26QE045_Attachment 4_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 88 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HE125426QE045
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This document is a Present and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for Solicitation HE125426QE045, issued by the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) for Safety Aides and Attendant Services in Mainland, Japan. The PPQ is designed to evaluate vendor performance on school bus transportation contracts and must be completed by vendors and returned by their references or customers to the Contract Specialist (Ms. Ronnie Swailes) and Contracting Officer (Mr. Dustin Fazzini) at DoDEA in Alexandria, Virginia.
The questionnaire contains two sections: a vendor information section requiring completion of contractor details (firm name, CAGE code, address, Unique Entity ID, contact information), work role designation (prime contractor, subcontractor, joint venture), project work percentage, and reference customer information (business name, address, contract number, final contract value, contract type, and period of performance); and an evaluation section to be completed by the vendor's customer using a rating scale (Poor/Unsatisfactory, Satisfactory, Good, Very Good, Excellent, or Neutral/N/A). The evaluation criteria assess contractor experience and performance across ten areas: transporting pre-K through high school students, special needs student transportation with safety aides, safety attendant services provision, personnel and vehicle management, incident and accident response, vehicle maintenance compliance with host nation laws, training provision and reporting, timely delivery of reports and contract deliverables, communication effectiveness, and overall performance. Respondents must provide comments for each rating and explain any problems and resolutions, along with a brief description of effort demonstrating relevancy to RFP requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 26QE045_QA_AMD2.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Attachment 5_Price_AMD2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 26QE045_COMB SYNSOL_AMD2.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Attachment 3_Volume II Past Perf_AMD1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 26QE045_COMB SYNSOL_AMD1.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Attachment 1_PWS_AMD1.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_QA_AMD1.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Attachment 5_Price_AMD1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 26QE045_Encl2_52.222-56.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Encl5_252.239-7009.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Attachment 5_Price.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 26QE045_Encl4_CPARS.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_COMB SYNSOL_040626.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Attachment 2_Staffing Capability.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 26QE045_Attachment 7_NDA.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Encl1_52.209-7.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Encl3_Letter of Commitment.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Attachment 1_PWS_040626.pdf | ||
| 26QE045_Attachment 3_Volume II Past Perf.docx | DOCX document | |
| 26QE045_Attachment 6_ RepsCerts.pdf |
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Attachment 4
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This Questionnaire Pertains to: Solicitation HE125426QE045 Mainland, Japan
The Vendor must complete the “To be completed by Vendor” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Vendor’s Reference/Customer. The Vendor’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the completed PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:
Department of War Education Activity Attn: Contract Specialist: Ms. Ronnie Swailes Contracting Officer: Mr. Dustin Fazzini 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05E08 Alexandria, VA 22350 E-Mail: Ronnie.Swailes@dodea.edu E-Mail: Dustin.Fazzini@dodea.edu
This information section is to be completed by the Vendor.
| Contractor Information: | |
| Firm Name: Click or tap here to enter text. | N/CAGE Code: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Address: Click or tap here to enter text. | Unique Entity ID: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text. | Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text. | Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Work Performed as: ☐Prime Contractor ☐Subcontractor ☐Joint Venture ☐Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed: Click or tap here to enter text.
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #): Click or tap here to enter text.
| Reference Information: | |
| Business Name of Reference: | Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Click or tap here to enter text.
| Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text. | Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text. | Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Contract Number: Click or tap here to enter text. Final Contract Value: Click or tap here to enter text.
Contract Type: ☐Firm Fixed Price ☐Cost Reimbursement ☐Other (Explain)
Period of Performance: Click or tap here to enter text.
Present and Past Performance Questionnaire
Source Selection Information1 - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Attachment 4
This evaluation section is to be completed by the Vendor’s customer.
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 through 6 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor/Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral/N/A |
| Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance. |
| Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance. |
| Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance. |
| No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available. |
1. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience with transporting pre-kindergarten through high school grade children from their designated bus stops to and from school in the school districts? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
2. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience with transporting a special needs student with a Safety Aide and providing an appropriate vehicle from their designated stop to their school, and vice versa? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
3. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience in providing a Safety Attendant and/or Safety Aide services on the school bus during runs? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
4. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience in appropriately managing their personnel and vehicles (i.e. Has the Contractor been responsive to deficiencies and performance issues and making timely corrections? Has the Contractor taken a proactive approach when known performance issues may hinder mission requirements?) Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
5. How would you rate the Contractor in responding to incidents and accidents in regard to transporting students on the bus? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
6. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in maintaining their vehicles in accordance with host nation laws and contractual requirements? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
7. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing, tracking, and reporting required training? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
8. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing timely and accurate reports and other contract deliverables? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
9. How would you rate the Contractor’s communication? Have they communicated issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
10. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
Attachment 4
Explain any problems and resolutions.
Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFP.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .