Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24921R0086
About this file
This past performance questionnaire is for a contractor bidding on Project 596A4-19-102 to correct various mechanical system deficiencies at the Memphis VA Medical Center. The contractor must provide past performance information from previous contracts, including a description of services, award and performance dates, and contract amounts. Assessors knowledgeable about the contractor's previous work must complete the questionnaire, rating various metrics such as quality of service, schedule, and business relations on a scale of acceptable or unacceptable. The assessor is directed to send the completed evaluation directly to the contracting officer at the VA by June 28, 2021 to be considered in the bid evaluation.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation to provide construction services for Project # 614-18-107 to replace the security camera surveillance system at the Lexington VAMC in Troy, Ohio. The work includes general construction, alterations, demolition, and other items described in the specifications and drawings. The project requires experience in healthcare construction and will take place in a medical environment. The estimated value is between $1-3 million and it is a 100% SDVOSB set-aside. The contracting agency is the VA VISN 9 located in Murfreesboro, Tennessee. The response due date is tied to the actual solicitation release scheduled for June 12, 2020.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 55 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project 596A4-19-102, Correct Various Mechanical System Deficiencies
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation to Project 596A4-19-102 Correct Various Mechanical System Deficiencies at Memphis VA Medical Center.
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contracting Officer- Scheronica Cochran by way of email at scheronica.cochran@va.gov.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than June 28, 2021 at 11:00 AM CST. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (Scheronica.cochran@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
| Solicitation Number |
| 36C24921R0086 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Project , Renovate 596A4-19-102 Correct Various Mech Sys Def |
| Customer/Agency |
| Department of the Veteran Affairs, NCO 9, Murfreesboro, TN 37129 |
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Contractor Point of Contact:
3. Phone number (with area code):
4. Assessor Contract Award number:
5. Description of Services provided under contract:
6. Contract award date: Contract Amount: Initial Final
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date:
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.
RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings
| Rating |
| Description |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the |
required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform |
the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
3. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices. Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.)
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
| Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor. |
| Would most likely award another contract to this contractor. |
| Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed. |
| Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor. |
| Would not award another contract to this contractor. |
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
| ACCEPTABLE |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .