

AGENCY’S URL

URL DESCRIPTION

AGENCY CONTACT’S EMAIL ADDRESS

EMAIL DESCRIPTION

DESCRIPTION

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR STANDARD FORM

(SF) 330 ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGES ONLY. ALL INFORMATION

NEEDED TO SUBMIT SF330 DOCUMENTS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. NO SOLICITATION

PACKAGE, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, OR BIDDER/PLAN HOLDER LIST WILL BE ISSUED.

THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT PAY, NOR REIMBURSE, ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH

RESPONDING TO THIS REQUEST. THE GOVERNMENT IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO

AWARD A CONTRACT AS A RESULT OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT.

The only attachments being provided at this time are the SOW and PPQ form.

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is seeking sources and intends to award a firm fixed price design contract for Architect-Engineering (A-E) services for the development of complete construction documents, which include working drawings, specifications, and reports, and construction period services for Project 630-22-700 EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades, Margaret Cochran Corbin VA Campus, New York Harbor, Manhattan VAMC, 423 E 23rd St., New York, NY 10010-5011.

The A-E Services contract that is anticipated to be awarded will be procured in accordance with the Selection of Architects and Engineers statute [formerly known as the Brooks Architect Engineer Act], Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 36.6 “Architectural and Engineering Services,” VA Acquisition Regulation (VAAR) 836.6, and VA Acquisition Manual (VAAM) M836.6 Architect-Engineer Services. In accordance with FAR 36.209, “Construction Contracts with Architect-Engineer Firms,” no contract for the construction of a project shall be awarded to the firm that designed the project or its subsidiaries or affiliates, except with the approval of the head of the agency or authorized representative.

2. PROJECT INFORMATION

This project is a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) concerns. The NAICS code for this procurement is 541330 “Engineering Services” and the annual small business size standard is $25.5M. A full design team is required to complete this project.

The VA expects to award the anticipated A-E contract in April 2024.

The anticipated period of performance for completion of design is 400 calendar days after notice of award (NOA). The VAAR magnitude of construction is between $50,000,000 - $100,000,000.

Please note that the 400-calendar-day period of performance for the design completion begins with the issuance of the NOA and that a notice to proceed (NTP) will not be issued for the completion of a design project.

3. A/E SELECTION PROCESS

Firms submitting SF330s in response to this announcement, not later than the closing date and time specified herein and in accordance with submission requirements, will be considered for evaluation. The selection will be made as follows:

• SF330s will be evaluated in accordance with the primary selection criteria as stated in this pre-solicitation notice. These evaluations will determine the most highly qualified firms for this particular requirement. In accordance with FAR 36.602-3(c), at least three of the most highly qualified firms will then be notified of the Government’s intent to hold discussions. All firms not invited to participate in discussions will be notified at this time. In accordance with FAR 36.607(b), any requested debriefings of successful and unsuccessful firms will be held after final selection has taken place and will be conducted, to the extent practicable, in accordance with 15.503, 15.506(b) through (f), and 15.507(c). Note that 15.506(d)(2) through (d)(5) do not apply to architect-engineer contracts.

• Discussions will be held with the most highly qualified firms in the form of written responses.

The firms invited to participate in discussions will be notified by email and provided further instructions, including any questions or topics to address. Following the completion of discussions, the firms will be evaluated and ranked based on the primary and (if necessary) secondary selection criteria. The final evaluation and ranking will consider the SF330 submission for each firm, as well as additional information obtained via discussions. The highest rated firm will be selected to receive the solicitation and engage in negotiations.

• The solicitation will be issued to the highest rated firm as a Request for Fee Proposal (RFP).

All SOW attachments and site-specific documentation will be provided to the highest rated firm with the RFP. A site visit will be authorized during the negotiation process. An award will then be made as long as the negotiation of rates and hours leads to a fair and reasonable determination of the final contract price. If negotiations with the highest rated firm are unsuccessful, the firm will be notified that negotiations have been terminated. Negotiations will then be initiated with the next highest rated firm, and so on until award can be made.

4. SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this notice will be evaluated and ranked using the selection criteria listed below. The factors are listed in descending order of importance. The evaluation will consider how each factor is addressed and how it is formatted to coincide with the selection criteria.

Primary Selection Criteria:

1. Professional Qualifications (Sections C through E) necessary for satisfactory performance of required service. The A-E shall demonstrate they are able to sign and stamp each drawing by individuals licensed in any state in the United States for the key positions listed below. Provide Professional License numbers and/or proof of Licensure. The evaluation shall consider the specific experience (minimum of five years) and qualifications (i.e., education, training, registration, certifications, overall relevant experience, and longevity with the firm as fulltime employees) of personnel proposed for assignment to the project, and their record of working together as a team when evaluating professional qualifications. The lead designer in each discipline must be registered but does not have to be registered in the particular state where the project is located.

A resume for each of these key positions must be provided via Section E in the SF330. Key positions and disciplines required for this project include, but are not limited to:

a) Architect (LEED certified)

b) Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD)

c) Estimator

d) Civil Engineer

e) Electrical Engineer

f) Environmental Engineer

g) Fire Protection Engineer

h) Industrial Hygienist

i) Mechanical Engineer

j) Plumbing Engineer

k) Project Manager

l) Quality Assurance

m) Structural Engineer

n) Physical Security Specialists

o) Commissioning Agent

Offer must include the following statement of SDVOSB compliance when submitting the personnel proposed to perform the work under this requirement:

“I [signatory authority] ___________________, [company] __________________, certify that the SDVOSB prime contractor will not pay more than 50% of the amount paid by the government to the prime for contract performance to firms that are not certified SDVOSBs by the Small Business Association’s Veteran Small Business Certification (VetCert) in compliance of VA Acquisition Regulation (VAAR) 852.219-75.”

The information provided in sections C through E of SF330 will be used to evaluate this evaluation factor. Do not include this information in section H, unless it is pertinent to support the information listed in the other sections.

2. Specialized Experience and technical competence (sections F, G, and H): in the design and construction period services shall be provided for network infrastructure installation, renovations, or upgrades. Projects experience should include upgrading large scale (multi-building with multiple generational OIT systems) fiber optics, data cable, structured cabling, electrical distribution design, electrical upgrades, uninterruptable power systems (UPS), electrical bonding, building management systems/building automation systems (BMS/BAS), HVAC, IT room renovations/expansion/relocations, Data Centers/Server Rooms reconfiguration, and physical security upgrades, duct bank and direct boring operations. Other specialized experience includes experience in critical path scheduling, fire protection, construction infection control protocols, energy conservation, transition, and sustainable design practices. Experience with phasing of projects to limit the impact of construction on Medical Center activities is desired.

Submissions shall include no more and no less than five (5) recent and relevant Government and private experience projects similar in size scope and complexity, and experience with the type of projects/competence above. “Relevant” is defined as those task requirements identified in the Statement of Work. “Recent” is defined as services provided within the past five (5) years. Each project shall include the following:

• Project title, location and detailed narrative describing the scope of services provided including the type of work performed by the offeror and its role in the project i.e. prime contract, Teaming Partner or subcontractor

• Project Owner, owner’s point of contact including telephone number and email address.

• Services & Deliverables provided under the contract/task order

• Period of Performance, including start and completion dates

• Total dollar value of the project

• Contract number associated with the project.

Section G will used to evaluate the prior experience of the prime firm and any key subcontractors working together on the provided relevant projects.

The evaluation will also consider narratives addressing the following topics in Section H. Simply re-stating this list in Section H will not be sufficient. The narrative of how the firm addresses each of these will be evaluated.

1. The management approach to large projects and how customer needs, VHA and Code technical requirements are met.

2. The coordination of disciplines and subcontractors

3. Quality control procedures, and

4. Familiarity with VA Design Guides/Manuals, Master Specifications and other applicable standards.

3. Capacity (section H): The evaluation will consider the firm’s ability to meet the schedule of the overall project, as well as the available capacity of key disciplines to perform the work in the required time. Provide the available capacity of key disciplines by providing current project workload, inclusive of all projects awarded by the VA during the previous 12 months and the full potential value of any current indefinite delivery contracts. Offeror shall clearly state their available capacity presenting workload percentages for the key disciplines and/or team members. Also, the offeror must provide the completion percentages and expected completion date for the VA projects awarded in the previous 12 months. The information for this factor shall be provided in Section H of the SF330. Please ensure the capacity applies toward the team/personnel provided in the SF330.

4. Past performance (section H): Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules.

Past performance will be evaluated for all projects provided in Section F. The Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS) database will be reviewed to evaluate the projects that have a CPARS entry. CPARS are not required to be submitted with the SF330 submission. The contract number for the project must be submitted with each project in Section F so CPARS can be reviewed in the database.

For any project that does NOT have CPARS data available, a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) is required to be submitted with the SF330. The PPQ should be rated and signed by the evaluator. In the event that a firm does not receive a requested complete PPQ from an evaluator prior to the time for submission, the firm shall submit the partially completed PPQ with Section 1 and the Evaluator Information in Section 2 completed. Ensure a POC is listed with the project title/contract number.

The VA will make reasonable attempts to contact the POC upon submission for PPQ completion.

Evaluations may also include additional performance related from the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, publicly available sources, and additional projects in CPARS. The Government reserves the right to contact any POC listed on a CPARS report or PPQ.

Evaluations will consider superior performance ratings on recently completed VA projects as well as the reputation and standing of the firm and its principal officials with respect to professional performance, general management, and cooperativeness. If appropriate, the record of significant claims against the firm because of improper or incomplete architectural and engineering services may be evaluated.

Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the office/branch/individual team member performing the work under this contract. The information for this factor shall be provided in Section H of the SF330.

For PPQs, please utilize the attached PPQ document. Completed PPQs should be incorporated into the SF330 directly. PPQs should not be submitted to the VHA PCAC directly. Any PPQs will not be counted towards the page limitations for this submission.

However, any narratives provided for past performance in Section H will be counted toward the page limit.

5. Knowledge of Locality (section H): Knowledge of the locality, to include specific knowledge of certain local conditions or project site features, such as geological features, climatic conditions, working with and local construction methods or local laws and regulations. The information for this factor shall be provided in Section H of the

SF330.

Note that the intent of this factor is to showcase a firm’s understanding of the site and locality, and NOT where the firm is located, how far away the firm/branch office is from the site, and how they would travel to the site. Information related to the firm’s location shall instead be provided in Section H under Secondary Selection Criterion Factor 1, Geographic Location. See below.

6. Experience in construction period services (section H): Experience in construction period services to include:

a. Solicitation support services,

b. Professional field inspections during the construction period

c. Coordination with commissioning requirements

d. Review of construction submittals

e. Support in answering requests for information during the construction period

f. Support of construction contract changes to include drafting statements of work and cost estimates.

g. Attendance at weekly conference calls

h. Providing minutes of meetings between the AE, VA, and contractors

i. Providing component references and maintenance needs for installed mechanical equipment.

j. Pre-final inspection site visits

k. Generation of punch-list reports, and

l. Production of as-built documentation

The information for this factor shall be provided in Section H of the SF330.

Secondary Selection Criterion*:

Geographic location. Location of the firm, as measured by the driving distance (miles) between the offeror’s principal business location and the project site. Determination of the mileage will be based on Google Maps (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/).

*The secondary selection criterion is used as a tiebreaker, if necessary, in Rating the most highly qualified firms following the completion of discussions. The secondary selection criterion will not be applied when determining a firm’s SF330 submission “Highly Qualified” or “Not Highly Qualified.”

5. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

The below information contains the instructions and format that must be followed for the submission of the SF330 Statement of Qualifications:

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/

• Submit ONE (1) SF330 Statement of Qualifications to Contract Specialist Devin Russell at Devin.Russell@va.gov. This must include Parts I and II and any applicable attachments.

• The submission must include the SF330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications (form is available online at http://www.cfm.va.gov/contract/ae.asp).

• The SF330 submission is due by 2:00 PM ET on December 14, 2023.

• The SF330 must be submitted in one email and have a file size no larger than 5 MB. No hard copies will be accepted.

• The subject line of the email must read: “SF330 R0022 Manhattan EHRM”

• The SF330 submission must not exceed a total of 50 pages. This includes title page, table of contents, and any other relevant information. Any pages submitted by an offeror that exceed the limit will not be considered during the evaluation. Each page must be in Arial size 12 font, single spaced. Part II of the SF330 and any CPARs or PPQs will NOT count toward the page limitation.

• A PPQ obtained for another SF330 submission may be submitted for this project. However, if significant portions of the project have been completed since the PPQ was filled out, a new PPQ should be submitted to accurately assess the project.

• Firms must include the following information in section B of the SF330 submission:

1) SAM Unique Entity Identifier

2) Tax ID number

3) Cage code

4) Primary point of contact’s email address and phone number

• All questions must be submitted to Devin.Russell@va.gov with the subject line “Questions SF330 R0022 Manhattan EHRM”. The cutoff for question submission is 2:00 PM ET on November 28, 2023. Questions will be answered through modification to the pre-sol notice posted to Contract Opportunities at SAM.gov.

• This procurement is a 100% set-aside for SDVOSB concerns. Offers received from other than SDVOSBs will not be considered. Offerors must be certified as SDVOSBs by the U.S.

Small Business Administration (SBA) and visible in the Veteran Small Business Certification

(VetCert) database (https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/) at the time of SF330 submission, written response submission, and award. Failure to be certified in the VetCert database at these times will result in the offeror being deemed ineligible for award.

• All joint ventures must be SBA certified at the time of SF330 submission, written response submission, and award and must submit agreements that comply with 13 CFR 128.402 prior to contract award.

• All prime firms must meet the NAICS code requirement specified in this notice. The Contracting Officer will verify the NAICS code in VetCert. Failure to meet the NAICS code requirement may result in the rejection of the SF330 submission.

• SF330 submissions received after the date and time specified will not be considered. Late proposal rules per FAR 15.208 will be followed for late submittals. Firms not providing the required information may not be evaluated. All information must be included in the SF330 submission package.

• It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the Contract Opportunities website at SAM.gov for any revisions to this announcement prior to submitting their SF330.

http://www.cfm.va.gov/contract/ae.asp https://sam.gov/ https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/ https://sam.gov/

See attached document: SOW - EHRM Manhattan Infrastructure Upgrades - 11-2-23 VAAR.

See attached document: PPQ - EHRM Design - Manhattan.

End of Document

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .